If the US is serious about tackling extremism and "perverted" Islam, they have to tackle it at the source of the extremism and perversion, Saudi Arabia.
Let's not go off the deep end. They have oil.
If the US is serious about tackling extremism and "perverted" Islam, they have to tackle it at the source of the extremism and perversion, Saudi Arabia.
What failure are you talking about?
Sure, but Imam Bloggs and his cohort of Islamic Scholars could just as easily say that Obama hasn't got the first idea what he's talking about. You say their view is a self created lie, just as they'd say the same of your view. Which of you does the source material say is correct? My bet is on both and neither.As the president said, daesh view is based off of a self created lie to legitimize and when we legitimize their view, we create a definition of islam outside of what it was in its inception and becsuse people Persue Daesh view as legitimate, it empowrrs them and disempowers moderates
Sure, but Imam Bloggs and his cohort of Islamic Scholars could just as easily say that Obama hasn't got the first idea what he's talking about. You say their view is a self created lie, just as they'd say the same of your view. Which of you does the source material say is correct? My bet is on both and neither.
If you actually read the excerpt, I'm pretty clearly talking about the attempt to get Al Qaeda and ISIS to work together, just to attempt to secure the release of one America hostage, and how dangerous it would have been had it worked and Al Qaeda and ISIS moved closer to each other.
Let's not go off the deep end. They have oil.
I get what you are saying but why is relevant if it didn't actually work?
I'm not sure why year old quotes are relevant to today.
So do we. US produces almost as much as Saudi Arabia. US imports more oil from Canada than it does from Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia exports mostly to Asia.
Definitely agree. Extremism and terrorism will exist, if religion didn't exist, they'll find a different justification and will just find a way to blame the other party.
Yes, are you saying Wahabbism isn't a form of islam?
And at any rate it is clearly religion to the terrorist themselves so it strikes me as immensely stupid for Obama to let religion off the hook.
Wahabism is a direct contributer to the motivation and goals of many of the islamic terrorists.
No, but it's used as a justification for terrorism, and it's used as a recruiting tool for terrorism, and it's used as a basis for selecting victims of terrorism....
What a load of crap. It definitely plays a part.
It kind of is a bit.
It's like saying racism isn't responsible for hate crimes.
It's a global market though so the price would go up for everyone unless we put into place price controls. I think it would be justified if we actually went after the root of the problem though.
Because the fact that they even tried to get Al Qaeda and ISIS to work together shows how little they understand the differences between the two groups.
As I said, the rift between those groups is based on different interpretations of religious doctrine. Could refusing to acknowledge that they're both fundamentalist Islamic groups who base their ideology on religious texts, and bizarrely (and against all evidence) dismissing them as not-Islamic terrorists, be the reason for this dangerous failure?
This dangerous failure was not much of failure if it didn't even work is my point.
Whether Obama classifies them as islamic terrorist or non islamic terrorist does not matter.
What we do know is that they arose to power due to a authority vacuum in the middle east.
Their resources were also underestimated.
Labeling them islamic or unislamic has very little to do with the situation as it is today.
Just as there is very little point to furthering the idea this is a religious conflict with the west. Implying that "Islam", radical or extremist, is what we are fighting gives ISIS more power to convert followers.
Whether or not the religion is the cause is one thing, but why make it easier for ISIS to frame it however they want? They want an ideological or religious war and you do not fight an enemy on their terms, its like the second rule of warfare.
What we're fighting is people.At least by acknowledging that what we're fighting is radical, violent Islam.
Quran 9:29
Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.
Quran 9:30
The Jews say, "Ezra is the son of Allah "; and the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allah ." That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?
Quran 61:9
It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to manifest it over all religion, although those who associate others with Allah dislike it.
What we're fighting is people.what we're fighting is radical, violent Islam.
When we were fighting the Nazis you could also say "What we're fighting is people" but that's rather meaningless because we were not fighting all people, but those who were Nazis specifically.
Venn Diagram
big circle: all people
little circle inside it: fundamentalist Islamic terrorist groups made up of, yes, people
Whoa are we equating islam with nazism now . Wow
Whoa are we equating islam with nazism now . Wow
Read it again.
It's not meaningless when we've got mosques burning and muslims being murdered.
Whoa are we equating islam with nazism now . Wow
I did
guns don't kill people
Are you being intentionally obtuse? It's clear that he's talking about categorization. Sure it's poes law, but we do sort people by what they align with. Whether that's democrat, pacifist, atheist, Christian, Buddhist, nazi, or , muslim.I did
Are you just looking for something to be offended by? Replace Nazism with Communism (the Cold War) if that will make you actually pay attention to the argument being made instead of immediately playing the outrage card.
The common thread is "things fought against, past and present" not anything beyond that...
Are you being intentionally obtuse? It's clear that he's talking about categorization. Sure it's poes law, but we do sort people by what they align with. Whether that's democrat, pacifist, atheist, Christian, Buddhist, nazi, or , muslim.
Quran 9:29
Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.
Quran 9:30
The Jews say, "Ezra is the son of Allah "; and the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allah ." That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?
Quran 61:9
It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to manifest it over all religion, although those who associate others with Allah dislike it.
Most people can see right through for the intentional nuance
Thankfully Obama gives me hope as an American Muslim. Unlike the shit stirring I see in a Lot of GAF threads lately.
What we're fighting is people.
At least you're not a Sam Harris type and at least qualified by saying 'radical, violent Islam' rather than just 'Islam'. I'll give you that.
Well of course we're fighting people. Duh! During WWII did the Allies refer to their enemies as "people" as well? No! They called them what they were: Germans, Japanese and Italians.
We're fighting radical Islamic extremists. Period!
Obama said:"Humanity has been grappling with these questions throughout human history. Lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ."
Most Jews, Christians, and Muslims are good people, despite the backwards, morally abhorrent shit in their holy texts. You don't reach those people by telling them that, though. It takes patience and example and love to win them over. They must resolve their own rational failings in their own time.
Socially speaking, an reformation of Islam towards a pacifistic interpretation would be a great thing for the world. Preach hateful condemnation in writing over bombs and guns. Teach the believers that mixing their faith with government is against their interest.
Pretty sure Bush said the same thing after 9/11.
Wonder how much hear he got from Fox at the time?
I couldn't disagree more with your first, second, and last sentences... everything but the power vacuum / underestimated part.
And I strongly suggest you read that full article for a better understanding of what ISIS really is (Salafist muslims whose views mainly differ from others regarding takfir, or excommunication, who have founded a caliphate led by a descendant from the Quraysh tribe of the Prophet Mohammed)... If that's not Islamic what exactly is Islamic?
What is islamic about them when they fail all tests of how a moral muslim should be?
I somewhat agree. Terrorism is a result of unstable crazy people. However I don't feel that Religion gets off free and clear here. Religion is the uniting force for unstable crazy people to find common ground and then decide to defend that institution that bonds them at all costs.