• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NYT Editorial: Obama Administration "Has Lost All Credibility" (Re: NSA monitoring)

Status
Not open for further replies.

gcubed

Member
Pretty much.


Although, I think many had hoped that Obama was going to relax it and stop the wars overseas. But his main goal seemed to be getting re-elected, he wasn't going to let another terrorist attack subvert that.

That's the catch-22 that every lawmaker is going to be in, going forward. If you relax the laws, the spying, the espionage and something happens, you and your party will be left holding the bag.

after 2 years in office it was pretty clear he wasn't going to stop anything related to the patriot act. There was no bombast or rhetoric from him during its renewal either
 

Liberty4all

Banned
This whole "Assassinating American citizen" is fucking ridiculous. People EVERY SINGLE other country in the world, were they in America's situation would've done the exact same thing.

Moroever, why the fuck does it seem like you all care more that he was an "American" than the fact that he was (rightfully, I might add) assassinated? He was committing treason, which by definition, is the death penalty. Whether you agree with it or not, that shit was lawful.

People deserve a proper trial instead of kangaroo military courts sentencing them to death?

Even pieces of shit like him.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

Okay no. The Patriot act is terrible. What the NSA is doing here is terrible. Don't get me wrong. But I am going to continue to call out this quote as really really dumb every time someone uses it. Balancing the freedoms afforded by security and the freedoms supported by lack of restrictions is central to society and civilization and it is a balance
 

Enron

Banned
Okay no. The Patriot act is terrible. What the NSA is doing here is terrible. Don't get me wrong. But I am going to continue to call out this quote as really really dumb every time someone uses it. Balancing the freedoms afforded by security and the freedoms supported by lack of restrictions is central to society and civilization and it is a balance

Pretty much. It's the entire idea behind "laws".
 

Daver

Banned
Okay no. The Patriot act is terrible. What the NSA is doing here is terrible. Don't get me wrong. But I am going to continue to call out this quote as really really dumb every time someone uses it. Balancing the freedoms afforded by security and the freedoms supported by lack of restrictions is central to society and civilization and it is a balance

How about Thomas Jefferson:

"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have."

Our founding fathers weren't idiots. They understood Tyranny.


Actions speak louder than words. This is what creeps me out about him. He can sound so sincere and authentic and then he'll turn around and act like a completely different person.
 
Okay no. The Patriot act is terrible. What the NSA is doing here is terrible. Don't get me wrong. But I am going to continue to call out this quote as really really dumb every time someone uses it. Balancing the freedoms afforded by security and the freedoms supported by lack of restrictions is central to society and civilization and it is a balance

I think the keyword is "essential". I don't think that quote means giving up any and all freedoms for meaningful security is terrible and we should live in some Mad Max world.

How about Thomas Jefferson:

"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have."

Our founding fathers weren't idiots. They understood Tyranny.

Most people in the US today believe tyranny is something that happened back during the olden days and can't ever occur again.
 

delirium

Member
How about Thomas Jefferson:

"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have."

Our founding fathers weren't idiots. They understood Tyranny.
Those founding fathers also pass some laws like the Alien and Seditions Act.
 

Daver

Banned
Those founding fathers also pass some laws like the Alien and Seditions Act.

True. Doesn't discredit everything they accomplished though. They were geniuses. The sad thing is Fox News and the Tea Party have turned 'founding fathers' into a nauseating buzzword and unfortunately it has turned many people off to the their ideals and fundamentals; They are viewed more as a cliche if anything.
 

mnannola

Member
The god damn patriot act needs to be scrapped, and something much less over reaching should be put in it's place. Obama needs to come out in support of the immediate rejection of the patriot act policies, and point the public toward congress to revise or eliminate the patriot act. If he doesn't do this, even though he didn't sign the patriot act into law, he is the primary person to blame at this moment. Especially after being against it during the 2007 election season.
 

delirium

Member
I'm not seeing anywhere in that article where he may face prosecution.

Might as well have titled it "Glenn Greenwald may get hit by a drone strike for his role in leaking the NSA scandal"
I guess he's following the Glenn Greenwald school of hyperbole.
 

Espresso

Banned
I'm not seeing anywhere in that article where he may face prosecution.

Might as well have titled it "Glenn Greenwald may get hit by a drone strike for his role in leaking the NSA scandal"

After writing intensely, even obsessively, for years about government surveillance and the prosecution of journalists, Glenn Greenwald has suddenly put himself directly at the intersection of those two issues, and perhaps in the cross hairs of federal prosecutors.

The article, which included a link to the order, is expected to attract an investigation from the Justice Department, which has aggressively pursued leakers.

He said that he had been advised by lawyer friends that “he should be worried,” but he had decided that “what I am doing is exactly what the Constitution is about and I am not worried about it.”

Did you even read the article?
 

gcubed

Member
I think the keyword is "essential". I don't think that quote means giving up any and all freedoms for meaningful security is terrible and we should live in some Mad Max world.



Most people in the US today believe tyranny is something that happened back during the olden days and can't ever occur again.

thank the political climate. Same reason why no one gives a shit about "scandals". You cry wolf you get ignored. When you attach tyranny to someone taking a shit in a different bathroom it loses its effectiveness as a word
 

Hari Seldon

Member
I see more and more comments on even liberal websites (not just tea partiers) for an American spring. Between this shit and the banks and everything else, I don't think America has ever been more unstable. How many more years of absolute dogshit government can this country take before something insane happens? Elections are not changing anything, same shit over and over.
 
I see more and more comments on even liberal websites (not just tea partiers) for an American spring. Between this shit and the banks and everything else, I don't think America has ever been more unstable. How many more years of absolute dogshit government can this country take before something insane happens? Elections are not changing anything, same shit over and over.

Unstable? The average person does not care about any of this. If they didn't riot over the bailouts, mass shootings and do nothing congress they ain't gonna do shit over this.
 

News Bot

Banned
I see more and more comments on even liberal websites (not just tea partiers) for an American spring. Between this shit and the banks and everything else, I don't think America has ever been more unstable. How many more years of absolute dogshit government can this country take before something insane happens? Elections are not changing anything, same shit over and over.

I genuinely wonder how an "American spring" could possibly work when the majority of people simply don't care.
 

MooseKing

Banned
I see more and more comments on even liberal websites (not just tea partiers) for an American spring. Between this shit and the banks and everything else, I don't think America has ever been more unstable. How many more years of absolute dogshit government can this country take before something insane happens? Elections are not changing anything, same shit over and over.


Here is the thing. If this happened in the early 60's or early 70's, people would be out in force.

Today, not so much. You can sit at home, on your ass, use the Internet, watch TV, contact your friends, and do loads of other things without moving a muscle. If you want to talk about the news, you don't have to leave home (hell, we are on GAF right now). If you want to read the news, you point and click.

Back then, you had to get involved to have good discussion about the world and what is happening. By getting involved you met like minded people, and started to take action on your feelings. There was nothing else to do. You coud not sit at home and act fake mad on the Internet.

This will never happen anymore, Americans are lazy, not involved with anything, and care more about the next episode of the Kardasians than this. Go to work and ask your co-workers I would bet more than 50 percent have no idea this is even happening.
 
You said he's worse than bush regarding civil liberties. Bush held Americans in Gitmo and tortured them while repressing their Habeus corpus.

So no, spying is not as bad.



However spying is still bad. Very bad. Awful in fact.

We're still holding innocent people in guantanamo so your argument is moot.
 

Crisco

Banned
lol @American spring. As long as people aren't starving to death (which is what really caused the Arab spring), nothing will happen.
 
thank the political climate. Same reason why no one gives a shit about "scandals". You cry wolf you get ignored. When you attach tyranny to someone taking a shit in a different bathroom it loses its effectiveness as a word

Agreed. I've heard tyranny used about everything political that people don't agree with.
 

wildfire

Banned
Here is the thing. If this happened in the early 60's or early 70's, people would be out in force.

Today, not so much. You can sit at home, on your ass, use the Internet, watch TV, contact your friends, and do loads of other things without moving a muscle. If you want to talk about the news, you don't have to leave home (hell, we are on GAF right now). If you want to read the news, you point and click.

Back then, you had to get involved to have good discussion about the world and what is happening. By getting involved you met like minded people, and started to take action on your feelings. There was nothing else to do. You coud not sit at home and act fake mad on the Internet.

This will never happen anymore, Americans are lazy, not involved with anything, and care more about the next episode of the Kardasians than this. Go to work and ask your co-workers I would bet more than 50 percent have no idea this is even happening.

Occupy and Tea Party flareups says otherwise. It just so happens one movement couldn't get pass the being angry and ranting stage and fizzled out, while the other has had an impact on American politics but one that I personally don't prefer.
 
This whole "Assassinating American citizen" is fucking ridiculous. People EVERY SINGLE other country in the world, were they in America's situation would've done the exact same thing.

Moroever, why the fuck does it seem like you all care more that he was an "American" than the fact that he was (rightfully, I might add) assassinated? He was committing treason, which by definition, is the death penalty. Whether you agree with it or not, that shit was lawful.

Definitely. His 16-year-old son was a piece of shit, too. Good thing they both posed an imminent threat to our national security.
 
if the TSA doesn't get people riled up enough to do anything about, something non intrusive like this isn't even going to register

Unfortunately I have to agree again. I'd like to imagine millions in the street screaming no more but more Americans were more upset at the last episode of Game of Thrones than they are about this type of shit.

:(
 
Moroever, why the fuck does it seem like you all care more that he was an "American" than the fact that he was (rightfully, I might add) assassinated? He was committing treason, which by definition, is the death penalty. Whether you agree with it or not, that shit was lawful.

Uhhhh no. Treason is not punishable by summary execution no matter how you much you want to justify it. In this country we have due process for every citizen, treasonous or otherwise. Maybe you would rather try to justify it as he was an enemy combatant but that's a tenuous charge at best, which is probably why they would rather just drop a missle on him and his (innocent, American) son
 
Until we get rid of Corporate Welfare and Military Industry Complex Go! Go!, shit ain't never changing

When the Army is telling the government that it has 3000 Extra Abrams (Surplus of Tanks!) and Congress says Fuck it spend it, make more, shit is just wrong
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/09/army-to-congress-thanks-but-no-tanks/comment-page-4/

When the FUCKING ARMY is like "Yo', we have to much firepower, it's just stupid to keep building these", Congress goes "Make more, just in case"



It moved to where the conservatives are, they whole balance shifted right that way <===

The Tea Parties and fringe at the edge of the right, Democrats left the liberal side and are more conservative to cover that side @_@!

It's a fucking disaster. I constantly wonder what the US government could do with its money if we didn't have a military industrial complex.

Maybe the infrastructure in this country wouldn't be such shit. High speed trains? Internet as a public utility? We will never know.
 
I see more and more comments on even liberal websites (not just tea partiers) for an American spring. Between this shit and the banks and everything else, I don't think America has ever been more unstable. How many more years of absolute dogshit government can this country take before something insane happens? Elections are not changing anything, same shit over and over.

The United States isn't unstable, it's led by buffoons who are more concerned about getting re-elected than passing meaningful legislation.

We have so many problems and no one is willing to stick their neck on the line. Thus we are left with this:

Worst-Congress_laws-passed-chart.jpeg
 

derder

Member
So much hyperbole in this thread.

Am I the only one who doesn't think this is a big deal? This year is the safest I've felt from foreign-born terrorism. I will gladly give the NSA the metadata of (federally regulated) cell phones, if it allows the NSA to see every phone call that the marathon bombers made.

Full stop.
 
So much hyperbole in this thread.

Am I the only one who doesn't think this is a big deal? This year is the safest I've felt from foreign-born terrorism. I will gladly give the NSA the metadata of (federally regulated) cell phones, if it allows the NSA to see every phone call that the marathon bombers made.

Full stop.

It's a disproportionate response. People defending this act like the choice is either monitory all citizens -OR- the terrorists win and will blow up America with nuclear weapons tomorrow.

There's a way to fight terrorism without giving up the very things that supposedly make America what it is.

Have we become so cowardly that we're willing to accept government reading our emails, monitoring our cell phone records for the illusion of stopping terrorism?
 

Mudkips

Banned
Hasn't this been going on for 7 years per Saxby Chambliss? With proper Congressional oversight to boot.

Repeal the PATRIOT act, but Congress doesn't want to do it, that's for sure.

How about we just repeal Congress instead? Useless shits.
 

Hari Seldon

Member
So much hyperbole in this thread.

Am I the only one who doesn't think this is a big deal? This year is the safest I've felt from foreign-born terrorism. I will gladly give the NSA the metadata of (federally regulated) cell phones, if it allows the NSA to see every phone call that the marathon bombers made.

Full stop.

The problem is that they are also collecting all of your internet communications as well. Who knows what else is secret? The government feeding participating corps insider information about competitors? Low level people with access to the queries collecting private sexting info from people? Politicians on the committee exchanging support for the program for insider information about opponents in the next election? We have no clue because there is no oversite, no transparency.
 

Parch

Member
Man, you'd think Obama actually passed the Patriot Act
I laughed then. I laugh now. Blame game is funny.

It doesn't matter the administration. Both want more control at the expense of citizen freedom. The paranoid justify. The upset play blame game.
 
This whole "Assassinating American citizen" is fucking ridiculous. People EVERY SINGLE other country in the world, were they in America's situation would've done the exact same thing.

Nope. But even if it were true, that's about the lowest bar for acceptable behavior anybody could set. It's playground level ethics.

Moroever, why the fuck does it seem like you all care more that he was an "American" than the fact that he was (rightfully, I might add) assassinated?

It should not surprise you that the American government has greater responsibilities towards American citizens (from whom it derives its power to exist and act). And he was wrongfully assassinated. He was summarily executed based on government allegations of wrongdoing without a trial and absent any imminent threat to public safety.

He was committing treason, which by definition, is the death penalty. Whether you agree with it or not, that shit was lawful.

People commit capital murder, the punishment for which can be death in many states. It doesn't mean we summarily execute those accused by the government of it without a trial. And you are wrong that the punishment for treason by definition is death. Indeed, mandatory death sentences are unconstitutional. Even more, what you propose--summary execution without trial for those merely accused by the government of treason--is explicitly barred by the constitution itself. "No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court." Article III, Section 3.

So much hyperbole in this thread.

Am I the only one who doesn't think this is a big deal? This year is the safest I've felt from foreign-born terrorism. I will gladly give the NSA the metadata of (federally regulated) cell phones, if it allows the NSA to see every phone call that the marathon bombers made.

Full stop.

Talk about hyperbole. Being killed by a terrorist in any given year is like being struck by lightning. If you want to feel safer from terrorism (which is kind of silly to begin with), then getting the fuck out of the Middle East and West Asia would be the way to go.
 

Daver

Banned
So much hyperbole in this thread.

Am I the only one who doesn't think this is a big deal? This year is the safest I've felt from foreign-born terrorism. I will gladly give the NSA the metadata of (federally regulated) cell phones, if it allows the NSA to see every phone call that the marathon bombers made.

Full stop.

Read 1984 Or Fahrenheit 451
 

APF

Member
Obama never gets a break. I don't think there has ever been a President in history that has been under as much scrutiny as Obama.

While this is true, blame the exact same advances in technology that live at the core of this story. Every single President will be under more scrutiny than every one that has preceded them, and it's been that way for most of our lives.
 
For me it comes down to a basic question:

Is the threat of terrorism so great as to justify the Government taking a huge piss all over the 4th Amendment? Is that reasonable? For every single cell phone and data plan in the nation of 300 million+ people?

My answer is fuck no.
 

ISOM

Member
For me it comes down to a basic question:

Is the threat of terrorism so great as to justify the Government taking a huge piss all over the 4th Amendment? Is that reasonable? For every single cell phone and data plan in the nation of 300 million+ people?

My answer is fuck no.

I understand your position but as you are a civilian with no knowledge of what or how many planned attacks happen on U.S soil. You really are not qualified to make an informed decision of whether it's worth it or not. And I'm just being honest here.
 

Wthermans

Banned
Have we become so cowardly that we're willing to accept government reading our emails, monitoring our cell phone records for the illusion of stopping terrorism?
Not cowardly, defeatist. The people hold no reins on their government and haven't for some time now. The wiretapping cat is out of the proverbial bag and has been for more than a decade.
 

Menelaus

Banned
For me it comes down to a basic question:

Is the threat of terrorism so great as to justify the Government taking a huge piss all over the 4th Amendment? Is that reasonable? For every single cell phone and data plan in the nation of 300 million+ people?

My answer is fuck no.

Way to support terrorism, you son of a bitch! Might as well turn all your flags upside down and post MOLON LABE on every website comment section.
 

Metaphoreus

This is semantics, and nothing more
I understand your position but as you are a civilian with no knowledge of what or how many planned attacks happen on U.S soil. You really are not qualified to make an informed decision of whether it's worth it or not. And I'm just being honest here.

This is a joke, right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom