I agree that Nintendo gets too much praise for their gameplay
Drugs works the same way.This is complete bullshit.
Nintendo is out here making PS3/360 games.
The rest of the industry is not, nor does their audience want them to.
Lolimplying the physics and simulation isn't the bread and butter of TotK design? The whole game is designed around physics/enviromental puzzles, game would be worse than a generic ubisoft open world without them.
It's their race, their roles.![]()
Nintendo wins the master race
lmao, prove me wrong.
Wtf is an animation frame content and Wtf are your examples of how AI is being used.
Is he confirming the next Nintendo gaming device is so weak that it doesn't support DLSS like the rumors suggest?
Or
That the next hardware is so powerful that it doesn't need DLSS in his opinion?
I don’t think their console philosophy will change. They don’t go around the world to ask what 3rd party devs want like Sony or Microsoft. They design their consoles based on their internal devs needs.Is he confirming the next Nintendo gaming device is so weak that it doesn't support DLSS like the rumors suggest?
Or
That the next hardware is so powerful that it doesn't need DLSS in his opinion?
At least their games are more fun than starfieldThis is complete bullshit.
Nintendo is out here making PS3/360 games.
The rest of the industry is not, nor does their audience want them to.
No audience for PS3 games, huh?Nintendo is out here making PS3/360 games.
The rest of the industry is not, nor does their audience want them to.
The only reason there "isn't an audience" for ps3 games is because Sony still doesn't want to provide decent PS3 emulation. Which is why you get a pcNo audience for PS3 games, huh?
Coulda sworn I played Demon's Souls, tLoU & Like a Dragon Ishin! on PS5. Here comes Lollipop Chainsaw & Shadow of the
Yes, consistent turd qualitybut also more consistent quality in asset generation
AI in gaming are for lazy one. We not only take jobs, but also promove mediocrity.
Everyone in here is talking about graphics, but he's actually referring to using AI to generate game content/assets (automating devs' work)Is he confirming the next Nintendo gaming device is so weak that it doesn't support DLSS like the rumors suggest?
Or
That the next hardware is so powerful that it doesn't need DLSS in his opinion?
"Generative AI models can take inputs such as text, image, audio, video, and code and generate new content into any of the modalities mentioned. For example, it can turn text inputs into an image, turn an image into a song, or turn video into text."Everyone in here is talking about graphics, but he's actually referring to using AI to generate game content/assets (automating devs' work)
Graphic whores completely missing the point lmao
I feel like Nintendo Legal had a hand in this. You can't sue us because we're saying we don't use Gen AI trained on anyone else's work to make our products, but you better believe we're gonna sue if we think anyone else's AI assisted content was trained on our assets.As someone who works in AI and always having implementations on my mind...I hope he is essentially suggesting they are exploring where it makes sense to use, and where it is not mature enough yet. If this is just him more or less saying, we know what we are doing and don't need that...The same kinda thing was said 100 years ago when cars started to come out. "Who needs a car, my horse gets me to work just fine." is what my grandfather said...
I really hope he isn't that bullish.
People online in gaming forums are graphic whores. The PS2, DS, 3DS, Wii and Switch outsold the competition whilst being underpowered. The rest of people playing video games don't care nearly as much.Everyone is graphic whores or else we would never buy new gaming devices that do what?
Nintendo fans are graphic whores or else they wouldn't buy new gaming devices and/or the overpriced HD remasters.People online in gaming forums are graphic whores. The PS2, DS, 3DS, Wii and Switch outsold the competition whilst being underpowered. The rest of people playing video games don't care nearly as much.
Yes they do.... just not in the tech area anymore.Nintendo leads the way by example, respect.
Really showing who's in it for the gsmes and who's in it for the tech showcases.Man Nintendo got mouthbreather gaf, shook to their core.
buh buh buh rehashes buh buh shit hardware.
Animation key frames, and AI generation of art assets like pieces of levels, textures, models.
I don't know what part of that is difficult for you to understand?
Animation key frames? Lol?
There is no animator in the Games Industry, or alive and breathing, who is giving a Rigged Model to some AI and saying "Can you animate and produce key frames for x, y and z animation for me using this rigs 100 different controllers and custom attributes" . There are automated processes in 3D software and things like UE, but it's not what you seem to be assuming - because who the fuck says "Animation Key Frames" and thinks AI can generate that.
Also AI can't even make truly unique and usable 3D models yet, it's not denting the Games Industry at a medium to high level of any art asset production any time soon.
Only major influence in a game where AI was used for art assets, where it also stood out, and wasn't obvious generic rubbish, was when Carry Castle used procedural texture sets, which were still based off real-life photos that they captured anyways.
They just copy pasta their games and sell them at full msrp. Of course no AI is needed.
You guys might want to temper your expectations on Nintendo's benevolence.
You say that like the PS360 gen didn’t absolutely body the PS4XB1 and so far the PS5XBS generations in game quality both single player and multiplayer lol.This is complete bullshit.
Nintendo is out here making PS3/360 games.
The rest of the industry is not, nor does their audience want them to.
Don't forget noita that make make look the physics system of zelda like child play.He was talking about generative AI specifically btw.
I appreciate some of the things TotK does, especially in terms of scale, but this circlejerk around it with people pretending the game invented physics and crafting is ridiculous
Didn't want to mention it because it was 2D. But yeah, that one is great too.Don't forget noita that make make look the physics system of zelda like child play.
If that was even important they're still wrong and misremember how games looked back then.Some people, specially in this place, still think Switch is "only PS3/X360 level" in its graphic capabilities
You guys might want to temper your expectations on Nintendo's benevolence.
They have 20+ series just on Switch.Zelda, Mario, Smash, Donkey Kong, Pokemon, Animal Crossing. Sorry 6.
He's talking specifically about the IP issues with generative AI. Wouldn't apply to DLSS.Is he confirming the next Nintendo gaming device is so weak that it doesn't support DLSS like the rumors suggest?
Or
That the next hardware is so powerful that it doesn't need DLSS in his opinion?
Not entirely true. They increased the RAM on Switch at the request of Capcom. I'm sure they've been discussing Switch 2 with third parties for years.I don’t think their console philosophy will change. They don’t go around the world to ask what 3rd party devs want like Sony or Microsoft. They design their consoles based on their internal devs needs.