Dr Zhivago
Member
Could someone with a 55" KS8000 tell me the width of the space between the legs on the set? I'm trying to figure out if I could fit one in my room on the current stand I have.
I don't own one, but the AVForums review says 112cm.
Could someone with a 55" KS8000 tell me the width of the space between the legs on the set? I'm trying to figure out if I could fit one in my room on the current stand I have.
The M-Series is inferior to the KS8000 in that it is an 8-bit panel. However, it is FALD (I think 64 zones) whereas KS8000 is edge-lit.Going to be checking out the Vizio 65" M65-D0 and the Samsung 65" KS8000 this weekend at Costco. I'm leaning towards the Samsung right now. Anyone have experience with either of these sets and how gaming is?
The M-Series is inferior to the KS8000 in that it is an 8-bit panel. However, it is FALD (I think 64 zones) whereas KS8000 is edge-lit.
If you're going to be spending KS8000 money, then you should be looking at the Vizio P-Series. Those are in the same tier of tech/feature set and their differences amount to Samsung's Edge-Lit + lower input lag + higher NITS vs Vizio's 126 FALD zones + slightly higher input lag + Dolby Vision.
Everyone has their own opinion on the matter, but my personal take is I would never spend that kind of money on an edge-lit set. In addition, the P-Series has Dobly Vision support, making it more future-proof than the Samsung. Which is why I went with the P-Series.
Seeing as this threads become a defacto oled thread ;-)
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/kd65zd9-201610164372.htm
Sorry if it's been posted but I don't think it has.
I think the review does a really good job of talking about the strengths and weaknesses.
I don't own one, but the AVForums review says 112cm.
The M-Series is inferior to the KS8000 in that it is an 8-bit panel. However, it is FALD (I think 64 zones) whereas KS8000 is edge-lit.
If you're going to be spending KS8000 money, then you should be looking at the Vizio P-Series. Those are in the same tier of tech/feature set and their differences amount to Samsung's Edge-Lit + lower input lag + higher NITS vs Vizio's 126 FALD zones + slightly higher input lag + Dolby Vision.
Everyone has their own opinion on the matter, but my personal take is I would never spend that kind of money on an edge-lit set. In addition, the P-Series has Dobly Vision support, making it more future-proof than the Samsung. Which is why I went with the P-Series.
You are correct. Xbox One S HDR is broken on the P-Series. Its fix is coming in the next firmware update, which should drop sometime in November. Of course, it'll be out when it's out.this is a fair assessment, but given this is a gaming forum it should be mentioned that currently the vizio p series does not work with hdr gaming on the xbox one (does it work on ps4/pc?)
they've already said they are looking into it and will patch it, but currently that patch does not exist. so anyone on the fence may want to hold off for a few weeks until that arrives, if they can
Okay so I went to the Sony Centre in Nunnawadding and spent about 2 hours in front of the Z9D. If anyone else lives in Melbourne and is interested in doing the same, give them a call, and ask to speak to Ben, he was awesome, and let me bring an XBOX One S and try out anything I wanted. He also gave me the remote and let me change any settings on the TV.^awesome let us know what you think
Okay so I went to the Sony Centre in Nunnawadding and spent about 2 hours in front of the Z9D. If anyone else lives in Melbourne and is interested in doing the same, give them a call, and ask to speak to Ben, he was awesome, and let me bring an XBOX One S and try out anything I wanted. He also gave me the remote and let me change any settings on the TV.
First of all before I plugged in the One S, the demo footage was playing and I was instantly very impressed. Front on I couldn't see any blooming, and I got close to the screen, I was pretty much pressing my nose against it, and the contrast between the brightest highlights and the black right next to it was incredible and I couldn't spot any halo-ing.
All that changes when you go off angle though, and the weaknesses of LCD are immediately apparent. You can definitely see blooming at an angle, and that might be a dealbreaker for some, in my case, I'm never going to be anywhere but directly in front, so it's not an issue for me personally.
Anyway, he came over and we plugged the XBOX in, and spent quite a while trying to set it up properly. We kept getting a whole bunch of crosses on the 4K compatibility screen on the XB1. And playing anything with HDR turned on just looked shit, way over saturated and heavy contrast.
After a while we figured out that the HDMI port had to be set to enhanced mode (bolded in case anyone else wants to go try it out, HDR will not work unless this is done), then we got 100% green ticks on the 4K compatibility scene. Before we got this stuff sorted out that, I was already impressed with the set. Gears of War and Forza both looked very good, and I was very happy with the input lag. But when we finally got HDR working, and we booted up Forza and Gears, holy smokes... it was a game changer. In the opening scenes of Gears you're storming a beach like location, and there is this intense blue lightning, which is just incredible on the Z9D. Forza is a similar story, the colours and HDR were incredible, the sky looked amazing, and the highlights of the sun reflecting off the cars and puddles looked insane.
Switching from HDR on to HDR off was like going from graded footage to LOG footage. It's amazing how what was originally impressive (the TV running in standard) quickly becomes shit compared to HDR, and also how quickly your eyes adjust to HDR and accept it as standard.
Next up I tested out Mad Max on 4K Blu Ray (sadly the only one I own), but similar results here. Black performance is outstanding, the TV looks like it's turned off during black scenes, and even with bright objects against a black background like the opening titles held up extremely well (I even went to the end credits, and was very impressed with how well it did pure white against pure black, I couldn't see any halo-ing on axis).
Things that impressed me in Mad Max were again the specular highlights, HDR really brings the picture alive, fire looks amazing, the sun reflecting off the steering wheel right before they enter the storm looked awesome, and then when they entered the storm the lightning was just crazy, the Z9D can get seriously bright, and it helps for HDR heaps.
At that stage I felt like I'd seen enough, and then went to The Good Guys to check out the OLEDs.
They didn't have the G6 on display unfortunately, just the E6, but I've been told the only difference is the soundbar, so it should more or less be the same.
The guys there also let me hook up the XB1 S, and try stuff out. Initially we had the same issues as the Sony, and the HDMI port had to be set to Enhanced Colour something, and the TV restarted itself, then we got all green ticks, and were ready to go.
Right off the bat, the OLED impresses with it's pure blacks, and glossier (than the Z9D) screen.
I started with Mad Max, and initially I wasn't happy as I could see motion artefacts all over the place, and there was a slight amount of SOE (very subtle mind you). Specifically in scenes with the cars that have the sticks sticking out of them (see below) when they swayed from side to side there was shocking artefacting.
![]()
So I asked the guys if I could muck around with the settings, and they were very happy to let me do so, so I turned off all TruMotion, Noise Reduction etc settings, and the image cleaned up remarkably, but once I did that, it introduced unbelievable judder in the image. Very evident in the first scene Furiosa is driving away, if you look at the clouds in the sky as they drive by and the camera pans across it was like the video was stuttering.
I tried mucking around with the settings a bit more, but any motion enhancement I turned on would bring back the SOE / motion artefacts. The guy in the store tried doing something with the OLED which turned it off (screen refresh or cycle) but it didn't fix anything. So I'm not 100% sure what the best settings are for it, it was my first time mucking around with an OLED. If anyone who has one has optimal settings to remove SOE without introducing judder let me know and I'll go back and try again.
Anyway, I wasn't satisfied with Mad Max, so then I tried Forza Horizon, and while it looked nice, and the blacks were very deep, it didn't have quite the intensity or impact of the Z9D, and I think that comes down to the peak brightness of the sets. Keep in mind, when I was looking at the Z9D, it didn't look too bright, or strain my eyes, it was only small parts of the scene that would go super bright, and if anything it just looked more true to life.
I noticed more reflections on the OLED, but I put that down to store conditions and the glossier screen, not really an issue.
Anyway I think that about covers it, sorry for the gigantic post, if anyone has any questions feel free to ask. As for what I'll be going with in December, after spending a good amount of time with both, it's the Z9D hands down, even if it was more expensive, I'd get it over the OLED. The motion issues I experienced with the OLED instantly cancel it out as I couldn't deal with that, despite the amazing quality of the screen and black levels. The Z9D simply had more of a wow factor also, and the HDR presentation was much more impactful.
Okay, I didn't enable TruMotion, it was on by default. I turned it off because I could notice it was adding SOE / motion artefacting around those items pictured above.There are no 24p motion issues on the OLED. You certainly don't need to enable TruMotion. Perhaps the player wasn't set to output 24p or RealCinema wasn't enabled. You need RealCinema enabled on the TV for it to show 24p natively, and if you turned everything off, that probably included RC.
Yeah, it gives a much more impactful HDR presentation for sure.Same impression i got when viewing LED based HDR (Z9D) and OLED based HDR(G6). Somehow the higher brightness helps combat some of those OLED individual lighted pixels.
Another set i would give a try would be Panasonic DX900(902 in some parts of the world). It has a smaller 58" model if you want save$ on the space.
I am waiting for next years set though, it seems 4K HDR sets are nearing 'perfection'.
HDTV Test is without a doubt the best review site on the net for TV's. I've been using them as ref since early 2000's and they've only gotten better.
Just posted in comments asking if they can upload high res uncompressed images.
Really good to see such a positive review. Next years models from LG & Sony will kill it!
Most impressive thing I found was how it beat out the Oppo in upscaling...that is insane for a TV. Very happy that Sony & LG have really stepped it up. Samsung needs to deliver next year it's falling behind when it comes to flagships.
Okay so I went to the Sony Centre in Nunnawadding and spent about 2 hours in front of the Z9D....*snip*
Great read, didn't realise you were from Melbourne! I've been thinking about ringing that Sony store to see if they had one but you've answered my question.
Got to ask, what price are we looking at? And when do we see a general release?
Okay, I didn't enable TruMotion, it was on by default. I turned it off because I could notice it was adding SOE / motion artefacting around those items pictured above.
I highly doubt it was something to do with the player, I'm not saying the XB1S is an amazing 4K Blu Ray Player (it's the cheapest on the market), but I didn't see these issues on the Z9D, which kind of eliminates the player issue.
So, the setting I need to enable on the OLED is called RealCinema? I don't recall seeing it in the menu, which section is it under? I went through all of the settings in picture mode and into Expert Control and don't recall seeing it.
.
I am able to score a new 65" LG C6 for $2,800.
Do I pull the trigger or wait until next year?
Still debating between the ks8000 and a B6...keep going back and forth between those two. The vendors at both the stores I visited weren't too positive on selling oled tv's, they said some things about life span not being great on oleds and that picture quality degrades over time, due to it having organic parts.
Do they have a point? Or were they just trying to sell a Samsung?
Still debating between the ks8000 and a B6...keep going back and forth between those two. The vendors at both the stores I visited weren't too positive on selling oled tv's, they said some things about life span not being great on oleds and that picture quality degrades over time, due to it having organic parts.
Do they have a point? Or were they just trying to sell a Samsung?
Yeah that's my bad I should have researched before I went in, I've been doing some reading since then and came across this on HDTVTest's review of the E6correct, real cinema is essentially the native 24 fps thing. You need to enable it.
Also, true cinema does give better motion performance on the TV, something like dejudder 1/2 and deblur 5.
Engaging [TruMotion] more than doubled motion resolution to 650 lines, although it would invariably introduce interpolation artefacts or soap opera effect (SOE) to 24fps films. One improvement from 2015′s EF950V is that owners no longer need to customise their [TruMotion] “User” settings to obtain judder-free 1080p/24 playback – the LG E6 does this automatically with [TruMotion] off and [Real Cinema] on.
I'd like to point out that many people in this thread overstate the importance of input lag, especially with 22ms vs 35ms. On paper, it may be 50% lower, but in reality, the screen lag is just a small part of the overall controller input to photon lag in a game. Most games, even 60fps games, have between 90 and 120ms of processing lag, and 30fps games even have 150ms and above. See for yourself: http://www.displaylag.com/video-game-input-lag-database/
Thus, the 13ms advantage goes from close to 50% better to merely 8-10% better. Not worth it compared to the huge advantage of image quality on OLED, in my opinion.
Still debating between the ks8000 and a B6...keep going back and forth between those two. The vendors at both the stores I visited weren't too positive on selling oled tv's, they said some things about life span not being great on oleds and that picture quality degrades over time, due to it having organic parts.
Do they have a point? Or were they just trying to sell a Samsung?
I am able to score a new 65" LG C6 for $2,800.
Do I pull the trigger or wait until next year?
The M-Series is inferior to the KS8000 in that it is an 8-bit panel. However, it is FALD (I think 64 zones) whereas KS8000 is edge-lit.
If you're going to be spending KS8000 money, then you should be looking at the Vizio P-Series. Those are in the same tier of tech/feature set and their differences amount to Samsung's Edge-Lit + lower input lag + higher NITS vs Vizio's 126 FALD zones + slightly higher input lag + Dolby Vision.
Everyone has their own opinion on the matter, but my personal take is I would never spend that kind of money on an edge-lit set. In addition, the P-Series has Dobly Vision support, making it more future-proof than the Samsung. Which is why I went with the P-Series.
Well I have the E6 OLED, and love it! Just remember tax needs to be included with price, plus warranty costs, I went from $3500 to $4300, but have a full 3 year Best Buy warranty and live in CA (10% sales tax...).
No offense but you got massively ripped off.
You can get a 55 E6 for $2500 no tax/no extra warranty right now.
No offense but you got massively ripped off.
You can get a 55 E6 for $2500 no tax/no extra warranty right now.
Sounds more like the 65 inch version?
Does your friend have the M or P series? Because the P series has the wide color gamut. I would be surprised if it was the P series, because on mine the colors pop like crazy. Just curious.I have the samsung amd my buddy has the vizio. I love the FALD on his set, and minor light bleed is definitely present on the samsung, but I think the picture and colors don't look as nice on the vizio. It looks dull to me. Both are fantastic sets though.
Personally I'd waittill next year at the earliest. We still don't know the situation with HDR gaming and input lag going forward so I'm on wait and see since that is the "next big thing". If you really need a TV now/don't care about that then go ahead, it is a nice TV.and am waiting
March to May is new TV season.When will we know? CES 2017? How long do tv sets take to release in the market after shown at CES?
March to May is new TV season.
That's the crushing dilemma for me. I want a TV now, but if I wait I might get a much better TV when next year's models come out, but I don't want to wait 6 months, but next year's high end LG OLED models might not support 3D anymore (which is a deal breaker for me). I kinda want to wait, but I also don't want this to turn into a dragon chase.
The M-Series is inferior to the KS8000 in that it is an 8-bit panel. However, it is FALD (I think 64 zones) whereas KS8000 is edge-lit.
If you're going to be spending KS8000 money, then you should be looking at the Vizio P-Series. Those are in the same tier of tech/feature set and their differences amount to Samsung's Edge-Lit + lower input lag + higher NITS vs Vizio's 126 FALD zones + slightly higher input lag + Dolby Vision.
Everyone has their own opinion on the matter, but my personal take is I would never spend that kind of money on an edge-lit set. In addition, the P-Series has Dobly Vision support, making it more future-proof than the Samsung. Which is why I went with the P-Series.
That's the crushing dilemma for me. I want a TV now, but if I wait I might get a much better TV when next year's models come out, but I don't want to wait 6 months, but next year's high end LG OLED models might not support 3D anymore (which is a deal breaker for me). I kinda want to wait, but I also don't want this to turn into a dragon chase.