Geometric-Crusher
"Nintendo games are like indies, and worth at most $19" 🤡
Nintendo will never make a game using good graphics again, it's your fault for paying $60 for a standard indie game.
Think about it
Think about it
Real talk: they have zero incentive to adjust their hardware to other console's level so their games will always look two generations old.
I wouldn't go that far, but it's true that the companies prioritize different things. I enjoy both of them. Microsoft maybe not so much anymore, but I loved my 360.And can you explain what amazing gaming innovations have been achieved by Sony and Microsoft endlessly releasing new more expensive consoles?
Thought so.
The answer is, zero.
Every PS4 and PS5 game have the exact same gameplay as PS2 and PS3 games. So again the point you're trying to make is...pointless.
And can you explain what amazing gaming innovations have been achieved by Sony and Microsoft endlessly releasing new more expensive consoles?
Thought so.
The answer is, zero.
Every PS4 and PS5 game have the exact same gameplay as PS2 and PS3 games. So again the point you're trying to make is...pointless.
The price of a game needs to be compatible with graphics technology, Nintendo games are worth at most $19.
Nintendo is dead for me, I'm not going to buy Switch 2 for shit.
It doesn't even matter. His take and this thread will quickly be out of touch once a stronger system is announced and released.Careful you'll get banned instantly for these opinions as certain people here are hardcore Nintendo-never-is-bad fans.
Dear fuck, how is releasing a new console every like 7 years endless? Take that Nintendo sack out of your mouth. (I hope this is bait though)And can you explain what amazing gaming innovations have been achieved by Sony and Microsoft endlessly releasing new more expensive consoles?
Thought so.
The answer is, zero.
Every PS4 and PS5 game have the exact same gameplay as PS2 and PS3 games. So again the point you're trying to make is...pointless.
How about you think about it instead?Nintendo will never make a game using good graphics again, it's your fault for paying $60 for a standard indie game.
Think about it
Should have bought the Gamecube, bitchesNintendo will never make a game using good graphics again, it's your fault for paying $60 for a standard indie game.
Think about it
I think you have a terminal case of the Mandela effect if you think Nintendo ever did "good graphics"? Which I suppose means high budget AAA style artwork in this context.
Fuck, I wish indie games looked and played as well as Nintendo's stuff.
except pokemon, but tbf nintendo doesnt make those so they dont count.Every Nintendo game has great graphics.
From a certain point of view.
They used to make games with great graphics but they stopped doing that almost 20 years ago.I think you have a terminal case of the Mandela effect if you think Nintendo ever did "good graphics"? Which I suppose means high budget AAA style artwork in this context.
Fuck, I wish indie games looked and played as well as Nintendo's stuff.
It doesn't even matter. His take and this thread will quickly be out of touch once a stronger system is announced and released.
Nintendo just has to keep up with mobile graphical potential so that they can get some of the good stuff from Apple Arcade and Google Play Plus.
M$; Let's spend 6 years forensically mapping out a fjord in Iceland for a 4 hour long boring slogIt's the competition that should learn the lesson. Spend less money on graphics tech for the graphic whores that buy 2 titles a year to jerk off in photo mode and gifs and instead make compelling, fun, gameplay focused experiences.
Nintendo is doing it right. Everyone else isn't.
During the N64 and Gamecube days they had good graphics.I think you have a terminal case of the Mandela effect if you think Nintendo ever did "good graphics"? Which I suppose means high budget AAA style artwork in this context.