They built that, though. DON'T TELL THEM THEY DIDN'T BUILD THAT. They paved their own way for being entitled to Government-sponsored health insurance!Top-class troll.
Where do governors get their health insurance from?
USA
They built that, though. DON'T TELL THEM THEY DIDN'T BUILD THAT. They paved their own way for being entitled to Government-sponsored health insurance!Top-class troll.
Where do governors get their health insurance from?
Poverty! The American Dream.
Top-class troll.
Where do governors get their health insurance from?
Government run health insurance for Republicans works differently than government run health insurance for everyone else. When a Republican touches their insurance card, it becomes infused with freedom particles and is immediately purified and exorcised of evil government spirits (it's similar to how Kagome can purify a shikon jewel shard).
Government run health insurance for Republicans works differently than government run health insurance for everyone else. When a Republican touches their insurance card, it becomes infused with freedom particles and is immediately purified and exorcised of evil government spirits (it's similar to how Kagome can purify a shikon jewel shard).
:LOL
I'm guessing you watched that last night?
Grover Cleveland in 1892, Alton Parker in 1904, John Davis in 1924, and Al Smith in 1928 all won the democratic primary as very conservative pro-bank candidates, showing that there was a split between people like that and progressive anti-bank types like William Jennings Bryan or Woodrow Wilson.Can somebody tell me what the Democratic Party platform was pre-FDR? All I can see is that they were anti-bank and anti-black.
I seriously cannot find the platform of either party. I've heard of big tent but holy shit. People were also very divided back then, I wonder of what being that the two parties hardly seemed rigid in ideology then.Grover Cleveland in 1892, Alton Parker in 1904, John Davis in 1924, and Al Smith in 1928 all won the democratic primary as very conservative pro-bank candidates, showing that there was a split between people like that and progressive anti-bank types like William Jennings Bryan or Woodrow Wilson.
It seems to me that the anti-black thing was the most common thread, which seemed to continue into-anti women's suffrage and the anti-prohibition that followed it.
I seriously cannot find the platform of either party. I've heard of big tent but holy shit. People were also very divided back then, I wonder of what being that the two parties hardly seemed rigid in ideology then.
Interesting link. I like seeing things like dems being the pacifists back when McKinnely and Roosevelt were waging the SpanishAmerican War and Philippine-American War, but come WW1 when Wilson was president, all of a sudden the pro war and anti war roles got reversed.you can't find it?
really its takes one google search for every platform
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/platforms.php
Biden/Warren 2016We need some real progressives who aren't spineless cowards.
Speaking of Warren, is it just me, or is a Warren 2016 possibilities completely gone after taking that leadership role? People in congressional leadership roles seem to avoid the presidential races lately, and I can't help but wonder if part of the reason they gave her the position is to keep her from challenging Clinton.
Not that I'm complaining about it, I'm sure she'll get a lot done there, maybe more than a failed presidential run if it continues down that path long term. I just feel like that position was a trade off.
Speaking of Warren, is it just me, or is a Warren 2016 possibilities completely gone after taking that leadership role? People in congressional leadership roles seem to avoid the presidential races lately, and I can't help but wonder if part of the reason they gave her the position is to keep her from challenging Clinton.
Not that I'm complaining about it, I'm sure she'll get a lot done there, maybe more than a failed presidential run if it continues down that path long term. I just feel like that position was a trade off.
Despite the questionable nature of the Twitter communications, experts doubt the FEC will do much to act. Members of the commission have been deadlocked along party lines for years and attorneys for these groups often develop legal arguments before engaging in such practices to avoid acting outside the bounds of the law, Ryan said.
"In many instances, we have very sophisticated political players with really good lawyers who know where the legal lines are and know where to push them to their client's advantage," he said.
Republicans coordinating illegally on twitter
you can't find it?
really its takes one google search for every platform
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/platforms.php
Labor Standards and Rights
The purpose of fair labor standards legislation has been the maintenance of the minimum standards necessary for the health, efficiency and general well-being of workers. Recent inflation has eroded the real value of the current minimum wage. This rapid devaluation of basic income for working people makes a periodic review of the level of the minimum wage essential. Such a review should insure that the minimum wage rate at least keep pace with the increase in the cost of living.
Raising the pay standard for overtime work, additional hiring of part-time persons and flexible work schedules will increase the independence of workers and create additional job opportunities, especially for women. We also support the principle of equal pay for comparable work.
We are committed to full implementation and enforcement of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Over a generation ago this nation established a labor policy whose purpose is to encourage the practice and procedure of collective bargaining and the right of workers to organize to obtain this goal. The Democratic Party is committed to extending the benefit of the policy to all workers and to removing the barriers to its administration. We support the right of public employees and agricultural workers to organize and bargain collectively. We urge the adoption of appropriate federal legislation to ensure this goal.
We will seek to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to speed up redress of grievances of workers asserting their legal rights.
We will seek to enforce and, where necessary, to amend the National Labor Relations Act to eliminate delays and inequities and to provide for more effective remedies and administration.
We will support the full right of construction workers to picket a job site peacefully.
We will seek repeal of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act which allows states to legislate the anti-union open shop.
We will maintain strong support for the process of voluntary arbitration, and we will enact minimum federal standards for workers compensation laws and for eligibility, benefit amounts, benefit duration and other essential features of the unemployment insurance program. Unemployment insurance should cover all wage and salary workers.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 should cover all employees and be enforced as intended when the law was enacted. Early and periodic review of its provisions should be made to insure that they are reasonable and workable.
The Democratic Party will also seek to enact a comprehensive mine safety law, utilizing the most effective and independent enforcement by the federal government and support special legislation providing adequate compensation to coal miners and their dependents who have suffered disablement or death as a result of the black lung disease.
We believe these policies will put America back to work, bring balanced growth to our economy
and give all Americans an opportunity to share in the expanding prosperity that will come from a new Democratic administration.
you can't find it?
really its takes one google search for every platform
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/platforms.php
This is amazing.
1976 Democratic Party Platform
Every single one of the bolded items is something the Democrats are still working on. Hell, I've heard stories on NPR in the last week about mine safety, equal pay, issues at the NLRB and, of course, the minimum wage. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The only exception is the item I underlined. It's very interesting to see that 30 years, the party asked for more part-time jobs and flexibility while now it is constantly defending Obama's policies for only creating those types of jobs.
This is amazing.
1976 Democratic Party Platform
Every single one of the bolded items is something the Democrats are still working on. Hell, I've heard stories on NPR in the last week about mine safety, equal pay, issues at the NLRB and, of course, the minimum wage. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The only exception is the item I underlined. It's very interesting to see that 30 years, the party asked for more part-time jobs and flexibility while now it is constantly defending Obama's policies for only creating those types of jobs.
Bill Clinton was basically a Goldwater Republican. He'd have survived early 1970's Republican primaries.
I don't know if people are serious with these comments
?
- welfare "reform"
- defense of marriage act
- financial deregulation
- NAFTA
- capital gains tax cut
- DADT
- "The era of big government is over!"
Sounds pretty Republican to me.
Here's an actual positive, non-shitty story to come out of the midterms:
http://blog.chron.com/goplifer/2014/11/the-missing-story-of-the-2014-election/
?
- welfare "reform"
- defense of marriage act
- financial deregulation
- NAFTA
- capital gains tax cut
- DADT
- "The era of big government is over!"
Sounds pretty Republican to me.
Here's an actual positive, non-shitty story to come out of the midterms:
http://blog.chron.com/goplifer/2014/11/the-missing-story-of-the-2014-election/
most of those were GOP congress.
And he takes credit for it. Obama is also pretty centrist but at least he would have vetoed some of the inane poverty slashing bs.most of those were GOP congress.
Where did you find an article by Diablos's GOP clone? He's absolutely right about most of his points, I just was not ready for another Diablos.
Huh, that's pretty interesting, and very well articulated. It's got to be tough being a Republican moderate these days.
Although it's a shame the comments were closed. That would've been entertaining.
Gallup said:Democrats: 36%
Republicans: 42%
Here's an actual positive, non-shitty story to come out of the midterms:
http://blog.chron.com/goplifer/2014/11/the-missing-story-of-the-2014-election/
US politics is also similar to Inuyasha in that it spends years without anything of any significance changing
mirite guys
Via KOCO:
A large crowd gathered at the Wilshire Gun grand opening Friday to watch Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin drive a tank over an old car.
The stunt kicked off the three-day opening celebration, as Wilshire Gun becomes the first shooting range in the state to sell alcohol.
Well it was interesting being able to ride in this tank and crush a car, and what an exciting way to open up the Wilshire Gun range today, Fallin said. Its a great new edition to Oklahoma City and its creating jobs.
Fallin said having a place that teaches gun safety is an important addition to the community.
Having the ability to have meeting spaces where people can learn about gun safety and the appropriate handling of firearms, which is also a very important part of gun ownership, Fallin said.
Happy 65th Birthday, @SpeakerBoehner! Welcome to Medicare and Social Security!
I really, really wish this was parody:
http://www.thelostogle.com/2014/11/17/mary-fallin-drove-a-tank/#more-50423
My state reelected this woman. Overwhelmingly.
Jesus.
He's (she's? I don't want to assume) right that the math is pretty intimidating for Republicans in 2016, although I won't rule out a win for now. If they do win though it would be a squeaker. And not a Dick Morris "squeaker" like Obama winning with 332 electoral votes, like just barely over 270.Here's an actual positive, non-shitty story to come out of the midterms:
http://blog.chron.com/goplifer/2014/11/the-missing-story-of-the-2014-election/
Here's an actual positive, non-shitty story to come out of the midterms:
http://blog.chron.com/goplifer/2014/...2014-election/
In 2016 Republicans will be defending 24 Senate seats and at least 18 of them are likely to be competitive based on geography and demographics. Democrats will be defending precisely one seat that could possibly be competitive. One.
He's (she's? I don't want to assume) right that the math is pretty intimidating for Republicans in 2016, although I won't rule out a win for now. If they do win though it would be a squeaker. And not a Dick Morris "squeaker" like Obama winning with 332 electoral votes, like just barely over 270.
The Senate is a bit more up in the air, but Democrats still have a good chance at taking it. IL (Duckworth), PA (Sestak), NH (Hassan), WI (Feingold?) could all flip easily, and OH, FL and IA could under the right conditions. And those are just the states that Obama won in both elections.
It's just too bad the House fucking sucks. Pick off the low-hanging fruit and Democrats could swing maybe like 15 seats or so but they'll need double that to win a majority.
And he takes credit for it. Obama is also pretty centrist but at least he would have vetoed some of the inane poverty slashing bs.
keep Inuyasha out of this please
I am 100% certain Willy is going to drive Hillary's office from the backseat. You'd be a fool to think otherwise.He's disavowed a few of those things.
And again, a centrist policy isn't republican policy and especially not goldwater republican.
(you should have waited to use that against hilary since she actually was a goldwater gil)
I am 100% certain Willy is going to drive Hillary's office from the backseat. You'd be a fool to think otherwise.