• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Official "I need a new PC!!" 2009 Edition

TheExodu5

Banned
ElyrionX said:
Well, the 4890s are about $30 to $50 more over here depending on the brand and I'm reading that the performance increase from the 4870 and GTX260 is marginal at best so I'm not so sure what to think about that.

You in Canada? I've found that NCIX and the like sell GTX 275 for roughly around the same price as HD 4890s here, so that's worth considering as well.

MSI TwinFrozr GTX 275 for $239.99! That's the equivalent of $210 US.
http://ncix.com/products/?sku=37424&vpn=N275GTX-Twin Frozr OC&manufacture=MSI/MicroStar&promoid=1025

Why couldn't I wait a week? :(
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
Ugh, after some some financial bumps in the road, I was unable to drop all that money on upgrading my rig - now I'm back in the black with a little extra cash, and I don't think I can do the full upgrade, but I can do the essentials (my mobo is busted right now so my rig is dead as it is).

Case

Motherboard

Fan

- am I getting better at picking stuff or do I still suck (all that after tax and shipping is almost exactly 300 bucks) - I also need to get a new GPU and better memory (2gb at 533hz ugh) - but the stuff I have my eye on (Radeon 4850 1gb, 4gb 1066hz) would cost me another 200 bucks at least, which would have me cutting it too close this month. I figure at any rate, it'll all be cheaper next month.
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
Kinitari said:
Ugh, after some some financial bumps in the road, I was unable to drop all that money on upgrading my rig - now I'm back in the black with a little extra cash, and I don't think I can do the full upgrade, but I can do the essentials (my mobo is busted right now so my rig is dead as it is).

Case

Motherboard

Fan

- am I getting better at picking stuff or do I still suck (all that after tax and shipping is almost exactly 300 bucks) - I also need to get a new GPU and better memory (2gb at 533hz ugh) - but the stuff I have my eye on (Radeon 4850 1gb, 4gb 1066hz) would cost me another 200 bucks at least, which would have me cutting it too close this month. I figure at any rate, it'll all be cheaper next month.
Raidmax PSU's aren't that great
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129045

Mobo is Biostar, eh...
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128372

Cooler is for the wrong socket:
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835103031

No need for spending extra on 1066 RAM, get cheap 800Mhz sticks, also a 1GB 4850 will offer 0-5% better performance than the 512MB version and it can't utilize the memory at higher resolutions anyway.
 
brain_stew said:
This. Save up the money instead, so that you can get a proper upgrade much quicker. Considering you can build a nice rig for close to $500 these days, $100 sets you a good way on your way to that nice new rig.

If you can find a second hand 6600gt/6800gt/x1600/7600 or something AGP for something like $20-$30 you might want to consider it, otherwise just forget about it.

Thanks for the input guys. This is the path I may well take, assuming that we start to get some idea of system requirements for StarCraft 2 coming out of the beta (or *gasp* if Blizzard releases the specs). I definitely want to be able to play the can campaign on high settings with a stable frame rate.

Do you guys have any recommendations on sites for decent second-hand GPUs? Seems like EBay's limited to re-sellers charging jacked up prices or guys scooping their old card up the floor and throwing up there for 40 bucks, buyer beware....
 

Kadey

Mrs. Harvey
Okay. Refresh my memory here since I haven't updated my GPU drivers in a long time.

Uninstall current drivers, reboot in safe mode, run driver sweeper, etc, reboot back and install new drivers. Woolah?
 

Chiggs

Gold Member
Kadey said:
Okay. Refresh my memory here since I haven't updated my GPU drivers in a long time.

Uninstall current drivers, reboot in safe mode, run driver sweeper, etc, reboot back and install new drivers. Woolah?

I think there's a very broad consensus on this matter. I would recommend doing what you wrote if you were going from ATI to Nvidia, but if you're staying within the brand, it's a bit overkill.
 

McLovin

Member
Hey guys I'm in the process of making a new pc for a friend of mine.. these are the parts I'm thinking of using.
Case- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811147001
GPU- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102801
CPU- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115206
Mobo- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128368
Ram- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134582
PSU- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817341010

He has am on an EXTREMELY limited budget (over budget actually) so anything that can lower price without sacrificing it's ability is fine. He plans on gaming a bunch, and since he only has a 17" monitor atm, no extreme resolutions. He also plan to use it for 3d Modeling and rendering, so keep that in mind. He's also keeping his DVD drive and HDD for now. Anything over $700 is a nogo, and it would be better if it where closer to $550. Thanks for the assistance in advance.
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
Hazaro said:
Raidmax PSU's aren't that great
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129045

Mobo is Biostar, eh...
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128372

Cooler is for the wrong socket:
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835103031

No need for spending extra on 1066 RAM, get cheap 800Mhz sticks, also a 1GB 4850 will offer 0-5% better performance than the 512MB version and it can't utilize the memory at higher resolutions anyway.

Thanks a bunch, stupid mistake with the fan, would have probably cried when I figured it out on my own. Also you're probably saving me 100 bucks with all that info <3. (even though the case/mobo/fan combo is 25bucks more than my last one =/ )
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
McLovin said:
Hey guys I'm in the process of making a new pc for a friend of mine.. these are the parts I'm thinking of using.
Case- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811147001
GPU- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102801
CPU- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115206
Mobo- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128368
Ram- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134582
PSU- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817341010

He has am on an EXTREMELY limited budget (over budget actually) so anything that can lower price without sacrificing it's ability is fine. He plans on gaming a bunch, and since he only has a 17" monitor atm, no extreme resolutions. He also plan to use it for 3d Modeling and rendering, so keep that in mind. He's also keeping his DVD drive and HDD for now. Anything over $700 is a nogo, and it would be better if it where closer to $550. Thanks for the assistance in advance.
Case: Antec 300 + 430w or other Antec
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129065
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129045


GPU: GTX 260 (CoD: 5 + FC2 + Rebate) or HD 4890 ... Both have Double Lifetime warranty
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150329
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150359

CPU: Toss up between Q8200 and Q9400, 9400 is way more, but has VT, aka running XP in Vista. 8200 does not. Q9400 also has 6MB vs 4MB of cache.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115131
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115055


RAM: Solid stuff, don't need more than DDR2, lifetime warranty
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231122


Slightly step up GB Mobo:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128359


PSU: Included with Case, Antec Earthwatts


Now someone can substitute the AMD mobo/CPU in there :lol
pseudocaesar said:
Im in the market for a new monitor (im getting a new PC soon, need a monitor asap), so I need something decent enough to handle gaming later on. My budget is around the AU200/US160 mark, and want at least 19 inch.

Im looking at maybe this one,
http://www.tasmanianpc.com.au/index.php?q=item&cat=1923&id=6609.

Any tips on what to look for? Whats the best in that range?
1920x1080 if you are lucky, but probably 1680x1050.
What graphics card do you have? What can you buy? (Brands / models available to you)
You'll probably find Acer, Spectre, and maybe 1 or 2 others in the cheaper band of LCD's.
Acer is pretty decent.

From that site these 2 stand out to me:
http://www.tasmanianpc.com.au/index.php?q=item&cat=1923&id=6231
http://www.tasmanianpc.com.au/index.php?q=item&cat=1923&id=6931

The LG is larger and has better response times for just a bit more. Overall general impressions seem good to the average person.
 
Hazaro said:
1920x1080 if you are lucky, but probably 1680x1050.
What graphics card do you have? What can you buy? (Brands / models available to you)
You'll probably find Acer, Spectre, and maybe 1 or 2 others in the cheaper band of LCD's.
Acer is pretty decent.

Well, at the moment im running pretty much a...well shitheap, its like an old old Radeon (X800 maybe? I forget). I dont use my PC for gaming outside of RTW (which runs like shit). Buuuuut, the monitor I have now is on the fritz, it makes buzzing noises and static for a few seconds, then goes back to normal. So, before I buy a new PC, I need a monitor lol. In the future I plan on getting like a mid-high PC. Capable of running but not maxing Crysis (cant afford too much). But to be honest I havent thought that far ahead yet, I guess maybe a 9600GT or todays equivalent.

EDIT: Yeh that LG is probably the go looking at that. This is gonna sound silly, but how does the resolution labeled there factor into gaming? Is that basically saying the max resolution I could run a game in would be 1680x1050? Or can I upscale or whatever?
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
pseudocaesar said:
Well, at the moment im running pretty much a...well shitheap, its like an old old Radeon (X800 maybe? I forget). I dont use my PC for gaming outside of RTW (which runs like shit). Buuuuut, the monitor I have now is on the fritz, it makes buzzing noises and static for a few seconds, then goes back to normal. So, before I buy a new PC, I need a monitor lol. In the future I plan on getting like a mid-high PC. Capable of running but not maxing Crysis (cant afford too much). But to be honest I havent thought that far ahead yet, I guess maybe a 9600GT or todays equivalent.

EDIT: Yeh that LG is probably the go looking at that. This is gonna sound silly, but how does the resolution labeled there factor into gaming? Is that basically saying the max resolution I could run a game in would be 1680x1050? Or can I upscale or whatever?
That is the max res, however LCD's look best in their native resolution so it's best to play in windowed or at the LCD resolution.

A $100 HD4850 is more than capable of pumping out Crysis on vHigh, the build I just did above shows how incredible a rig you can get for so cheap, trim $100 off CPU and get a cheap dualie and you save even more.

Not sure if the price cuts on the ATi cards will hit you soon, but I recall that the 4830 is decently priced in AU, next to the 9600GT like you said.
 
Hazaro said:
That is the max res, however LCD's look best in their native resolution so it's best to play in windowed or at the LCD resolution.

A $100 HD4850 is more than capable of pumping out Crysis on vHigh, the build I just did above shows how incredible a rig you can get for so cheap, trim $100 off CPU and get a cheap dualie and you save even more.

Not sure if the price cuts on the ATi cards will hit you soon, but I recall that the 4830 is decently priced in AU, next to the 9600GT like you said.

Awesome, thanks for that. I'll have to come back here when im ready to build.
 
McLovin said:
Hey guys I'm in the process of making a new pc for a friend of mine.. these are the parts I'm thinking of using.
Case- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811147001
GPU- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102801
CPU- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115206
Mobo- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128368
Ram- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134582
PSU- http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817341010

He has am on an EXTREMELY limited budget (over budget actually) so anything that can lower price without sacrificing it's ability is fine. He plans on gaming a bunch, and since he only has a 17" monitor atm, no extreme resolutions. He also plan to use it for 3d Modeling and rendering, so keep that in mind. He's also keeping his DVD drive and HDD for now. Anything over $700 is a nogo, and it would be better if it where closer to $550. Thanks for the assistance in advance.

Go with an X3 720 based rig then, the extra core will come in very handy.

Take this GPU instead, similar cooling but cheaper and with a free game (if the one year warranty bothers you then the XFX card is a better buy, see the second link):

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814131148

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150395


This case/PSU combo is better for the money in my book:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129065

Better RAM can be had for less:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227269
 

Ikuu

Had his dog run over by Blizzard's CEO
Got my new monitor this morning and it's so good, just need to arrange my desk so I can fit my PS3 and 360 onto it, love all the connection options. Ran the SF4 Benchmark again and it looks even better at 1080p and with a better monitor :D
 

McLovin

Member
Thanks for the replies Hazaro and Brian! Do you guys think that 430w PSU included in the case mentioned would be enough? I ask because the few people I've talked to said over 500w is a must. It doesn't matter if the case is ugly btw. It can be ugly as sin, we just need it cheap.
 
McLovin said:
Thanks for the replies Hazaro and Brian! Do you guys think that 430w PSU included in the case mentioned would be enough? I ask because the few people I've talked to said over 500w is a must. It doesn't matter if the case is ugly btw. It can be ugly as sin, we just need it cheap.

I wouldn't have recommended it if I didn't think it was enough, the wattage the figure actually means very little its the amperage on the 12v rail that matters (and the overall quality) and the Antec Earthwatts deliver in this area.

If you'd like something a bit beefier on the PSU side (might be nice so you're well set for future upgrades and the like, a good PSU will last you several builds) and don't mind an "uglier" case, then this may be a bettter bundle for you:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129037
 

Chiggs

Gold Member
I've been mulling over the idea of building a new rig, but I've been fairly out of the loop in recent months thanks to school. So, here are some questions:

1. Phenoms - what's the general consensus?
2. Core i7 - any new models coming down the pipeline I should wait for?
3. DDR 3 - best brand/speed?
4. Windows 7 - Is it still November?
5. DirectX11 cards - when are they rumored to hit?
6. General consensus on best Corei7/Phenom motherboards (I've always been an Asus guy).

Budget is 1500.00 - $2000.00 (and I already have an awesome case and power supply).
 
Quick question on fan setup in my soon to be here Anten Nine Hundred Two:

The side fan port comes empty so I bought an extra 120mm to put there. Is the side fan meant to be an exhaust or intake?

Edit: Also, should I choose to Xfire 4890's, would a 750W Corsair PSU be sufficient? The CPU would be an i7 FYI.
 

Ikuu

Had his dog run over by Blizzard's CEO
Anyone made the jump to SSD yet? Thinking about getting one around Windows 7 release.
 

Minsc

Gold Member
Chiggs said:
I've been mulling over the idea of building a new rig, but I've been fairly out of the loop in recent months thanks to school. So, here are some questions:

1. Phenoms - what's the general consensus?
2. Core i7 - any new models coming down the pipeline I should wait for?
3. DDR 3 - best brand/speed?
4. Windows 7 - Is it still November?
5. DirectX11 cards - when are they rumored to hit?
6. General consensus on best Corei7/Phenom motherboards (I've always been an Asus guy).

Budget is 1500.00 - $2000.00 (and I already have an awesome case and power supply).

October 22nd, can't wait for a new PC w/ it. Hopefully it will release even earlier.

Also, I'm under the impression that unless you're going for a very large overclock, RAM speed is irrelevant (obviously you need to get RAM compatible w/ your motherboard).
 
Chiggs said:
I've been mulling over the idea of building a new rig, but I've been fairly out of the loop in recent months thanks to school. So, here are some questions:

1. Phenoms - what's the general consensus?
2. Core i7 - any new models coming down the pipeline I should wait for?
3. DDR 3 - best brand/speed?
4. Windows 7 - Is it still November?
5. DirectX11 cards - when are they rumored to hit?
6. General consensus on best Corei7/Phenom motherboards (I've always been an Asus guy).

Budget is 1500.00 - $2000.00 (and I already have an awesome case and power supply).

1. You want the phenom II's, if you are going AMD
2. Yes there will be the "Lynnfield" CPU's coming later this year that are meant to be "mainstream" Core i7's.
3. You should be good with Corsair/OCZ/Kingston, the usual brands.
4. Oct 22, but you can download the Release Candidate 32/64bit for free now, lasts till next July.
5. End of the year, AMD will be first to market with DX11 cards.
6. Asus for high end, Gigabyte for value
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
MWS Natural said:
Awwh man, got home today and I have a vertical pink line through my new 23inch Samsung monitor...had it less than a damn month!
Try checking the monitor cord and reseating your video card.
 

dionysus

Yaldog
Minsc said:
October 22nd, can't wait for a new PC w/ it. Hopefully it will release even earlier.

Also, I'm under the impression that unless you're going for a very large overclock, RAM speed is irrelevant (obviously you need to get RAM compatible w/ your motherboard).

I will be doing a massive upgrade at the same time too.
 
I was wondering if anyone could suggest a very small and very budget build for me. Basically i want to put together a little box i can hook up to my TV which is dedicated to playing emulators. I know this subject is a little sticky so I only want hardware recommendations of course. I've had an itching to hook up my old 16-bit consoles recently and thought this would be the better way to do it, with filters etc. Nothing too taxing, just SNES, Megadrive, MAME, NeoGeo stuff and the like.

Any good recommendations for small motherboards and cases, and a decent and cheap processor and graphics card? Thanks in advance.
 

Hazaro

relies on auto-aim
Charmicarmicat said:
I was wondering if anyone could suggest a very small and very budget build for me. Basically i want to put together a little box i can hook up to my TV which is dedicated to playing emulators. I know this subject is a little sticky so I only want hardware recommendations of course. I've had an itching to hook up my old 16-bit consoles recently and thought this would be the better way to do it, with filters etc. Nothing too taxing, just SNES, Megadrive, MAME, NeoGeo stuff and the like.

Any good recommendations for small motherboards and cases, and a decent and cheap processor and graphics card? Thanks in advance.
Check the AMD 790 motherboards, and SPCR's HTPC section.
MWS Natural said:
I changed ports on the video card but even when I turn the monitor off and disconnect it I still see it.
Crack in LCD then?

That's not good...
 
Charmicarmicat said:
I was wondering if anyone could suggest a very small and very budget build for me. Basically i want to put together a little box i can hook up to my TV which is dedicated to playing emulators. I know this subject is a little sticky so I only want hardware recommendations of course. I've had an itching to hook up my old 16-bit consoles recently and thought this would be the better way to do it, with filters etc. Nothing too taxing, just SNES, Megadrive, MAME, NeoGeo stuff and the like.

Any good recommendations for small motherboards and cases, and a decent and cheap processor and graphics card? Thanks in advance.

Check out the Acer Aspire Revo's, or other Nvidia ION boxes.
 

AndyD

aka andydumi
I went ahead and ordered based on your guys advice to go with my recent 23 inch Samsung monitor, 1080p.

AMD Phenom 2 X4 940.
ASUS motherboard.
XFX 4890.
4 GB G-Skill ram.
BFGtech 550 watt PS.

The whole group for a shade over 500 with newegg combos and coupons and sales.
 

Kadey

Mrs. Harvey
So I updated,

Motherboard drivers.
GPU Drivers.
Sound drivers.
And Vista to SP2 and things seem better already. I haven't had any BSOD which is a very good thing because the old POS drivers kept saying ATIKDMAG.SYS or another can't update the video fast enough or whatever.
 

Minsc

Gold Member
MWS Natural said:
Awwh man, got home today and I have a vertical pink line through my new 23inch Samsung monitor...had it less than a damn month!

Better for that to happen while it's covered by the return policy or manufacturer's warranty, than after. That does suck though :(
 

McLovin

Member
brain_stew said:
I wouldn't have recommended it if I didn't think it was enough, the wattage the figure actually means very little its the amperage on the 12v rail that matters (and the overall quality) and the Antec Earthwatts deliver in this area.

If you'd like something a bit beefier on the PSU side (might be nice so you're well set for future upgrades and the like, a good PSU will last you several builds) and don't mind an "uglier" case, then this may be a bettter bundle for you:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129037
That should do it. Thanks again :)
 

Mr Jared

Member
Can GAF halp me build a decent gaming PC? I want to build one literally just for Street Fighter 4 so that I can put it inside an existing Japanese cabinet (along with, you know, other stuff).

I've been out of the PC gaming world for years now, so I literally don't know where to start when it comes to picking out new hardware. I want to try and keep it under $800 and be able to run SF4 without any problems (60+ fps, max settings, ect), so what should I generally be looking for in terms of processors (I believe I'm going Intel) and video cards? On these two key areas, I feel like I totally have no knowledge anymore.

Here are the system requirements of SF4-

Street Fighter 4 Minimum System Requirements:
OS: Windows XP
CPU: Intel Pentium4 2.0GHz or higher
RAM: 1GB or higher
HDD: 10GB of free space or more
Video Card: DirectX 9.0c/Shader3.0 or higher compatible, NVIDIA GeForce6600 series, ATI Radeon(TM) X1600 or higher or higher, VRAM :256MB or higher
Sound: DirectSound compatible, DirectX 9.0c (or higher) compatible
Input Devices: Mouse, Keyboard

Street Fighter 4 Maximum System Requirements:
OS: Windows Vista
CPU: Intel Core2Duo 2.0GHz or higher
RAM: 2GB or higher
HDD: 10GB of free space or more
Video Card: DirectX 9.0c/Shader3.0 or higher compatible, NVIDIA GeForce8600 series or higher, ATI Radeon(TM) X 1900 or higher, VRAM :512MB or higher
Sound: DirectSound compatible, DirectX 9.0c (or higher) compatible
Input Devices: Gamepad :Xbox360 Controller for Windows
 

zbarron

Member
Kadey said:
So I updated,

Motherboard drivers.
GPU Drivers.
Sound drivers.
And Vista to SP2 and things seem better already. I haven't had any BSOD which is a very good thing because the old POS drivers kept saying ATIKDMAG.SYS or another can't update the video fast enough or whatever.
I feel for you. The Atikmdag error pissed me off so much I can't see myself going back to ATI for a very long time.

Mr Jared said:
Can GAF halp me build a decent gaming PC? I want to build one literally just for Street Fighter 4 so that I can put it inside an existing Japanese cabinet (along with, you know, other stuff).

I've been out of the PC gaming world for years now, so I literally don't know where to start when it comes to picking out new hardware. I want to try and keep it under $800 and be able to run SF4 without any problems (60+ fps, max settings, ect), so what should I generally be looking for in terms of processors (I believe I'm going Intel) and video cards? On these two key areas, I feel like I totally have no knowledge anymore.

Here are the system requirements of SF4-

Street Fighter 4 Minimum System Requirements:
OS: Windows XP
CPU: Intel Pentium4 2.0GHz or higher
RAM: 1GB or higher
HDD: 10GB of free space or more
Video Card: DirectX 9.0c/Shader3.0 or higher compatible, NVIDIA GeForce6600 series, ATI Radeon(TM) X1600 or higher or higher, VRAM :256MB or higher
Sound: DirectSound compatible, DirectX 9.0c (or higher) compatible
Input Devices: Mouse, Keyboard

Street Fighter 4 Maximum System Requirements:
OS: Windows Vista
CPU: Intel Core2Duo 2.0GHz or higher
RAM: 2GB or higher
HDD: 10GB of free space or more
Video Card: DirectX 9.0c/Shader3.0 or higher compatible, NVIDIA GeForce8600 series or higher, ATI Radeon(TM) X 1900 or higher, VRAM :512MB or higher
Sound: DirectSound compatible, DirectX 9.0c (or higher) compatible
Input Devices: Gamepad :Xbox360 Controller for Windows

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129060
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136319
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134730
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128368
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150337
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116072
I'm sure someone could do better

Hopefully it comes out on Steam so you don't need a DVD drive.
 
I have a problem with HDMI Out.. I know the post is a little long but please bear with me. If anyone can help me with it I'll be VERY grateful!
e
Yesterday, I hooked up my PC to my HDTV through HDMI using the ATI DVI-HDMI adapter. It all started after this.

My HDTV is an HD Ready LCD with 1366x768 resolution. No matter what resolution I pick the image refuses to sit correctly on the screen.

I pick 1280x720 60Hz output and the image is incorrectly displayed. Parts of the desktop is outside the viewing area on all sides. I've never had such a problem with any image source before, so I mess around with the CCC and find out about custom HDTV resolutions. I say fine, let's try this, and I set up one for myself - it turns out I can tweak the 720p signal for a viewing area of 1152x684 and get a full image.

Now, if you can do numbers in your head, you'll notice that this is NOT a 16:9 aspect ratio. The height is off - it should've been 648. What this means is, now I have rectangular pixels on my screen! Worse yet, when I play movies in 16:9 aspect ratio, I get black bars on top and bottom, which I shouldn't get on a 16:9 HDTV.

So I say what the hell and switch back to regular 720p and try the scaling option. To my surprise and horror when I underscan the image so that I can fit it horizontally, I have the exact same black bars on the top and bottom.

My graphic card is outputting HDTV in a wrong aspect ratio.

What the hell is going on? Is the driver messing up because my main monitor is 16:10 and not 16:9? Can I scale the image outside the aspect ratio - i.e. stretch it vertically more than horizontally?

This thing is driving me nuts, I spent 2 hours last night trying to fix it and gave up. My system is below and I've tried using Catalyst 9.5 and 9.6.

AOpen H600B12
High Power 430W
Biostar TA780G-M2+
AMD Phenom X3 8750
A-Data 2x 2GB PC6400
Powercolor Radeon HD3850 PCS
Samsung HD300LJ
Philips DVDR824K/40
Samsung SyncMaster 932NW
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RC Build 7100

Please help me GAF, you are my only hope
 

Mr Jared

Member
zbarron said:
Hopefully it comes out on Steam so you don't need a DVD drive.

Thanks a lot, barron. I'll check all this out and read up on the specs. It should go along way to get me up to speed.

And I think I'm still going to install a cheap-o DVD drive, just in case :lol You just never know..
 
tahrikmili, sounds like the monitor is underscanning...but what particular TV is it? You should try to find out what resolutions it actually supports (usually, not many. I'd guess not 1366x768 native, anyway, but the manual usually shows all valid modes)

Turn off any sort of stretch modes, see if there is any sort of underscan/overscan option on your TV, and then give us a clear idea of what the following resolutions turn out as:

1280x720@60
1366x768@60
1920x1080@60 (yes, humor me)

I guess the only help I can offer is to try and output clean at those resolutions, and see if the TV side byitself has any sort of tweaking to offer. Also, it is worth trying to set your desktop to 16:9 and then port out and see what happens...
 
The TV is an LG 32LC2R, a somewhat aged 720p panel with a native resolution of 1366x768

It would seem the TV IS indeed underscanning at first but why and how would it underscan out of aspect ratio? Moreover, other HDMI 720p sources fit on the TV perfectly with no scanning errors. I am more inclined to believe this is a driver issue.

The TV has no scanning mode options I'm afraid and no service mode menu that I'm aware of. It's set to display at 16:9 over HDMI.

At 1280x720 @ 60Hz the image is stretched beyond the TV's panel both horizontally and vertically. When I underscan the image by 8% through the drivers it fits on the screen horizontally. It is not displayed in a correct 16:9 ratio, the height is too short. TV shows signal as 720p 60Hz.

At 1360x768 The image sits perfectly horizontally. Verticaly, I get black bars on top and bottom but these are NOT 3p black bars I would expect to get at this resolution. The Aspect Ratio is definitely not correct, the height is too short. TV shows signal az 720p 60Hz (why? HDMI can't output non-standard HD resolutions?)

At 1900x1080 @ 30Hz I have the same problems as 1280x720 @ 60Hz. TV shows signal as 1080i 30Hz.

:(

I will add photos when I get home. I will also try setting the desktop monitor to 16:9. I have a hunch that this is the problem and the driver can't output at two different aspect ratios correctly. Which would be utterly idiotic but I've come to expect worse from drivers..
 
Any idea as to when we will see uhh.. nvidia ion equipped netbooks? ...yeah, there's the Len ideapad S12 but when will see more models?

I really want to buy one but I'm trying to hold out.
 
Mr Jared said:
Can GAF halp me build a decent gaming PC? I want to build one literally just for Street Fighter 4 so that I can put it inside an existing Japanese cabinet (along with, you know, other stuff).

I've been out of the PC gaming world for years now, so I literally don't know where to start when it comes to picking out new hardware. I want to try and keep it under $800 and be able to run SF4 without any problems (60+ fps, max settings, ect), so what should I generally be looking for in terms of processors (I believe I'm going Intel) and video cards? On these two key areas, I feel like I totally have no knowledge anymore.

Here are the system requirements of SF4-

Street Fighter 4 Minimum System Requirements:
OS: Windows XP
CPU: Intel Pentium4 2.0GHz or higher
RAM: 1GB or higher
HDD: 10GB of free space or more
Video Card: DirectX 9.0c/Shader3.0 or higher compatible, NVIDIA GeForce6600 series, ATI Radeon(TM) X1600 or higher or higher, VRAM :256MB or higher
Sound: DirectSound compatible, DirectX 9.0c (or higher) compatible
Input Devices: Mouse, Keyboard

Street Fighter 4 Maximum System Requirements:
OS: Windows Vista
CPU: Intel Core2Duo 2.0GHz or higher
RAM: 2GB or higher
HDD: 10GB of free space or more
Video Card: DirectX 9.0c/Shader3.0 or higher compatible, NVIDIA GeForce8600 series or higher, ATI Radeon(TM) X 1900 or higher, VRAM :512MB or higher
Sound: DirectSound compatible, DirectX 9.0c (or higher) compatible
Input Devices: Gamepad :Xbox360 Controller for Windows

You can do that for over $200 under budget and that's without scrimping in any area at all either, should be fine for even 1080p with 4xAA, max settings and a rock solid 60fps ingame judging by the benchmark thread:


http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136319
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103681
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129037
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150337
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227269
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128384
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827151188

Comes to $585 + there's $30 worth of rebates to claim. Whilst any game will run fine on that rig, since you have the budget for it, you could always do these two upgrades, since they're well worth the money:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103471

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150359

That'd be $777 (plus $10 rebate) and will deliver way above and beyond what you originally wanted.
 
tahrikmili said:
The TV is an LG 32LC2R, a somewhat aged 720p panel with a native resolution of 1366x768

It would seem the TV IS indeed underscanning at first but why and how would it underscan out of aspect ratio? Moreover, other HDMI 720p sources fit on the TV perfectly with no scanning errors. I am more inclined to believe this is a driver issue.

It's entirely possible. We just need to narrow this down to one or the other...

FWIW, I had very similar problems on my old PC (HD2600 card) with my Plasma. Haven't tried it with my 285 yet though.

tahrikmili said:
At 1280x720 @ 60Hz the image is stretched beyond the TV's panel both horizontally and vertically. When I underscan the image by 8% through the drivers it fits on the screen horizontally. It is not displayed in a correct 16:9 ratio, the height is too short. TV shows signal as 720p 60Hz.

Hmm. So at 720p, it shows up fine in aspect, but it's underscanning? And when you set manual underscan, it's only doing so horizontally? That does sound like drivers. Are you just running Nvidia's driver package?

tahrikmili said:
At 1360x768 The image sits perfectly horizontally. Verticaly, I get black bars on top and bottom but these are NOT 3p black bars I would expect to get at this resolution. The Aspect Ratio is definitely not correct, the height is too short. TV shows signal az 720p 60Hz (why? HDMI can't output non-standard HD resolutions?)

No, that sounds like a TV reporting issue. It's probably only build to say the regular ATSC resolutions. HDMI can definitely output 1360, but it's very likely that your TV has a max resolution that's different than its real resolution; a lot of TVs, especially a couple of years ago, would have a "PC MAX" and a "TV MAX", which is to say they would reserve 1:1 resolution for a VGA port and only use ATSC on the HDMI/component/SVGA/RCA plugs. (Presumably this was done to route in the VGA without using the scaler.) In cases where the manufacturer was selling cheap and pro brands, they would just strip the VGA out of the cheaper set.

Yeah, it's crap, but sets are slowly digging out of that technological hole lately. Give the aspect ratio idea a try and let us know what's up.
 
Top Bottom