Robert, really, let me lend you a hand.
All you have to do, rather than trying to change the evidence toward your conclusion as you have which is not working at all, is to try and argue something different. Change your claim, change the language.
That is, the Sharks reached 100 points in fewer games than the Wings*. Simple. Not that they were the first team to do so, because no amount of effort, save actual time-travelling, could make that possible. They simply weren´t and pointing at GP is not at all persuasive.
* While ultimately meaningless, there is some irrelevant merit