Flying_Phoenix
Banned
Oh shit! Jasoco was right! :lol
koam said:I did get it after june 8th and it didn't come with snow leopard, it doesn't work for me tho
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=17107306&postcount=185Flying_Phoenix said:Oh shit! Jasoco was right! :lol
Mecha_Infantry said:To those who are talking about clean install:
You need to clean install Leopard, THEN Snow Leopard. Not just Leopard
(This is as I believe)
ThePeacemaker02 said:Alright I posted this in the noob thread but might as well try here too. Does the up to date apple program work in the Apple store to or is it online only? I'm not going to be home but I'll be with my computer and near an Apple store, so if doesn't I'll probably just end up buying the regular one.
celebi23 said:If you bought a Mac after June 8th, 2009 (and it didn't come with a Snow Leopard Disc (or come with Snow Leopard already installed), you'll need to enter the Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Up-to-Date Program ($9.95) (have until December 26, 2009 to get order your Up-to-Date Disc)
- Use this link if you got it from the Apple Online store
- Use this link if you got it from an Apple store or an authorized retailer
So for people who bought MBPs last summer and run Leopard...is it just as simple as pop the disc in, install, and BAM, new OS with your personal files untouched?
koam said:I did get it after june 8th and it didn't come with snow leopard, it doesn't work for me tho
BrandNew said:I'll post this again since it's important:
?
BrandNew said:I'll post this again since it's important:
?
Flying_Phoenix said:So this update is mostly for developers to truly take OS X by the horns now since the old PowerPC architecture was holding them back?
BrandNew said:I'll post this again since it's important:
So for people who bought MBPs last summer and run Leopard...is it just as simple as pop the disc in, install, and BAM, new OS with your personal files untouched?
?
celebi23 said:Well, that and users finally get a Cocoa Finder![]()
celebi23 said:There's an update option (which will do what the quoted described). There's an archive & install option (moves all old files to one folder & the updates the system). Or an erase & install option (wipes everything clean & installs Snow Leopard)
celebi23 said:No problem. You need to fill out the information online. Use the below links. There's one for if you bought the computer online & another link if you bought the computer in an Apple Store
Hope this helps
Flying_Phoenix said:They're updating "Finder"? Thank God!
And outside of keeping your old files neither has a benefit over the other correct?
ThePeacemaker02 said:I should have made myself more clear sorry, I meant can I redeem the snow leopard disk in store for 10 bucks. Or can you only do that online?
celebi23 said:There's an update option (which will do what the quoted described). There's an archive & install option (moves all old files to one folder & the updates the system). Or an erase & install option (wipes everything clean & installs Snow Leopard)
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:There are no install options. You upgrade.
What is there to be made unstable by an upgrade anyway? There's no registry. Applications aren't wildly thrown about your hard drive with dependencies on randomly placed files.
Let's stop talking about every OS like it's Windows XP. Do Linux people get like this with new versions of Ubuntu?
Flek said:actually:
you need to clean install leo than iwork 09 than ilife 09 and then snow leo ;P :lol (at least if you have a mac as old as mine ;P)
The guys on the Macbreak Weekly podcast always talk about doing a clean install, as opposed to an upgrade. Are they wrong? Or is it just an old wives tale?Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:There are no install options. You upgrade.
What is there to be made unstable by an upgrade anyway? There's no registry. Applications aren't wildly thrown about your hard drive with dependencies on randomly placed files.
Let's stop talking about every OS like it's Windows XP. Do Linux people get like this with new versions of Ubuntu?
TOTALLY agree with you here. The advantages of a "clean install" with OS X are mostly a myth. You get identical performance using the upgrade option or erase & install. Unless your system is already so messed up that you need to reformat anyway.Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:There are no install options. You upgrade.
What is there to be made unstable by an upgrade anyway? There's no registry. Applications aren't wildly thrown about your hard drive with dependencies on randomly placed files.
Let's stop talking about every OS like it's Windows XP. Do Linux people get like this with new versions of Ubuntu?
Old wives tale.entrement said:The guys on the Macbreak Weekly podcast always talk about doing a clean install, as opposed to an upgrade. Are they wrong? Or is it just an old wives tale?
mcawesome said:I bought an iMac in March and have a MacBook I bought in 12/09 both running Leopard. Can I just get the $29 version and install SL on both? or will I need to get the $49 one?
Yeah, I would go for the family pack version. Apple doesn't have any DRM on their OS releases, but I would reward companies for not including DRM in their software instead of trying to find loopholes.celebi23 said:Turns out the Up-to-Date discs are in fact shipping alongside the rest of the Snow Leopard versionsMight still go to my local Apple Store on Friday just for the T-Shirt. I've got one from the Leopard launch and then a Mac OS X Public Beta T-Shirt
Technically, you can just get the $29 version (the disc has no way to detect that you've installed on one computer already). But, morally speaking, you might need the Family Pack version (the $49 one).
celebi23 said:Technically, you can just get the $29 version (the disc has no way to detect that you've installed on one computer already). But, morally speaking, you might need the Family Pack version (the $49 one).
entrement said:The guys on the Macbreak Weekly podcast always talk about doing a clean install, as opposed to an upgrade. Are they wrong? Or is it just an old wives tale?
I also think that the many switchers may opt for the clean install just out of habit, from their experiences with Windows.
LCfiner said:hey guys, let's spend 75 minutes talking about various ways to setup a networked drobo and then follow that up with a 45 minute conversation on the best way to annotate screen shots and put them up online"
Flying_Phoenix said:"Morally" my ass. Morally it's my OS disk I brought and therefore I should be able to install it to as many computers as I own.
SnakeXs said:Morally it's Apple's disk, you merely bought a license to install it. 1 license.
Just sayin'.
ckohler said:I'm really looking forward to this.
Does anyone know if SL Safari fixes the animated GIF issue along with the plug-in crashing?
Do you have a link to the original pic by chance?giga said:Those Cupertino bastards photoshopped the blood out of the original photograph. This is outrageous.
Flying_Phoenix said:I see what you mean and where you're coming from, but that's like saying if I brought a movie that I can only watch it on one player.
To me it just seems like a bogus way to increase sales. I know about stopping piracy, freebies to friends, used market, and what not, but that's just something that software companies will have to accept (similar to how nearly every other media has to go through similar things).
Flying_Phoenix said:I see what you mean and where you're coming from, but that's like saying if I brought a movie that I can only watch it on one player.
To me it just seems like a bogus way to increase sales. I know about stopping piracy, freebies to friends, used market, and what not, but that's just something that software companies will have to accept (similar to how nearly every other media has to go through similar things).
panda21 said:i'm not really sure but since SL i have had zero problems browsing gaf with safari, and it used to annoy me on a fairly regular basis before that. could just be luck not running into any big .gifs, but i think its much better, to the point that i no longer notice it, when it used to beachball like mad fairly often.
Check out this video of a snow leopard hunting. Probably the coolest footage from Planet Earth (I think it took like 3 years for them to get that 30 seconds of footage).giga said:Those Cupertino bastards photoshopped the blood out of the original photograph. This is outrageous.
[]http://localhostr.com/files/8ec9af/Screen%20shot%202009-08-24%20at%202.12.39%20PM.png[/IMG]
panda21 said:except when you buy a movie, it doesnt say its a license to use it on one player. if apple want to sell os x as a single machine license thats up to them
SnakeXs said:And your analogy is way off. When you buy a movie you buy a license to watch that movie for personal use. When you buy an OS, you buy a license to install that OS 1 time.
SnakeXs said:Considering there's not 1 drop of DRM on it, saying it's way to boost sales is silly. Again, morally you're in the wrong. Apple doesn't really care, though.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Small gifs play at normal speed, larger ones are half speed.
Snow Leopard Safari doesn't play the gif at all until it's fully loaded and it's sure it can play it. So in the gif thread, you're stuck looking at a bunch of unmoving pictures until about 10 seconds later when they'll start to move.
It never beachballs, but it can just end up never playing a gif sometimes if it's large enough. You can force it to play by right-clicking and "Open Image in New Tab" where it'll start playing without a problem.
bionic77 said:Check out this video of a snow leopard hunting. Probably the coolest footage from Planet Earth (I think it took like 3 years for them to get that 30 seconds of footage).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIVcg0eGEsg
Firestorm said:Is it confirmed that the $29 USD / $35 CAD version is a full retail disc and not just an upgrade disc? I'm on the final checkout screen with no prompts asking me to put in an old Mac serial number or anything to confirm eligibility... I really don't want a disc that can only upgrade.
Isn't that the version they want you to pay more for if you don't have Leopard? Thought they'd check or something...Ashhong said:why would you need eligibility?