The Librarian
Banned
Why should I give you something?
I was hoping you'd give me something cause I haven't gotten an Obama gift in the mail for quite some time.
Why should I give you something?
I was hoping you'd give me something cause I haven't gotten an Obama gift in the mail for quite some time.
I was hoping you'd give me something cause I haven't gotten an Obama gift in the mail for quite some time.
I was hoping you'd give me something cause I haven't gotten an Obama gift in the mail for quite some time.
Only foreign countries celebrate the American May Day.
One day, comrade, one day.
Not to sound like a proponent of Kautskyism, but its revival here as a day to demonstrate for workers who are undocumented is at least a step in the right direction.
I guess it make sense. I just don't think the results from that study are that radical. That being said I'd be interested to see the study about the whole private school vs public schol thing.
If Colbert wins the "How many sisters do you have in Congress" contest.If Colbert wins what?
Edit:
Oh, this special election thing? Dunno, haven't paid the slightest amount of attention to it. Thought you were talking about Stephen Colbert or something.
It shows people will vote along party lines no matter how shitty the candidate is.If Mark Sanford wins, it will just go to show the power of redemption in American politics.
If Mark Sanford wins, it will just go to show the power of redemption in American politics. Make the right appeals to Jesuss forgiveness, state how we are all humans who make mistakes, and a certain section of the electorate will forgive you. Its curious how righteous indignation is only left for the other team, though.
The only thing Sandford has going for him in his case was that his path along the Appalachian trail led to an actual relationship, and not a typical sordid affair. The fact that it was love and not lust that drove him probably makes it easier to forgive in some peoples eyes.
It shows people will vote along party lines no matter how shitty the candidate is.
The paper I interned at a few years ago (a small weekly) does a profile on important figures in the labor movements of the past every year. They're always fascinating reads. If it weren't behind a pay wall I'd post this year's. Not everyone has forgotten, but May Day should be much much bigger than it is.
Smaller sections will go for Sanford and will come in first. I'd bet my left nut this tightens up in the remaining 50% or so that hasn't come back.
EDIT: The margin is 8k votes or so and still 46% remaining. It'll be close.
It shows people will vote along party lines no matter how shitty the candidate is.
These are Republicans we're talking about.
About 5-10 minutes ago the race was between 1-2% and Colbert-Busch was winning both Charleston County and Dorchester County (now losing both, although the former only very slightly), so it's going in the opposite trend of what you're saying
I do think it'll tighten up though simply because of Charleston, not sure to what degree it will though
Tough crowd.
I agree with you though. The hypocrisy can only come from one side on this issue, by definition (i.e. from the 'family values' party). I was just pointing out that if a candidate wraps himself in the cloak of redemption, it can work with a certain group of people. And those people are Republicans.
Democrats have no tolerance for this however. If you screw up like Spitzer and Weiner, then you have to get out for good. Clinton is probably the one exception.
It will be interesting to see how NY reacts to Weiner's (possible) mayoral run.
If Sanford wins here I think it's fair to say Weiner's got a shot in NYC.
This is what happens when the Democrats nationalize a race in a district where the national Democratic Party is unpopular
Maybe a little Bradley effect in the polls from conservatives embarrassed to admit they're voting for Sanford, too
That's great news!
Probably the latter. Just looking at how the district has swung in recent years tells the story, if this had been 2008 she may have been able to do it. Not 2013, not now.
I can't believe he won though, the guy secretly left the state to go cheat on his wife in Brazil, didn't tell anyone, denied it until they had him dead to rights and finally admitted it. Family values my ass.
So it's officially been called? Politico reports that with 75% of the vote in, Sanford has a 10K lead.
Vitter was just Sex.If Mark Sanford wins, it will just go to show the power of redemption in American politics. Make the right appeals to Jesuss forgiveness, state how we are all humans who make mistakes, and a certain section of the electorate will forgive you. Its curious how righteous indignation is only left for the other team, though.
The only thing Sandford has going for him in his case was that his path along the Appalachian trail led to an actual relationship, and not a typical sordid affair. The fact that it was love and not lust that drove him probably makes it easier to forgive in some peoples eyes.
The family values part isn't even the big deal IMO, Sanford used government funds to pursue his affair. Fiscal responsibility my ass, too.
Yep
So it's officially been called? Politico reports that with 75% of the vote in, Sanford has a 10K lead.
Vitter was just Sex.
The "Family Values" party is officially a joke.
Sanford, Vitter, DesJarlais, etc.
Something tells me they won't be bragging about this.Ugggh. Lame. Gives the GOP something to crow about, even though they had to fight tooth and nail to win a seat Romney won by 18 points.
Tough crowd.
I agree with you though. The hypocrisy can only come from one side on this issue, by definition (i.e. from the 'family values' party). I was just pointing out that if a candidate wraps himself in the cloak of redemption, it can work with a certain group of people. And those people are Republicans.
Democrats have no tolerance for this however. If you screw up like Spitzer and Weiner, then you have to get out for good. Clinton is probably the one exception.
It will be interesting to see how NY reacts to Weiner's (possible) mayoral run.
I've heard a lot of pundits spin it as bad news for Democrats if they couldn't win this district, or even if they won it by an unconvincing margin. Context, what is thatSomething tells me they won't be bragging about this.
Something tells me they won't be bragging about this.
@CuffyMeh 3m
Sanford needs to Chappaquiddick some poor lady and then he'd be bulletproof.
Jesus Christ, she couldn't even win Charleston. Dax you've got some explaining to do.
I'd prefer it if Democrats did have tolerance for it, given that there isn't hypocrisy involved. Weiner never should have been abandoned by Democrats unless it was for his foreign policy views (which frankly do deserve it).
go on twitter.
Isn't she from NC?
Also I need to get off twitter
Erick Erickson infuriates me, every thing comes back to liberals wanting to kill babies. Every damn time.
I'm guessing a celebratory vacation to South America is out of the picture, right Mark? #MarkSanford
I agree with you. Democrats have lost good people due to scandal. Imagine how forceful a person like Spitzer would be if he was still on the case of the big banks. And I don't agree with Weiner on everything, but he definitely was a liberal attack dog who could espouse liberal idea effectively.
I took your advice. Oh god. People can rationalise away anything.