subzero9285 said:Re-introduce ground effects, turbos, single-deck diffusers, smaller rear/front wings, unlimited testing, and ban all of Tilke's tracks except Turkey.
Great image, sadly spoiled by the Crown prince and Bernie.santi_yo said:
subzero9285 said:Great image, sadly spoiled by the Crown prince and Bernie.
avaya said:You are so polite. I would day it's spolied by the pack of cunts at the front.
Tilke should be prosecuted for crimes against motorsport
Kimi was having a shit ?santi_yo said:
Goldrusher said:Kimi was having a Choc ice ?
Reno7728 said:Team of the week: Lotus, a fantastic achievement to get 2 cars to the finish, and goes to show that having experience through the heart of a team is the key when entering the sport
Explain that to Kubica and Sutil.AndyD said:Glad there was no big pileup in the first corner
Although Michael Schumacher had "good fun" in Bahrain, the seven-time F1 World Champion admits it was all rather boring.
Schumi made his return to F1 racing at this weekend's Bahrain GP, starting from seventh place on the grid.
But aside from overtaking Mark Webber at the start to move up to sixth, there were no other major moves on the German's part - or made on him by others.
And that, quite simply, is because "overtaking is basically impossible", as Schumi said summing up F1's biggest problem.
"It's the start and then after it is just sort of go your pace and not do mistakes," he told the BBC.
"Overtaking is basically impossible, other than if somebody makes a mistake - Lewis (Hamilton) had a little one so Nico (Rosberg) was able to pass him, but got back past at the pit stop. That's about it.
"That's the action we are going to have unfortunately with this kind of environment of race strategy.
"But, anyway, it was good fun. Especially the beginning and now we are going to work forward in order to catch up what is in front of us."
And although some were hoping for more from the 41-year-old, the Mercedes GP driver insists he is pleased with his P6.
"I can live very well with sixth position and it gives both me and the team a good base to make progress. I have every confidence that we will improve the car," he said.
"Working with the team for our first race together was very positive and the guys did a great job so I would like to thank them for their support in my comeback race.
"We all know that we have some way to go but we will get there. The season is long."
pretty much. everyone was just 'managing' their cars over the distance.Reno7728 said:He wasn't the only one...
http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/6026891/Schumi-Good-fun-but-rather-boring
Goldrusher said:Explain that to Kubica and Sutil.
GitarooMan said:Agree with the sentiment that it was a very boring race to start the year, I always thought the no refueling was a bad idea. We'll see how it develops though, hopefully it will get more interesting.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82145Whitmarsh told the BBC that something needed to be done to change the dynamic of the racing - perhaps by revisiting a mandatory two pitstops rule or making tyre compounds more on edge.
"We were one of three teams, that said we should have two mandatory pitstops because we were worried about [people] one-stopping.
"I think we have to re-examine that. But I think if we can now push on Bridgestone to have 'racier' tyres, we need a super-soft tyre that is really going to hurt if you take it to 20 laps. You shouldn't be able to do that with a super-soft tyre and I think even the prime, if it's a struggle to get it to do half a race distance, then you force [the issue].
"The tyres were much closer in the race than we expected and they determined the spectacle," he added. "There was no real serious degradation of the tyres, we started the roll of pitstops because we were trying to get ahead of [Nico] Rosberg and everyone started to come in at that point.
"But otherwise, just based on tyre degradation, we could have run to lap 25 or more on the super-soft tyres. If you can do that on the softest tyre, then the primes are just going to romp through for as long as you like."
Bobo said:Dull race but it's really nice to see Massa back racing and Alonso in a good car again.
Anyway I found what Martin Whitmarsh was saying on the BBC F1 Forum quite interesting.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82145
Then I started to have a problem, definitely the whole race in terms of temperature in the car. That made a lot of fuel consumption, so I started to save fuel maybe in the last 25 laps, even 30 laps to go. I was saving fuel and there was nothing to do anymore. I was also lucky with the problem with Sebastian Vettel to pass him and gain some more points and I was lucky that Lewis was not so quick at the end, so I could manage to save a lot of fuel and also hold the position.
S. L. said:pretty much. everyone was just 'managing' their cars over the distance.
yay
Bobo said:Dull race but it's really nice to see Massa back racing and Alonso in a good car again.
Anyway I found what Martin Whitmarsh was saying on the BBC F1 Forum quite interesting.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82145
avaya said:Not gas guzzling engine. The problem is the cooling, when the fuel gets hot it vaporises. They need to sort the cooling out.
EDIT:
Making the racing more interesting. Forget banning wings, that will cost the entire grid close to $1bn in lost sponsorship money.
Easy way to fix it is to increase the braking zone - you do this by making them use shittier brakes. When you have a 150m braking zone it is easier to pass than just a 50m zone. It is the simplest change possible. No extra cost.
moojito said:Would we still have Massa on the grid if they'd had this last year?
While I'll certainly agree with that and with the banning of double deck diffusers next year (correct me if I'm wrong) that should help somewhat, but Whitmarsh was talking more about an immediate fix. I don't think there should be any rash decision either way about the rules at least not until after the Malaysian GP.Aegus said:Or they could just make the cars not as dependant on aerodynamic packages.
i shake my fist at those who picked liuzzi over sutil. crazy people they are!Reno7728 said:The anticipation of the fantasy league results is killing me...
Same.Reno7728 said:The anticipation of the fantasy league results is killing me...
subzero9285 said:Same.
The site was down for maintenance last time I checked.
Heh, Lewis called it before RBR announced it. They told him exhaust, but Lewis said Vettel's engine wasn't firing on all banks on team radio. I REALLY love the McLaren website, btw. Awesome balance between that, live timing and the streams provided.navanman said:It was the engine not the exhaust that was the problem for Vettel.
A spark plug fault caused him lose power and the race win.
Because they bought the best fuel, Those cheaters. *scrapes winnings together to buy better fuel.*Reno7728 said:Complain mode: How can so many of the top teams have Senna driving (DSwii and his two non finishing drivers *shakes fist*)
the top teams scored with the ferrari fuel i guessReno7728 said:Complain mode: How can so many of the top teams have Senna driving (DSwii and his two non finishing drivers *shakes fist*)
Also the prices and money for your teams has been updated, but no changes can be made yet.
I did quite well on the betting but just over 1mil short for shell... there is a bonus question still to come, I guess sometime during the week?S. L. said:Bobo: Mcl fuel it is next race
Pimpwerx said:Top teams overall were
Sen Kov For For She
I wanted both Force Indias, but couldn't make the numbers work with Liuzzi. I knew Liuzzi could point, so I wanted him, but apparently driver points don't weight enough. Matter of fact, I'd say drivers ain't shit. Next race I'm probably going with the two Lotus drivers (since their cars might actually finish) and then just try to get the best combo with the rest of the parts. PEACE.
EDIT: There's a subleague competition too, and our league is 3rd of 9. Not bad.