TerryLee81
Member
LG's customer service is pretty rad.
Replaced my 6-week old 65EF9500 that had issues (replaced the panel first) with a 65E6P.
Whoa that's great.
LG's customer service is pretty rad.
Replaced my 6-week old 65EF9500 that had issues (replaced the panel first) with a 65E6P.
Gaf, what's a good 27" 1080p VA/AMVA monitor for gaming? I want something that has good black levels.
I bought an IPS panel (Asus MX279H) a few days ago and I'm disappointed in the blacks. I've never owned an IPS panel before and I don't think it's for me. I just can't get used to the weak blacks, so I'm probably gonna return it.
Ben Q makes a good 28" one.
LG's customer service is pretty rad.
Replaced my 6-week old 65EF9500 that had issues (replaced the panel first) with a 65E6P.
Is it the BenQ GW2870H?
I stumbled across the BenQ GW2760HS last night. It seems to be an older model, but do you know if it's pretty good too?
About to move into a new house and I'm looking for a new TV. What are the developments over the past few years?
I'm not too concerned about input response time, as this will not be my primary gaming TV. So I want something with superb picture quality, good (and fast!) internet functionality and integrated streaming, about 60", and good viewing in both light and dark conditions. Price range is $2500 - $4000.
Anyone got any recommendations?
Here's what I don't understand. OLED uses the same sample and hold technique as LCD, so shouldn't OLED have similar motion issues?
I've been eyeing the BenqQ EW2750ZL myself. It seems to have reviewed pretty well. There's a thread here on the hardocp forums about the best reviewed A-MVA monitors if that would help. They seem to recommend against the 28" panels, as they apparently cover less of the sRGB color space in comparison to the 27" panels.
I have the 27ZL. It's good and responsive. The colors are great even though I don't know the exact sRGB coverage. They pop and are accurate (after little calibration). It's an awesome monitor but I now use it for my computer set up. I plan on buying RL2755HM for my gaming purposes. I know the response time is better (1ms vs 4ms) and the input lag is slightly better at 10ms as opposed to 14 on the ZL.
Although I haven't played with the RL, it's one of the most reviewed monitors on the net and has thousands of reviews on Amazon. You can't go wrong with either monitor.
Ordering my 27RLHM soon.
Used for my Wii U and PS4 for about 3 months. Then got an Intel NUC and needed a monitor so I'm back on my TV unfortunately.
9/10 because you can't tilt it at all
For the people still saying the LG Oled is the best I certainly don't agree. There's still pros and cons to all the tech out there.
I saw an LG Oled next to a 2016 Sony Bravia and the whites and yellows were terrible compared to the Sony.
Nope wait 2-3 more yearsSo I have the Sony KDL-55W900A from 2013. Is the Sony XBR55X810C a worthwhile upgrade? I honestly love my tv now but hey I'm down to upgrade if it's a good difference in quality. I don't really have 4K programming though, is the tv that much better otherwise? I use it for both gaming and TV
They're professionals and I'm not, but their settings appear bizarre to me. Their combined settings for Oled light, Contrast, Brightness and 2.2 gamma give an overly washed out picture, that may be apt to a very bright room but that I don't like a bit.
2.4 gamma (which is actually a bit lower) is a firm point for this tv imho, I'm even convinced that bit higher gamma would have magnified more oled's punchy contrast and picture depth. Contrast at 95 clips white levels and flattens the picture, default of 80 is the max I would suggest, if you need an overall brighter picture bring up Oled light. On this matter, keep in mind my settings are for a natural picture (plasma-like I dare to say) and in dim/dark room, I think they retain good even in a bright environment, just adjust Oled light to your taste.
For the people still saying the LG Oled is the best I certainly don't agree. There's still pros and cons to all the tech out there.
I saw an LG Oled next to a 2016 Sony Bravia and the whites and yellows were terrible compared to the Sony.
For the people still saying the LG Oled is the best I certainly don't agree. There's still pros and cons to all the tech out there.
I saw an LG Oled next to a 2016 Sony Bravia and the whites and yellows were terrible compared to the Sony.
For the people still saying the LG Oled is the best I certainly don't agree. There's still pros and cons to all the tech out there.
I saw an LG Oled next to a 2016 Sony Bravia and the whites and yellows were terrible compared to the Sony.
So I have the Sony KDL-55W900A from 2013. Is the Sony XBR55X810C a worthwhile upgrade? I honestly love my tv now but hey I'm down to upgrade if it's a good difference in quality. I don't really have 4K programming though, is the tv that much better otherwise? I use it for both gaming and TV
For 60+ inch tv's is there any real value getting a 4k vs a 1080p model? Does 1080p look noticeably better on a 4k set?
For pc gaming, how 1080p to under 4k resolutions upscale on a 4k set?
Both my gf and I are in the market for new sets. Trying to decide if 4k is worthwhile for one or both of us.
If I understand the question correctly, you want to know if the Vizios will only output the lower Hz frequencies to go to a sub? If so, the answer is no, at least the P series cannot. I can't speak for Samsung, though.Samsung and Vizio question? With the audio out on the television, can you connect a subwoofer and select it to output the low frequencies through the sub? I know on Sonys you can.
Thanks for answering! Yeah, it's kind of odd motion isn't brought up as much with OLEDs.It does, but just as with LCD/LED reviews will gloss over it and most owners will claim "it looks fine to me." Motion resolution measurements are similar between the technologies and no level of pixel response time will ever fix that. It also doesn't help matters that the only major OLED player is currently LG -- a company that historically produces televisions with poor image processing.
I've read that black frame insertion is being investigated for future OLED televisions at the very least. Whether or not light output will get to where it needs to be to make it palatable for the masses is unknown.
If I understand the question correctly, you want to know if the Vizios will only output the lower Hz frequencies to go to a sub? If so, the answer is no, at least the P series cannot. I can't speak for Samsung, though.
Thanks for answering! Yeah, it's kind of odd motion isn't brought up as much with OLEDs.
Is it because at a size like 48 inches they can't build screens of that quality?
Nope. That's a fantastic TVGAF, I'm getting close to pulling the trigger on a Samsung KS8000 (most likely the 65") as an all-arounder for movies and games.
Any reason I should not do so from a technical/spec perspective?
Anyone have experience with the 2016 Sonys? Looking to replace a 10 year old 40" Bravia with either a XBR-55X930D or XBR-65X930D
I recently bought the vizio M60-c3 for this reason. My hdmi cable run through my wall is 1.3, and I don't really use 4k today but for the price point, the lower lag for gaming, and the somewhat future proofing I'm very happy with the amount I got with this 60 inch tv. I will say the firmware update was needed along with some tweaking in order to get colors and soap opera effect squared away but it was worth it.
Nope. That's a fantastic TV
probably not set correctly.
The OLED's blacks are the foundation of everything. Settings must've been messed up on the OLED.
And don't put it beyond sales people or other reps to play with the other TV's settings. Crazy stuff happens in sales rooms
Anyone have experience with the 2016 Sonys? Looking to replace a 10 year old 40" Bravia with either a XBR-55X930D or XBR-65X930D
Awesome TVs. The only thing that pissed me off is Sony went with last years chipset (which was dated then) so the OS could be smoother. I returned and am now holding out for the next round of Sonys since they should have this newer mediatek.
http://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphics/39674-mediatek-showcases-world-s-first-android-tv-6-0
So I'm moving to a new house and want to upgrade from my current 2012 Panasonic Plasma to something a little newer. I'm currently considering the Vizio 65" P65-C1 and the LG OLED65E6P. Both seem like great sets, but obviously the LG is $4K more. What should I do?
edit: May just go with the P65-C1. I can do a lot with $4K and apparently the OLED's are a little dim compared with the SUHD sets.
I came from a similar situation as you, minus the whole house moving part. I can, however, attest to the picture quality of the P65-C1. The viewing angles are the downside, but the colors, response time, and blacks are all excellent. And I'm coming from the last Pioneer Kuro Elite that was produce. I never thought my next HDTV would be LCD.So I'm moving to a new house and want to upgrade from my current 2012 Panasonic Plasma to something a little newer. I'm currently considering the Vizio 65" P65-C1 and the LG OLED65E6P. Both seem like great sets, but obviously the LG is $4K more. What should I do?
edit: May just go with the P65-C1. I can do a lot with $4K and apparently the OLED's are a little dim compared with the SUHD sets.
What are the nits on the E6P? Vizio only reports their full white screen nits measurement, which is the only true measurement that is reflective of real world scenarios. So, when comparing nits you need to ensure you're looking at the full white screen measurements of other models.The LG if you can afford it, otherwise go with the Vizio. BTW, the nits on the E6P are actually higher than the Vizio.
I came from a similar situation as you, minus the whole house moving part. I can, however, attest to the picture quality of the P65-C1. The viewing angles are the downside, but the colors, response time, and blacks are all excellent. And I'm coming from the last Pioneer Kuro Elite that was produce. I never thought my next HDTV would be LCD.And $2000 can't be beat for the technology.
What are the nits on the E6P? Vizio only reports their full white screen nits measurement, which is the only true measurement that is reflective of real world scenarios. So, when comparing nits you need to ensure you're looking at the full white screen measurements of other models.
I'm not necessarily defending the Vizio P series, as I am in love with OLED, but for the price I couldn't pass up the P series until OLEDs' prices come back down to earth. I've taken the money I was going to spend on an LG 65" G6 and put it in a savings account until it's time.
Actually, Robert has said that the brightness varies from panel to panel. That said, he has seen an approximate quarter stop increase in brightness on average in the G over the E but has commented that it is virtually unnoticeable. That said, my E6 measured a peak brightness of 770. Again, it varies panel to panel and this cannot be stressed enough. This should not be seen as a discernible issue.
Ugh. I looked at the Vizio in person in BB and the screen looked great but the thickness and bezel absolutely sucked. That silver bezel is thick and quite hideous. Why didn't they just make it black?