• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Our industry is poorer for the lack of Die Hard Game Fan

WarPig

Member
ferricide said:
:rolleyes

i'm just in it for the money!


You can say whatcha want, but I AM just in it for the money. Nobody's gonna pay me this much as a librarian, that's for fucking sure.

DFS.
 

Shouta

Member
Gamefan was good for a laugh back in the day. It'd be nice to have around nowadays just for some magazine that isn't so vanilla-flavored.

Oh and FF9 > FF7 > FF8 except for gameplay systems where FF8 > FF7 > FF9.
 
FnordChan said:
"Atari is back, come pet the cat."

FnordChan

My favorite quote has to be either "Donkey Kong Country 2 is the best 16 bit game ever" or something about Knuckles Chaotix being the best 32-bit game (ha!) or Sonic game or some other nonsense.
 

Kai Dracon

Writing a dinosaur space opera symphony
BlackClouds said:
No doubt. That was Gamefan's best asset, the sheer amount of coverage of the industry, domestic and import. Magazines today are have almost nothing in them, and can be read in 30 minutes. Also, anybody with common sense could actually use the coverage to their advantage.

For instance, the pictures and information in the mag showed that that Jaguar was not going to be a system even worth looking at, despite the hard sell hype job. Low poly counts, lack of big time third party support, barely above Genesis/Snes level 2D stuff, obvious D level games. Hype rarely motivates me, so I was able to see through the hype to find the information in the articles/reviews to make my owned informed decisions. So what they hyped games and systems I wouldn't be caught dead buying, I let people have their fun, as long as I can get mine. You can easily tell that the hype was heartfelt, so it was easy to ignore if I felt it was unwarrented. BTW, I would not admit in public that I bought a Jag at full price, doesn't look good.

Nerds have not replaced Gamefan, nor has any of the pay information sites. Nerds/fanboys don't know shit about anything so they are the current information source? That's retarded.

Now this is a balanced and perceptive observation about Gamefan, compared to "circle-jerking" or just-as-bad anti-circle-jerking hate. Something the hate of GF isn't taking into account as well is that Gamefan was a creature of a different era. This was before mainstream Internet for one thing. Screenshots can tell a million words, but virtually all publications back in the day at most gave you a handful of shots that frequently were just the publicity shots given to them by the publisher. Gamefan was the precursor of websites like Gamespot which archive massive amounts of media. You could really get a feel for many games thanks to Gamefan's total visual blowout.

Also, for all the venom spewed at Gamefan for being "fanboy" (and this is somehow less fanboy than -other- nerds who sit on forums flaming the Gamefan nerds for liking stuff too much?)... I'm not sure if that's a huge step down from modern reviewing practices, where it's suspect that many reviewers didn't even come near to finishing the game, and give ratings that frequently are called pure bullshit for different reasons. Which would you rather have? A wildly enthusiastic and amusing to read fan of a game where you can just turn down the hype a bit in your head, or post-cynical, pseudo-professional Game Journalists who, in my view, increasingly say very little about the games they review that doesn't fit into a predictable formula?

Something the Gamefan staff said more than once, was that they always kept in mind they were writing about videogames, and they did not delude themselves that they were journalists. (Damning accusations of their fanboy nature fall flat to my ears when GF itself readily admitted this.) Also, in my opinion, modern Internet Fanboy Pundits are not nearly so entertaining to read as the GF writers were :p Unless you're reading for pure schadenfruede to chuckle over how superior you are to them :p (Which in itself, often denotes a different kind of fanboy.)
 

callous

Member
JackFrost2012 said:
Wow, people don't still argue "FFVIII's battle system just has you just summon Guardian Forces over and over," do they? ...do they?

Actually, I'd say it's still a valid argument since drawing from enemies and items is pretty much every bit as tedious as watching those goddamn GF scenes. It's like a choice between eating puke with a fork or a spoon. Junctioning is a cool system, though.
 

djtiesto

is beloved, despite what anyone might say
God, I miss Gamefan... nice, huge screenshots and reviews of super obscure import games... their reviews were pretty over-the-top, but game reviews sucked then and they suck just the same now :p Though, me listening to their hype caused me to buy Landstalker and Gunstar Heroes, can't say I regret that!!!

Oh, I think out of all the PSX games, I liked 7 the best... I thought 8 was one of my least favorite FF's, story and gameplay-wise (well, except for X2), and 9 was extremely dry... the story never grasped me, the dungeons sucked (most had what, like 4 or 5 rooms in them?), soundtrack was repetitive and boring (FF8 probably has the best of the 3), and it was loaded with random encounters. 3 through 6 were my favorite of the FFs... and I actually liked 10 a fair amount.
 

WarPig

Member
D2M15 said:
Did someone say Jackal?

No, that was some other thread, but any thread could use a healthy injection of Jackal. Especially another fucking FF vs. FF vs. FF dork-o-rama. You know what kicks the fuck out of every fucking Final Fantasy ever?

Jackal%20-%20Konami.jpg


MOTHERFUCKING JACKAL, MOTHERFUCKER

DFS.
 

djtiesto

is beloved, despite what anyone might say
WarPig said:
No, that was some other thread, but any thread could use a healthy injection of Jackal. Especially another fucking FF vs. FF vs. FF dork-o-rama. You know what kicks the fuck out of every fucking Final Fantasy ever?

Jackal%20-%20Konami.jpg


MOTHERFUCKING JACKAL, MOTHERFUCKER

DFS.

I wouldn't go THAT far, but that game definitely needs a sequel.

Kajima - that's a fantastic post above, I agree completely. I'd much rather listen to Gamefan's fanboy-induced rants (and drool over their nice screenshots) than adlibbed "journalistic" reviews from the likes of EGM, PSM, etc...
 

WarPig

Member
djtiesto said:
I wouldn't go THAT far...

BULLSHIT! THERE IS ONLY JACKAL!

jackal_(usa).jpg


And fuck all the bullshit about this or that magazine. The only good magazines are the ones that PAY ME.

DFS.
 

madara

Member
Gamefan ruled. It got you excited about games even if you didnt agree sometimes. You realized to discern rabid love from stg fan didnt mean you going to love that stg game if you find them average at best but still respected their unique amateurish way they got you pumped up for games without blantantly lying, it was just true diehard love.
Heck first time I heard about Landstalker or seen Landstalker was because of GF. Among dozens of others I imported because of them. I actually owe them great deal. They even went so far as having mini import game guides to help you threw games abit, not as much as I would have liked but more then any mag as dared try. Early 90's wouldnt been same without them, like 80s not having he-man or MJ.
 

spookyfish

Member
I still hate that GameFan was gone before the Xbox and Gamecube launched. I would really have enjoyed their coverage.

My favorite magazine, hands down.

I'm still want to find the issues I never was able to buy. It's the only magazine I go back and read - sometimes for laughs but mostly for nostalgia's sake.
 

Dave Long

Banned
The problem is people try to look at the entirety of GameFan and call it "great" when it really only was great until the 32-bit era started going in full swing. It lost some of what made it so freaking cool as soon as games were turning 3D and Playstation became a household word. I have some of those really early issues, the one with the 16-bit Blaster Master 2 on the cover, and from about there on. Honestly, there was absolutely nothing else like it at the time. The people trying to say it's nostalgia are full of it. I pull those issues out today and they are AWESOME to look at.

Every one of them makes me want to play those games they reviewed well because I can see the detail in the screens. The screens always seemed to be handpicked to convey what was so cool about the game they were discussing. As I said though, the further from the start of the mag you go toward the end of its run, the less it resembled what it started out as. It definitely was better early on.

I'm definitely a fan of the mag. I was showing it to people every chance I got when I worked at EB. I wanted people to read it so they knew there was more to gaming than Bart vs. The World because people had no fucking clue what was good back then. GameFan at least championed the winners. They highlighted games that everyone needed to get their hands on because a lot of those games simply made gaming BETTER and more vital. Gunstar Heroes, Aliens vs. Predator and Tempest 2000 on Jag, even smaller titles like the still amazing even today Dashin' Desperadoes and tiny gems like Atomic Runner, both from the always overlooked Data East.

Those Game Fan eds reading this can rest assured they got it right and that people calling it pure nostalgia are simply wrong. Go back and pull out your old Game Fan mags and marvel at those eye blazing layouts. Enjoy the enthusiasm for games on every single page. There really has never been another magazine or website like it since. GAF is the closest we get to those days.

Because dammit, it's fun to be the people who notice the sparks are better in the PS2 version of Burnout 3!

EDIT! - I just thought about this as I'm listening to GamingFM and the ZoE2 theme just came on. Consider if you will, a modern day Game Fan mag that runs a spread on Zone of the Enders 2. Your eyes would melt! People might actually have paid attention to how awesome that game is!
 

MVS

Member
bionic77 said:
Ask and you may recieve.

Dango might be interested in reviving Gamefan or something similar. I don't know the likelihood of it happening, but I know that he is interested in making it happen. Hopefully he does, gaming media blows these days.

Not a hope in hell.
 
Dave Long said:
The problem is people try to look at the entirety of GameFan and call it "great" when it really only was great until the 32-bit era started going in full swing. It lost some of what made it so freaking cool as soon as games were turning 3D and Playstation became a household word. I have some of those really early issues, the one with the 16-bit Blaster Master 2 on the cover, and from about there on. Honestly, there was absolutely nothing else like it at the time.
Although I agree with majority of what you said, I can't say I agree here. IMO, Gamefan was rock solid all the way up to and including the 32-bit era. They did an awesome job covering the SS, PS and even the N64 (import and domestic) and still even devoted pages to the dying 16-bit games releasing well into the 32-bit days. Where GF went south for me is when they had a 'changing of the guard' where the mag went under new management. Although the quality of the mag was relatively consistent with that of the older issues, the staff just couldn't get it together making the mag sporadic, never knowing when or even if a new issue would release. There'd be 2, 3, and even 4 month gaps between issues and then it just died. I have every single issue of GF and go back to read them from time to time and even the latter issues, while slim were still doing the job of covering the games we, the gamers, cared about most.

RIP GF :(
 
Top Bottom