gundamkyoukai
Member
IMO none of the groups in OP are good .
You have people that are good but not the organizations \groups.
You have people that are good but not the organizations \groups.
Doflamingo said it during the war, which side is justice? Whichever side prevails.
Is the pages colored? No?Hey guys. I've been following One Piece since nearly 10 years and I finally decided to give Oda some of his well earned money. Anyway, just got the first manga box set and wanted to share it with you.
Is the pages colored? No?
People who only read One Piece online will never understand the feeling of having the actual books.
Just saw this and I'm not following. This isn't the heart of the cards, Yugi.
Just saw this and I'm not following. This isn't the heart of the cards, Yugi.
It means hes better than us
It means hes better than us
I love to smell books. Young, white books. Untainted by anyones hand. Moving my finger slowly down the pages, open it slowly and dive in with my face, using my nose to navigate me into the deepest edge, smelling the unique smell of freshness.
ADude...I don't know what to tell you. If you're seriously arguing that the marines are that moronically ridged in their operations, that horrifically stupid that they think it's a good idea to send their strongest warriors off every time some weakling dipshit punches a celestial dragon when there are lower ranking marines that would suffice, then it's a wonder that the half the marines don't die from forgetting to breathe. I mean, are you seriously going to defend this by suggesting there is a flaw in their system that is so myopic and exploitable that I can only surmise hasn't been used against them is because no one thinks the marines are dumb enough to actually adhere to it so literally?
Pirates could force pawns to just attack celestial dragon after celestial dragon to keep them busy. "Why would some mook touch one?" As I said, PAWNS. Threaten to kill their families if they do it or whatever, there are thousands of ways to coerce a person into a suicide attack.
I don't know what benefit you see in defending the WG from not making a smart decision by saying they have a rule (that they themselves can choose to not enforce) that, if true, would render the highest tier marines utterly useless in a real tactical sense. because they'd be forced to be hunting scrubs all day long.
People who pay for One Piece are than those who don't. Praised be every euro paid for Oda's product.
I subscribe to English shonen jump. I've also bought some volumes digitally, but I really want them to rerelease the second digital bundle before I buy moreAll jokes aside, I agree completely with this. I find it slightly embarrassing when people call themselves "One Piece fans" yet they've never paid anything for it and just read it illegally online. I can understand not buying them if you're only remotely interested in One Piece and thus don't care too much though.
Not to mention that most people in this thread don't even read SBS, which comes naturally with the books.
All jokes aside, I agree completely with this. I find it slightly embarrassing when people call themselves "One Piece fans" yet they've never paid anything for it and just read it illegally online. I can understand not buying them if you're only remotely interested in One Piece and thus don't care too much though.
Not to mention that most people in this thread don't even read SBS, which comes naturally with the books.
Even if you don't buy the books there are a lot of ways to support OP.
Of course you don't have to buy stuff to be a fan .
What even?
You just yourself said that "something can be a persons job and still be morally repugnant" and that "if you posit that killing innocents is wrong, then it's hard to argue that that is nullified by the fact that he gets a paycheck for doing it".
So let me get this straight. You make up things that I said, claim that they are wrong, and when I say that I never even said those things, you say that there's no reason not to talk about them, even though I think they're irrelevant and you think they are wrong. Do you ever use logic?
For you first paragraph: too narrow. Akainu isn't a small scale police offer who acts on an individual level. The situation at Ohara is different. It's not about the murderer only having one target, it's about, like I posted earlier, the greater good. For whatever that's worth. By your example, murdering a person with potential access to a weapon that can destroy the world, would be the same as murdering that person and also the world (as your example states that you kill both the murderer and its target). It doesn't hold up.
Second paragraph: nope. He didn't kill Ace purely for being the son of a pirate. There was way more to that whole thing. He was a dangerous criminal, an execution had already been decided, there were high stakes, the worlds most powerful pirate was at the scene; just far more stakes. In either case, not that it matters anyway, him wanting to kill pirates for being pirates is neither strange nor wrong, really.
You are ascribing a degree of agency to the Marines that does not exist. When it comes to the Celestial Dragons, the Marines do what they are told. The CD are the unquestioned rulers of the world, they do not care about the autonomy of the Marines in any capacity. They are spoiled, selfish, sociopathic individuals and when they demand an admiral as their bodygard, they get one. This isn't a courtesy being offered by the Marines, they have no say in this function. "Oh we can provide a similarly powered force that-" no, the CDs want the admiral, and they will get the admiral.
This is also why you can't just give Garp a title in name only. If he's an admiral it means he is at the beck and call of the Celestial Dragons. The Marines can't just say "nah you don't have to go," that is outright insubordination and I have no doubt that the Celestial Dragons would gut the management structure of the Marines at the drop of a hat if they thought it wasn't going to give them what they want.
That is my impression as well. The CD literally own that whole shit, providing the majority of the WGs and Marines funds. I mean, they are the 1% of the 1%,Maybe the CDs do the majority of military funding.
Old money runs deep and may work for itself. At some point you're so rich that it's downright difficult to get poor.My impression was the opposite. They are only so well taken care of because the marines pamper their ass financially as well as politically. I mean, if its the case that they own money, that means they have to manage it, and I don't see them as workers of any kind to do that.
Besides, if it's just a money issue, the Marines still have the option of just robbing their ass blind. You know, for Justice.
At some point you're so rich that it's downright difficult to get poor.
Old money runs deep and may work for itself. At some point you're so rich that it's downright difficult to get poor.
My impression was the opposite. They are only so well taken care of because the marines pamper their ass financially as well as politically. I mean, if its the case that they own money, that means they have to manage it, and I don't see them as workers of any kind to do that.
Besides, if it's just a money issue, the Marines still have the option of just robbing their ass blind. You know, for Justice.
The Marines tax regular people (or Morgan did, at least), and this probably funds a portion, but I would guess the current CDs inherited old money and have servants to do stuff like money management, but pay the Marines to exist and be protection.
We saw the way a man was shot for merely crossing the path of a CD on the street, so if you stole money, I would imagine your bounty would be quite large. For all we know, someone's current bounty is because of something like this. But I imagine it will be explained later, at least to some degree.
I'm not saying a marine should do it, but the Marines, the organization as a whole. I say robbing, but technically it would justified as a warfund acquisition. They wouldn't be able to place a bounty because the Marines are both the ones who issue it and who hunt the bounties down. They're not going to place a bounty on themselves.
As I said before, whatever hold the CD have on the WG better be amazingly good, because I can't think of any justification for them to be entrapped to these idiots the way they are.
I mean, it's mindboggling, but it worked more less for hundreds of years in Europe. That was the amazing thing about the New World (ours), about the american dream: that anybody could rise to be great, where on all levels in Europe family lines where important. The royal families, the merchant clans and big peasants had all giant linages that carried themselves. Until the french revolution hit, social movement was very difficult to impossible. I don't even mean getting from a peasant to a king, but even from a peasant to anything else above and royalty lived in incredible lavishness to the point where nobles where kinda disgusted by The Old Fritz of Prussia who chose to live relatively simple or when the russian king went on vacation in Europe and applied for simple work to learn how to build ships with his own hands. I can totally see how the World Nobles still feed off the Old Money, Old Connections and Old Ways.
No, we know for a fact that the original Pluton is hidden somewhere in Alabasta.Maybe they have the original Pluton? It has to be something huge, otherwise yeah, just Coby could probably tear up the CDs.
So referencing real life here doesn't get us anywhere. What works for us isn't going to work for OP.
No, we know for a fact that the original Pluton is hidden somewhere in Alabasta.
You could probably apply this to every argument about OP that has ever taken place, in this thread or anywhere. That's good news.
I'm glad that's the case for you, but I can't agree. My understanding of good worldbuilding is that there should be a great deal of internal reasons to justify the structure of the world. That's why Tolkien is as renown as he is, the depth to the world he created is INSANE. It's most obvious when you talk to Edmund Dantès, there is an answer for almost any questions and you have to get really nitty gritty into pointless nitpicking (such as asking for the biological make up of Balrogs) before the illusion starts to crack. Ops world is huge and has consistently to it, but I can't get lost in it because any time I ask "how does that work", I realize that it actually doesn't.
I'm very much not getting into a wall of text battle with you, but I read this thread occasionally during my ban, and the impression I get is that you look at this series expecting it to be something it was never intended to be. It's cool to theorize about why this or that doesn't happen, but comparing Tolkien's work that was released in a completed form to something that exists in an unfinished format and can be swayed by editors or popularity polls or a variety of things, is like watching Scary Movie and wondering why it isn't as immersive and impressive as Amadeus or something. It's misguided.
There's nothing wrong with wanting more, but I'd be willing to wager that when this series is completely finished and Oda retires to his money bin, you still won't be satisfied with how his story is told. But it's his story to tell his way. :shrug:
I'm glad that's the case for you, but I can't agree. My understanding of good worldbuilding is that there should be a great deal of internal reasons to justify the structure of the world. That's why Tolkien is as renown as he is, the depth to the world he created is INSANE. It's most obvious when you talk to Edmund Dantès, there is an answer for almost any questions and you have to get really nitty gritty into pointless nitpicking (such as asking for the biological make up of Balrogs) before the illusion starts to crack. Ops world is huge and has consistently to it, but I can't get lost in it because any time I ask "how does that work", I realize that it actually doesn't.
I can't really make a big wall of text as of now in any case, and I don't want to go into the meta discussion of criticism itself, but I think I'm pretty fair in how I apply these standards to all stories, because I separate that from whether I actually like a work or not. It's not about expectations, it's about whether the work meets those standards.
One piece is a very celebrated work. When there was a best story ever thread, it came up a few times. The whole GOda meme stems from the fact that Oda is one of the few who pays careful attention to worldbuilding. He accomplished a lot when it comes to creating a world. However, it just doesn't seem sensible to me to only frame analysis of where one piece triumphs in regards to storytelling, and not acknowledge where it falters, even if it has good reasoning to falter.
And some would say that Tolkien's prose suffers as a result.
The thing about creating a fictional world is while there's a temptation to explain every piece of minutiae, sometimes you need to leave things to assumed knowledge, because they screw with your story's pacing. And for a visual medium such as manga, that's even worse.
I can't really make a big wall of text as of now in any case, and I don't want to go into the meta discussion of criticism itself, but I think I'm pretty fair in how I apply these standards to all stories, because I separate that from whether I actually like a work or not. It's not about expectations, it's about whether the work meets those standards.
One piece is a very celebrated work. When there was a best story ever thread, it came up a few times. The whole GOda meme stems from the fact that Oda is one of the few who pays careful attention to worldbuilding. He accomplished a lot when it comes to creating a world. However, it just doesn't seem sensible to me to only frame analysis of where one piece triumphs in regards to storytelling, and not acknowledge where it falters, even if it has good reasoning to falter.
I'm not sure that Tolkein "did the math" when he created the economies, agriculture or other infrastructure and logistics of the lord of the rings world. What he did do was write an allegory of how power and greed can change the culture and environment of nations. One Piece is similar in that it if you look at an arc like Dressrosa it deals with themes like how a control freak government can tear families and lives apart while going at great lengths to project a superficial image of a happy society. The important thing about Lord of the Rings to most readers isn't if Gondor can afford to maintain a large standing army while in constant war with major losses of territory.
http://www.middleearthcenter.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20330
Just googling Gondor Agriculture brought up this thread. Notice how many people are arguing based on logistics and infrastructure of the cities locations, customs, etc. Edheldae seems to have an especially expansive summary. Just remarking on a city being close to the ocean, or have horses as their mascots informs us of their culture. Notice how very few people, only at the tail end of the thread, refer to external reasons for theorizing how the culture worked (by pointing out that Tolkien based a lot of his cultures on vikings). This couldn't have happened by accident. I don;t know to the extent of the math that Tolkien didn't but he didn't go "There was a city that was in constant war" and leave it at that. By filling in the minutae details, he sculpted it into something believable, not just a hypothetical construct. And for the record, I've never visited that forum. I'm not even that huge a tolkien fan, I just thought he was a good example of what I'm talking about. These are the tolkien enthusiasts, and look at them go, making informed speculation on something so minute to the story based on what they know in the books. They don't have an definitive answer, but that they can even do this speaks volumes of the depth of Tolkien's world.
I don't believe a discussion like that is possible for One Piece. We can talk about what the main narrative of OP is about, but as soon as we stray from that, every discussion seems to break down. I don't mean specifically economics, but architecture, or art. literature or non-world threatening government. Cooking customs, since Sanji's cooking is basically rarely touched upon besides for being made to look impressive. I don't have any earthy clue as to the methods of Nami's navigation. Stuff like that would lend so much authenticity to this crazy world.
The thing is that all of that is fan speculation and invention. To argue that we can't do that with One Piece is just to argue that you and I don't have the ability to do the same not that there is something especially missing in the One Piece world. In fact since this world is based so heavily on maritime trade it's much easier to invent arguments for each island having it's own very specialised economy even relying mostly on imports for food.
Like Dressrosa. We are actually told straight up that Dressrosa is mostly an agricultural economy that thrived on good land and the specialist knowledge of the Dwarves. We were shown fields of sunflowers so we can also assume that sunflower oil is a major component of the economy. Probably the people of Dressrosa use sunflower oil when cooking and also possibly for fuel and lighting.
Since Doflamingo came along we know that the economy also became more dependant on it's status as a major black market trade port and the smile trade which also guaranteed protection from the warlord Kaidou limiting the need to pay any taxes to any external force for protection. This inflow of cash allowed for more urban development in Dressrosa.
It's not hard in that way.
Old money runs deep and may work for itself. At some point you're so rich that it's downright difficult to get poor.
Also, OP has the sheer physics of the story working against it. Again, the people of OP are capable of extreme things. If a real life kingdom got destroyed the way Dressrosa was, it'd essentially be considered unrebuildable, because the funds necessary for it would be astronomical. But no one in story seems concerned about this, so it brings into question exactly how much money even matters in OP.