I don't understand how Diablos and CS can follow politics day-to-day. It sounds like every little thing gives them a heart attack.
Good news out of CO, let's keep it goin'.
If Obama doesn't puss out during the next debate I'm probably donating.
Now this is bad news. Obama was at 54% before, his highest Gallup rating in eons, now he's down by 6 in only a couple days. Epic smh. That's how easily he had this debate in his pocket. Everyone was expecting him to just show up and put Romney away, now the dynamic is completely different because the Obama camp somehow thought acting like a skeptical professor was the best way to plead your case in front of some 67 million people.
As for enthusiasm, it's as though the debate totally made voters forget about the GOP's embarrassing convention. Dems had the edge. This really blows.
Obama's camp really made a critical error in how they prepared for the first debate. I do think it was intentional for him to be so nuanced but it has to be one of the dumbest ideas I've ever seen out of a modern day campaign.
Obama will (hopefully) do better in the townhall, but I expect Romney to be foaming at the mouth not willing to let Obama make a resurgence, you can bet he's prepping like crazy to make this a reality.
I'll say this, Mitt is fully aware of how bad September hurt his campaign, and he's not going to let go of what he's gained since the first debate without putting everything he's got into his campaign now.
I don't understand how Diablos and CS can follow politics day-to-day. It sounds like every little thing gives them a heart attack.
Anyone who follows politics for even one cycle should know things are volatile. Remember after the debt ceiling fight when everyone thought Obama was done for? Even Nate was floating the possibility of President Romney and a Dem Congress, which now seems somewhat implausible.I don't understand how Diablos and CS can follow politics day-to-day. It sounds like every little thing gives them a heart attack.
Oh my god.It's important to note, pigeon, because he hasn't been at 54% in quite some time and there's only one thing I can think of that would make him dive by 6 points in such a short period of time.
:lolPolls go up, polls go down. You can't explain that.
It's important to note, pigeon, because he hasn't been at 54% in quite some time and there's only one thing I can think of that would make him dive by 6 points in such a short period of time.
I've pointed out on at least four occasions that Gallup's trackers swing wildly over many weekends. It had Obama at +10 approval, which was a clear outlier. It's current spread is simply regression back to the mean.
http://news.yahoo.com/ark-gop-calls-candidates-statements-offensive-212508499.htmlLITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) Arkansas Republicans tried to distance themselves Saturday from a Republican state representative's assertion that slavery was a "blessing in disguise" and a Republican state House candidate who advocates deporting all Muslims.
The claims were made in books written, respectively, by Rep. Jon Hubbard of Jonesboro and House candidate Charlie Fuqua of Batesville. Those books received attention on Internet news sites Friday.
On Saturday, state GOP Chairman Doyle Webb called the books "highly offensive." And U.S. Rep. Rick Crawford, a Republican who represents northeast Arkansas, called the writings "divisive and racially inflammatory."
Hubbard wrote in his 2009 self-published book, "Letters To The Editor: Confessions Of A Frustrated Conservative," that "the institution of slavery that the black race has long believed to be an abomination upon its people may actually have been a blessing in disguise." He also wrote that African-Americans were better off than they would have been had they not been captured and shipped to the United States.
Fuqua, who served in the Arkansas House from 1996 to 1998, wrote there is "no solution to the Muslim problem short of expelling all followers of the religion from the United States," in his 2012 book, titled "God's Law."
He wrote a book called "God's law"? Why don't you go be a preacher and not an elected official?
I did just have four cups of coffee.We went from this:
To this:
Within the span of one page.
Truly:
I did just have four cups of coffee.
so they admit the whole below 8% thing was just their talking point? gasp!Brit Hume: "7.8% certainly improves the [president's] talking point, but people don't make their decisions based on a number. Besides, the unemployment and underemployment rate is 14% and remains unchanged, and I think that reflects what people are feeling and seeing."
We went from this:
To this:
Within the span of one page.
Truly:
Brit Hume: "7.8% certainly improves the [president's] talking point, but people don't make their decisions based on a number. Besides, the unemployment and underemployment rate is 14% and remains unchanged, and I think that reflects what people are feeling and seeing."
I guess u6 is important now. I thought real Americans hated that number and didn't like it being brought up.
I prefer we pay attention to u6 more than the vanilla number, I'm glad my conservative friends are finally starting to agree.
Underemployment technically isn't the same thing as unemployment, though it is a problem. But people are going to hear 14% and think that's the "real" unemployment figure.
Jesus this is a Great political cartoon on youtube called WhyObamaNow that's rising in views over 100k so far. Don't know if this is posted already.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9G8XREyG0Q&feature=colike
Brit Hume: "7.8% certainly improves the [president's] talking point, but people don't make their decisions based on a number. Besides, the unemployment and underemployment rate is 14% and remains unchanged, and I think that reflects what people are feeling and seeing."
Underemployment technically isn't the same thing as unemployment, though it is a problem. But people are going to hear 14% and think that's the "real" unemployment figure.
U4 and U5 include discouraged workers and are most useful for the purpose of tracking true unemployment. U6 counts workers who technically aren't unemployed; for this reason, it's 4% higher than U5, and if you use it for the sake of tracking unemployment, then it paints a picture of the labor market that is more pessimistic than it really is (though, as I said, it's still a problem). Underutilization, not unemployment, is a good way of describing the true usefulness of U6 as a metric.U6 also includes discouraged workers--those who want work but have given up looking at the time of the survey. It really is the most comprehensive measure of labor underutilization and should be considered the "real" unemployment figure. Although I obviously get the political point you are making.
U4 and U5 include discouraged workers and are most useful for the purpose of tracking true unemployment. U6 counts workers who technically aren't unemployed; for this reason, it's 4% higher than U5, and if you use it for the sake of tracking unemployment, then it paints a picture of the labor market that is more pessimistic than it really is (though, as I said, it's still a problem). Underutilization, not unemployment, is a good way of describing the true usefulness of U6 as a metric.
empty vessel should be immune from any and all bannings
Jesus this is a Great political cartoon on youtube called WhyObamaNow that's rising in views over 100k so far. Don't know if this is posted already.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9G8XREyG0Q&feature=colike
Unlike Mitt, I loathe Sesame Street. It bears primary responsibility for what the Canadian blogger Binky calls the de-monsterization of childhood the idea that there are no evil monsters out there at the edges of the map, just shaggy creatures who look a little funny and can sometimes be a bit grouchy about it because people prejudge them until they learn to celebrate diversity and help Cranky the Friendly Monster go recycling. That is not unrelated to the infantilization of our society. Marinate three generations of Americans in that pabulum and its no surprise you wind up with unprotected diplomats dragged to their deaths from their safe house in Benghazi. Or as J. Scott Gration, the presidents special envoy to Sudan, said in 2009, in the most explicit Sesamization of American foreign policy: Weve got to think about giving out cookies. Kids, countries they react to gold stars, smiley faces, handshakes . . . The butchers of Darfur arent blood-drenched machete-wielding genocidal killers but just Cookie Monsters whom we havent given enough cookies. Im not saying theres a direct line between Bert & Ernie and Barack & Hillary . . . well, actually I am.
...what the hell did I just read?http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/329585/sesame-nation-mark-steyn
things republicans hate: sesame street, mr. rogers, empathy for human beings
Kids need to learn the truth about the world.http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/329585/sesame-nation-mark-steyn
things republicans hate: sesame street, mr. rogers, empathy for human beings
BARTLET All right! (back to OBAMA) And that was quite a display of hard-nosed, fiscal conservatism when he slashed one one-hundredth of 1 percent from the federal budget by canceling “Sesame Street” and “Downton Abbey.” I think we’re halfway home. Mr. President, your prep for the next debate need not consist of anything more than learning to pronounce three words: “Governor, you’re lying.” Let’s replay some of Wednesday night’s more jaw-dropping visits to the Land Where Facts Go to Die. “I don’t have a $5 trillion tax cut. I don’t have a tax cut of a scale you’re talking about.”
OBAMA The Tax Policy Center analysis of your proposal for a 20 percent across-the-board tax cut in all federal income tax rates, eliminating the Alternative Minimum Tax, the estate tax and other reductions, says it would be a $5 trillion tax cut.
BARTLET In other words ...
OBAMA You’re lying, Governor.
BARTLET “I saw a study that came out today that said you’re going to raise taxes by $3,000 to $4,000 on middle-income families.”
OBAMA The American Enterprise Institute found my budget actually would reduce the share of taxes that each taxpayer pays to service the debt by $1,289.89 for taxpayers earning in the $100,000 to $200,000 range.
BARTLET Which is another way of saying ...
OBAMA You’re lying, Governor.
BARTLET “I want to take that $716 billion you’ve cut and put it back into Medicare.”
OBAMA The $716 billion I’ve cut is from the providers, not the beneficiaries. I think that’s a better idea than cutting the exact same $716 billion and replacing it with a gift certificate, which is what’s contained in the plan that’s named for your running mate.
BARTLET “Pre-existing conditions are covered under my plan.”
OBAMA Not unless you’ve come up with a new plan since this afternoon.
BARTLET “You doubled the deficit.”
OBAMA When I took office in 2009, the deficit was 1.4 trillion. According to the C.B.O., the deficit for 2012 will be 1.1 trillion. Either you have the mathematics aptitude of a Shetland pony or, much more likely, you’re lying.
BARTLET “All of the increase in natural gas has happened on private land, not on government land. On government land, your administration has cut the number of permits and licenses in half.”
OBAMA Maybe your difficulty is with the words “half” and “double.” Oil production on federal land is higher, not lower. And the oil and gas industry are currently sitting on 7,000 approved permits to drill on government land that they’ve not yet begun developing.
BARTLET “I think about half the green firms you’ve invested in have gone out of business.”
OBAMA Yeah, your problem’s definitely with the word “half.” As of this moment there have been 26 recipients of loan guarantees — 23 of which are very much in business. What was Bain’s bankruptcy record again?
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/329585/sesame-nation-mark-steyn
things republicans hate: sesame street, mr. rogers, empathy for human beings
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/329585/sesame-nation-mark-steyn
things republicans hate: sesame street, mr. rogers, empathy for human beings
Big bird killed Ambassador Chris Stevens. See . . . that why Mitt is after him.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/329585/sesame-nation-mark-steyn
things republicans hate: sesame street, mr. rogers, empathy for human beings
That was fun.Any The West Wing fans? This is so good.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/o...-smoking-and-scheming.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&
That's just part of it. The rest is gold. I'm sure Obama's already got the point by now from his advisors. Better be ready next time.
The thing about the Big Bird thing, outside of a good sound bite, is the meaning behind it I think. You can say you are for education but if you are willing to do away with one of the best sources of early education for everyone how can anyone trust anything you say regarding it. PBS has tons of shows that many children watch growing up. Almost all adults have memories of it and its one station everyone that is reasonable can trust to sit their baby or toddlers down in front of. Those who are primary care givers for children, women especially, know this very well. So it's a double hit against Romney when it comes to those that value education highly and women, mothers specifically. The only people that I can think of that think it's really okay to do away with it are those that really have never watched it or took advantage of the channel and it's shows and others like it.
I used to be a Real American, but then I went and got one of them fancy college degrees. Worst idea ever.
I was shocked until I realized that this is the party that would probably willingly eliminate child labor laws.
Yeah, but it's from Hillbilly University, so it doesn't count.
I went to WVU.
Byakuya, now, don't go doing that!
Don't you guys dare ruin this for me!