Gordon Shumway
Banned
Internalize..Get over it.
Internalize..Get over it.
While we're at it, they should probably bring in some people who actually watch animated films instead of 'my kids liked it so I voted for it fuck Chinese cartoons"
The Academy's viewpoint on animated flicks is so backwards. I still don't get how people keep being surprised by their narrowness.
Unrelated to the Oscars, but why can't non-white people be racist? The word, as I understand it, simply means believing one race is inherently superior to another. Black people can be racist against Mexicans. Chinese against Japanese.People conflate racism with prejudice all the time.
If you guys were waiting for Clint Eastwood to weigh in, here you go.
It's semantics.Unrelated to the Oscars, but why can't non-white people be racist? The word, as I understand it, simply means be living one race is inherently superior to another. Black people can be racist against Mexicans. Chinese against Japanese.
And really, is there anything more than a semantic difference between those two words, anyway? It seems better to differentiate "racism" and "systemic racism" than "racism" and "prejudice".
Yeah. But some people get *really* heated about semantics. :/It's semantics.
Unrelated to the Oscars, but why can't non-white people be racist? The word, as I understand it, simply means be living one race is inherently superior to another. Black people can be racist against Mexicans. Chinese against Japanese.
And really, is there anything more than a semantic difference between those two words, anyway? It seems better to differentiate "racism" and "systemic racism" than "racism" and "prejudice".
Shame that he didn't seem very invested in the question or movement, but his response isn't all that surprising.
Unrelated to the Oscars, but why can't non-white people be racist? The word, as I understand it, simply means be living one race is inherently superior to another. Black people can be racist against Mexicans. Chinese against Japanese.
And really, is there anything more than a semantic difference between those two words, anyway? It seems better to differentiate "racism" and "systemic racism" than "racism" and "prejudice".
Everyone is a peon to ByakuyaI don't think that people are suggesting that non-white people cannot be racist against other non-white people. The idea is borne of white people being at the top, and thus the angle of racism meaning the belief of racial superiority, or racism as a structure, generally isn't directed from non-white people to white people. Clearly, playing Byakuya has blinded you to your privilege!
If it wasn't clear, that last line was a million </s>es and s
I think this happens because the argument is usually presented in a way to blame black people or to shift the discussion to something that it's not. It gets tiring watching white people dodge racism, imply they have it just as bad as anyone else, or put the responsibility on black people instead of themselves. So people get heated about reminding white people who actually has the power and influence in America and that they have the responsibility to do something about it.Yeah. But some people get *really* heated about semantics. :/
How many countries are like the US?I mean if you were arguing that, for instance, white people experience racism in parts of Asia, I would agree that it's certainly a thing. It is however much harder and less common for it to happen in countries like the US.
Yeah. i tend to dodge these discussion because it's nothing more than a smoke screen.I think this happens because the argument is usually presented in a way to blame black people or to shift the discussion to something that it's not. It gets tiring watching white people dodge racism, imply they have it just as bad as anyone else, or put the responsibility on black people instead of themselves.
True.I think this happens because the argument is usually presented in a way to blame black people or to shift the discussion to something that it's not. It gets tiring watching white people dodge racism, imply they have it just as bad as anyone else, or put the responsibility on black people instead of themselves. So people get heated about reminding white people who actually has the power and influence in America and that they have the responsibility to do something about it.
How many countries are like the US?
Fun fact: Jet Li and Aaliyah just hugged in their movie because them kissing was thought to have been too much for mainstream America. Seriously. In the year 2000.
https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilear...he_original_ending_of_romeo_must_die_had_jet/
I don't get why so many white posters come into these threads and shit on Compton, Creed, and SLJ when talking about minorities getting Oscars. No, maybe you didn't think these movies were all that great, but a lot of people of color did, and that's the whole problem we're dealing with. it's about diversity in perspectives, diversity in audiences, diversity in nominees.
Isn't this simply how most Oscar discussions go down? I've also seen people shit on DiCaprio or Damon when talking about how Black actors got snubbed.I don't get why so many white posters come into these threads and shit on Compton, Creed, and SLJ when talking about minorities getting Oscars. No, maybe you didn't think these movies were all that great, but a lot of people of color did, and that's the whole problem we're dealing with. it's about diversity in perspectives, diversity in audiences, diversity in nominees.
If you guys were waiting for Clint Eastwood to weigh in, here you go.
I understand her side of the Argument.
Down the line will we see some white people denided a nomination just because they need more persons of colour to balance it out?
Yes that would be racism as well as the other way around.
James Gunn said:Dear All People from Now Until Forever, Especially Famous People in the Press:
If you're going to apologize for something you said, please don't say you're sorry that your "words have been misinterpreted," or you're sorry that people misunderstood you, or you're sorry your words were taken out of context. That is not taking responsibility. That is putting the onus on the other party, since they are the ones who misunderstood or took your words out of context.
If you've said something stupid, and you're sorry, say you're sorry for saying the stupid thing you said, or being thoughtless, or whatever YOU did. God knows, I've had to do this myself. Many times.
If you didn't say anything stupid, and people really are just misunderstanding, then DON'T APOLOGIZE. It's okay. Really. People don't have to be sorry for everything, and we're going to disagree about a lot of stuff.
But please stop with this in-between, sorry-but-really-though-it's-your-fault thing people commonly do. Because, personally, I'm less offended by the idiotic things people say or do than I am by the inability to know what an apology is.
I am perplexed as to how anyone over the age of eighteen, who has had to live his or her life surrounded by friends and family and girlfriends and boyfriends can misunderstand this one basic rule of communication.
End rant. Have a great Saturday.
I understand her side of the Argument.
Down the line will we see some white people denided a nomination just because they need more persons of colour to balance it out?
Yes that would be racism as well as the other way around.
The Academy needed the overhaul. It needed more diveristy in colour and sex, and its sad this has come to this level of bad publicity to get it done.
Unrelated to the Oscars, but why can't non-white people be racist? The word, as I understand it, simply means believing one race is inherently superior to another. Black people can be racist against Mexicans. Chinese against Japanese.
And really, is there anything more than a semantic difference between those two words, anyway? It seems better to differentiate "racism" and "systemic racism" than "racism" and "prejudice".
Fun fact: Jet Li and Aaliyah just hugged in their movie because them kissing was thought to have been too much for mainstream America. Seriously. In the year 2000.
https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilear...he_original_ending_of_romeo_must_die_had_jet/
16 years later
I understand her side of the Argument.
Down the line will we see some white people denided a nomination just because they need more persons of colour to balance it out?
Yes that would be racism as well as the other way around.
The Academy needed the overhaul. It needed more diveristy in colour and sex, and its sad this has come to this level of bad publicity to get it done.
If that's your definition of racism, then certainly. And it's a valid one. It just seems like describing that phenomenon as "systemic racism" is both less ambiguous and more descriptive, but to each their own.Racism has power, prejudice, by it self, doesn't.
For example, PoC can hate a White person all they want for being White. There is no system in greater society that empowers that viewpoint, versus in a White dominated society, the dominant group sets the tone for others, meaning hating PoC IS EMPOWERED, based on societal conditions.
Racism is what gets a kid in a bathing suit thrown to the ground and detained, while her White counterparts goes free. The cop that assaults that kid over may not have prejudice in his/her conscious thinking but the racism that created the system of bias made that kid a more likely suspect than the other kids. Same goes with a woman clutching her purse or refusing to get into an elevator with a PoC alone. The list goes on.
Racism is a system that can be enforced. Prejudice, by it self, is just that--prejudice. It has no real power in greater society. I know the semantics police will link me dictionary definitions of why I am wrong or whatever but that is what it boils down to for me. The reason it is impossible for PoC to exhibit racism (instead of prejudice) towards White people is because it is not PoC dominated society.
Yeah we wouldn't want racial bias ever going the other direction would weDown the line will we see some white people denided a nomination just because they need more persons of colour to balance it out?
While I agree that the industry has a lack of diverse roles and lots of whitewashing, I don't particularly agree with the uproar in regards to the Oscars. If the roles aren't there, then how do you expect there to be nominations?
What annoys me about this whole issue is the Smith family and their stance. Will Smith has been nominated twice in the past, and now that he has done another serious role and wasn't nominated he and his wife are raising a fuss and playing the race card? It simply means that you weren't good enough bro. And this whole "let's us do us" and "let them do them" is so racist it is not even funny, totally the wrong stand to take just because things haven't gone your way the last 2 years.
This whole boycott thing is so childish.
Right, so basically it's not that an aging 94%-white panel has a racial bias, it's that white people conveniently year-over-year are the best
While I agree that the industry has a lack of diverse roles and lots of whitewashing, I don't particularly agree with the uproar in regards to the Oscars. If the roles aren't there, then how do you expect there to be nominations?
What annoys me about this whole issue is the Smith family and their stance. Will Smith has been nominated twice in the past, and now that he has done another serious role and wasn't nominated he and his wife are raising a fuss and playing the race card? It simply means that you weren't good enough bro. And this whole "let's us do us" and "let them do them" is so racist it is not even funny, totally the wrong stand to take just because things haven't gone your way the last 2 years.
This whole boycott thing is so childish.
You clearly didn't read my post
Well considering it worked...I'd call it effective not childish
But hey thanks for your hot take and dropping of "the race card"
Also the roles were there (still not enough overall but enough for nomination), that ground has bern covered....
Fun fact: Jet Li and Aaliyah just hugged in their movie because them kissing was thought to have been too much for mainstream America. Seriously. In the year 2000.
https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilear...he_original_ending_of_romeo_must_die_had_jet/
You clearly didn't read my post
Race Card is like Exodia. Play it and all problems on the playing field are destroyed
Also, just curious, which performance by a non-white actor is most worthy of being nominated? Michael B. Jordan did a great job, but I didn't see too many movies this past year. Was Will Smith good in Concussion?
Also, just curious, which performance by a non-white actor is most worthy of being nominated? Michael B. Jordan did a great job, but I didn't see too many movies this past year. Was Will Smith good in Concussion?
Also, just curious, which performance by a non-white actor is most worthy of being nominated? Michael B. Jordan did a great job, but I didn't see too many movies this past year. Was Will Smith good in Concussion?
Okay. We've seen and answered this question a few times already, but here:
Best Picture
Straight Outta Compton
Sicario
Creed
Beasts of No Nation
Best Actor
Abraham Attah - Beast of No Nation
Michael B Jordan - Creed
Best Supporting
Idris Elba - Beasts of No Nation
Benecio del Toro - Sicario
Sam Jackson - Hateful Eight
You can see some of these in Scott Feinberg's list of Oscar predictions prior to the official release. (He's gotten rather good at picking the nominations.)
Benicio del toro?
Is there more to this question, or is this about spelling?
Isn´t he white? I´m googling it but it is not very clear. I always saw him as white.