Heimdall_Xtreme
Hermen Hulst Fanclub's #1 Member
Fucking idiots.
With that budget we could have had many more wonderful games.
The karma punch to the CEO idiots
Last edited:
In Concord's case, it's the purchase/formation? of the studio+dev cost I believe.How is Forbes determining the "net loss" amount when one of the two games hasn't even released?
Also, it assumes that the average development cost of both these games is at least $600 million per game (!), and they make $0 in revenue.
Sounds like a really stupid, unsubstantiated statement.
Pendejadas and Tonterias.I don't understand what Sony is doing this gen.
I don't understand what Sony is doing this gen.
Fucking idiots.
With that budget we could have had many more wonderful games.
The karma punch to the CEO idiots
That and Sony not understanding they can't make a highly profitable GAAS game to save their life. They really should stick to third person over the shoulder 'cinematic' experiences, for their core customer base.GAAS is that popular.
Which makes it super competitive and unlike SP games they spend lot of money to support it and highly depend on players to engage with it.GAAS is that popular.
The ps5 gen has made more money than the 1-4 gen's combined.Screenshot is fake.
No such tweet on Forbes Entertainment and the link is fake too.
Well done OP.
Who the hell believes it cost 1.2 billion to make those two games and also believe the PlayStation brand has not been profitable this generation.
So Concord cost 400 million and Marathon 800 million lol?
Didn't Sony say this is the most profitable PlayStation generation ever?
To be fair, Daniel Ahmad said back in the middle of 2020, that PS first party games were not profitable.Who the hell believes it cost 1.2 billion to make those two games and also believe the PlayStation brand has not been profitable this generation.
To be fair, Daniel Ahmad said back in the middle of 2020, that PS first party games were not profitable.
I edited my first post; I was referring to thisThis is the most profitable PlayStation generation. Confirmed by Sony themselves.
There is no such article, it's a fake screenshotWhile the article sounds like tales from your ass, one does have to wonder why the cancelled that Last of Us faction game and went ahead with these 2 abominations.
I edited my first post; I was referring to this
I think even that turned out to be a max. of $400 million (not confirmed, but only as per a couple of rumors)? That still leaves $800 million for Marathon, which doesn't sound practical at all.In Concord's case, it's the purchase/formation? of the studio+dev cost I believe.
We're just letting bullshit false information spread now?
Also, that link (http://go.forbes.com/c/7hwQ) in the forbes image they're retweeting or replying or whatever the fuck you do on there links to this article. Literally nothing to do with Playstation on that page.
Ah, this makes more sense.This article is not real. Stop posting fake articles