And the moderator asks him again about it and Kerry just says that we should "look at it" and moves on to attacking Bush.CrimsonSkies said:Lawyers support tort reform.
ahah.
MetatronM said:Bush just GOT HIS OPPONENT'S NAME WRONG.
And besides that, what point was he trying to make by pointing out how liberal Kerry's voting record is anyway?
Newbie said:are there any web streams of this, i'm getting tired of going back and forth from my TV to my computer
Nope. Cause he did eventually referrence back to it later in his response saying that the reason he told you how liberal Kerry was is because it explains his actions or something to that effect.CVXFREAK said:I thought he was referring to the R. Kennedy guy. O_O
MetatronM said:Nope. Cause he did eventually referrence back to it later in his response saying that the reason he told you how liberal Kerry was is because it explains his actions or something to that effect.
This is true. That is a strange contradiction.CrimsonSkies said:"Tax cuts are bad in times of war. Here's mine though."
Matt said:Is it just me, or is CrimsonSkies hearing exactly what he wants, and not what is, in fact, going on?
Hey, I said you were right on the tax cut discrepancy.CrimsonSkies said:Oh and you guys aren't.
Dan said:Kerry can tell by looking at the audience that none of them make $200,000 a year? I'd find that offensive.
My point was that Kerry a few minutes earlier condemned Bush for cutting taxes for the first time in US history during a time of war. Then he proceeded to lay out his OWN tax cut for the middle class.robojimbo said:He said just before that, that Bush's tax cuts effect the top 1% more so than anyone else. Kerry plans to roll back all taxcuts for incomes higher than $200k, like he just said.
He could just have been going by the population ratios. About 150 people there, and 3 qualify, thats about right.Ned Flanders said:I thought of this as soon as he said it. He got laughs but I'm sure some "town hall" members may have taken some offense, whether or not they do earn $200,000 a year. It could be viewed as condescending elitism etc..