Well, a state in Palestine should have (and would have) been established, decolonization was happening everywhere, and since I think it's hard to argue against getting European jews the fuck out of Europe, might as well send them there.Regarding the Israel discussion on the previous page, I think it's important to note that the territory of Palestine was not the only area in consideration for creating the state. IIRC, an area of Texas and Argentina were also under consideration (this was before WW2). My opinion is that, with the advantage of hindsight, the state of Israel probably never should have been created. I'm honestly pretty disturbed at establishing any state with the express intent of having a religiously/ethnically pure population.
I understand the desire, after the revelations of the holocaust, for a save haven and a means to defend themselves against hostile states. And, to be fair, at the time Palestine was a sparsely populated territory without much of a national identity, so some people naively assumed Palestinians would just move to neighboring Arab states, but the people creating Israel knew that wouldn't happen and had already been planning on how to remove the Arabs. I think the best thing to do would have just been for Jews to move to existing countries more friendly to them, like the US (I realize at the time there was still more anti-Semitism in the US than now, but they still had legal protections). Hell, if the Zionists had organized to move a lot of Jews to a sparsely populated state like Wyoming they could still have a political subdivision where they're a majority, similar to Mormons in Utah.
I took a (introductory level) course on the Israel/Palestinian conflict history recently. I went into it with a negative opinion of Israel just based on the modern human rights abuses I see in the news, but I left with an even worse opinion of it, and my professor was a Jewish Rabbi (he was really good at explaining context objectively. I still have no idea what "side" he's on). For almost all of its history, since before its founding, Israel has been led mostly by right wing radical pieces of shit like Begin and Sharon. Israel has never had any intention of making peace with Palestine, and some of the big players in Israel's creation and early governance were literally terrorists, like Begin who was part of Irgun (which I believe is what became the IDF once Israel was created). Irgun was a right wing terrorist group that attacked the British in the Palestinian territory, seeking independence from the colonial powers. It's kinda funny how some of those same people, when in positions of authority in the new State of Israel, mercilessly kill Palestinian terrorists (fighting for independence from what they view as a colonial power) without the slightest hint of acknowledging the irony.
This post ended up being longer than I intended so sorry for the rant. My basic point is that I think creating Israel was a mistake, albeit with understandable and sympathetic reasons. However, the people in charge of Israel throughout history have ranged from being shitty to being cartoon villains. And the government has been consistently engaged in disgusting actions and policies that have made what was already guaranteed to be a bad situation even worse, rather than trying to actually address the problems Israel's creation caused with something other than war and Arab discrimination.
But it shouldn't been a state that codified Jewish privilege.
There's plenty of resentment there already.Thats a policy that seems destined to create resentment of non-Jewish people living in Israel towards Jews. And even Jews towards the religious Jews since I remember reading that they give religious Jews special priviliges as well
The only move is to give equal rights to everyone and do the whole peace and reconciliation thing.
Yeah, it's hard, and no, I'm not sure this will work (and that's big part of why I left that part of that world) but I honestly don't see any other option that can work long term.
Everybody fucked up the formation of Israel.The early Jews and Palestinians both share a lot of the blame for mistakes during the original founding of Israel, but the British are probably most to blame for playing both sides off each other. The early Jewish settlers had a very colonialist attitude to the Arabs near them: they anticipated no resistance to the creation of Israel from these Arabs because they thought it was obvious that they would be better off living under Jewish rule. The UN partition was also a complete miscarriage of justice as it gave the majority of the land to the Jews even though the Arabs greatly outnumbered them (not to mention stupid borders). The Arabs were to blame though for initiating violence first after the UN partition was announced, though Jewish terrorist groups actually waged war much more brutally than the Arabs did.
After the initial war was over Palestinians were split between Egypt and Jordan so any complaints they have that time period belong with those countries mostly. After the 1967 war though, Israel has been nearly entirely to blame for the suffering in that region. In my opinion any support for Israel after 1967 is entirely misplaced. The PLO's and Hamas's violent tactics aren't the answer,but Israel has been easily worse.
From the old colonial habit of randomly drawing lines on the map (and don't get me started about Jordan, ugh, but hey, dude's speak English and was in Star Trek, so it's all good) through the UN making stupid unworkable decisions to the Jews and Arab leaders.
In any case, I think who's fault it was is not as important as who has the power to solve that mess at this point, and that would be unquestionably Israel.