NYT: Some US citizens detained as "illegal immigrants"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gaborn

Member
CITIZEN-articleInline.jpg


A growing number of United States citizens have been detained under Obama administration programs intended to detect illegal immigrants who are arrested by local police officers.

In a spate of recent cases across the country, American citizens have been confined in local jails after federal immigration agents, acting on flawed information from Department of Homeland Security databases, instructed the police to hold them for investigation and possible deportation.

Americans said their vehement protests that they were citizens went unheard by local police officers and jailers for days, with no communication with federal immigration agents to clarify the situation. Any case where an American is held, even briefly, for immigration investigation is a potential wrongful arrest because immigration agents lack legal authority to detain citizens.

“I told every officer I was in front of that I’m an American citizen, and they didn’t believe me,” said Antonio Montejano, who was arrested on a shoplifting charge last month and found himself held on an immigration order for two nights in a police station in Santa Monica, Calif., and two more nights in a teeming Los Angeles county jail cell, on suspicion that he was an illegal immigrant. Mr. Montejano was born in Los Angeles.

This year the immigration agency has been rapidly extending its leading deportation program, known as Secure Communities, with a goal of covering the whole country by 2013. Under that program, fingerprints of every person booked at local jails are checked against Department of Homeland Security immigration databases. If the check results in a match, federal immigration agents can issue detainers, asking local law enforcement authorities to hold a suspect for up to 48 hours.

Detentions of citizens are part of the widening impact on Americans, as well as on immigrants, of President Obama’s enforcement strategies, which have led to more than 1.1 million deportations since the beginning of his term, the highest numbers in six decades.

John Morton, the director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said the agency gave “immediate and close attention” to anyone who claimed to be a citizen.

“We don’t have the power to detain citizens,” Mr. Morton said in an interview on Tuesday. “We obviously take any allegation that someone is a citizen very seriously.”

Later this month, Mr. Morton said, the immigration agency will publish new forms for its detainers. The forms, in several languages, will require the police to notify suspects who are being held on federal immigration authority, he said. They will also provide a hot line where detainees can call the immigration agency directly.

Exact numbers of Americans erroneously held by immigration authorities are hard to come by, since they are not systematically recorded. In one study, 82 people who were held for deportation from 2006 to 2008 at two immigration detention centers in Arizona, for periods as long as a year, were freed after immigration judges determined that they were American citizens.

“Because of the scale of enforcement, the numbers of people who are interacting with Immigration and Customs Enforcement are just enormous right now,” said Jacqueline Stevens, the study’s author and a political science professor at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill.

Ms. Stevens has concluded that “a low but persistent” percentage of the nearly 400,000 people held for deportation each year are citizens.

One was Mr. Montejano, when a holiday shopping outing on Nov. 5 to a Los Angeles mall with his four children ended badly. After his young daughter begged for a $10 bottle of cologne, Mr. Montejano said, he inadvertently dropped it into a bag of things he had already bought. As he left the store, he was arrested.

With no prior criminal record, Mr. Montejano, 40, expected to post bond quickly at the Santa Monica police station on the misdemeanor charge and go home. He had his driver’s license and other legal identification, but because of an immigration detainer he was denied bail and held even after a criminal court judge canceled his fine and ordered the police to let him go.

Mr. Montejano was freed on Nov. 9 after American Civil Liberties Union lawyers sent Immigration and Customs Enforcement his United States passport and birth certificate.

“Just because I made one mistake,” Mr. Montejano said, “I don’t think they should have done all those things to me.”

He said he thought the police did not believe he was an American because of his appearance. “I look Mexican 100 percent,” he said.

Mr. Montejano had triggered a positive match in the Homeland Security Department databases, A.C.L.U. lawyers discovered, because immigration officials had failed once before to recognize his citizenship, mistakenly deporting him to Mexico in 1996. His records were not corrected.

An American college student, Romy Campos, was also trapped in a California jail last month for four days on an immigration detainer. After her Nov. 12 arrest in Torrance on a minor misdemeanor charge, Ms. Campos, 19, was denied bail and transferred to a Los Angeles County jail. A public defender assigned to her in state court said there was nothing he could do to lift a federal detainer.

“Can’t they see in my file or something that I’m a citizen?” Ms. Campos said she asked him. “He said: ‘I’m sorry, but this is state court. I can’t do anything about it.’ ”

After four days, Ms. Campos was released, soon after Jennie Pasquarella, an A.C.L.U. lawyer, provided her Florida birth certificate to the immigration agency.


Ms. Campos said the experience was shocking. “I felt misused completely, I felt nonimportant, I just felt violated by my own country,” she said.

Ms. Campos, a citizen of both the United States and Spain, later learned that she had a Department of Homeland Security record because she had once entered the United States on her Spanish passport.

United States citizens can also be tagged in a Secure Communities fingerprint check because of flukes in the department’s databases. Unlike the federal criminal databases administered by the F.B.I., Homeland Security records include all immigration transactions, not just violations. An immigrant who has always maintained legal status, including those who naturalized to become American citizens, can still trigger a fingerprint match.

According to Margaret Stock, an immigration lawyer in Alaska, under the nation’s complex citizenship laws, many foreign-born people become Americans automatically, through American parents or adoption. Often their citizenship is not recorded in Homeland Security databases, Ms. Stock said.

Other cases of possibly illegal detentions of citizens have been recently reported in Allentown, Pa., Indianapolis and Chicago.

ICE agents generally cancel detainers immediately when they determine that the suspect is a citizen. In no recent cases was an American placed in deportation.

But Ms. Stevens cautioned: “It’s sort of like the canary in the mine. If those who have the full due process rights of U.S. citizens are being detained, it tells us a lot about potentially unlawful people who do not have those protections.”

Story Here

Of all the idiotic, incompetent, stupid...
 
Well, when you live in a police state, you can't blame the prison industrial complex for getting a little overzealous.

Aw hell, I'm sure there's a way we can charge these folks with something! Resisting arrest and willful misrepresentation to a federal agency?
 
Wow, she's hot (and soon to be rich).

Apart from the obvious injustice towards Hispanics I have to say that none of this would be happening if the US introduced personal IDs like every other country out there..
/edit
Upon further reading I realized that it probably still would be happening with or without IDs. Sad..
 
With no prior criminal record, Mr. Montejano, 40, expected to post bond quickly at the Santa Monica police station on the misdemeanor charge and go home. He had his driver’s license and other legal identification, but because of an immigration detainer he was denied bail and held even after a criminal court judge canceled his fine and ordered the police to let him go.

What. The. Fuck.
 
It happens all the time, unfortunately. It's not like there's an easy way to tell the difference, so racial profiling and racial bias start getting in the way.
 
Yes?
They were assumed to be illegal immigrants because a majority of illegal immigrants are hispanic.

That is racial profiling.

The odd thing is that in modern use of the word Hispanic, Ms. Campos wouldn't be a Hispanic.
 
So when you have the federal government trying to work with hundreds of local authorities sometimes there are mistakes? Is this supposed to be shocking? And they're trying to address it?

Later this month, Mr. Morton said, the immigration agency will publish new forms for its detainers. The forms, in several languages, will require the police to notify suspects who are being held on federal immigration authority, he said. They will also provide a hot line where detainees can call the immigration agency directly.

Not bolded of course, for maximum OUTRAGE!!

Also, sorry, Glibertarians, but I have to inform you that St. Paul is just as bad if not worse than Obama on this.

http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/immigration/

* Enforce Border Security – America should be guarding her own borders and enforcing her own laws instead of policing the world and implementing UN mandates.

He also hates the Constitution, btw.

* End Birthright Citizenship – As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be granted U.S. citizenship, we’ll never be able to control our immigration problem.
 
Ron Paul, the only statesman who champions civil liberties, for president in 2012.

Some civil liberties. He thinks states should have the right to discriminate as much as they want - like pass anti-sodomy laws and ban gay marriage. He just doesn't want the federal government to do be able to do it.
 
Some civil liberties. He thinks states should have the right to discriminate as much as they want - like pass anti-sodomy laws and ban gay marriage. He just doesn't want the federal government to do be able to do it.

And he's free to believe that. Sodomy laws will not happen though since Lawrence v Texas. Marriage bans have been happening regardless who is president.
 
Fuck secure communities, such a terrible policy, and this is exactly what its critics warned will happen.

Obama - doubling down on Bush's dumbest policies since 2009.
 
And he's free to believe that. Sodomy laws will not happen though since Lawrence v Texas. Marriage bans have been happening regardless who is president.

And I'm free to believe he's a piss poor advocate for civil liberties. He's also homophobic and very likely a racist, so I'm also free to loathe him on a personal level as well. Yay freedom.
 
And I'm free to believe he's a piss poor advocate for civil liberties. He's also homophobic and very likely a racist, so I'm also free to loathe him on a personal level as well. Yay freedom.

Hey, that's your choice. I hope you feel better now.
 
Ron Paul wants to "secure the border" and "enforce our immigration laws" - i.e. deport people. There is no reason whatsoever to think he'd be handling this any differently.

Ron Paul also wants to undo Lawrence v. Texas, but I'm assured we shouldn't care about that either for some reason.
 
This didn't seem so bad - I mean, it happens, no system is perfect - and they are taking action to prevent it from happening as much in the future (unbolded part of the article). Mind you, the very idea of assuming someone might be an illegal immigrant because they are hispanic is abhorrent.

Aw well, CANADA!
 
And he's free to believe that. Sodomy laws will not happen though since Lawrence v Texas. Marriage bans have been happening regardless who is president.

He IS likely, however, to appoint originalist supreme court justices that aren't a big fan of the civil rights or privacy jurisprudence that Lawrence v. Texas relies on.
 
He IS likely, however, to appoint originalist supreme court justices that aren't a big fan of the civil rights or privacy jurisprudence that Lawrence v. Texas relies on.

He actually wants to render those cases null and void in one stroke via legislation. 1950 America was best America.
 
I would be more mad if these people didn't have the option of suing for violation of their civil liberties as american citizens. The system makes mistakes and the people that aren't supposed to get tangled in it do, which is why we allow them legal recourse. There need to be very clear and strictly enforced guidelines on how these detentions happen. It's an unfortunate byproduct of the rule of law. I don't particularly see these particular incidents as any sort of sign of a systemic problem of limiting the civil rights of US citizens, just poorly designed programs that need to be rethought.
 
Good reminder of the importance of the ACLU (inexplicably hated by the FoxNews crowd). In both the cases described the citizens were only released when the ACLU turned up their passports.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom