soundwave05 said:Yeah, a coin toss would be crazy.
They should at least play a game of one-on-one basketball or something for it.
that would be amazing, but what about a game of counterstrike on some kind of baghdad map
soundwave05 said:Yeah, a coin toss would be crazy.
They should at least play a game of one-on-one basketball or something for it.
snapty00 said:Geez. Did he really say that? :lol It really is basically impossible. With 99% of Ohio reporting, Bush has 51% and Kerry had 48%. Even if the last 1% were all for Kerry, he wouldn't win.
600000? I heard from 175000 to 250000. Unles you are talking nationally.Shompola said:There are upwards 600,000 provisionaly votes not counted. So in theory it isn't impossible at all.
Meier said:What's this I am hearing that the % of provisional votes accepted is generally less than 30% due to error, etc.? The Democrats need 200 of 250k to come close in Ohio as is but that isnt even accounting for the fact that likely only 50k of them will even be accepted. What a trip.
Shompola said:There are upwards 600,000 provisionaly votes not counted. So in theory it isn't impossible at all.
I've heard all three numbers on TV. It seems like they're treating 600,000 as an absolute maximum, but the expected number will be somewhere in the 200,000-250,000. And with those numbers, it is mathematically possible for Kerry to win. It's just not very realistic.Society said:600000? I heard from 175000 to 250000. Unles you are talking nationally.
Well I can see why you are a Republican, as you are grossly mis informed. In 2000 90% of provisional votes in Ohio were accepted.
Kiriku said:If I understood this correctly, they count each state with a number of electoral votes that is representative for the number of people living there, right? But why not count all the votes all over the country and add them together instead of using representative numbers like that? Wouldn't that make it more fair?
Society said:Well I can see why you are a Republican, as you are grossly misinformed. In 2000 90% of provisional votes in Ohio were accepted.
Given his popularity, he'll probably just send his concession through his Yahoo fan mailing list.Hollywood said:Dude the secretary of state in ohio said its around 175,000. DAMNIT STOP FIGHTING IT!
SLEEEEEPPP.
Has Ralph Nader conceded yet?
It's to prevent the voice of smaller states from getting washed out by the more massive votes of the large states. It's sort of a compromise between giving weight to population and making sure every state feels like it has a say.Kiriku said:If I understood this correctly, they count each state with a number of electoral votes that is representative for the number of people living there, right? But why not count all the votes all over the country and add them together instead of using representative numbers like that? Wouldn't that make it more fair?
I mean, let's say there are two states with the same amount of electoral votes. In one state candidate A wins with 80-20, and in the other candidate B wins with 51-49. Is it really fair to give them the same weight?
I'm just wondering, what is the point with this system? The advantages?
You're not hallucinating, but that was like 15 minutes ago, so something strange might still be up.Hollywood said:Shit maybe I'm hallucinating ... but Dan Rather just said Bush just broke the all time record for votes in US History.
Like with Kerry would have been different...Funky Papa said:I respect the decision of the american people, but I can't understand it. I think this will be a very sad day not only for the USA but for the whole world.
It's true. Remember, the US population is larger than ever before, and the voter turnout was pretty massive.Hollywood said:Shit maybe I'm hallucinating ... but Dan Rather just said Bush just broke the all time record for votes in US History.
Tenguman said:I heard that only 17% of the youth vote bothered to vote, about the same as 2000
PRETTY FUCKING SAD
Pretty much. I don't think either one is out to screw any other country, but I certainly do think they're going to put the U.S. first, seeing as how they were elected by the American people, not foreigners.ourumov said:Like with Kerry would have been different...
Both Kerry and Bush want the best for their country and it's a natural reaction. PERIOD. Unless Kerry cared more about the whole world than his own home, things would be exactly the same.
I see Ford and GM leaving Spain soon...
soundwave05 said:The youth vote could've helped Kerry, but there's too much damn apathy with that crowd.
Bush is a likeable guy who doesn't pretend he's smarter than you and loves God (and God loves him).Do The Mario said:The US economy is also doing poorly, can someone please tell me what the bush government did right during its first term?
Tenguman said:I'm sure at least 20% was going to vote Kerry but forgot to register
WHAT? WE HAVE TO REGISTER?!?
soundwave05 said:The youth vote could've helped Kerry, but there's too much damn apathy with that crowd.
I hope Bush does reinstitute the draft, just to give some of these kids a kick in the ass.