Some of us want to game in actual HD resolutions, and at something better than 30FPS.~Kinggi~ said:..since everything is shifting to consoles.
1280*720 and 1920*1080 are HD resolutions.Ikuu said:Some of us want to game in actual HD resolutions, and at something better than 30FPS.
~Kinggi~ said:\Not too long ago i was really excited to get a new beefed up gaming machine, but every time that happens i always get brought back down to reality as to how not worth it it is to spend the money for just a handful of games since everything is shifting to consoles.
Some of us want our hardware to render at HD resolutions, not to scale to HD resolutions.~Kinggi~ said:1280*720 and 1920*1080 are HD resolutions.
~Kinggi~ said:1280*720 and 1920*1080 are HD resolutions.
thats the windows vista experience index you're describing. it goes as high as 5.9. other than that i dont know.McLovin said:Quick question. Is there a program that looks at your computer and tells you whats keeping it back? Like you have a good graphics card but your processor sucks.. or you don't have enough ram.
If a program like this doesn't exist here are my specs... maybe one of you could help me out.
Q6600 2.40ghz quad core
3gb of ram(stock ram... would upgrading to gaming ram help much?)
Stock mother board(not sure what it is.. whatever hp uses on their m9040n PCs)
8800gts os 614mb of ram(I know the gts one isn't as good as gt or gtx but I cant afford an new card)
any help would be much appreciated.
edit- Also is mixing ram with different clock speeds a bad idea?
~Kinggi~ said:\Not too long ago i was really excited to get a new beefed up gaming machine, but every time that happens i always get brought back down to reality as to how not worth it it is to spend the money for just a handful of games since everything is shifting to consoles.
Knowing that makes me fell a lot better. I was thinking it was out of 10 and was wondering why my brand new quad was only getting 5.9.Broseybrose said:thats the windows vista experience index you're describing. it goes as high as 5.9. other than that i dont know.
if you mix ram of different speeds your BIOS should default to run at the lowest one's speed.
get an 8800GT. no doubt best bang for buck this gen and cheaper than your 640MB.
Spy said:I'm back again and want you to tell me what you think of this final (really) build.
The only upgrade I'd do in the future would be removing the E8400 for the E8600 then build my little brother a computer with the E8400.
I'm sorry but when someone starts a sentence like this :Hajaz said:no offence, but its pretty stupid to buy a new gpu now. both nvidea and ATI are about to launch new series of cards this month.
According to OBR@Xtremesystems, 4850 in Crossfire offer a better gaming experience than GTX280. that means that a 300$ crossfire setup will run circles around the current top cards easily
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=3047486&postcount=1390
I can't help but call Bullshit.This score in Crysis are authentical....
Kind of, but you don't really want NV notebook cards :-/ I find them generally inferior to their ATI versions (until you get to high end where there are no ATI versions..)MeowMeow said:has nvidia made new graphic cards for laptops? :/
bathala said:finally got my desktop and now time to get a graphic card. I didn't know u have to buy a PSU
my stock is 300 max so if i want 8800 GT card need at least 500w PSU and my budget is below $90
thinking of getting this Corsair PSU.
VictimOfGrief said:Reports coming out that the Nehalem chipset is going to be delayed.
Story over @ X-bit : here
~Kinggi~ said:\Not too long ago i was really excited to get a new beefed up gaming machine, but every time that happens i always get brought back down to reality as to how not worth it it is to spend the money for just a handful of games since everything is shifting to consoles.
exactly, I'm not a hardcore PC gamer. I'm not going to spend over $200 on a graphics card. I have the consoles for main gamingZaraki_Kenpachi said:"no offence, but its pretty stupid to buy a new gpu now. both nvidea and ATI are about to launch new series of cards this month.
According to OBR@Xtremesystems, 4850 in Crossfire offer a better gaming experience than GTX280. that means that a 300$ crossfire setup will run circles around the current top cards easily
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1390"
No offense, but he probably doesn't have a crossfire motherboard so things like that are completely irrelevant to him. If he needs a card though he probably doesn't want to wait too.
looking at newegg. the only 500w they have is over $100 my budget is below $90aznpxdd said:If you are going to buy a Corsair PSU, go with the HX series, they are made by Seasonic.
This is true. I will upgrade my Quad Core to a 3.0GHz Quad that AMD will release by the end of the year, but nothing more than that. More than 4 cores is overkill.VictimOfGrief said:While I'm not downplaying Intel's newest chip (thanks to the benchmarks out there), while it would be nice to have a 4 logic core chip w/ Hyper-Threading for "8" cores, the software really needs to get it's shit in gear and I hope Windows is coded for a multi-core environment and I hope the 64bit advancements in Vista help make Windows 7 64-bit more well rounded.
Either way though, it's a neat thing and if you're getting a new PC, then go for the Nehelam, but for people like me.... I don't see the need for upgrading my Quad-Core for at least 4 years or so. GPU--- sure, but CPU? not so much.
He already proved he has the cards with pictures. Look at the thread. Right now, it may be because of drivers, but you cannot call bullshit on him. He has no NDA signed because he got the cards early from an ATI partner to write about them for the magazine he works for. Right now he just got called by AMD, and he wont post benches because he is trying to not generate a conflict between his magazine and AMD, but his benches will show up in the magazine he works for, and in 2 weeks when the NDA's are lifted.VictimOfGrief said:I'm sorry but when someone starts a sentence like this :
I can't help but call Bullshit.
You don't need a 500w for a 8800gt. I've been using a 8800gt with a 420w psu just fine for a long time now. Everything is working great.Zaraki_Kenpachi said:"looking at newegg. the only 500w they have is over $100 my budget is below $90"
As long as you don't have massive loads of stuff on your computer you should be fine with a good 350-400 watt power supply if you just want a 8800GT IIRC.
my PSU (stock) is 300w is that okay.DarkAngelYuna said:You don't need a 500w for a 8800gt. I've been using a 8800gt with a 420w psu just fine for a long time now. Everything is working great.
bathala said:my PSU (stock) is 300w is that okay.
i did the whole newegg power calculator and with my config it showed 464w (if i added 8800gt)
ok thanks I thought I could get away not buy a Power supplyDarkAngelYuna said:300 is way too weak for a 8800gt.
Not to be an asshole, but the 4850 is being released this week, and it costs less than the 9800GTX and offers way better performance. About 20%. The benchmarks just got released today. If by any chance you can still chance your build do it.Spy said:Well I just ordered the PC I listed above GAF. I'll let everyone know how it is when I build it.
No, wait because this week the 4850 is being released at $200 and it thrumps any current videocard.SteveO409 said:Hey guys, I found a decent deal on a computer and was wondering how it would run games like Age of Conan and other current games.
Vostro 400, Intel Core2 Duo CPU E8300
2GB DDR2 SDRAM 800MHz, Dual Channel DT (Could take 2 gigs of RAM from my old PC)
ATI Radeon HD 3800 Series
godhandiscen said:Not to be an asshole, but the 4850 is being released this week, and it costs less than the 9800GTX and offers way better performance. About 20%. The benchmarks just got released today. If by any chance you can still chance your build do it.
No, wait because this week the 4850 is being released at $200 and it thrumps any current videocard.
Both released this week. Full abailability in a week or two. Even if AMD benchmarks are too optimistic, you know they will achieve this in the long run with driver revisions.
Just get the 4870 if you can. Look for compatibility with your motherboard though in case you want to crossfire later.Spy said:You know, maybe something is telling me to get the ATI Radeon HD 4870. I didn't order the graphics card yet because I was trying to find a website selling the EVGA 9800 GTX SSC but they're all backordered. I have never had an ATI card.
Then the 4870X2 will be $1000? Thats just ridiculous. Even if AMD went batshit insane and started charging more for its cards it would be $400 at most. The chip costs already were released and AMD/ATI are making a lot of money by selling them at $350. AMD also wants to force Nvidia to hurt itself. Nvidia will have to lower its prices if the benchmarks are true, and the GTX280 which was initially expected to be at $600+ dollars is now expected to sell at a loss according to the people that have benched the 4850 and the GTX280 and say that 2x4850 in CX mode perform better.Trax416 said:Still waiting for retailers to put up prices.
the Q9450 was suppose to be $260 retail. Intel also suggests it retails for that price (according to Tank guys).
I wouldn't be surprised if the 4870 was closer to $500.
Wait a week, the 8800 will go down in price.JRPereira said:Can someone link me to the cheapest, best (I'm hearing things like the 2-slot cooler 8800GTs are pretty loud and inefficient, and the 1-slot ones are better) 8800GT available atm? Preferably newegg or mwave (I'd rather mwave, considering the amount of DOA's newegg keeps shipping me).
JRPereira said:Can someone link me to the cheapest, best (I'm hearing things like the 2-slot cooler 8800GTs are pretty loud and inefficient, and the 1-slot ones are better) 8800GT available atm? Preferably newegg or mwave (I'd rather mwave, considering the amount of DOA's newegg keeps shipping me).
AMD wouldn't be responsible for it, the retailers would. Retailers love to take advantage of demand.godhandiscen said:Then the 4870X2 will be $1000? Thats just ridiculous. Even if AMD went batshit insane and started charging more for its cards it would be $400 at most. The chip costs already were released and AMD/ATI are making a lot of money by selling them at $350. AMD also wants to force Nvidia to hurt itself. Nvidia will have to lower its prices if the benchmarks are true, and the GTX280 which was initially expected to be at $600+ dollars is now expected to sell at a loss according to the people that have benched the 4850 and the GTX280 and say that 2x4850 in CX mode perform better.
godhandiscen said:Wait a week, the 8800 will go down in price.
What is your budget? If the benches hold true, you could even be able to buy 2x8800s.JRPereira said:Works for me. I'm a bit worried about the performance increase. Generally I've heard that I can get 2-4x the performance of my 7800gtx, however I'm mostly buying the card for Savage 2 (despite not looking as good, it seems to have crysis-like requirements if you crank the details up) and I'm not sure how well the game will take advantage of it.
My specs:
evga 7800gtx ko (256mb)
asus m2n32sli deluxe
amd64x2 4600
2gb mwave value ram
windows xp pro
zoku88 said:AMD wouldn't be responsible for it, the retailers would. Retailers love to take advantage of demand.
Then wait, I would say. Right now newegg has good prices on the 8800 just type "8800" in the search, however, they could get better.JRPereira said:I'm not going SLI. There's a major bug in savage 2 which screws performance with SLI and one 8800GT should be able to get me locked at 60fps with vsync on and the details turned as high as they go.
My Budget is preferably closer to $150 and no higher than $200 (including shipping if that can be figured out).