Black Mamba
Member
oh man, the potential.
oh man, the potential.
Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? Get in the ring,” she said. “This is hard and, you know, it’s an important thing that we’re doing right now and it’s an important election and it is time for all Americans to realize how significant this election is and how lucky we are to have someone with Mitt’s qualifications and experience and know-how to be able to have the opportunity to run this country.”
Tort reform is probably part of the answer, but it's not the key issue. It should be pretty clear that if you have a system where doctors get paid for providing services regardless of their efficacy
She would do herself a world of good if she would stay out of the media.
She would do herself a world of good if she would stay out of the media.
She's probably forced into it. For some reason their camp think she's some golden ticket to victory.
The public wants certain services regardless of their efficacy.
Ann Romney said:"Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? Get in the ring, she said. This is hard and, you know, its an important thing that were doing right now and its an important election and it is time for all Americans to realize how significant this election is and how lucky we are to have someone with Mitts qualifications and experience and know-how to be able to have the opportunity to run this country.
For what it is worth, in the secret tape MItt did say they are making a concerted effort to not use her much.
Unless you implement something like this, you will not achieve meaningful reduction in costs. The US public has to either accept insane health care costs or accept rationing.
Has Michelle ever said anything like this? I understand being thrust into the national spotlight and all, but that's such a sour attitude.
Nice of the Obama campaign to dish out some bonuses for a job well done...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...bonuses-to-top-staff/?wprss=rss_election-2012
oh wait, that's for Romney's team. :lol
Has Michelle ever said anything like this?
Peter King is on CNN claiming Obama wants to release Blind Sheik.
LMAO. The Repubs are really throwing everything at the wall, even their own feces.
holy fuck!
edit: OMG, Wolf is actually taking King to task. ahahaha
Peter King is on CNN claiming Obama wants to release Blind Sheik.
LMAO. The Repubs are really throwing everything at the wall, even their own feces.
holy fuck!
edit: OMG, Wolf is actually taking King to task. ahahaha
Michael Savage of all people summed up Ann Romney perfectly: obnoxious country club woman. I also chuckled when he said that if he finds her annoying then he can't even imagine what poor people think of her lawl.
Median household income in the city last year was $49,461, just below the national median and down $821 from the year before (compared with a national decline of $642). Median earnings for workers fell sharply to $32,210 from $33,287 much more than the national decline.)
The now cast on 538 is so sexy. 47 god damn days.
Nate Silver said:But if Mr. Obama is having days like this in the polls a week from now, then Mr. Romney is either going to be banking on an exceptionally lopsided turnout, or some sort of October surprise. Either is a possibility, but not one you’d want to put a lot of money on.
oh man, the potential.
Peter King is on CNN claiming Obama wants to release Blind Sheik.
LMAO. The Repubs are really throwing everything at the wall, even their own feces.
holy fuck!
edit: OMG, Wolf is actually taking King to task. ahahaha
I didn't exactly watch the entirety of the last pres. debates, but what was the consensus in the media on how well Obama did?
One interesting factual observation about this election, and by all means Kosmo, chime in. Dems are terrified the other guys get in and do what they have stated they will do. Republicans are terrified the other guy will win and do stuff they completely made up.
"Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? . . . This is hard and, you know, its an important thing that were doing right now . . .
Bill O's new theory: Everyone is on the internet and is dumbed down, so that is why Obama is in the lead in polls.
Social issues and the Ryan plan. And the Supreme Court.What exactly is Romney going to 'do what they have stated' with a slim House majority and a Senate minority? I thought the big knock on the Romney campaign was that they haven't stated shit?
What's the big fear? Households making less than 200k might have to pay less capital gains?
Flag etiquette is something that exists that no one adheres to. You're not supposed to put it on clothing for instance. How many red/white/blue and stars clothing do you see around the 4th that looks tacky as hell? A lot.
Social issues and the Ryan plan.
Flag etiquette is something that exists that no one adheres to. You're not supposed to put it on clothing for instance. How many red/white/blue and stars clothing do you see around the 4th that looks tacky as hell? A lot.
Mr. Obama's challenges may be more daunting. His strategy hasn't worked. Team Obama planned to use its big financial edge to bury Mr. Romney under negative ads over the summer. From April 15 to Labor Day, they spent an estimated $215 million on TV. But this was more than offset by conservative groups (principally American Crossroads, which I helped found). While Mr. Obama drained his coffers his own negatives climbed, and Mr. Romney partially repaired his image with voters.
Mr. Obama needs a different strategy, but his team seems stubbornly focused merely on disqualifying Mitt Romney by whatever argument or means necessary. Yet as Rahm Emanuel has repeated for most of the year, Mr. Obama must, as he put it on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sept. 2, "lay out an agenda and a clear vision of the next four years" or he'll lose.
How will Ryan's plan come to fruition when the paradigm will be exactly the same as when it failed the first time? What do you mean by 'social issues'? That's a ridiculously broad brush.
This lady in blue on Univision is smoking hot
So what? That's the entire point of doctors -- to provide appropriate medical service, and to delineate what that appropriate service is.
If doctors didn't get paid for providing unnecessary services, they wouldn't provide them, and the public would stop requesting them.
But a reduction in unnecessary services is by no means "austerity."
Definitionally, if they're unnecessary, then the public will not notice a decline in health from not getting them -- so there won't actually be any austerity required.
But when it comes to expensive, hi-tech treatments with some potential to extend life, there are few restrictions.
By law, Medicare cannot reject any treatment based upon cost. It will pay $55,000 for patients with advanced breast cancer to receive the chemotherapy drug Avastin, even though it extends life only an average of a month and a half; it will pay $40,000 for a 93-year-old man with terminal cancer to get a surgically implanted defibrillator if he happens to have heart problems too.
"I think you cannot make these decisions on a case-by-case basis," Byock said. "It would be much easier for us to say 'We simply do not put defibrillators into people in this condition.' Meaning your age, your functional status, the ability to make full benefit of the defibrillator. Now that's going to outrage a lot of people."
"But you think that should happen?" Kroft asked.
"I think at some point it has to happen," Byock said.
"Well, this is a version then of pulling Grandma off the machine?" Kroft asked.
"You know, I have to say, I think that's offensive. I spend my life in the service of affirming life. I really do. To say we're gonna pull Grandma off the machine by not offering her liver transplant or her fourth cardiac bypass surgery or something is really just scurrilous. And it's certainly scurrilous when we have 46 million Americans who are uninsured,
Obama's lost the Eagle Scout vote. I wonder if 538 will factor this in.
How will Ryan's plan come to fruition when the paradigm will be exactly the same as when it failed the first time? Actually, probably worse because the left have completely drove up the negatives on it in the public realm of opinion.
What do you mean by 'social issues'? That's a ridiculously broad brush.