ckohler said:angry five paragraph diatribe
Please tell me you got that RAM from somewhere other than Apple!Omikaru said:Just pre-ordered along with a much needed RAM upgrade for my MacBook (from 1gb to 4gb). Can't wait!!
Oh yes, for sure. I build my own PCs (I just happen to like having a Mac as a laptop with a PC combo), so I know the score with RAM and HDDs when it comes to Macs. :lolRubxQub said:Please tell me you got that RAM from somewhere other than Apple!
BrandNew said:What's the deal with this 1password thing? What does it entail?
BrandNew said:What's the deal with this 1password thing? What does it entail?
Fraull said:holy fuck yes APPLE! This is awesome, cant wait for faster OS goodnessDoes anyone know if this will make apps such as adium unusable (until a patch or something?)?, sorry if answered/dumb question, im on a break at work dont have a chance at the moment to read all of this
.
SnakeXs said:I'd explain, but the vidcasts they have at their site will probably explain it better. I was happy enough with keychain and how Safari autofills things, but this is one step further, and the iPhone app syncs everything which is very sweet.
BrandNew said:just went to the site
...
holy shit. Me want. So the problem people were having is that you have to get the new version once Snow Leopard comes out...or something along the lines of SL Safari not working with it?
That's what it says.DMczaf said:So Snow Leopard delivers on Aug 28th even with free shipping on Apple.com?
scorcho said:Trying out the GM build and on the surface it's not that distinguishable from Leopard, even when booting the 64-bit kernel. 64-bit Safari is a beast though; it blasted through the sunscript JS benchmark in 351ms (!!!)
The 32bit kernel is quite capable of spawning 64bit processes. If you want to run a 64 bit kernel you will need 64bit kernel extensions, and visa-versa for 32bit. Kext's are not interoperable between architectures.
Your mac will default to the 32bit kernel except if you are running an xserve. You must also have a 64bit EFI to load 64bit kernel, this limitation is imposed by Apple as it's not technically needed. 64bit kernel support is disabled for ALL MacBooks.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:That's what it says.
Flying_Phoenix said:They're updating "Finder"? Thank God!
And outside of keeping your old files neither has a benefit over the other correct?
Mar_ said:I'll walk downstairs on Friday and buy 2 copies. One for me and one for my wife. Looking forward to it for some odd reason (this is when you know you've been fully converted to Mac).
Fraull said:man everytime i read your posts in Mac threads, you always have to be sacrastic about something, as if what your saying there is a major flaw in OSX. Are you just extremely bored or something? Cmon man its getting old, well imo it is.
Mar_ said:I'll walk downstairs on Friday and buy 2 copies. One for me and one for my wife. Looking forward to it for some odd reason (this is when you know you've been fully converted to Mac).
LCfiner said:no family pack? you'll save 10 bucks.
do you need 2 physical discs?
Jill Sandwich said:If there's an Apple thread, Flying_Phoenix and Liu Kang will pop up in it, bringing their own off-the-wall brand of comedy. All you can do is grab a hot dog and enjoy the show!
I think part of the problem with your analogy is that you can't watch the same disc on two different players at the same time, however, when your computers will both have the OS at the same time.Flying_Phoenix said:I guess, but I still call bullshit
I really don't think you got the point of my post.
I was saying the concept of only being able to use an OS for one computer.
Let's just drop this subject so we don't derail the thread.
Awesome, thanks Liu Kang. I just have one more question though. If I close Safari and open it back up again, will it load the previous pages I was viewing (much like Camino)?
Because this is the only thing holding me toward Camino now.
LCfiner said:no family pack? you'll save 10 bucks.
do you need 2 physical discs?
Jill Sandwich said:If there's an Apple thread, Flying_Phoenix and Liu Kang will pop up in it, bringing their own off-the-wall brand of comedy. All you can do is grab a hot dog and enjoy the show!
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:Phoenix is annoying, Liu Kang is not.
Slurpy said:I was irritated that Apple left aqua in when Leopard was released. Now, it's just beyond ridiculous. What sane UI person would believe that leaving in those fluorescent, striped, jellybeanish ass-ugly, outdated scrollbuttons and buttons that clash with every single window was a GOOD idea, or even acceptable? It seems fucking trivial for Apple to replace these outdated elements. Why not change them to those matte ones in the iLife suite, OS-wide? They've had ages to do that, the same eyesore they've had since Cheetah. Its inconsistent, and downright sloppy, since they look nothing like any of the UI elements Apple has designed in the past few years. They're a complete eyesore. You'd think this would have been a part of 'optimizing' Leopard. I shouldnt have to install a hack to replace them.
StrikerObi said:I was just reading the Tech Specs and my MacBook (early January 2008, the last revision before the unibody MacBooks) won't support hardware acceleration of h.264 in QuickTime X and it also won't support Open CL. I have an Intel X3100 graphics chip in this Mac and you need at least an nVidia 9400M![]()
Burger said:I'm in the same boat, but when I think about it I don't give a shit. My MBP can render 1080p h264 video fine, and I'm not interested in OpenCL.
Besides, my media center (which is a Windows 7 machine) outperforms my mac anyway.
Do you have problems running non accelerated video at the moment ? If not I wouldn't worry. Open CL sounds cool, but I haven't seen a single useful application for it yet (and don't mention video encoding, the only public Open CL video encoder is a pile of crap).