Around now?BigJonsson said:AirBrian
I can play most any time tonight
Were you throwing screens or attempting to? That's the only way Coleman and Williams came through.dskillzhtown said:FUCK!!!
Stafford is out 7 weeks..
Lions getting ready for the draft.
GG, Striker. I had no answer for your rush. That really was the key to the game.
Striker said:Were you throwing screens or attempting to? That's the only way Coleman and Williams came through.
Quinn was off early, I'm actually surprised it ended like that. I'm happy James Davis' injury wasn't big. He is an upgrade over Lewis, who isn't so bad in his short-yardage role.
Calvin Johnson is a manly beast. I was ashamed how poorly my DB's were tackling him.
Sorry about Stafford. :\
edit:
^^ :lol
BigJonsson said:you raped my run D
AirBrian said:Good game, BigJonsson. My offense was clicking and you couldn't get anything going offensively until later in the game. I will say your d-line was nasty at points. Twice you got to Collins before I could even hand the ball off. :lol
BigJonsson said:gg
you raped my run D
Wellington said:Not that I want them to happen, but it annoys me how there are virtually no injuries to defensive players. I feel like a chump for having held onto my D-Line depth instead of trading it away for a super team like Cold did with the Eagles. I think I am a good safety away from a terrific defense.
And how about that NFC Playoff picture, good grief. (Without taking this week's results into account) Five teams are within a half game for the final spot, eight teams are within a game and a half. Whoever wants the last spot is going to have to step it up, of course I already fucked myself by going 0-3 in the division so far.
Wellington said:Not that I want them to happen, but it annoys me how there are virtually no injuries to defensive players. I feel like a chump for having held onto my D-Line depth instead of trading it away for a super team like Cold did with the Eagles. I think I am a good safety away from a terrific defense.
I inquired about a trade for him and I am still interested for the off-season.Fifty said:I lost Ed Reed for 8 weeks. But since I play better without him, his ass can go back on the medical table.
Aside from my DEs I really don't have any chips worth trading. My highest rated LB is Pierce at 86, and Ray Lewis fills that MLB slot for you.Fifty said:I told you that if you weren't offering me DEs (which I'm set at), we'd have something going. I would trade him for an elite outside LB, for example. He has the rest of the season to prove himself!
Without you, that may be debateable.Shawnwhann said:Good luck with the remainder of the season, and may the best man win.
Shawnwhann said:Everyone,
Well, I just got a PM from FMT alerting me that I've been booted from the league. Outside of being called out by two guys, I hadn't personally received a complaint about my game this season, even from a variety of regulars I play in unranked scrimmage games. Apparently some folks complained to FMT behind the scenes (about what, I don't know) in some of the dominant games I've won, and now I've earned the ban hammer, so to speak.
While FMT mentioned that he didn't have a problem with my game, I can understand the position he's coming from. He has a league to run and he has to make decisions that he feels will benefit the league.
If there is one thing my scenario should teach everyone, I hope my situation encourages people to communicate more honestly and transparently post-game. If someone is doing something that you interpret as being nefarious, let them know. Since I first started playing in leagues here, I've tried to exhibit an ability to self-correct and play/conduct myself in a way that just allows me to fit in with everyone. I've never apologized for wanting to win dominantly, and I suppose playing in a Madden tournament for the first time and sharing that experience didn't help the perception that has been peddled by some of my more passionate detractors.
While I have no doubt that this development will trigger opinions on both sides of the proverbial coin, but I'm done with being a focal point of controversy. Deep down, I know I played the game with integrity, and I'm good with knowing that the only thing that could derail me was back-room politicking.
Big ups to FMT for the privilege of playing in his leagues and to the guys I've had some real wars with over the years. Many of you have pushed me to learn and develop in ways I never thought I could. Whether it's Bob's brilliant use of his tight ends and Wellie's mastery of d-line play to LJ's sophisticated blitzes and CB's effective running, there's things I picked and pulled to bring my game to the next level. Though I'm gone, I hope we can continue to go toe-to-toe for many years to come.
Good luck with the remainder of the season, and may the best man win.
-Shawn
Wellington said:This is absolute horseshit. How can whoever wins the "Super Bowl" claim to be the top dog if Shawn isn't even in the league anymore?
I understand we are all cogs in the machine of this league, but at the very least let someone know if you think they are cheating. I've had my issues with Shawn in the past and I let him know what my problems were, like a man. Further, I think that with the ability to save replays, specific examples should be added and shown.
I don't want to seem like a malcontent, but I want to make my opinion be known, this is a move that I disagree with.
Edit: Lastly, not once in Madden 10 did I think that Shawn did something questionable. He beat my ass legitly in week 2 and I was going to beat his ass legitly in 2 "weeks". For what it's worth...
IMO, this falls under the "play sim" umbrella. It's bullshit. No one punts low and short in real life.DenogginizerOS said:Some things I would like commishes to comment on:
1. Short Punts. I have noticed in a couple of games that people like to quick snap and punt short to try and catch a person off-guard so they don't activate the fair-catch. This has led to a game-changing fumble that cost me a game. To use this tactic on every punt seems cheap. Thoughts?
If I am using LB and I bite on the PA, I just hit the stumble stick or tackle the HB. Don't go after the QB.3. MLB Manual Control. If a person is more comfortable with controlling the LB before the snap and using him for manual pass coverage, that is acceptable, right? But what if the person uses that MLB to rush the QB on a play-action pass? Does this still fall under manual blitzing?
I can't tell if you're serious or not. Running outside is not banned, no.4. L Running - I have caught running backs well behind the line of scrimmage in the flats, sometimes with two people, only to have the person wiggle their way out. Most times, the player then has a wide-open field in front of them that has resulted in big gains or TDs. In most instances I have encountered this, the running back is a speedier back and gets well outside the Tackle and is an isolated position against the OLB or perhaps a CB. Is using the tactic of running your back parallel to the line of scrimmage until they almost get to the sidelines before turning upfield good football or cheese?
A lot of times on hand offs if I get past the RT I shadow the QB in case it's a PA. Is that okay?Rorschach said:IMO, this falls under the "play sim" umbrella. It's bullshit. No one punts low and short in real life.
If I am using LB and I bite on the PA, I just hit the stumble stick or tackle the HB. Don't go after the QB.
I can't tell if you're serious or not. Running outside is not banned, no.
Heh that's fine if I understand you right. It's like you're getting reverse PA'd!Wellington said:A lot of times on hand offs if I get past the RT I shadow the QB in case it's a PA. Is that okay?
It's led to a lot of yardage on my side.
I was just trying to clarify this L thing. It seems I must have really poor tacklers on the Jets out in the flats because I have essentially lost games due to the inability to tackle someone in the flats. What concerned me was the very un-sim-like parallel running to the sidelines and then turning 90 degrees upfield. This usualy gives time to receivers to clear out any man-coverage with crossing patterns. I have had to resort to more zone packages to stop this because I have had Revis and Shepeherd or Scott hit people squarely in the flats only to have the back squirt away very late in the animation. I must be hitting the hit stcik improperly or something. Really frustraing.Rorschach said:I can't tell if you're serious or not. Running outside is not banned, no.
Yeah. The Giants did this a lot with Osi against the Cowboys (Basically just keep outside contain so that Romo doesn't scramble) and the result was getting gashed on his side of the line for big gains.Rorschach said:Heh that's fine if I understand you right. It's like you're getting reverse PA'd!
CB3 said:I've only heard livewires complaints, which I would say are extremely questionable at best.
This whole just doesn't sit right with me
What has helped me is something I picked up from FMT. Switch to the tackling defender and mash on X as if you were the ball carrier and mashing on the right stick to break through. Nine times out of ten the guy is brought down.DenogginizerOS said:I was just trying to clarify this L thing. It seems I must have really poor tacklers on the Jets out in the flats because I have essentially lost games due to the inability to tackle someone in the flats. What concerned me was the very un-sim-like parallel running to the sidelines and then turning 90 degrees upfield. This usualy gives time to receivers to clear out any man-coverage with crossing patterns. I have had to resort to more zone packages to stop this because I have had Revis and Shepeherd or Scott hit people squarely in the flats only to have the back squirt away very late in the animation. I must be hitting the hit stcik improperly or something. Really frustraing.
Wellington said:I will give FMT the benefit of the doubt because he has shown to be a levelheaded leader, and I know that he likely wrestled with this decision for a long time.
I just want to know what exploits Shawn (allegedly) used, so that I can implement them myself.
1. People actually do this? Yeah, that's pretty cheesy in my book.DenogginizerOS said:Some things I would like commishes to comment on:
1. Short Punts. I have noticed in a couple of games that people like to quick snap and punt short to try and catch a person off-guard so they don't activate the fair-catch. This has led to a game-changing fumble that cost me a game. To use this tactic on every punt seems cheap. Thoughts?
2. Show Blitz. Are we allowed to use this or not?
3. MLB Manual Control. If a person is more comfortable with controlling the LB before the snap and using him for manual pass coverage, that is acceptable, right? But what if the person uses that MLB to rush the QB on a play-action pass? Does this still fall under manual blitzing?
4. L Running - I have caught running backs well behind the line of scrimmage in the flats, sometimes with two people, only to have the person wiggle their way out. Most times, the player then has a wide-open field in front of them that has resulted in big gains or TDs. In most instances I have encountered this, the running back is a speedier back and gets well outside the Tackle and is an isolated position against the OLB or perhaps a CB. Is using the tactic of running your back parallel to the line of scrimmage until they almost get to the sidelines before turning upfield good football or cheese?
I don't know why FMT shouldn't get the benefit of the doubt since he's been so easy on everyone that he's been labeled as "soft" by some. When has FMT ever done something like this let alone to a vet? He even let MaestroRyan and BigZep flake on us multiple times. I'm sure it wasn't an easy decision for him and you guys should at least give him a chance to talk if you're not gonna give him the benefit of the doubt he has earned for the last 5 years...I will give FMT the benefit of the doubt because he has shown to be a levelheaded leader, and I know that he likely wrestled with this decision for a long time.
I know you both have smileys so I pray you're both joking.dskillzhtown said:Same here. The Lions need all the help they can get with Stafford gone. :lolWellington said:I just want to know what exploits Shawn (allegedly) used, so that I can implement them myself.
25 times seems excessive to me... Thankfully, it HAS died down besides a couple of people. In reality, not relying on it makes you a better player anyway. There are a couple people here who would fall apart if you covered the HB who is their one and only read.Since we are asking questions out in the open, is there a real rule against passing to your RB 25 times a game? I ask because I have really avoided it in my games as to be fair, though I don't have the best WR corp in the league. Early on in the season there was alot of talk about it, but now it seems there is only one RB in the top 10-15 of receptions in the league.
No.AirBrian said:We've even played a game...do you think I cheesed at all?
dskillzhtown said:Early on in the season there was alot of talk about it, but now it seems there is only one RB in the top 10-15 of receptions in the league.
I have to agree. I have honestly stopped caring about wins/losses. I just want to play a competitive game (which, sadly, I haven't done in 3 of my losses this year). EA really has lost the "fun factor" in Madden.LJ11 said:I really hate this game.
Some of this stuff; passing to the back, stupid D AI in the flats and on PA, terrible run angles, iffy zone and pass blocking AI, and so on have caused more issues/problems than the ones already present when trying to run a league. If EA had its shit together we wouldn't be discussing any of this.
Haha, exactly.LiveWire said:As for the Show Blitz commentary, has anyone ever considered what happens if the offensive player snaps the ball before the defensive player audibles out of All Blitz?