Nintendo "not trying anymore" gave me the most fun I ever had with a console, the Nintendo DS.
A compromise I can live with.
I'd probably say too that the DS is the best console I owned hands down.
Nintendo "not trying anymore" gave me the most fun I ever had with a console, the Nintendo DS.
A compromise I can live with.
A game doesn't have to be photo realistic in order to be as richly detailed as the Witcher 3.they're just not going for photorealism, and have built a game in which physics plays a FAR bigger role in anything and everything than it does in Witcher. also we wont have Epona (or whichever mount you have) being able to routinely run directly in to foliage
Yes...yes I do when compared to what we are seeing on PS4/XB1 (e.g. Zelda: Breath of the Wild vs Horizon Zero on PS4).
Instead we get this...
And FYI - I am a MASSIVE Nintendo fan. I'm just getting sick and tired of Nintendo screwing us Nintendo fans over and over again by releasing under-powered hardware generation after generation.
Yeah, that panel was a joke, Rawmeatcowboy guy made a video on it for GoNintendo and even though he stumbled a bit on his points, I couldn't stop smh. These "professionals" were no better than a random poster on any game forum.Lmao yall gotta watch this. Summary of IGN Sony thoughts of the Nintendo switch lol
https://www.youtube.com/embed/d6-eXlnwyFQ
Yeah, that panel was a joke, Rawmeatcowboy guy made a video on it for GoNintendo and even though he stumbled a bit on his points, I couldn't stop smh. These "professionals" were no better than a random poster on any game forum.
I'm really not expecting it though, since the small amount of gameplay they showed on Fallon looked as bad as, if not worse than, the Wii U version in those two areas.
Looking back on it, the DS years were definitely my peak gaming years. I'll never recapture those golden days.
Future generations will never know the glory of TWEWY and Ouendan and that's a shame.
Now let's compare Super Mario Galaxy (Wii) to The Order 1886 (PS4).
Am I doing it right? The Order 1886 is the better game?
My wife is watching the Golden Globes and I want to play Stardew Valley on PS4 but can't. Save me from lame television, Switch.
Just got in my preorder with EB Games Australia, that $999 placeholder price lol.
Deposit was only $60 (50 for the console, 10 for the pro controller).
since the small amount of gameplay they showed on Fallon looked as bad as, if not worse than, the Wii U version in those two areas.
I can't be bothered pre-ordering. Nintendo consoles don't really sell out in Australia like elsewhere, i'm not even sure the wii sold out at it's peak (i honestly can't remember now).
True but I want to play something that isn't too involved so I can continue to cook dinner and also mock every presenter at the same time.. Stardew would be perfect for that!Wii u has solved this since 2012.
Switch cards will likely be smaller than BluRay not 10x biggerI hope they talk about the game cards capacity in the presentation and compare them with bluray's to let casuals know that the game cards aren't just '3DS sized games'.
BLURAY: 50GB
Nintendo Switch Game Card: up to 512GB
God that would be nice
I can't be bothered pre-ordering. Nintendo consoles don't really sell out in Australia like elsewhere, i'm not even sure the wii sold out at it's peak (i honestly can't remember now).
Plot twist: The Link in Breath of the Wild is actually the Hero of Time waking up in a far future.
That's why he's such a badass. He's done all this before.
But there has to be concessions for both to work. One of those concessions is the Switch ditching discs in favor of cartridges.
Video comparisons have already established better draw distance and framerate in the exact same parts, the projector used in the studio degrades the quality of the footage (shown with Mario Maker comparisons), there is no way the Switch version of BotW will run worse than the Wii U lmao.
At a minimum I'm expecting 1080p, better draw distance, and a locked 30 fps. I will be disappointed otherwise - it's their flagship title.
okay so the cartridge part, is that in the base console or the detachable part? if it's in the base, they could've still gone with disc as it could've been some remote play shit
although i'm guessing the cartridge goes in the detachable part
okay so the cartridge part, is that in the base console or the detachable part? if it's in the base, they could've still gone with disc as it could've been some remote play shit
although i'm guessing the cartridge goes in the detachable part
Where do patches go for games? Are the carts read and write?
okay so the cartridge part, is that in the base console or the detachable part? if it's in the base, they could've still gone with disc as it could've been some remote play shit
although i'm guessing the cartridge goes in the detachable part
okay so the cartridge part, is that in the base console or the detachable part? if it's in the base, they could've still gone with disc as it could've been some remote play shit
although i'm guessing the cartridge goes in the detachable part
The game also seemed to still be using bilinear filtering for the textures, which looked very muddy.
If it hits you like a ton of bricks then you've been in denial for a long time. There's no bizarre reason at all, just good old logic. That feeling in your gut is reality.
Going by every piece of footage that Nintendo has released of games supposedly running on Switch, we have yet to see anything that wouldn't run on a marginally more powerful Wii U. Nintendo has little to gain from the Switch reveal video hiding the true power of the console. The most graphically intensive game showed was a Skyrim remaster.
Then you take in price and battery life considerations. Then you look at everything Nintendo has said about their approach to competing with Sony and MS.
There's no reason to believe that the Switch is going to be in the same league graphically as PS4/XB1, and plenty of reasons to believe otherwise.
I'm basing my analysis off this video.
Anyways, compare a direct feed screenshot of Super Mario Run with the footage shown in the same Jimmy Fallon video, it's apparent at least to me that the muddiness is due to the projector and the off-screen nature of the footage.
I'm not expecting dramatic differences between the versions, but I do not anticipate the Switch version will run worse whatsoever.
No, they can't compete in the high end product market so they have to go the affordable route.
You don't allow re-writes on game carts or discs as it can possibly botch up the whole copy.
I mean, I gotta agree. Nintendo's not trying anymore on that front because they think they can get away with it after the Wii, and that blows.
Surely patches go on the gamecard, like a partition set aside for it?
Surely patches go on the gamecard, like a partition set aside for it?
Surely patches go on the gamecard, like a partition set aside for it?
To add to this: You have to consider the line Nintendo has to tow here. Nintendo is dependent on getting as much of their own software as possible in a year to sell their systems and increase their libraries, and they don't necessarily have bountiful 3rd party to rely on like Sony.
With where they are starting out with their Switch generation, even if it had tech up there with the PS4 Pro, they would not necessarily have the resources or man power to make games that fully made use of that tech, since they are limited by time and resources. Look at how long Breath of the Wild has taken. Now how long would it have taken if it contained the production values of something like Horizon Zero Dawn?
Consider that a game like Assassin's Creed Black Flag, which was a cross generational title, had almost a thousand people working on it, while Nintendo EPD, their internal Japanese studio, has about the same amount of employees, working on at least ten projects of various sizes, including Zelda, Mario Kart, Splatoon, etc. (Though they get plenty of help from other studios as well.)
We see how their jump to HD had a hugely detrimental effect to Wii U's library and pacing through it's entire life, but especially in it's first 18 months until Mario Kart 8 released. Making another generational leap would likely have a similar impact if their goal was graphic-centric.
And the solution is not necessarily as simple as, well just throw more money and resources at it. You see with the the first party of Sony and Microsoft, they are not necessarily coming any faster, especially when they are aiming for bigger and more realistic experiences.
There's a cost and balance to these things.
Patches that could be downloaded to the gamecard would be amazing. IMHO increases resale value if you wanted to sell your games in the future without requiring to download a patch each time it's played on a different system.
As I've delved further into Steam gaming...
Nintendo, please just keep the games coming with high variety and offer persistent support. That's all.
Seriously. If Switch takes a lot of cues from PC it'll be a hell of an alternative system. It's already kinda-sorta a tablet and will dip into the mobile market a bit. Might as well fully realize the concept of a Nintendo console with a Steam-like storefront and support for games from multiple eras.
We'll see.
Even if Zelda was on the PS4 it wouldn't somehow look magically better.
Random question, but has there been any bits on how game/system suspension will work? I'm sure there will be an option via the OS, but while portable, I'll miss having it as easy as the 3DS made it by simply closing the system (and the clamshell doubles as screen protection as well).
Random question, but has there been any bits on how game/system suspension will work? I'm sure there will be an option via the OS, but while portable, I'll miss having it as easy as the 3DS made it by simply closing the system (and the clamshell doubles as screen protection as well).