SJRB
Gold Member
How is it possible that the biggest brand in world have the least impressive looking games. These games look ugly.
(But I am buying that Arceus one though.)
You answered your own question.
How is it possible that the biggest brand in world have the least impressive looking games. These games look ugly.
(But I am buying that Arceus one though.)
To be fair a lot of people bought Sword and Shield sooooo....
That's my point. They bought garbage before and they will buy garbage again.And why would anyone think this case will be any different?
They have their fanbase in the palm of their hand(at this point one could call this Stockhold Syndrome). They could serve poop on a plate and it would still sell millions. Pokemon brand name is stronger than even the games themselves, any company would dream to have that.
You answered your own question.How is it possible that the biggest brand in world have the least impressive looking games. These games look ugly.
(But I am buying that Arceus one though.)
AgreedYou can make a Switch with Ps5 hardware and this game would still look like ass. (just with less aliasing and at higher res)
The problem is Gamefreak/Pokemon Company, not the hardware.
The Switch isn't THAT weak, this thing is more powerful than the WiiU/360/Ps3.
There's no excuse for the game to look like this:
![]()
Even Oblivion Looked better (outside of the horrible faces)... in 2006, like 4 months after the launch of the Xbox 360
![]()
Arceus looks like the Pokemon game I've wanted for a long time......... if it was being made by a group of fans in their free time on a budget of $0.
Those environments literally look like they bought the cheapest, lowest quality stock assets they could find and then threw some Pokemon in there.
Meanwhile a more niche, lower selling franchise on weaker hardware:
![]()
![]()
To be fair, cannot blame them. Consumers have already proved that they will eat up the same shit (and old formula) year in year out.You could move this game to Xbox Series X and it would still look the same. The Switch is more than capable of pushing nicer visuals than these although it may sacrifice some resolution to keep the framerate up.
You won't find anybody more on board for a hardware bump, but this game doesn't push the Switch except maybe in poor engine efficiency.
To be fair it's an on-rails game (so it should look good given the limited stuff they need to render in view) but yeah overall I agree. There are lots of good looking (or let's say decent looking) games on Switch.Bandai Namco made pokemon look like this on the same hardware just a few months ago, the more I look at the Arceus trailer the worse it looks lol.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How is it possible that the biggest brand in world have the least impressive looking games. These games look ugly.
(But I am buying that Arceus one though.)
What if I told you I've never played a SMT game before?As much as people in GAF like to shit on Pokémon, they are still much more willing to talk about that game than Shin Megami Tensei V.
Being SMT fan in GAF sucks.![]()
That's the problem, majority of people in GAF didn't play SMT games, this is why I said being SMT fan in GAF sucks.What if I told you I've never played a SMT game before?
Humanity was a mistake, it's nothing but trash.
Too early for what? You think Pokemon fans give a shit about graphics?The landscape in Pokemon Legends: Arceus look way too muddy and hideous. Just hire some landscape artists, damn.
I think they are definitely releasing it too early.
Why even release BDSP, and then Legends: Arceus a few months later? Just give BDSP some time to shine, then release Legends Arceus when it's actually polished in a year.Too early for what? You think Pokemon fans give a shit about graphics?
This game will outsell every exclusive on competing platforms regardless.
In fact, Pokemon fans standards for graphics are so low this be a revolution to them.
Xenoblade 2 looks like dogshit because of the image quality. At its best it runs at 720p, has no anti aliasing and uses an oversharpening filter. Give it 1080p and 4x AA and it would look gorgeous.Weird though because if it's on weaker harder, how come to Xenoblade 2 looks like fucking dogshit? (it does)
Gamefreak is releasing this game not Nintendo EAD.Why even release BDSP, and then Legends: Arceus a few months later? Just give BDSP some time to shine, then release Legends Arceus when it's actually polished in a year.
My guess is for Pokemon 25th Anniversary. Which is dumb because it's being released next year, anyway. And Pikachu isn't even shown in Legends.Gamefreak is releasing this game not Nintendo EAD.
This is a polished graphical masterpiece by their standards.
I'm guessing the release date is to keep the Switch train rolling at full capacity in early 2022 during the off season.
BD/SP is being outsourced to ILCA outside of key staff members, so I think most of the team is on Legends Arceus.Why even release BDSP, and then Legends: Arceus a few months later? Just give BDSP some time to shine, then release Legends Arceus when it's actually polished in a year.
Can't wait for that gameThat's the problem, majority of people in GAF didn't play SMT games, this is why I said being SMT fan in GAF sucks.
Weird though because if it's on weaker harder, how come to Xenoblade 2 looks like fucking dogshit? (it does)
Pokemon sword is a very bad piece of media
To be fair those "reactions" are 100% fake. There's no way anyone over the age of like 10 is that excited for a Pokemon game. Plus his movements etc are so exaggerated it's obviously just him being "in character" for his videos/streams (whoever the fuck he is).Fucking sake... this can't be real.
To be fair those "reactions" are 100% fake. There's no way anyone over the age of like 10 is that excited for a Pokemon game. Plus his movements etc are so exaggerated it's obviously just him being "in character" for his videos/streams (whoever the fuck he is).