BigEmil
Junior Member
9.6 uodated review from ign is good stuff
http://m.uk.ign.com/articles/2017/02/02/nioh-review
http://m.uk.ign.com/articles/2017/02/02/nioh-review
You know... I might grab this.
DS3 really burnt me out on the "souls formula" that I basically ignored Nioh for a while after DS3 released.
But from what I am hearing the game is mission based and the loot system is akin to Diablo?
Because what burnt me out on souls was basically the world exploration, because for the most part asides from fashion souls, exploration felt tedious instead of rewarding (with the exception of finding shortcuts). So yeah... might grab this.
Is there a website for planning builds? Had a loo but I couldn't find one.
Ideally something low-key so I can do it at work. No pictures of Geralt and Samurai women. Just numbers and stats.
Grab it. Embrace it. The resemblence to DS is there, but you won't notice it after a while.
First PAL game I see with the "PS4 Pro Enhanced" logo back in the box.
Also no "Only on PS4" logo. Expect Nioh Sigma multi plattform.
Fuck it. Pre ordered it on amazon
Is Sony the publisher ?
Playstation UK/FR/ES Official site still show "Koei" as the publisher, very unprofessional
You'll really enjoy the combat, much faster and intense than Dark Souls 3.
Similar to Bloodborne.
Nice, may get to 90 avg score!IGN final review is out.
9.6
Should I just post the OT now or wait a bit longer?
Worst case you can just respec.
Question(s): Never played a Nioh game.
Is this game more like dark souls or ninja gaiden?
How hard is the game dark souls or ninja gaiden difficulty?
How is the lore/story?
Can you respec however you want or is it limited like in DS?
Question(s): Never played a Nioh game.
Is this game more like dark souls or ninja gaiden?
How hard is the game dark souls or ninja gaiden difficulty?
How is the lore/story?
Fuck it. Pre ordered it on amazon
I don't think Nioh feels like an AAA-title. I could imagine sequels with SoulsBorne-appeal, with bigger boss fights, with less copy-paste design and clever enemy encounters. Nioh does have potential. The combat mechanics are very unique and ideas like the different stances and the related skills are brilliant. I'd love to see a sequel with more variety and polishing. In terms of gameplay Nioh feels much more japanese than Souls and both franchises could co-exist perfectly.
Personally, I'm sceptical. I don't think Koei Tecmo will offer the budget for potential sequels to go en par with Souls. I can imagine Nioh will get the Musou-treatment and we'll get sequels without bigger changes. And then the Dark Souls 2 effect could kick in and we will play great games with a small feeling of disappointment.
But that's just me being pessimistic. I enjoy Nioh a lot. And right now I don't need any sequels. Nioh is a fantastic original game in its current state. I can't wait to discover all the game mechanics, the lore and I'm looking forward for PVP and coop material grinding.
Because the Souls games got cinematic 30fps graphics so it gets an extra AYou're right it's not a big AAA, you might call it AA if you want, but I don't understand why do you consider BB and the Souls series AAA, seems all of those games are on the same level more or less production wise.
I have my doubts. A massive amount of people loved UC4.AAA has got to be the most worthless tag in gaming. It basically says "this game looks expensive". Nioh would have crushed any game in 2016s GAF GotY elections.
don't really think it matters with the way respeccing works in this game.
You're right it's not a big AAA, you might call it AA if you want, but I don't understand why do you consider BB and the Souls series AAA, seems all of those games are on the same level more or less production wise.
I have my doubts. A massive amount of people loved UC4.
IGN final review is out.
9.6
Up to 88 on opencritic now
First PAL game I see with the "PS4 Pro Enhanced" logo back in the box.
Also no "Only on PS4" logo. Expect Nioh Sigma multi plattform.
Maybe they never updated the pages.
AAA has got to be the most worthless tag in gaming. It basically says "this game looks expensive". Nioh would have crushed any game in 2016s GAF GotY elections.
Bloodborne did beat The Witcher and rightly so.
How long is this game for a somewhat experienced souls player. Just beat yakuza and want to play a game that will take me to Nier but not over.
40 to 70 hours. Hell maybe 100 hours according to IGN if want to master it. I don't think bring an experienced Souls player is going to be a major asset for this game.
How long is this game for a somewhat experienced souls player. Just beat yakuza and want to play a game that will take me to Nier but not over.
Bloodborne did beat The Witcher and rightly so.
No we won't.
Maybe you are reading too much into nothing. You seem obsessed with the possibility of a port.
Probably not. Not as accessible. The same reason Bloodborne didnt beat The Witcher 3.
?
My first reply was about no logo,
Second was about Sony not updating the page with them as publishers.
Where is the obsesion?