Odrion said:It's going to go like this.
damn you I thought that was real! I had a hard-on!
Odrion said:It's going to go like this.
Christopher said:you did that on purpose.
Twilight Princess is the worst Zelda game ever - stay away. (it's not a BAD game, it's just not the best zelda game)
Scenester said:damn you I thought that was real! I had a hard-on!
Christopher said:I'm hoping it looks something like this (wow am I bored today):
PLEASE
Somehow I think 3 titles is more in-line with realism than 2 high-profile titles in one week.Iam Canadian said:(I kept it a two-game week to keep it within the bounds of realism.)
WII-KLY UPDATE: TWO NEW CLASSIC GAMES ADDED TO WII SHOP CHANNEL
March 3, 2008
Earthbound: (SNES®, 1 player, Rated E for Everyone - Fantasy Violence, 800 Wii Points): You asked for it, and finally we caved. Join a bizarre cast of characters in one of the most unique RPGs ever made. It's the game everyone's been begging for, and we had to shut them up somehow.
Princess Tomato in Salad Kingdom: (NES, 1 player, Rated E for Everyone, 500 Wii points): Minister Pumpkin and his evil Farmies are threatening the kingdom of Saladoria! As the brave Sir Cucumber, it's up to you to thwart their evil plans in this colorful point-and-click adventure from Hudson Soft.
It was released on NES, then on GBA only in Japan in one of the Hudson compilation carts. You might be thinking of Tomato Adventure.JSnake said:I thought PTiSK was a GBA game...
Cheesemeister said:I'm guessing the PR isn't coming today.
speedpop said:Definitely grab LttP, it's my favourite Zelda title but cops a bit of flak on here at times due to people having played OoT first or Link's Awakening.
But LttP was the start of the whole light vs dark world scenario.
Captain N said:Any chance we'll see Smash Bros. 64 on Monday?
BooJoh said:Somehow I think 3 titles is more in-line with realism than 2 high-profile titles in one week.
I keep seeing this thrown out but I really am not convinced that original Smash is as obsolete as the posters in this thread say it is. Melee may be a better game overall but I know many people who would rather play SSB in parties than Melee, which is popular with the tourney crowd and as a result, many people can't play it without making it about how they can win the most matches. Melee also seems less pick-up-and-play than original Smash, although that is debatable.Odrion said:Yeah, I think it's very likely it's going to be just Smash Brothers. That'll be sorta kinda cool, but a tad pointless.
Nostalgia is the reason, which is what fuels most people's VC purchases.JasonMCG said:I won't be buying Smash - I honestly don't see why anyone would with Brawl coming out in less than a week.
gwiz210 said:Nostalgia is the reason, which is what fuels most people's VC purchases.
WIIKLY MIIKLY UPDATE! MIIKLY'S ARE IN!
March 3rd 2008
Whats a "Miikly" you ask? Its a week that there are no vc games. Instead there are Miis on the Wii Shop. WiiPoints vary/
Launch titles:
NOA_REGGIE Mii (2000 WiiPoints, rated A for Teen,)
Mario (5000 WiiPoints, Rated E for 10 and under)
ITS OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!!!!!!!! (9001 WiiPoints, Rated 9 for Nine)
It makes you want to Miikly, huh?
I think you should stop immediately.WiiRevolution1 said:Oh cool I thought of another fake PR:
So what do yall think?
You should stop making stuff up.WiiRevolution1 said:So what do yall think?
Firestorm said:I'd buy Smash 64 again and try to 100% it before Brawl enough though I have like 3 sealed games I haven't opened and another 3 games I've opened but haven't even put into my systems
![]()
WiiRevolution1 said:Oh cool I thought of another fake PR:
So what do yall think?
WiiRevolution1 said:Oh cool I thought of another fake PR:
So what do yall think?
Excel tells me that I'd never played 62.50% of the VC games I have. For the others, I think it's more frequently quality than nostalgia. But then, I'm not terribly representative of "most people."gwiz210 said:Nostalgia is the reason, which is what fuels most people's VC purchases.
Stop for the sake of all of us. :|WiiRevolution1 said:So what do yall think?
Jiggy37 said:Excel tells me that I'd never played 62.50% of the VC games I have. For the others, I think it's more frequently quality than nostalgia. But then, I'm not terribly representative of "most people."
Stop for the sake of all of us. :|
Only at costume parties.Firestorm said:I thought you were Excel?
Well, besides just games I didn't play, there's also the category of games I had played but never owned, which makes up 14.58%. I'd experienced Kirby's Adventure and Zelda II via... certain means. And I'd played ActRaiser, Super Castlevania IV, Legend of the Mystical Ninja, Donkey Kong Country 1, and Super Metroid via friends or other people I knew who owned or rented them. Super Turrican, when that comes out, will also fall into that category of having played it through someone else, and the same will be true of games like Castlevania III, Fire 'N' Ice, Demon's Crest, EVO, Shadowrun, The Twisted Tales of Spike McFang, Zombies Ate My Neighbors, and Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon. And Chip 'n' Dale Rescue Rangers, Duck Tales, Little Nemo: The Dream Master, Lufia and the Fortress of Doom, and Mischief Makers, if against all odds any of those ever show up.Iam Canadian said:Yes, I don't often purchase VC games that I already own on other systems. There are exceptions, of course, but as a general rule, I use the Virtual Console as a means of discovering retro games that I missed the first time around, rather than as a nostalgia vehicle.
well thats not entirely true.. Actraiser is an Enix game for example.. he said that SE games will only be released if they dont see any chances for those games to be remaked...EphemeralDream said:For those who don't listen, the most recent Retronauts went a little into the state of Square-Enix releases on VC. From what I can recall from my half-awake state, Mr. Parish refers to his interview with a chief player at the company (can't remember the name, don't feel like looking through the podcast for it) who basically admitted that SE will likely not be releasing any major titles to VC. These are the titles that could potentially be remade, ported, etc.
So yes, SE 'fessed up to what was expected. This is not such a terrible state if it really only refers to the DQ and FF lines, which have in many cases received superior treatments over the years, but the importance of titles like CT will continue to fade in time.
EphemeralDream said:For those who don't listen, the most recent Retronauts went a little into the state of Square-Enix releases on VC. From what I can recall from my half-awake state, Mr. Parish refers to his interview with a chief player at the company (can't remember the name, don't feel like looking through the podcast for it) who basically admitted that SE will likely not be releasing any major titles to VC. These are the titles that could potentially be remade, ported, etc.
So yes, SE 'fessed up to what was expected. This is not such a terrible state if it really only refers to the DQ and FF lines, which have in many cases received superior treatments over the years, but the importance of titles like CT will continue to fade in time.