Leunam said:Money worries just went out the window for Sauber.
Poor bastard :lolDeadman said:So did nick heidfeld :lol
AutosportRichard Branson has backed the call from Lotus boss Tony Fernandes to get rid of blue flags in grand prix racing.
Fernandes, whose team has made its Formula 1 debut this year, said earlier this season that he believed the sport would benefit from not having blue flags.
"Drivers are paid to overtake, whether they are back markers or at the front," said Fernandes back in May. "I think it would be good for the sport to get rid of blue flags. In the days of Ken Tyrrell, he would never let any car pass.
"If it's really hard for a world champion to get past a backmarker then I think it's a sad day for racing. I think racing is all about getting past people and overtaking and adding a little bit of 'je ne sais quoi'.
"You've got a driver saying it's ridiculous that he's lapping someone four times, so why should he be complaining about overtaking a guy that he's lapping four times?"
Branson, the main backer of newcomer Virgin Racing, agreed with Fernandes, as he reckons the sport would be more entertaining without them.
"It would be a lot more fun if they didn't have blue flags," said Branson. "I am sure some of the more established teams would not like it, but it is a racing track and they should not have to be told to pull over.
"If that is what Tony is saying, I definitely agree with him. It doesn't sound like racing - and it makes a bit of a mockery of the sport."
Virgin Racing's CEO Graeme Lowdon reckons blue flags hurt smaller teams too much, as they lose big amounts of time letting the leading drivers through.
"We get a blue flag three seconds before someone approaches us, and at the moment three seconds is almost a lap and you have to let them by within four corners," he said. "So we have situations where our guys are pulling to one side and the car behind cannot catch up.
"It's a massive compromise over the whole of a race. We do this graph of time against distance, and you look at the graph and you immediately see where the blue flags start because up to a point of the race we are there or thereabouts in terms of pace, but then it drops away.
"The issue is that you get the flags so early - and three seconds is quite a long time. And you have to tell your driver to let the guy past but you cannot speed the car up behind. It has ruined a lot of racing for us."
DrM said:
Adam CooperLotus will source its gearbox and hydraulics system from Red Bull Technology in 2011, rather than Renault as had been widely assumed.
In fact Renault was never in a position to supply a transmission to go with its engine, and at one stage Lotus was looking at a deal with McLaren although when I suggested as much on Twitter a few weeks ago I got a few sceptical replies! However the RBT arrangement is clearly preferable as both teams will use the same engine and Lotus will in effect share the whole rear end of Adrian Neweys RB7.
The news also emphasises that RBT wants to create as much extra income as possible, rather than rely on a massive subsidy from Austria as mentioned in my story yesterday.
Like the other new teams Lotus has suffered badly with its bought-in hydraulics system this year, and did not want a repeat next season.
In a team statement Mike Gascoyne said:The announcement that we have reached a multi-year agreement with Red Bull Technology for the supply of our gearboxes and hydraulics from 2011 is obviously a massive step forward for us, both in engineering terms, and as an expression of our ambitions for next year and for future Championships. The gearbox/hydraulics package obviously plays a critical role in the performance of the car, not just on track but in design and packaging terms, and this deal gives our design and aero teams a very exciting platform to work with.
The removal of the double diffusers in 2011 will allow the whole grid to tighten up the rear bodywork and mechanical structures around the gearbox, and this supply deal will allow us to capitalise on that with our 2011 car. Exciting times lie ahead!
Christian Horner added: We are very pleased about Lotus Racings decision to use Red Bull Technology gearboxes and hydraulic systems from 2011. The fact that Red Bull Technology has been chosen to be a supplier to another team despite its short history demonstrates how much we have achieved since our first season. We very much look forward to working with Lotus Racing from 2011 onwards.
Pretty sure Mclaren spends more than Ferrari.navanman said:Major bankroll for them.
On that note, Adam Cooper has a great article on Red Bull funding of RBR in 2009 based on their latest financial figures.
The Austrian drinks company pumped 100 million pounds into RBR in 2009 and probably even more this season to try and win both championships.
That's up their with McLaren budget and not far off Ferrari.
Good news for them for sure, and I want them to do well, so I hope it works out for them.navanman said:
Seanspeed said:Pretty sure Mclaren spends more than Ferrari.
Seanspeed said:Pretty sure Mclaren spends more than Ferrari.
Although the rumours suggested it will be a complete Renault rear end for Lotus Racing, today the team announced it will in fact use the Red Bull gearbox and hydraulics from 2011.
Equally unexpected was the confirmation that the technology will not simply be Red Bulls 2011 RB7 design. But a part Lotus designed gearbox. Silvi Schaumloeffel from Lotus exclusively telling ScarbsF1.com Its a bespoke gearbox for us and we have been in contact for several weeks and have been able to progress the design. Thus the 2011 Lotus already has the Gearbox design considered as part of its initial philosophy.
This deal underlines the determination of Lotus Racing to get a foot hold into the midfield. Their race results this year have been undermined by hydraulic failures. Lotus Racing are one of the two teams using the complete Xtrac gearbox and Geoff Willis technical director of HRT has been critical of the units packaging in comparison to current F1 standards. Clearly if Lotus want to progress then they need to resolve the reliability issues with the cars rear end. Moreover the team also need to improve their aerodynamics, at the rear of the car this is largely constrained by the gear case design. As the gear case itself forms a large obstruction to the airflow approaching the diffuser. Plus the gearcase dictates the rear suspension geometry, spring\damper packaging and the hydraulics packaging.
:lol :lolWe don't design the car to have a Red Bull torpedo it amid-ships, no... That's not a part of the design preparation really
:lol :lol :lolWe're throwing everything and the kitchen sink at it
Leunam said:By the looks of it, Red Bull cars aren't designed to be torpedoed by Red Bull cars either.
S. L. said:it doesn't say on wiki >_<
it's not Irvine
i think it's Ralf
For one, what Ferrari earns is not always what they spend, unless you think that Ferrari is in the habit of not wanting to make money.dalin80 said:Not even close, the bonus money ferrari get just for being ferrari is more then most of the small team budgets.
S. L. said:it doesn't say on wiki >_<
it's not Irvine
i think it's Ralf
Seanspeed said:For one, what Ferrari earns is not always what they spend, unless you think that Ferrari is in the habit of not wanting to make money.
Two, the bonus money is still directly related to their position in the standings. They dont get the full $80 million or whatever it is(I think thats right, though) if they are 3rd in the WCC.
Three, Mclaren spends more. :lol
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/09/22/toyota-has-biggest-f1-budget-4456m/
This is from 2008, but it still shows that Ferrari aren't the dominant spenders like they used to be. Mclaren is a healthy corporation and can afford to outspend Ferrari, which isn't surprising considering that F1 is their main business while Ferrari is equally committed financially to their road car programs.
rhfb said:FP2 on right now. Suzuka is so damn awesome, just behind Spa on my favorite tracks list. Might have to dump Hammy though in fantasy league :| Should have just gone for Vettle when I had the chance.
Also, I love the timing of this race :lol Eat a late dinner on Saturday and sit back and enjoy the 9:30-Midnight race time :lol
6am start for me :lolrhfb said:Also, I love the timing of this race :lol Eat a late dinner on Saturday and sit back and enjoy the 9:30-Midnight race time :lol
The European races run from 4-6 am for me. I used to be able to watch them all, but that was before I had a job that required me to be up very early the next dayAdamm said:6am start for me :lol
Although i quite like watching TV at that time of the morning
Glad they changed itGoldrusher said:It's an hour later than previous years.
Race starts at 3 pm local time, it used to be 2 pm or even 1.30 pm.
Zinga said:I read that Hamilton broke the new rear wing on his car and they are trying to fly a new one out from Woking ASAP... I am still expecting he will bounce back from his slump in form at the race but not a great way to start the weekend that's for sure!
Goldrusher said:Hamilton's little crash: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CF82WPQABOg
Screwed up the turn just before going under the overpass.
Leunam said:And a new hat!
I wondered why I didn't feel like the weekend had started! :lol Great as always.Leunam said:Took me long enough to get this up. >.>
Especially considering its one of my favorite tracks.
Dilly said:Where was Jake?
rogue_pigeon said:Commonwealth Games.
Lee really got thrown in at the deep end with this one, but she held it together bloody well considering. Just a shame that she as all the character (i.e. none) of Rosenthal and Ryder.