yea, I just scrolled up and saw that.peterb0y said:I thought I read that there was 1 reported...
Dreams-Visions said:holy shit..
as long as there were no casualties, I'm sure they can work this out. If there were casualties...fuck.
Source?farnham said:okay NK opened the fire again it seems
Zeke said:they still don't have a reliable delivery system AFAIK so its moot
Evlar said:No, when I say the US does not recognize NK as a nuclear power I mean the US does not believe they have the capability to deliver a nuclear strike. Those are the "facts on the ground".
In a crazy kind of way, I can see the NK leadership thinking this will give them leverage. Clearly, they see some benefit in presenting themselves as irrationally violent and unpredictable. They know that SK has a LOT more to lose than they do if it comes to a fight, so they want to see how far they can push.BocoDragon said:So what is this Yeonpyeong Island?
It is military or civillian, or both?
Do we have any idea why it would be the target of attack? Is there some strategic reason why the North would attack this site..... is it just to inflict civilian casualties? (that would be scary)
A country run by a crazy person?Josh7289 said:It was a soldier death last I read, for what it's worth politically.
That being said, North Korea couldn't have known it wouldn't kill any civilians.
It's a strange situation but I still don't think it will lead to anything seriously violent. What country seriously wants that?
MSNBC is so shitty for breaking news. Always the last to catch up. I was hoping CNN here would broadcast their international channel or something instead of dumb reruns.JohnTinker said:No coverage on CNN International. Good coverage on BBC, Sky, Al Jazeera.
Fox broke in 30min ago with preliminary report, cnn had 5min blurb then went back to sleep, lights out at msnbc
North KoreaJosh7289 said:It was a soldier death last I read, for what it's worth politically.
That being said, North Korea couldn't have known it wouldn't kill any civilians.
It's a strange situation but I still don't think it will lead to anything seriously violent. What country seriously wants that?
North Korea? They sure didn't give a fuck when they fired that artillery.Josh7289 said:It was a soldier death last I read, for what it's worth politically.
That being said, North Korea couldn't have known it wouldn't kill any civilians.
It's a strange situation but I still don't think it will lead to anything seriously violent. What country seriously wants that?
No, explain why. The leaders know exactly what they're doing. They're not stupid.peterb0y said:A country run by a crazy person?
Source?ahoyhoy said:Hmm.. might have actually been an accident.
Kind of reminds me of Israel, except the circumstances are different.TheHeretic said:North Korea should have been taken out years ago. These maniacs have killed and kidnapped civilians like nobodies business for 40 years, and gotten away with it by holding the South hostage. Why anyone thinks this situation is going to get any better is beyond me.
He's not crazy.peterb0y said:A country run by a crazy person?
Firing 200+ artillery shells on a piece of disputed land is not an accident.ahoyhoy said:Hmm.. might have actually been an accident. Either that or they just needed a new reel of propaganda.
Yeah, Al Jazeera is only talking about the return fire from the South. Nothing on any continued shelling by the North.MiDNiGHTS said:Al Jazeera says no reports of new shelling in last hour.
TacticalFox88 said:Kind of reminds me of Israel, except the circumstances are different.
my ass.BocoDragon said:Ok that partially answers my question... If Yeonpyeong Island was home to a recent military drill, then it's possible that the South did something to threaten the North's sovereignty during that drill
TacticalFox88 said:Kind of reminds me of Israel, except the circumstances are different.
Yes.-COOLIO- said:do you guys really think they'd bombard seoul? wouldnt that be suicide?
Tabris said:NK has 17 long range artilery guns that can reach Seoul and start bombarding.
The NK Air Force have MiG-29's and in capable hands are able to match F-15 planes. They could be there within minutes, carpet bomb, then be back for dinner.knitoe said:South Korea won't do anything and the North knows it. Because, Seoul would be destroyed in minutes if an all out war happens. S. Korea is dumb to have their capital city within mortar shelling range. That's why N. Korea has the South by the balls no matter how more powerful or advance the South vs North.
Tabris said:NK has 17 long range artilery guns that can reach Seoul and start bombarding.[/QUOTE]
Well then the US better be ready to destroy them all simultaneously. Maybe the US should illegally and secretly place nukes in satellites over NK to do an orbital bombardment or something.
again reliable is the key word all of their missile tests have been failures and why would they even try firing at Japan? They don't SK, US, and JP all at their front door.xbhaskarx said:Wrong. To reach the US, sure, but they can reach Japan and South Korea with their current Taepodong missiles. Hell, they can reach Seoul with just artillery.
NK ballistic missiles capable of carrying a nuclear payload:
Taepodong-2 (failed test in 2006): 4-6,000km
Taepodong-1: 2,500km
*Rodong-2 (aka Nodong): 2,000km
*aka Iran's Shahab-3 and Pakistan's Ghauri II
Yeah, those old fogeys hundreds of years ago were so dumb to put Seoul where it is.knitoe said:South Korea won't do anything and the North knows it. Because, Seoul would be destroyed in minutes if an all out war happens. S. Korea is dumb to have their capital city within mortar shelling range. That's why N. Korea has the South by the balls no matter how more powerful or advance the South vs North.
If this all really turned into war, then yeah, Seoul would be probably the first spot to receive fire. Or somewhere around the DMZ, dunno.-COOLIO- said:do you guys really think they'd bombard seoul? wouldnt that be suicide?
yea, gonna have to agree with this. it's hard to start a fight when you have so much to lose.delirium said:If North Korea sinking a frigate and killing dozens of sailors didn't provoke war, I don't know what will. South Korea just has too much to lose to go to war with Korea, never mind the economic meltdown that would happen when reunification happens afterwards.