OMG Wrestling is Fake, why do you watch this crap

Status
Not open for further replies.

kiguel182

Member
I assume the best use of your time for these purposes is "whatever entertains you the most," which for you may be UFC but for someone else might be wrestling. For me it's neither.

I can understand calling wrestling juvenile, but 1) that's a different argument and 2) lots of things are juvenile, and if we went around yelling at every woman who loves soap operas and every guy who likes wrestling and every person who likes E! entertainment news and every alien who watches real house wives of Atlanta, we'd pretty quickly be pointing our fingers at basically everyone, which doesn't seem productive. Most people have their "I want to watch something stupid, silly and fun" time, and if this is what wrestling fans want to do with theirs, so be it.

To be clear: while I am calling wrestling "stupid, silly fun," I'm also complimenting wrestling fans for (mostly) being aware of that, instead of insisting that their preferred stupid-silly-fun of choice is actually deep and meaningful and how dare you malign the respected name of [insert stupid, silly fun hobby here].

While there are a ton of stupid and silly fun stuff in wrestling not everything is that. It's a little reductive to put it all in that same bag.

Wrestling as tons of great moments that aren't silly or dumb and actually involve people in a meaningful way. I get that it's hard for people who don't watch it to understand that but it's true.

Bryan's Wrestlemania moment wasn't dumb or silly. Actually, it had an impact on me that few TV Shows have had on me.
 

see5harp

Member
I guess my mind works differently but I never associated wrestling with being gay, or looking gay, or what not. I just didn't.

I mean yeah we had gold dust and I guess part of that was playing up on said audience fears. But you have to be real uncomfortable with who you are for not watching or hating for that particular reason.

The person who said that is a fucking idiot.
 
You should watch more wrestling if you think there is no thrill or dynamic even if the outcome is predetermined. Doesn't mean you can't have a great match or wonder what will happen next. You don't always know who wins.

Katsuyori Shibata vs Tomohiro Ishii: http://youtu.be/ASVEQ6VGkQA


And this mindset of soap opera for men is so outdated. There is more to wrestling than WWE. That is like saying that all MMA is UFC.

I'm not saying it isn't thrilling to watch on a minute to minute basis even if the outcome is predetermined; clearly wrestling fans find that core action exciting. Nor am I saying that it isn't thrilling or fun for fans to speculate who will "win" the match as it progresses.

I'm saying that the specific thrill of knowing that the playing field is completely even and the application of the athlete's skill is what will determine the outcome is absent in wrestling. I don't think that's a controversial statement. It's a different dynamic to other sports, where the wrestlers themselves have a degree of knowledge that the audience don't. Their job is to guide the match to an outcome that has already been decided. Ultimately, your tolerance for this dynamic will govern whether you will like wrestling or not.

I didn't bring up the soap opera thing, it's a pretty common analogy people make when talking about the American brand of wrestling that's exported internationally. Admittedly, I know virtually nothing about the intricacies of wrestling outside that sphere, but my immediate thought when watching that video you posted was "it looks more natural than American wrestling, but it still doesn't look like real combat", which feeds into my original point about verisimilitude and the distinction between action movies and live wrestling. I want to stress that I'm not shitting on anyone with a passion for wrestling, live and let live and all that.
 

kiguel182

Member
Honestly, a lot of my interest comes from seeing how predictable things are and how much i can decipher before things get revealed. For example, back during the attitude era when they constantly did over the top shit, any time there wasn't a ramp leading to the ring it meant that a vehicle of some kind was going to make it's way to the ring hence why the ramp wouldn't be there. And 9 times out of 10 it would always come out at the end the show like when stone cold brought out the beer truck and sprayed Vince


I can understand that. That's fair but it seems like people were genuinely surprised that he won. The guy had the one of the biggest followings in wrestling in pretty much forever and for what seemed like it spanned forever considering he was consistently being screwed over and held down by the authority (from a storyline persepective, can't speak on the actual backstage politics) the idea that he'd get his comeuppance at their highest rated PPV event of the entire year didn't seem like anything but predictable. That's not to take away from the moment but i just don't see how people who can recognize how scripted wrestling is wouldn't have seen that coming

I don't know if you know this but those times he got screwed weren't a set up for Mania. He simply got screwed because their future plans didn't involve Bryan.

The 18 seconds at Mania, the Authority vs Bryan feud and the Wyatt stuff wasn't a giant build up for his win.

Until the Royal Rumble the plan was Baptist vs Orton and HHH vs Punk. Bryan wasn't even close to the main event and they were pretty much forced into it by the fans that loved Bryan.

Bryan's victory was as real as it gets since, by sheer talent that made the fans love him that way, he got were he wasn't supposed to.
 
Wrestling is basically (at it's best) an highly athletic, over the top soap opera and I love that. Calling it "fake" is a huge disservice given how hard the guys and gals train, and how risky some of the moves and spots they do are.

Attitude era is my fave. Not as good as Sunset Beach or Neighbours during the "Evil Harold" era though. Slighlty better then Eastenders during it's golden "This is my Car Lot Roy"/"You hit me over the head with an Iron, mo" eras.

Current product is finally producing some compelling characters (Ambrose, Wyatt), but the storylines and commentary still need a LOT of work.

OP, I think the problem is people can't be bothered get past the "IT'S A FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE" part of it and see the great matches and witty repartee and vince macmahon vomit jokes(well, probably better to ignore that last one)
 

slit

Member
My other reasoning is that the writing, acting, and performance is poor. I don't know what is so confusing about that. I don't know why you would even try and make a distinction between a show filmed in moc doc fashion and a regular sitcom. No one on the planet thinks that Andy Samburg is an actual NY city police officer.

It's not confusing, it's just that a lot of us think judging based on the way it presents itself is stupid.
 

jmdajr

Member
Funny how reasoning starts with "I don't understand why."

Right, you don't understand. But if you would like to understand, people can explain why they like it. They have a multitude of reasons.

If after understanding the why you still don't like it, that's fine.

Some folks though are perfectly ok with not understanding and hating. Which is a universal problem all around.
 
D

Deleted member 47027

Unconfirmed Member
Vince can't be God, God was Shawn Michael's tag team partner vs Shane and Vince.

Unless it was all a higher power level swerve...hey, who DID lift the briefcase anyway?

Wait...GTV...it's all starting to make sense...

iOJLyQ29ZjWPP.gif
 

Evening Musuko

Black Korea
A great wrestling match is like a 20-30+ minute action scene that tells its own little story. When it involves characters and a storytline you're invested in it's especially compelling. There's nothing like it.

The real side of wrestling is also part of the draw to a lot of fans, which is something people don't get. The backstage politics, dirtsheet drama, following pushes and watching guys rise and fall. These are things are just as interesting as the on the on screen product--more so a lot of the time.

I don't defend being a wrestling fan. We all realize that on some level it's silly. So what. Half the people who shit on it were watching during the NWO/Attitude era with everyone else.

This right here. Especially the bolded. Lots of people here talk about the writing as in whenever a wrestler talks into a mic. Which is a shame because that's only part of what makes pro-wrestling, well, pro-wrestling.

It's the reason why people can watch a mid-90's All Japan Pro Wrestling match despite having little to no knowledge of Japanese.

Actions speak louder than words and nowhere is this more prominent than in pro wrestling
 

Aiii

So not worth it
Actual real response I've gotten from saying this:

"But movies and TV shows aren't trying to be real"

Heh, even that's wrong. As said above, there's mockumentary's, fount-footage films like Paranormal Activity and staged reality shows a plenty .
 

Lothar

Banned
Being scripted is just one part of why most non fans find wrestling incredibly dumb. I don't have a problem watching The Sopranos because the acting, cinematography, and writing is near perfection. I cannot say that about wrestling.

Comparing it to Sopranos is really dumb. It's more like the Mortal Kombat Conquest series or the MK movies or any martial arts film. It's fun and dumb; that's the appeal. And it's got some cool action, some humor, and some bad ass tough guys to root for. Do you also not get martial arts films?
 

Evening Musuko

Black Korea
Heh, even that's wrong. As said above, there's mockumentary's, fount-footage films like Paranormal Activity and staged reality shows a plenty .

Anyone who thinks wrestling is trying to be real these days, and isn't a child is just plain ignorant. Period.

Considering the fact that the biggest pro wrestling company calls itself "World Wrestling Entertainment", all the documentaries they produce with all kinds of behind the scenes footage, and the interviews wrestlers do talking about writers and planning out matches, there's really no excuse to think that any wrestling promotion is trying to be "real".

I mean, it's dumb for them to expect them to be "real" because then that's just breaking character.

Imagine if Bryan Cranston, in a live stage production of Breaking Bad, stopped being Walter White and just started doing things as Bryan Cranston. That would be pretty unprofessional. The same thing goes for pro wrestling.
 
This observation really makes people look spectacularly dumb, especially with as meta as the WWE is lately. AHEM *with professorial bearing THIS BATTLE IS STAGED AND THOSE GUYS AREN'T EVEN REALLY MAD AT EACH OTHER *crowd gasps

It's like a Homer Simpson level discovery, and is especially funny because it comes across like they JUST 'figured it out'. Not to mention that calling it fake shows they don't even really know what they're watching.
 
With Triple H and Stephanie and the top of decision making, I don't understand how anyone can continue to watch WWE with these two making the calls on who gets a push or not.
 

jmdajr

Member
This observation really makes people look spectacularly dumb, especially with as meta as the WWE is lately. AHEM *with professorial bearing THIS BATTLE IS STAGED AND THOSE GUYS AREN'T EVEN REALLY MAD AT EACH OTHER *crowd gasps

It's like a Homer Simpson level discovery, and is especially funny because it comes across like they JUST 'figured it out'. Not to mention that calling it fake shows they don't even really know what they're watching.

Most people that say it's fake somehow think they are in on something we don't know.
That's how everyone I met comes across.

OMG I DIDN'T KNOW!!!!!!!
 

kiguel182

Member
With Triple H and Stephanie and the top of decision making, I don't understand how anyone can continue to watch WWE with these two making the calls on who gets a push or not.

Vince still has the final decision, and it's honestly bringing them down.

NXT is all HHH and it's the best show WWE has by far with all the right decisions being made.
 

alterno69

Banned
I don't have a problem with it being fake, i do roll my eyes when people get excited about X wrestler being undefeated for X amount of time, quite the acomplishment that is.

Sorry, but that's how i see it.

Can you bet on wrestling matches even?

I can't get invested in a sport with fake champions. Yes they are magnificent athletes, but knowing it's all staged kills it for me.
 
D

Deleted member 47027

Unconfirmed Member
I don't have a problem with it being fake, i do roll my eyes when people get excited about X wrestler being undefeated for X amount of time, quite the acomplishment that is.

Sorry, but that's how i see it.

Can you bet on wrestling matches even?

I can't get invested in a sport with fake champions. Yes they are magnificent athletes, but knowing it's all staged kills it for me.

you watch football don't you?
 

hbkdx12

Member
Because those moments when the WWE follows up on a good predictable outcome that the fans want is few and far between these days. He lost the world championship at wrestlemania in 18 seconds.

The original plan was for Batista vs Orton. It only changed because of fan participation.


I don't know if you know this but those times he got screwed weren't a set up for Mania. He simply got screwed because their future plans didn't involve Bryan.

The 18 seconds at Mania, the Authority vs Bryan feud and the Wyatt stuff wasn't a giant build up for his win.

Until the Royal Rumble the plan was Baptist vs Orton and HHH vs Punk. Bryan wasn't even close to the main event and they were pretty much forced into it by the fans that loved Bryan.

Bryan's victory was as real as it gets since, by sheer talent that made the fans love him that way, he got were he wasn't supposed to.

Maybe it speaks to how bad the writing/scripting has become (or maybe it's really really good in a "we've believably shoehorned him into a situation we never anticipated and if your not heavily involved in the backstage politics you probably would have never known" kind of way? I dunno) but to me, as someone who admittedly has only gotten back into it the last year or so, all the writing was on the wall for bryan to take wrestlemania. Ever since Summerslam (i believe it was SS) where hbk and the authority screwed him over and orton cashed in his contract immediately after bryan won, it seemed like the powers that be were trolling fans being that his following was so huge. So from that moment i kind of figured he'd definitely get a legit comeuppance and what better place then wrestlemania where that following could swell even more going into they're biggest event of the year to help sell it. So yeah, the way i saw it, it all looked painfully obvious and the idea that there was even a possibility that he wouldn't even get the chance to legitimately regain and hold onto the title just seems like kind of ridiculous writing/booking given the outpouring of support he had been consistently getting.



I guess my mind works differently but I never associated wrestling with being gay, or looking gay, or what not. I just didn't.

I mean yeah we had gold dust and I guess part of that was playing up on said audience fears. But you have to be real uncomfortable with who you are for not watching or hating for that particular reason.

Goldust never bothered. The only thing that bothered me on any kind of "sexual" level was Val Venis and the Mae West/Mark Henry angle. Both were a lil too overt in how they were handled but again, the attitude era
 
Steph and Trips have been awesome. Don't understand the hate. Yeaaa some of the decisions have been a little nutty. If anything has gone down since the 90s its the writing.
 
D

Deleted member 47027

Unconfirmed Member
How witty.

Sure, it's been proven that SOME matches are fixed, just like some boxing matches are, doesn't make the rest of the 99% of games being played every year any less real.

ibfHYVrLOg1TjB.gif


The fundamental flop being the worst part of it for me
 
I don't have a problem with it being fake, i do roll my eyes when people get excited about X wrestler being undefeated for X amount of time, quite the acomplishment that is.

Sorry, but that's how i see it.

Can you bet on wrestling matches even?

I can't get invested in a sport with fake champions. Yes they are magnificent athletes, but knowing it's all staged kills it for me.

Getting excited about streaks and champions in Wrestling is no different than being invested in a storyline on any other TV Show. It's best not to compare wrestling to sports and instead compare it to any other work of fiction that you don't know the out come of if you haven't read the spoilers. You get excited because you want to see where it goes next. Will Undertaker go 22-0 or will he be finally defeated? I don't know, I had my assumption that he would win and was surprised by the swerve; just as I would be by any other work of fiction.

I watch both RAW and 24 and to be honest, the style of story between the two isn't that much different. Both are escapist forms of entertainment that rely on outlandish plot lines.
 

gogosox82

Member
Yeah I don't get it either. My g/f used to say the same thing "why you watch this shit, its so fake" etc but I think she gets it and kinda likes it now on some level (though I doubt she would watch it if I didn't). It's fun, mindless entertainment like watching a tv show or a soap opera with some athletic performance art thrown in.
 

joelseph

Member
Yeah I don't get it either. My g/f used to say the same thing "why you watch this shit, its so fake" etc but I think she gets it and kinda likes it now on some level (though I doubt she would watch it if I didn't). It's fun, mindless entertainment like watching a tv show or a soap opera with some athletic performance art thrown in.

With BnB injured I can see GFs' care levels dropping
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom