Palworld developers confirm they will fight against Nintendo lawsuit to ensure indie devs are not discouraged 'from pursuing their creative ideas'

Utamaru1706 said:
lol, Nintendo's efforts in patenting their game mechanics is finally comes to fruition, because they definitely don't want to experience another Genshin fiasco on their hand, where they can't do anything when Hoyoverse were allegedly using some of BotW's mechanics on Genshin, since they didn't patent the gameplay mechanics (they started doing it during TotK, though).
Click to expand...


Then, Ubisoft might sue Nintendo for basically copy-pasting most of their open-world mechanics.

Genshin plays nothing like Zelda, those games could hardly be any more different. And no, Nintendo didn't invent the cartoon graphics, either.

This "Nintendo invented the world" shit needs to end.
 
Angry_Megalodon said:
Then, Ubisoft might sue Nintendo for basically copy-pasting most of their open-world mechanics.

Genshin plays nothing like Zelda, those games could hardly be any more different. And no, Nintendo didn't invent the cartoon graphics, either.

This "Nintendo invented the world" shit needs to end.
Click to expand...
That depends whether Ubisoft patented their gameplay mechanics or not, and whether they want to go suing others IF they do patented it, since that would be a really easy case for them, considering how many games that were using the gameplay mechanics from their games.

Also, some people were calling out Genshin being a "BotW rip-off" during its early versions, because it uses some gameplay mechanics that were popularized by BotW, like the gliding traversal, free climbing, cooking for heals & buffs, or environmental effects (e.g grass burnt from fire).

But the game already evolved in many ways over the course of several years, it barely resembles BotW anymore, and the people who still think it's the same is either a really conservative person, a hater, or just a troll...
 
Utamaru1706 said:
Also, some people were calling out Genshin being a "BotW rip-off" during its early versions, because it uses some gameplay mechanics that were popularized by BotW, like the gliding traversal, free climbing, cooking for heals & buffs, or environmental effects (e.g grass burnt from fire).
Click to expand...

The only people saying that were rabid Pikmins. BOTW doesn't invent a single original mechanic. Everything is taken from other games, Nintendo's, and third parties. And that is fine because art is an iteration and nobody can claim ownership of a particular style, only concrete works.

What Nintendo is doing is wrong at all levels. If the other companies were as cunts as them, they wouldn't be able to make any games outside their legacy IPs, cos everything else would be patented by others. This is a lose-lose game.

Mihoyo has invented a gacha system that now is copied by everyone else, and they don't sue left and right, even if those are direct competitors. That's the market.

ReyBrujo said:
They don't need to have invented it, they just need to have been the first to patent it.
Click to expand...

Technically yes, but this is a road that leads to the end of any creation because EVERYTHING is the inspiration of a previous work. Imagine that From Software patented their formula. How many games wouldn't be released?

People who defend this are beyond fanboyism.
 
Angry_Megalodon said:
The only people saying that were rabid Pikmins. BOTW doesn't invent a single original mechanic. Everything is taken from other games, Nintendo's, and third parties. And that is fine because art is an iteration and nobody can claim ownership of a particular style, only concrete works.

What Nintendo is doing is wrong at all levels. If the other companies were as cunts as them, they wouldn't be able to make any games outside their legacy IPs, cos everything else would be patented by others. This is a lose-lose game.

Mihoyo has invented a gacha system that now is copied by everyone else, and they don't sue left and right, even if those are direct competitors. That's the market.
Click to expand...
Japan is definitely much stricter in terms of copyrights and patents compared to other countries, and video games are no different in this matter.

I mean, not a while ago Konami literally filed a case against Cygames with the same case like "Palworld vs Nintendo", because Konami felt Cygames were using gameplay mechanics from their Power Pros franchise that were first created & used by them for their Umamusume game, and Cygames didn't contact them to ask for permission, nor talking about terms & conditions (you could try google it about the case).

It's kinda wild, but I guess that's Japan for ya, lol...
 
Fuck 'em!
8w3QsCX.png
 
Angry_Megalodon said:
Then, Ubisoft might sue Nintendo for basically copy-pasting most of their open-world mechanics.

Genshin plays nothing like Zelda, those games could hardly be any more different. And no, Nintendo didn't invent the cartoon graphics, either.

This "Nintendo invented the world" shit needs to end.
Click to expand...

For Nintendo's sake, maybe they ought to hope the patent route doesn't work.

On the other hand, if it opens a precedent for Ubisoft to bitch, Nintendo's lawyers would just get more work.

Pocketpair could lose but "win" in the end by creating a giant permanent legal thorn in N's side of their own making.

Nintendo and Pocketpair's lawyers have probably shaken hands on it already! 🤝
 
Angry_Megalodon said:
Technically yes, but this is a road that leads to the end of any creation because EVERYTHING is the inspiration of a previous work.
Click to expand...
That's how the patenting system works (especially in US). Ironically the system was created so that investments in creations are protected.

Angry_Megalodon said:
Imagine that From Software patented their formula. How many games wouldn't be released?
Click to expand...
Counterfactually speaking we don't know how many new games and genres would have been created had studios not been able to just copy the formula. People complain about the large amount of metroidvanias and roguelites being released lately, had those studios been forced to innovate we could have gotten new and innovative games.
 
Evil Calvin said:
Didn't Pokemon blatantly ripoff tons of elements from Dragon Quest decades ago?
Click to expand...

We are talking about patent law here and you are talking about copyright. According to copyright standards? Probably not.

I also find the comparison questionable. I know a lot of people are making it here. But I don't share that opinion. Many of the designs bear little resemblance, except that they are birds, for example. And the style is completely different in each case. Palworld is damn close to Pokémon. So close, my children called it Pokémon for the first few days. Because of the balls, similar characters etc. the difference is much less than the DQ / Pokémon designs. When Palworld came out back then, the visuals were a huge topic. Now many may say oh my god, they're taking them to court, why? Nintendo is evil. If we think back to the Palworld launch, the tenor was oh god, that's so similar, they'll sue for sure.

From a copyright point of view, everything may even fit. In the case of texts, sometimes only a little modification is made and it passes as an original work. But this is about patent law. It remains to be seen how the courts will decide.

By the way, I have played a few of these collectible monster games. Others manage to be a bit more unique. I found Palworld rather uninspired. They just threw survival into the mix. But even the system was nothing that hadn't already been seen elsewhere. Damn close to Ark. For me, Palworld is Ark meets Pokémon. Or an Ark in a Pokémon costume. The thing could probably have existed as an Ark mod. It's nice, but quickly forgotten.
 
A lot of ppl here are comparing images of the monsters, while in the meantime Nintendo is sueing for the ball mechanic, thing is, you can't really patent a trap, it is the same thing as throwing a net at an animal. In my opinion everything will end up with pallworld changing the ball system with something else.
 
thief183 said:
A lot of ppl here are comparing images of the monsters, while in the meantime Nintendo is sueing for the ball mechanic, thing is, you can't really patent a trap, it is the same thing as throwing a net at an animal. In my opinion everything will end up with pallworld changing the ball system with something else.
Click to expand...
You can patent anything you came up with yourself, that's how technology works.
 
Last edited:
It's about the designs.

Anyone fooling themselves that it's a case of gameplay mechanic x against mechanic y infringement because of some legal jargon blah blah is deluded. This is how legalise works: use whatever tools you have to most easily get a win.

The designs have clearly been stolen -- everyone knows that -- and that's what's promoted the legal process.

I would say that not only have the designs been stolen but the theft of the IP has likely damaged the Pokemon brand.

The so called 'indie developer' (who has made millions $) pulling the standing up for the little guy... true creative people don't steal.
 
thief183 said:
A lot of ppl here are comparing images of the monsters, while in the meantime Nintendo is sueing for the ball mechanic, thing is, you can't really patent a trap, it is the same thing as throwing a net at an animal. In my opinion everything will end up with pallworld changing the ball system with something else.
Click to expand...

We are not talking about a net here either. A Pokéball is already quite specific. We already had this discussion yesterday in the other thread. The patent will maybe stand up in court because it is a very specific thing. We're not talking about broadly defined features such as monsters or catching them, but about catching them specifically with a ball. This is also difficult to compare with a net. Balls are not a common catching tool and more a fantasy thing.
 
Angry_Megalodon said:
Then, Ubisoft might sue Nintendo for basically copy-pasting most of their open-world mechanics.

Genshin plays nothing like Zelda, those games could hardly be any more different. And no, Nintendo didn't invent the cartoon graphics, either.

This "Nintendo invented the world" shit needs to end.
Click to expand...

True, Nintendo acting tough on small unknown studios. When big players come they will get scared easily and bugger off to whatever niche to milk their autistic man kids exactly like what happened after Gamecube when they felt like they can't compete with the big boys.. they created Wii and now relying completely on Switch.

They are going to be in for a rude awakening next-gen when the PC handhelds mature more and Sony and perhaps MS enter their space with full force!

I expect resorting to a theme park next, or reverting to their original form making playing cards 🤣
 
SweetTooth said:
True, Nintendo acting tough on small unknown studios. When big players come they will get scared easily and bugger off to whatever niche to milk their autistic man kids exactly like what happened after Gamecube when they felt like they can't compete with the big boys.. they created Wii and now relying completely on Switch.

They are going to be in for a rude awakening next-gen when the PC handhelds mature more and Sony and perhaps MS enter their space with full force!

I expect resorting to a theme park next, or reverting to their original form making playing cards 🤣
Click to expand...

So where are the lawsuits against Nexomon, TemTem, Coromon and similar games?
 
thief183 said:
A lot of ppl here are comparing images of the monsters, while in the meantime Nintendo is sueing for the ball mechanic, thing is, you can't really patent a trap, it is the same thing as throwing a net at an animal. In my opinion everything will end up with pallworld changing the ball system with something else.
Click to expand...
PLXH83z.jpeg
 
Closer said:
You can patent anything you came up with yourself, that's how technology works.
Click to expand...
Well not really, I can't patent a window for example, I can patent a system to open it maybe, but you can't patent the (don't know the word in english) most common one.

I'm not sure if I explained myself well...
 
FewRope said:
Such a good point, fuck Nintendo and if they win this is just the beginning
Click to expand...

Do you realise that the games mentioned are all older than Palworld? Perhaps Nintendo is not simply interested in similar designs and monsters that you can catch. Some reports have also mentioned several patents.

If Nintendo wanted to sue everyone who releases a game in which monsters can be caught: Why Palworld now and not the ones mentioned years ago? They are not unknown either. TemTem in particular was big. I may be wrong, but aren't all of these games available on the Switch? Nexomon, Nexomon 2 and Coromon for sure. I wasn't interested in TemTem, so I'd have to look it up first. I only discovered Nexomon because of the Switch.

Nexomon has some similarities in terms of the game system. However, the monsters are in their own style. And instead of balls, you throw Nexotraps. But it is similar to the older and classic Pokémon games. Even the soundtrack is reminds me of Pokémon.
 
Natsuko said:
We are not talking about a net here either. A Pokéball is already quite specific. We already had this discussion yesterday in the other thread. The patent will maybe stand up in court because it is a very specific thing. We're not talking about broadly defined features such as monsters or catching them, but about catching them specifically with a ball. This is also difficult to compare with a net. Balls are not a common catching tool and more a fantasy thing.
Click to expand...
The ner was an example, cause I agree that the ball is specific, but they can use a cube and it works, looking at the patent you will notice that is the catching logic the has been under scrutiny, and that is the reason I don't agree.

If I launch a "cube" at something there will be a chance of success, and a logic behind it. As an example Nintendo patent the fact that the item you throw can be of different levels with different chances.

If they win the lawsuit I can see this being applied to anything, like loot, or rarity levels exc...
 
I personally root for Pocketpair here because I generally empathize with small businesses, however, Nintendo typically does its homework when it comes to legal tactics and legal work, so it's likely that this thing will end in a way that's satisfactory to them.

My non-informed opinion on this is: I anticipate this ending in some form of settlement and maybe a licensing agreement for the patents.
 
Natsuko said:
Do you realise that the games mentioned are all older than Palworld? Perhaps Nintendo is not simply interested in similar designs and monsters that you can catch. Some reports have also mentioned several patents.

If Nintendo wanted to sue everyone who releases a game in which monsters can be caught: Why Palworld now and not the ones mentioned years ago? They are not unknown either. TemTem in particular was big. I may be wrong, but aren't all of these games available on the Switch? Nexomon, Nexomon 2 and Coromon for sure. I wasn't interested in TemTem, so I'd have to look it up first. I only discovered Nexomon because of the Switch.

Nexomon has some similarities in terms of the game system. However, the monsters are in their own style. And instead of balls, you throw Nexotraps. But it is similar to the older and classic Pokémon games. Even the soundtrack is reminds me of Pokémon.
Click to expand...
And what about it? They are not suing because copyright of the design, they are doing because Palworld uses kinda a pokeball, thats a dangerous precedent
 
thief183 said:
Well not really, I can't patent a window for example, I can patent a system to open it maybe, but you can't patent the (don't know the word in english) most common one.

I'm not sure if I explained myself well...
Click to expand...

And that is precisely the point. We're not talking about a ball or catching monsters here. We're talking about catching monsters with a ball and everything that goes with it in Pokémon. That's a bit more specific than there are monsters in both games and you collect them.

That's why it's not so certain that this really isn't a case that Nintendo can win. They haven't patented monsters or balls. We're talking about a detailed process of how these monsters are caught. There are even different coloured spheres in Palworld with different qualities in terms of the chance of catching them. Just like we've known from Pokémon for decades. Pokéball, Suberball, Hyperball, Masterball ... The Master Ball counterpart is the Ultimate Sphere.
 
Natsuko said:
According to reports, it is probably about catching with the Pokéball or, in this case, the Pallsphere. However, other reports mention several patents. Someone in the other thread posted this a few hours ago.

Whether this is ultimately a violation will have to be decided by judges and not by the forum.
Click to expand...
Nintendo is going to win easily…
 
FewRope said:
And what about it? They are not suing because copyright of the design, they are doing because Palworld uses kinda a pokeball, thats a dangerous precedent
Click to expand...

You obviously haven't read my posts, because I have pointed out more than once that this is not about copyright but patent law.

I also pointed out that there are various (well-known) games in which monsters are caught and then used to fight. Some here still insist that it is simply about the designs. If that were the case, why hasn't Nintendo sued the developers of TemTem, Nexomon and Coromon? Apparently Nintendo has even approved games reminiscent of Pokémon for its own hardware. I don't know why some people here keep harping on about monster designs. It's not about them and Palworld isn't the first game a la Pokémon. It was just particularly brazen in being a Pokémon (+Ark) clone. And may have infringed patents in the process. A court will sort that out or an agreement will be reached beforehand.
 
AFBT88 said:
I love Nintendo but i hate them as well.
Click to expand...
I'm less in love with them and hate most of their practices. They can make an oddball game that will appeal to an older than 10 kid but I stick to my principles and don't cave because THE NEXT GAME IN THAT FRANCHISE IS NOW IN 2K AND PORTABLE! Most people say will cave if there's a another portable Mario Kart or rehash times 10 because they sop up that Nintendo milk like sheep.

Every once in a while there's a game I legitimately want to play but let's be honest, Nintendo hasn't been "the best" since the SNES days. They have that Disney thing and that keeps them afloat with my kids. They get massacred in the games department by missing out a metric ton of games.

Now you have portable competition and PC HW which destroys what the limited little Nintendo phone can do. That is the real great thing is that we don't need a Nintedno portable anymore.
 
ReyBrujo said:
People complain about the large amount of metroidvanias and roguelites being released lately, had those studios been forced to innovate we could have gotten new and innovative games.
Click to expand...

That's like saying that new painters have to come up with new colors in order to paint.

"Sorry, red's taken… blue too… nope, Da Vinci did Lime Green first. Sorry, Van Gogh use that particular shade of midnight blue."
 
OGM_Madness said:
That's like saying that new painters have to come up with new colors in order to paint.
Click to expand...

Not really, it's what you do with the colors, not the colors themselves (which would be copyright or trademark). Cubism forced people to innovate, for example coming up with Futurism, Dada and Art Deco for example, and for the untrained eye they are vastly different.
 
ReyBrujo said:
People complain about the large amount of metroidvanias and roguelites being released lately, had those studios been forced to innovate we could have gotten new and innovative games.
Click to expand...
Who are "people"? Because "people" are buying, playing and enjoying these roguelites and metroidvanias, in vast amounts. It's why they're popular to make to begin with.
 
ReyBrujo said:
Counterfactually speaking we don't know how many new games and genres would have been created had studios not been able to just copy the formula. People complain about the large amount of metroidvanias and roguelites being released lately, had those studios been forced to innovate we could have gotten new and innovative games.
Click to expand...

I can't even.
 
ReyBrujo said:
Just talking after reading reactions here when new roguelites are announced at Nintendo Direct for example.
Click to expand...
Reactions here are barely a representation of the public at large. There's a considerable market for metroidvanias and roguelites (proportionally of course), its why there's so many of them in the first place.
 
ReyBrujo said:
Just talking after reading reactions here when new roguelites are announced at Nintendo Direct for example.

You don't need to.
Click to expand...

I found the solution for all the old, bad platform games. Just patent it so we only have one, then those hundreds of other developers would have been forced to come up with their own idea.

I never would have had this epiphany without you. Imagine how many more distinct puzzle, top-down, shooter and RPG games we'd have had. Exactly one for every platformer ever released! In fact, I have proof. It's called math, and I have a calculator.
 
Software patents need to die.
Like, delete this entire system, and the world would instantly be a better place.

Nintendo has to lose this. Anything else would set a scary precedent.
 
Last edited:
apple_of_enlightenment said:
It's about the designs.
Click to expand...

Feels like it. It's obvious to anyone how similar they are. Nintendo is chasing the patents because it'll give them a stronger case, but I suspect the real reason they have a problem is that the Palworld devs are shamelessly airlifting the aesthetic wholesale. It's a core part of the appeal of Nintendo's franchise, and they know it. Kids are gonna see Palworld and think 'Pokémon'.

If they'd gone with their own aesthetic and designs, they probably would be getting away with it.

Griffon said:
Nintendo has to lose this. Anything else would set a scary precedent.
Click to expand...

Complete and total opposite.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

VGC: Palworld confirms ‘disappointing’ game changes forced by Pokémon lawsuit
News  2 3
118
422
AngelMuffin replied
Pocketpair (Palworld devs) - Report on Patent Infringement Lawsuit
News 
33
2K
Tertullian replied
Palworld developers challenge Nintendo's patents using examples from Zelda, ARK: Survival, Tomb Raider, Titanfall 2 and many more huge titles
News  2
62
3K
Griffon replied
Nintendo is suing Palworld devs
4 5 6 7 8
353
21K
Dazraell replied
Palworld Lawsuit patent details; as vague as "press A to jump". Nintendo has lost their minds
43
4K
VGEsoterica replied
Top Bottom