[Eurogamer] If Switch 2 is the end of innovative Nintendo, there's much to be sad about

God I hate the mass media sometimes, they know depressing non-positive shit takes get clicks, and make sure to make anything and everything a negative.
My thoughts exactly. I just watched the last episode of the High Score docu series on Netflix. It talked about DOOM and Starfox. So much soul, gaming in the 90s was something else.

It's crazy how the gaming industry/hobby has evolved, in many ways, positively, but also, in many ways, negatively.
 
Man, that was a bad article. I notice this article complained about lack of innovation but didn't provided any of its own ideas.

Seriously, think about it. Should Nintendo have done VR? A traditional home console? A magic gaming space suit? What's it supposed to be? And then ask if those are actual sound business decisions.

Real Greta Thunberg energy, "Our job is to demand solutions, not provide solutions."
 
I think the system looks like shit, a low end tablet pc. I am not impressed.

Nintendo has been making handhelds before there was commercial tablets and portable PC's. Its a natural evolution from there gameboy, gba, ds. They are doing what they always do. Better to keep it safe when you have a winning formula after the Wii U disaster/

It looks like a normal handheld and not too uncomfortable. Would you like mickey mouse shape? Smarties shape? Amphibious landing-craft shape?
 
People act like this is the first time Nintendo did a straightforward successor to one of their systems. Yet when we look at the past

Super NES - Basically a more powerful NES with extra buttons and Mode 7

Nintendo GameCube - A more powerful Nintendo 64 with mini-discs and a tweaked controller design

Game Boy Advance - A more powerful Game Boy with 4-player support

Nintendo 3DS - A More powerful DS with 3D.

This isn't anything new for Nintendo. They've done straightforward follow ups to their consoles before. Wii U was really the only time they added some radical new gimmick to a direct successor.
 
People act like this is the first time Nintendo did a straightforward successor to one of their systems. Yet when we look at the past

Super NES - Basically a more powerful NES with extra buttons and Mode 7

Nintendo GameCube - A more powerful Nintendo 64 with mini-discs and a tweaked controller design

Game Boy Advance - A more powerful Game Boy with 4-player support

Nintendo 3DS - A More powerful DS with 3D.

This isn't anything new for Nintendo. They've done straightforward follow ups to their consoles before. Wii U was really the only time they added some radical new gimmick to a direct successor.
I don't know if I buy the Gamecube as a more powerful '64, but your point is solid. Nintendo is no stranger to a straightforward successor.
 
I would have been annoyed if Nintendo had departed madly from the first Switch. I don't want a repeat of Wii U. I just want them to focus on the games and bombard us with exclusives. I hope their output will be much better than Sony Studios.
 
I think the industry focus way too much on the hardware and nowhere near enough on the software.

I love great gfx as much as the next man but it's all pointless without amazing games.

I hope Nintendo bring it at the direct and show us hit after hit of amazing games.
 
I think the industry focus way too much on the hardware and nowhere near enough on the software.

I love great gfx as much as the next man but it's all pointless without amazing games.

I hope Nintendo bring it at the direct and show us hit after hit of amazing games.
You are irrevocably, irrefutably 100% correct.
 
Those outlets reach fors interaction and clicks only. There's little to no quality to them. Of course they'll slaughter this trailer for ten different articles. It's about reach, coverage and media penetration, and pace; not quality.
 
All they showed is the look of the console and the controller compared to what the original Switch looked like! And these dumb fucks are ready to write up this bullshit?! Fucking Eurogamer are trash.
 
Those outlets reach fors interaction and clicks only. There's little to no quality to them. Of course they'll slaughter this trailer for ten different articles. It's about reach, coverage and media penetration, and pace; not quality.
Honestly as usual the reactions show why video games medias are just a bunch of shill. We don't get this kind of discourse when they suck Nintendo's dick like they do 99,9% of the time.

I don't understand why people get mad over this.
 
I know this is slightly off topic, but the system will be expensive. They're not cutting corners really. I'm expecting $600.
 
Man, that was a bad article. I notice this article complained about lack of innovation but didn't provided any of its own ideas.

Seriously, think about it. Should Nintendo have done VR? A traditional home console? A magic gaming space suit? What's it supposed to be? And then ask if those are actual sound business decisions.

Real Greta Thunberg energy, "Our job is to demand solutions, not provide solutions."
Meanwhile the rest of the industry can't even make a decent remake. Or when they do make something new it is lecturing gamers.
 
Top Bottom