What's my issue? I don't have one. Don't understand where I conveyed that I have an issue. I'm simply trying to understand the mindset of someone ready to shell out $250 because "that's where it needed to be" price wise. Instead it's $50 more. I don't see how that is a back breaking difference. Obviously if it was another $100, $150, or $200 more I'd get it. But a difference of $50 being some arbitrary cutoff doesn't seem to be a huge difference.
I get it. $250 would have been better. But it's not like we thought $250 and they destroyed us with $399 or something. I know people have different incomes. But if you can't afford another $50 by launch, wait a few weeks or months until you get it. Instead I've seen people in several threads claiming that they would have made an instabuy at $250 and now they won't buy it at a $299 price point. I'm not defending Nintendo, just surprised by such a huge backlash over $50.
Because we all determine what something is worth paying for. You seriously mean to tell me that there isn't some arbitrary cutoff point where you wouldn't buy a Switch? If it were $700 would you buy it? What about $650? And when you figure that out, think about what the price difference is between what you are willing and not willing to pay.
So I don't get why it's so hard to understand that people value the Switch at $250 and Nintendo asking for more than that means they won't buy the Switch. It doesn't matter that it's just a $50 difference. It only matters that it's more than people think the console is worth.