Last edited:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Nvidia 5000 Series GPU Rumored To Offer Biggest Performance Leap In History
- Thread starter IbizaPocholo
- Start date
- Rumor Hardware
TheRedRiders
Member
RGT is not very reliable.
Regardless I do think we’ll see a huge leap in performance, will be curious to see how RDNA 3 will fair against it.
Regardless I do think we’ll see a huge leap in performance, will be curious to see how RDNA 3 will fair against it.
nemiroff
Gold Member
Yeah, rumors always sounds good.. But looking at the 4090, Nvidia might be able to deliver.. Anyway, been looking for a 4090 for months - And have found many available, but none good enough. I mean, with all the coil whine and fan bearing noise issues rampant in the new cards I might, just might, skip this generation and wait for the 50 series.
Last edited:
MikeM
Member
That seems to be a cpu problem per DF’s recent video. 4090 was only at 50-60% utilization
Lucifers Beard
Member
If the 4000 prices are anything to go by, Nvidia can fuck off.
Ulysses 31
Member
V1LÆM
Gold Member
my 4080 averaged about 292W "out of the box" while running a mix of Time Spy, Firestrike, Heaven/Superposition, and Cyberpunk. Time Spy + Firestrike + Superposition were at 4K. I tried setting Heaven to 4K but not sure because the results said 1440p. Cyberpunk was at 1440p with everything maxed out.
for comparison, my overclocked 2080 was averaging 274W. after undervolting my 4080 it averaged 249W and i was getting slightly better scores and basically same fps as stock settings!
in stock settings the highest recorded power usage i saw was 305W when running Time Spy. lowest was 256W. with undervolting max was 262W and low 207W.
i might as well just post my notes....
RTX 2080 Overclocked
________
PORT ROYAL - 6983 [SCORE], 69.7C, 1.05V, 274W, 2025MHz
TIME SPY EXTREME - 5424 [SCORE], 69.7C, 1.05V, 280.6W, 2040MHz
FIRESTRIKE ULTRA - 6723 [SCORE], 58.1C, 1.05V, 275.6W, 2040MHz
HEAVEN 4K MAX - 2126 [SCORE] (36 - 181.3fps), 76C, 1.05V, 267.5W, 2055MHz
SUPERPOSITION - 8611 [SCORE] (47 - 80fps), 74.5C, 1.05V, 279.4W, 2025MHz
CYBERPUNK MAX NO DLSS - avg fps 21.6, 72.9C, 1.05V, 267.9W, 2025MHz
~
Averages
Celsius: 70.15
Voltage: 1.05
Watt: 274.16
Frequency: 2035
_____________________________________________________________________
RTX 4080 Stock
________
PORT ROYAL - 17333 [SCORE], 57.1C, 1.075V, 297.8W, 2715MHz
TIME SPY EXTREME - 10571 [SCORE], 59.6C, 1.075V, 305.1W, 2715MHz
FIRESTRIKE ULTRA - 13903 [SCORE], 55.8C, 1.075V, 295W, 2730MHz
HEAVEN 4K MAX - 3972 [SCORE] (41 - 360fps), 54C, 1.075V, 256.1W, 2715MHz
SUPERPOSITION - 20613 [SCORE] (62 - 189fps), 59.1C, 1.075V, 299.7W, 2700MHz
CYBERPUNK MAX NO DLSS - avg fps 55.1fps, 59C, 1.075V, 294.6W, 2715MHz
~
Averages
C: 57.43 (-12.72 compared to 2080)
V: 1.075 (+0.025 compared to 2080)
W: 291.38 (+17.22 compared to 2080)
F: 2715 (+680 compared to 2080)
_____________________________________________________________________
RTX 4080 Undervolt
________
PORT ROYAL - 17365 [SCORE], 53.7C, 0.975V, 256.3W, 2700MHz.
TIME SPY EXTREME - 10435 [SCORE]. 54.6C, 0.975V, 262W, 2700MHz
FIRESTRIKE ULTRA - 14052 [SCORE], 52.5C, 0.975V, 260.85W, 2715MHz
HEAVEN 4K MAX - 3981 [SCORE] (33.1 - 359.7fps), 48.9C, 0.975V, 207.6W, 2700MHz
SUPERPOSITION - 20786 [SCORE] (105.3 - 190.7fps), 55.7C, 0.975V, 257.7W, 2700MHz
CYBERPUNK MAX NO DLSS - avg fps 55.4fps, 55.6C, 0.975V, 255W, 2700MHz
~
Averages
C: 53.5 (-3.93 compared to 4080 stock)
V: 0.975 (-0.100 compared to 4080 stock)
W: 249.91 (-41.47 compared to 4080 stock)
F: 2702 (-13 compared to 4080 stock)
Thebonehead
Gold Member
Where are you based?
I got hold of the 4090fe via a telegram channel notification and they regularly have drops in Italy, France, Germany etc... You should be able to just shop from there in the EU.
PhoenixTank
Member
That one is CPU limited isn't it? Even stuffing Jensen's jacket with precious gems and bearer bonds isn't going to help there
Sanepar
Member
Can u give me your numbers to undervolt mine?
Using afterburner? What voltage, core clock, mem clock and power limit?
V1LÆM
Gold Member
sure but what works for me might not work for you. my card is a Founder's Edition. and i should add that these settings are stable in those benchmarks (including cyberpunk bench) i mentioned in my previous post. i've not actually went and played any games yet so it's entirely possible these settings are unstable for me!
voltage: 0.975V - stock was 1.075V. tried 0.950 but it was unstable.
core: 2655 - i think there is a bug because i set it at 2718. i still get 2700-2715Mhz. not sure what's up there. stock was boosting to 2715-2730MHz
memory: +580 - tried +600 but was unstable so backed off -20
power limit: 110%
Last edited by a moderator:
GymWolf
Member
Maybe i wasn't clear, i don't want to buy a 4090, i didn't even searched for one.
Or maybe you are saying something else and my english comprehension fooled me once more.
Pharaoh 117
Member
With Nvidia you can always guarantee a leap in performance and a even bigger one in price.
Thebonehead
Gold Member
For some reason I thought you were after a cheaper 4090FE card. They can be had for €1,859.00 when they are in stock.
Still a big price though
GymWolf
Member
No, my max budget would be 1000 euros, a bit more for something noticeably better.
Last edited:
V1LÆM
Gold Member
that happens when competition sucks.
AMD aren't terrible but they basically justified Nvidia's price for the 4000 cards. nothing can touch a 4090 and a 4080 vs the new 7900 XTX is a no brainer. i paid £1,200 for my 4080 and i can get a 7900 XTX for £1,050. rasterisation performance is basically the same but the extra £150 gets me DLSS and better Raytracing. totally worth it.
the prices suck but what can you do? AMD need to do better.
Intel are new to the dedicated GPU market and while their A770 is a great starter they still have a long way to go before they catch up to AMD.
Last edited by a moderator:
Sanepar
Member
Thanks a lot sir!sure but what works for me might not work for you. my card is a Founder's Edition. and i should add that these settings are stable in those benchmarks (including cyberpunk bench) i mentioned in my previous post. i've not actually went and played any games yet so it's entirely possible these settings are unstable for me!
voltage: 0.975V - stock was 1.075V. tried 0.950 but it was unstable.
core: 2655 - i think there is a bug because i set it at 2718. i still get 2700-2715Mhz. not sure what's up there. stock was boosting to 2715-2730MHz
memory: +580 - tried +600 but was unstable so backed off -20
power limit: 110%
Thebonehead
Gold Member
SportsFan581
Member
For the biggest performance leap in history? $3k or you aren't even worthy.
GymWolf
Member
It's literally what i did in the past week.1,000 you say... Careful or you will end up like me.
From 6900 to 6950 to 7900xt...during lunch i was looking at 4080 prices...
The only difference is that i come from a filthy 2070super.
The thing is, i'm trying to see the gpu as buying a console or oled television, an essential part that is gonna guarantee thousands of hours of entartainment for 3-4 years so i can't go too cheap.
It is the only way to rationalize spending 1000+ euros for a fucking gpu...
GHG
Member
Frame gen has been a godsend for this game. But you're right there's no such thing as overkill for PC, going overkill also allows you to keep hardware for longer.
Once I've installed new parts I'd rather not have to do anything but clean dust filters for at least 2-3 years.
rofif
Can’t Git Gud
I am tired of these scam revolutions.
There is way too much emphasis on power.
And I cant wait to see revolutionary pprice and power usage…
We are not limited by hardware even on ps4. Look at tlou2 and ragnarok.
We are limited by amount of work required and art produced. 100tf won’t change that.
Nintendo had the right idea…
There is way too much emphasis on power.
And I cant wait to see revolutionary pprice and power usage…
We are not limited by hardware even on ps4. Look at tlou2 and ragnarok.
We are limited by amount of work required and art produced. 100tf won’t change that.
Nintendo had the right idea…
Last edited:
rofif
Can’t Git Gud
This chart is beyond stupid. You can’t run old cars in new game and then claim it’s more ways per frame.Yeah. I’m looking at reviews and it’s pretty good, energy wise.
Newest card will always win this chart lol
GHG
Member
No idea what FSR3 will or won't include at this stage to be honest.
But as usual, my recommendation is to buy hardware based on the performance it offers at the time of purchase, not based on future promises that may or may not come to fruition.
GymWolf
Member
Well, if amd has an history of improving a lot via drivers, it is a factor to consider, i can't just ignore that a 7900xt in 6 months from now is gonna perform way better, Same for the fsr3, if their tech is gonna be at least as good as dlss2 i can't ignore that, because dlss is the major reason to buy an nvidia card (for people who don't care about rtx)
Last edited:
RoadHazard
Gold Member
Will it be absolutely huge or just pretty damn huge?
amigastar
Gold Member
Last edited:
OmegaSupreme
advanced basic bitch
Swift_Star
Banned
Biggest leap in energy consumption too, I guess
ChiefDada
Member
crackajack
Member
That's what is supposed to happen, yes, but the jump is quite substantial this gen. Much more obvious than between 20 and 30. As it should be with the new node, otherwise something would have gone horribly wrong.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Tarin02543
Member
Exactly. By the time 5090 launches 3060 will become king in the Steam hardware surveys.
chromatic9
Member
Sounds like another great opportunity for nvidia to release a midrange card as their $2000 flagship.
Yay, bring it on. I'll be on my GTX 1080 till 2032
Yay, bring it on. I'll be on my GTX 1080 till 2032
Last edited:
ToTTenTranz
Banned
Can't wait for RTX Minesweeper to absolutely require the $5000 RTX 5090 for playable 1080p 30FPS because it's the only card that supports DLSS4.
Bruno_Arrais85
Member
here we go again