How is it a stupid statement? His implying that they want the console to be accessible to many people and that the price should be right.
Because Xbox.
How is it a stupid statement? His implying that they want the console to be accessible to many people and that the price should be right.
Because Xbox.
yeah...true. Sad, but true. Can't say anything good about Xbox. I am sure if this was Jim Ryan speaking it would be a different story.
I'm not a fan of the tone I felt reading that interview. Struck me as testing the water for a high priced X, laying the seeds for claiming S is to help people out due to economy, and getting ahead of bad news or market research or something. And worst of all, possibly laying groundwork for a delay. I might be getting worried about nothing since I'm itching to try out these next gen experiences and starting to wonder how much of the delayed conferences (industry wide) are due to disrupted work conditions for around 4-5 months depending on locale (as opposed to for the reasons stated). Who really knows?
It's not dumb at all. From a cost perspective if you can eliminate the biggest loss which is the box, you do it. They are creating an eco system that doesn't require their box to enter. Basically if you sell an XSX at 500$ but it cost 600$ to manufacture you are selling at a 100$ loss, but if you can get that same customer on a pc they build, and have them buy your software and gamepass you reap basically all the gains. From a business perspective it makes the most sense even if it's something us gamers can't gully get since we have in our mind "you only win by selling the most boxes." Just not the case anymore. I'm sure they'd rather have 50 million game pass users than 30 million XBSX in houses.Because the suggestion that the strategy isn't to sell a ton of Xboxes is fucking dumb on its face and irresponsible and insulting for people who've put their eggs in the Microsoft basket and partnered up with them.
Ruining console game? do you hear yourself?? My lord that is one of the worst statements in this thread. I think you just negated any option you have with that statement.
Almost makes you wonder if they'll do tiered launches again.I mean he’s not wrong but it doesn’t inspire confidence either.
I think they would if the backlash wouldn't kill the brand. Last gen Xbox jumped the gun trying to push digital too hard and it bit them. In the end yea most gamers buy games digital now, but being too far ahead the curve isn't good either for a business. Humans are stubborn and hold on to the past even when it's past being convenient. It's about timing. If in 5-10 years we see a similar shift where most gamers are playing Xbox on the eventual Xcloud smart TV app I'm sure they'll slowly phase out the box and it'll just be an optional thing you can buy they keep on hand in limited quantity.So why release a console? Why not just be a streaming service?
People here acting like Ms doesnt care how many consoles they sell? Well lets put it this way.
If MS sell under 30 million I doubt they will sell another console again......
More console = more subscriptions, more software sales.
Naw the funny one is "Microsoft doesn't care if you buy their games on PC or Xbox." Yea Microsoft loses 30% cut to Steam and $60 a year because your not paying for live, but they totally don't care.that phil spencer has actually convinced some people they don't care about how many xboxs they sell is honestly impressive
Not true. With Xcloud you don't even need an Xbox.The more Xboxes you sell, the more people you can sell your services and games? I guess Spencer came up with the name for Xbox 360.
And it's not like MS is a 1st party games powerhouse that can sell a truckload of their games on other platforms. Very odd strategy.
Great selling point for XSX.Not true. With Xcloud you don't even need an Xbox.
First that is pure nonsense. The consoles now were doing the same things as Xbox 360 and PS3. Title updates, downloading games, and DLC were all no different on those consoles then they are now, outside of the size of downloads.To be fair, I think once the generation of consoles that started with the 360 and PS3 was the end of traditional consoles (constant updates, downloading games, DLC). This is just furthering the end of console gaming. I HATE fucking streaming. I HATE the "Netflix" of gaming. This is disposable gaming and it's not what I want. That is my opinion.
How can you say gone are the days of a dedicated box.. What alternate reality are you living in. Series X is a an all out gaming tour deforce. You cannot argue that.Back in the day Microsoft actually made computers. They quickly went away from that model though to just offer Windows OS to computer manufactures. Nowadays Microsoft makes their money off of software and OS (although yes, I know they do still sell computers and other electronic devices.)
It really does sound like they are wanting to turn XBOX into the Windows OS model. The model that makes them the big bucks. They want to replicate that, even though it may not be successful. They just want to turn XBOX into that, no matter what the cost really.
This makes me sad. Gone will be the days of a dedicated box, made for a dedicated purpose.
First that is pure nonsense. The consoles now were doing the same things as Xbox 360 and PS3. Title updates, downloading games, and DLC were all no different on those consoles then they are now, outside of the size of downloads.
Who cares if you hate streaming. if you hate it, don't use it. I don't use it and it does nothing to make me thing MS should leave the games biz! Disposeable gaming? you're not making sense. You're playing the same games on streaming services that you could by physically.
Do you really think they are afraid of an SSD when they have RT.. What would you prefer Running fast in a game or super realistic worlds with no extra hit to the GPU because there are dedicated RT cores to handle the lighting and audio?If I was trying to compete with PS5’s best in class SSD, I/O solution and stable of first party developers, I’d be downplaying sales expectations to Wall Street and my bosses as much and as soon as possible also.
He knows what he’s doing here folks.
Do you really think they are afraid of an SSD when they have RT.. What would you prefer Running fast in a game or super realistic worlds with no extra hit to the GPU because there are dedicated RT cores to handle the lighting and audio?
I said in my original argument that the 360 and PS3 consoles starting this bullshit trend. I thought I made that pretty clear...
Who cares if I hate streaming??? I care! I'm happy if it is done alongside console/PC gaming, but we ALL know that streaming is what the console/PC devs all want. They want us to want it as well. I'm not down for that shit. The more we just let it happen and "who cares, don't play streaming games" won't make a lick of difference because they will creep it in to our gaming services and it will definitely be the end of gaming for many of us purists.
As for disposable gaming... If we head down the games pass route (the "Netflix" of gaming") then yes, that is disposable gaming. Play these games whilst we have them up for you but once they're gone, they're gone for good. We have a MASSIVE issue with not preserving our past games, and we will have similar problems in the future if everything turns into streaming and games pass (and it fucking will if it's successful).
Microsoft have stated time and again they don't give console numbers for sales as they are interested in "services" to distribute games. Call me old fashioned, but I love the new console near the TV playing games like the old days. There is nothing wrong with that and nothing stating we can't do that for the long term. If it ain't broke, don't fucking need fixing...
If they didn’t post about them selling millions and millions, you would be on here yelling about “omg MS must have horrible sales they won’t even post their sales numbers LOLZSo if they sell millions and millions they won't post/brag about it
Got it!
Sorry to break it to Spencer but consoles rely on the network effect, i.e., the fastest out the gate in terms of sales always wins. This is a ridiculous argument and they're already writing it off.
I don’t get this . Yeah this was applied before when higher console sales means more exclusives . Now third party games are on every console possible even stadia . The only exclusives are first party games and those games will be great / bad regardless if the console has 1 million sold or 100 million.Sorry to break it to Spencer but consoles rely on the network effect, i.e., the fastest out the gate in terms of sales always wins. This is a ridiculous argument and they're already writing it off.
I really can't understand how there are still fans of Microsoft and xbox after getting scraps since the second half of the 360 era and all of this generation I really can't understand it smdh but hey I guess people really love mediocre output from a as the fans would say " trillion dollars company". Like seriously don't y'all have any pride.
Well, let's stick with the topic and discuss why it makes sense to anyone that if a company is going to go into hardware and develop partnerships based at least (probably more) on that hardware, to say that they're not concerned with how many they sell in its launch year.
Not butt hurt in the slightest do u just trying to understand that allI can't understand how there are still people on neogaf who get butt hurt over people liking something they don't.
Like seriously, don't y'all have any brains?
Agreed.
At this point, if Series X fails, I think they need to consider just going 3rd party if they are in love with those subscription numbers soooooooo much.
I don't think the broader audience cares about any sort of metrics at all.I don't think the broader audience cares, understand, or gives a fuck about these new metrics
HW sales don’t matter
Software sales don’t matter
Exclusives don’t matter
Next gen exclusives don’t matter
Yeah, their approach is lagely based around costumer services while sony's revolves around new tech.They may be moving towards a model where they want subscriptions over sales
Lmao, JFC"People find real value in the investment that they make in gaming. You can buy a console, buy some games, and it can literally provide your family with hundreds of hours of entertainment. Even when we went back and looked at 2008-09, in that recession, to see what the impact was on gaming - gaming did OK. It was durable.
We want to make sure we're providing the right value to customers.
Price is going to be important.
But our strategy is centred around the player, not the device"
More at the source
![]()
Xbox Series X: Microsoft tailors launch plans for the pandemic
Xbox chief Phil Spencer explains how coronavirus has affected the console's release strategy.www.bbc.co.uk
Considering the approach PlayStation has already committed to aka fast conversion to PS5 the contrast will be stark and I'm guessing if Sony touts their sales, this type of sentiment kinda falls flat. THe problem is XBOX has always touted console and games sales and while they may be trying to move on from a metric of success that they created, I don't think the broader audience cares, understand, or gives a fuck about these new metrics, especially when XBOX refuses to say how many PAYING subscribers they have for any of their services.
The fact you even link console choice to pride is pretty telling.I really can't understand how there are still fans of Microsoft and xbox after getting scraps since the second half of the 360 era and all of this generation I really can't understand it smdh but hey I guess people really love mediocre output from a as the fans would say " trillion dollars company". Like seriously don't y'all have any pride.
Wow, almost like it’s trying to sell xCloud and not XSX. Almost like they’d rather have service subs than console sales. Almost like they’ve clearly stated that as their goal for months if not years now.Great selling point for XSX.
Going third party gives them way less wiggle room on controling the service as well as less money because the platform holder will want their cut.
why disposable? You have the option to buy any game available on game pass and at a discounted price at that. If owning the game forever is what you want and not just playing it, then that's covered too, unlike Stadia.To be fair, I think once the generation of consoles that started with the 360 and PS3 was the end of traditional consoles (constant updates, downloading games, DLC). This is just furthering the end of console gaming. I HATE fucking streaming. I HATE the "Netflix" of gaming. This is disposable gaming and it's not what I want. That is my opinion.
It allows them to be on legit, 160 million more units though.....
Plus on PC or even XB if they still continue it, its not as if they'd be charging themselves or something.