we'll see how real he is come playoff time!:lolkirbybreezy said:B. Real's Belief is Stronger Than Your Doubt....
we'll see how real he is come playoff time!:lolkirbybreezy said:B. Real's Belief is Stronger Than Your Doubt....
viakado said:obama would vote for dynamic pip. would you?
btw, spurs, sixer, nuggets. where you at?
yeah. figures. daw and zep, we have 24hours. ill be available after 5:30pm pst tomorrow.Smokey said:daw just moved 2500 miles away and is still in the process of getting settled so it may be a bit hard to get ahold of him.
CB3 said:i beg to differ. i play 100% on man D. and i usually play it pretty good. its my offense keeping me from wins
I *try* to play on-ball defense whenever possible, but when an opponent makes two or more passes and quickly rotates the ball around the perimeter --- eff that. I've *TRIED* to play on-ball in those situations, and all that ends up happening is that I end up with at least one, if not two defenders, out of position because of me briefly taking control and then having to rapidly switch away to where the ball just rotated to.Truelize said:yeah but playing a zone and then not ever switching defenders is the laziest/cheapest way to play defense possible.
I would love to enforce that people actually defend the ball themselves because then it is actually human vs human. But lately in my games I'm only playing against a human controlled defender occasionally. I've ever noticed a nice cheap little trick that people do now. I won a game by matching my opponent with the trick. I hated doing it but I guess you've got to even the playing field out however you can.
ecnal said:sorry bigat, got caught up again today.
scheduling games around the holidays is proving to be extremely difficult...
anyways, i'll be on most of tomorrow, so if you can post a time that you're available, i'll try and show. :lol
Take the Bobcats next season and prove me wrong. They are a horrid team from the perimeter (mid to long range) and if it were as easy as you claim to hit outside shots, then no one would care which team they had or would stack their teams with outside shooters like they do.DiddyBop said:every team in 2k9 are capable of hitting midrange/3 point shots,bobcats or not. dont give up just because of that. maybe cerrius will agree to a rematch?
AkaBalla said:Umm didnt u read Smokey's post? Cerrius provided Smokey a picture.. So that tells you he expected the win..
Unless he is a photographer in real life and likes to take pictures and send them to league admins..:lol
Points in the Paint In an effort to increase user satisfaction, we have tuned interior defense in combination with shooting percentages for shots taken in the paint. The result is something we feel will be more in-line with what our users are expecting.
Shooting Percentages Continuing with the above description, we have tuned down shot success of perimeter shots when the defender is amply covering the offensive player taking the shot.
AkaBalla said:I agree with CB.... I play on ball d 100% of the time...
Also our commish played a 1-3-1 zone vs me in our game.. That was very fun :lol
I dont expect man to man being enforced as well as on ball d if people are allowed to play zones..
By the way, I am curious what Cerrius' PIP and second-chance points were for our game. Smokey, do you still have the picture?
In the NBA, the team with the higher PIP% won by the slimmest of margins. Statistically there is no significant difference between winning and losing and higher PIP. Which is why I said there is no correlation.kirbybreezy said:You put in some serious work on those stats. Great job.
I do think that it can be a bit misleading though. Winning teams usually have some headroom to spare so to speak when it comes to PIP. The team that is trailing in that game usually depends on PIP to make the game competitive, or to close gaps. Hence why the losing team tends to have more PIP.
If we totally lift the PIP (I'm not sure if you're asking for that or not) than even the good teams will be able to run wild.
I'm not sure that this translates to the real NBA. Good teams usually do go to the paint alot, but they don't end up finishing, they end up getting a lot of free throws, so that doesn't show up in PIP.
shut the hell up. josh smith is a better defender than shaq. you've got the biggest cheeser in the game.pheeniks said:okay that's it. FUCK on-ball D. i can't defend the goddamn rockets
at the very least, i'm going to manually defend yao. i have to front him cause the game won't do it. if i don't front him it's an automatic 2 points
i should have kept shaq
DenogginizerOS said:In the NBA, the team with the higher PIP% won by the slimmest of margins. Statistically there is no significant difference between winning and losing and higher PIP. Which is why I said there is no correlation.
In a league where I am essentially the worst team as the Boobcats, I would much rather take my chances and fight with all I have against a team that is not restricted by PIP than have to fight hard and concede victory because I am not allowed to go to the paint any more.
Interestingly, here is a statistical study of NBA PIP: http://www.82games.com/pointsinpaint.htm that illustrates that the PIP stat is not entirely self-inclusive as a determinant of victory.
okay that's it. FUCK on-ball D. i can't defend the goddamn rockets
at the very least, i'm going to manually defend yao. i have to front him cause the game won't do it. if i don't front him it's an automatic 2 points
i should have kept shaq
shut the hell up. josh smith is a better defender than shaq. you've got the biggest cheeser in the game.
Smokey said:Some serious stat digging you did in your previous post. Good stuff.
All in all though the whole point of the PIP limit is to try and have a more enjoyable experience playing in the league than if you were to go to XBL and play a random person. In random matches people often bang the ball in the paint or chunk three's. There is no in between. So the idea is, in the league you really don't want to play somebody like that. The PIP rule tries to limit that by making you use other aspects of the game.
No it's not perfect and all sort of technicalities come up here and there but we have to have something to go by.
that's my nephew playing. im at work.Smokey said:kado is this you on xbl right now? i sent you a msg. i want to play a custom game (not using rockets)...i want to try something.
i'll vouch for you man. when we played our game yesterday, you didn't cheese/exploit whether you would've passed the 50pip barrier or not. so therefore in my book, breaking the 50pip=!exploiting. But rules are rules for this season. i can understand the admins following the rules. but if they dont change the rules next season, they'll be a lot of complaints.DenogginizerOS said:I have encountered that very thing in the few games I have played in this league. I see a lot of heavy three-point shooting after a drive to the basket. And if you want something to go by, I suggest honor. If someone is repeatedly abusing a post move, then I am sure you would hear about it. But in all the games I have played, I have not done this. It just so happens I happened to win one this time.
You both Lose, i'm getting NO. See my record, k thx.Zep said:Yea, these sliders + my team's shitty shooting ability = FUCkin Fail
No idea how someone could control these bums. Not in real life though <3
And bob, u lose. Im getting N.O.
you better give me back barbosa, you son of a bitch.pheeniks said:i'm taking phoenix again and i'm not trading shaq. that team is still going to be a cheese factory
i miss having shaq. i thought he was actually harder to defend than amare. he can actually still play in the nba...problem is no one gives him the ball so people think he's more washed up than he really is
so when i average like 10 dunks a game don't get mad!
teams that tank gets dibs? hmmmm...DCX said:You both Lose, i'm getting NO. See my record, k thx.
DCX
Hey there, yeah, i was falling asleep watching the MNF game waiting for you. I finally gave up ~11:20-11:25pm and went to bed.Truelize said:Sorry I missed you Anachronous One. I'm online for awhile though if you see this message.
FrenchMovieTheme said:i have no problem with the way denogg played or daw. its like this PIP rule has no context. if PIP are within the flow of the game then why not?
for instance, daw scored 70+ points against me in the paint (and i against him in our 113-111 barn burner), and i felt it was all within the flow. but the last time i played truelize, i was up big at the half and coming out in the 3rd quarter ALL he did was just drive to the basket with lebron and dunk. not really any strategy, he would quickly move the ball up court, and blow by me for the dunk repeatedly. lucky i had a big lead and i was hitting shots, or the game could have ended differently.
im not complaining or calling him out (i know he did this because he was frustrated with shooting airballs from outside) but the point still stands that without context the PIP rule doesn't mean much. i have had games where people score under 50 PIP and i felt their paint play was cheap vs. people who scored over 50 and i felt it was perfectly within the flow of the game.
Truelize said:I hope I can get all my games in our next week of games. Sucks that I've only played one so far this week and I'm working near 20 hours tonight setting my store up for Boxing Day sales after close tonight. I'll be home most of tomorrow though. So maybe I can get a scrimmage in at least.
anachronous_one said:Ouch. Good luck with work, man. Hope you have a relaxing holiday to make up for it.
So we won't be playing our game then, I assume?
I only did that because I was shooting airballs (not just missing shots, missing the entire rim and backboard) and you never ever play on ball defense against me. I find it near impossible with my roster to play against someone that doesn't try to guard me at all and then plays a zone. I do not use my pg much on offense so I wind up playing the majority of our games against your computer controlled players.