• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT16| Unpresidented

Status
Not open for further replies.

Debirudog

Member
I wasn't really being serious at all regarding Trump pulling a face turn lol. On the contrary, I'm planning to ask students about supporting Keith Ellison if they want someone new in the DNC chair and attend more activism. I plan to fight it.
 
Keep at it with the identity-only politics thing. That's what got us our first orange president.

Well I know you're just trying to stir shit up but no they're just good candidates. Also weren't you the one who wanted fucking Nina Turner lmao?

But you keep thinking that rural white people just want socialism lol
 
Keep at it with the identity-only politics thing. That's what got us our first orange president.

No it didn't lol

An uncharismatic, paranoid old white lady with serious trust issues and a poor public image ran a mediocre campaign.

Why is it always buzzwords? Establishment. Neoliberal. Identity politics. These are meaningless buzzwords that don't even come close to addressing this weird election.
 

mo60

Member
The republicans can kiss goodbye to their chances of holding the presidency and congress if they actually get rid of medicare.
 

Crocodile

Member
A) Democrats do well with young candidates

B) "Identity politics" is up there with "neoliberalism" in that if you complain about it sincerely, you're probably are an asshole with no good points to make.
 
No it didn't lol

An uncharismatic, paranoid old white lady with serious trust issues and a poor public image ran a mediocre campaign.

Why is it always buzzwords? Establishment. Neoliberal. Identity politics. These are meaningless buzzwords that don't even come close to addressing this weird election.

And a women who bet too big on human decency and was sabotaged by the KGB and FBI :mad:
 

Grexeno

Member
I think her being a woman was a large part of what started the Repub. hate machine in the first place. Remember, their vendetta against her began with "I could have stayed home and baked cookies", that's telling.
Well, that may be true, but a Kamala Harris or a Catherine Cortez Masto won't have that 30+ years of smear machine on them.
 

ampere

Member
spoiler alert: Dems do well w/ young candidates. Bad w/ old.

Just wondering how different things could have been in a real contested primary on our side... sigh. I got on the "it's Hillary's turn" train, but sexism is a hell of a drug for America
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Kander is identity politics?

And what makes Harris automatically identity politics? Her race and gender?

Jesus what the hell comment is this?

It's Lednerg, he worships at the alter of the image of the ideal Bernie Sanders.

What Bernie actually wants, does not matter, it's what the ideal image of Bernie Sanders actually wants.

Well, that may be true, but a Kamala Harris or a Catherine Cortez Masto won't have that 30+ years of smear machine on them.

True, they won't have enough time.
Clinton was right to be paranoid after seeing what happened this election but her justified paranoia also led to her narrative of the bulshit email story.
 

watershed

Banned
No it didn't lol

An uncharismatic, paranoid old white lady with serious trust issues and a poor public image ran a mediocre campaign.

Why is it always buzzwords? Establishment. Neoliberal. Identity politics. These are meaningless buzzwords that don't even come close to addressing this weird election.

Those buzzwords make the election easier to explain in a way that suits one's ideological leanings.

Instead of getting into the data and looking at all the dynamics, some people are more comfortable with simple explanations like identity politics which also implies that the concern is manufactured instead of very real for POC, LGBTQ, women, etc.
 
The republicans can kiss goodbye to their chances of holding the presidency and congress if they actually get rid of medicare.

I'm not even sure they have to get rid of it. Just Ryan pushing his plan and it failing would probably work.

Also it gives Democrats a nice thing to filibuster. They'd look like the heroes of the elderly.
 

Debirudog

Member
I mean, Kander had an effective moderate way of selling common sense background checks. He's a veteran and against Washington insiders.

hell, some republicans are begrudging saying, "why isn't he one of us" lmao.

I can't find a fault in this guy other than the fact that he's not quite as experienced but then you have Trump.

Meanwhile Kamala fought for criminal justice reform, sided with BLM, and to curb recidivism. Look at the speech and she's filled with emotion, passion and kindness. She reacts well with the audience.
...

and yeh, they're incredibly sexy to boot. They're just both great politicians.
 
I mean, Kander had an effective moderate way of selling common sense background checks. He's a veteran and against Washington insiders.

hell, some republicans are begrudging saying, "why isn't he one of us" lmao.

I can't find a fault in this guy other than the fact that he's not quite as experienced but then you have Trump.

Meanwhile Kamala fought for criminal justice reform, sided with BLM, and to curb recidivism. Look at the speech and she's filled with emotion, passion and kindness. She reacts well with the audience.
...

and yeh, they're incredibly sexy to boot. They're just both great politicians.

Harris-Kander 2020
 
A primary between Kamala and Kander would be a tough choice.

My only worry is they'll structure it so no one feels the pain of the cuts until 2021.

It doesn't really matter if the effects don't hit until the year 3000. The very act of doing it is enough to send AARP into a frenzy of mailers, robocalls and commercials during Price is Right and Wheel of Fortune.
 

lednerg

Member
It did huh?

So you are saying we cater to racists then? ok

Bernie Bros really want to go back to the Old White man running don't they?
Bernie Bros wanted to win.
Well I know you're just trying to stir shit up but no they're just good candidates. Also weren't you the one who wanted fucking Nina Turner lmao?

But you keep thinking that rural white people just want socialism lol
America just elected a game show host and you're thinking America is like the West Wing.
No it didn't lol

An uncharismatic, paranoid old white lady with serious trust issues and a poor public image ran a mediocre campaign.

Why is it always buzzwords? Establishment. Neoliberal. Identity politics. These are meaningless buzzwords that don't even come close to addressing this weird election.
Neoliberals are an actual thing. The Democratic Leadership Counsel was full of them.
Kander is identity politics?


Jesus why the hell comment is this?
"Just don't put old white men in, that's what counts." That completely ignores how Obama's 08 campaign energized people with economic poulism (which was then promptly abandoned, leading to the 2010 shellacking).
spoiler alert: Dems do well w/ young candidates. Bad w/ old.
The Dem base is the working class. They want to hear someone who doesn't sound like a fake and is angry for them. Age and identity matters not.
 

Joeytj

Banned
A) Democrats do well with young candidates

B) "Identity politics" is up there with "neoliberalism" in that if you complain about it sincerely, you're probably are an asshole with no good points to make.

I can understand the constant complaints against "neoliberalism" (although, yeah, it almost always comes from white or privileged men), at least it's a policy debate.

But I get pissed at seeing supposed liberals on Twitter and other places, complaining about Hamilton (??), and city liberals, and Democrats focusing "too much" on social issues.
 
I don't think tapping Kander for VP is a good idea. It feels like kind of a waste when we could have him pick up the governor's seat instead, if we're assuming he doesn't run straight for prez in 2020. Someone here, I think benji, pointed out that excitement VPs typically don't really do much, like Edwards or Quayle. I think there's some value in having a young/new candidate run with a Biden/LBJ-type to act as the "experienced adviser" role.
 

lednerg

Member
They wanted to win without having to vote. Now they're claiming Clinton is the problem because they sat out the election.

You keep ignoring how Bernie won the open elections. That's where the independents were allowed to vote. Independents are the largest portion of voters in this country by far.

They wanted to win without having to vote. Now they're claiming Clinton is the problem because they sat out the election.

No, they are not. There's an actual academic study on the term that corroborates this.

Oh goody, a study. I guess the Democratic Party elite hasn't been catering to corporate interests after all.
 
"Neoliberal" somehow describes both Pinochet and Barack Obama and thus probably isn't a real term unless "Not a Communist and to the left of Paul Ryan on economics" is a group you need to define (you don't, it's 98% of people).
 
OT going soft on Trump.

Gonna be a fun 4 years.
TO his credit, trump is a great salesman and knows how to play people.

Note that most people aren't responding to his crazier cabinet picks and more to the mostly normal interview he gave to 60 Minutes.

Trump's interview was soft so people are responding in kind
 

Totakeke

Member
I'll give Trump credit for being able to project a "normal" image during the 60 minutes interview. We knew that he himself was no true ideologue. He still surrounds himself with awful people though and that's where the harm comes from.

Edit: I would love to get the reactions from the "other" america though.
 

lednerg

Member
"Neoliberal" somehow describes both Pinochet and Barack Obama and thus probably isn't a real term unless "Not a Communist and to the left of Paul Ryan on economics" is a group you need to define (you don't, it's 98% of people).

It describes how the Democratic Party has abandoned labor for 40 years. It requires an interest in the history of the party to understand. If the term "union" gives you shivers, then look into that.
 
Harris and Cortez-Masto definitely appear like they could run in 2020, but it all depends on what actually happens in these next four years. They've both taken initiative to set themselves up as being stalwarts against Trump instead of the more reconciliatory tone of some others, which I suspect will be a boon for them when the time comes.

Kander missing the Senate this year definitely set him back, but I foresee a future for him regardless. It'll just take him longer to get there.

Joe Kennedy is another person who I fully expect to see further down the line, just not now. I imagine he'll wait in the House until Warren or Markey steps down, then take their seat.
Unfortunately I think the window on a female presidential candidate is shut for some time. Harris or Masto will wrongly elicit an "another woman?" reaction from rural white dumbfucks and they'll flock to Trump.
 
Bernie Bros wanted to win.

America just elected a game show host and you're thinking America is like the West Wing.

Neoliberals are an actual thing. The Democratic Leadership Counsel was full of them.

"Just don't put old white men in, that's what counts." That completely ignores how Obama's 08 campaign energized people with economic poulism (which was then promptly abandoned, leading to the 2010 shellacking).

The Dem base is the working class. They want to hear someone who doesn't sound like a fake and is angry for them. Age and identity matters not.

You didn't answer my question, how are Harris/Kander identity politics only...
 
Unfortunately I think the window on a female presidential candidate is shut for some time. Harris or Masto will wrongly elicit an "another woman?" reaction from rural white dumbfucks and they'll flock to Trump.
I think, assuming they run, it largely depends on if they can channel Obama-esque hype. If they can get white kids in Iowa showing up for hugeass rallies and seem well-liked and have good messaging, I think they can do well. If their support seems more tepid, then they probably aren't the right choices.
 

sphagnum

Banned
"Neoliberal" somehow describes both Pinochet and Barack Obama and thus probably isn't a real term unless "Not a Communist and to the left of Paul Ryan on economics" is a group you need to define (you don't, it's 98% of people).

I swear I wrote a response to basically this same post yesterday, but you don't have to be anything alike to both be members of a wide ranging ideology. Stalin and Orwell.

Hell, Obama and Ryan. Both liberals!
 

Odrion

Banned
The senate, house and president are going to go against the largest lobby in Washington and the only voters who vote reliably in every election?

It's their death warrant.
"the republicans can't be THIS self destructive! doing this is going to destroy them!" - poligaf, 2009~2016.

they give no fucks, they'll gut programs and make this country suffer. then work to gerrymander, suppress voter rights, and prey on white fear. will it work? well, it worked well for them this far so why are they going to stop?
 

Joeytj

Banned
I'll give Trump credit for being able to project a "normal" image during the 60 minutes interview. We knew that he himself was no true ideologue. He still surrounds himself with awful people though and that's where the harm comes from.

He tipped his hand with the abortion answer, on whether he has any real convictions or not. He either knows that abortion is still more controversial than gay marriage, or he personally care less about reproductive rights than gay rights.

Either way, that 60 Minutes interview is him passing the lowest of bars.

Democrats and the rest of the anti-Trump movement shouldn't get distracted with his Tweets and interviews. His cabinet will be where most of the criticism will matter, and then, his first 100 days.

His first 100 days will tell us just how much in trouble we will be. The same was for Obama, if we are being honest. How he handled the Stimulus, auto-bailouts and other actions during his first 100 or 150 days are pretty much how he governed for the rest of his two term.
 

kirblar

Member
I swear I wrote a response to basically this same post yesterday, but you don't have to be anything alike to both be members of a wide ranging ideology. Stalin and Orwell.

Hell, Obama and Ryan. Both liberals!
Yes, the vast majority of the population believes Marx is trash.

That is because Marx is trash. Not because they're bowing down to corporate overlords.
 
He tipped his hand with the abortion answer, on whether he has any real convictions or not. He either knows that abortion is still more controversial than gay marriage, or he personally care less about reproductive rights than gay rights. .

Honestly, I doubt he has much interest or passion for policy in general. He'll say things to rile up his base and (occasionally) to mollify critics, but someone who has the attention span and lack of intellectual curiosity he has probably isn't someone too bothered by the details of actual policy discussion.

That's what has me worried - I actually think Trump will be more amenable to policy concessions than the people that will make up his administration and many/most of the Republicans in Congress (not because he's a "good guy", but rather because he's not a fanatic about abortion or gay rights or whatever).
 
You keep ignoring how Bernie won the open elections. That's where the independents were allowed to vote. Independents are the largest portion of voters in this country by far.

.
What universe do you live in?

He won 5 or 6 out 17

which is about 29% of them

Washington for example: he won the binding caucus but lost the non binding primary which had a larger voting pool...
 

Odrion

Banned
anyone here who grew up paying attention to the bush administration will tell you that republicans are crazy evil fuckers
 

Totakeke

Member
Honestly, I doubt he has much interest or passion for policy in general. He'll say things to rile up his base and (occasionally) to mollify critics, but someone who has the attention span and lack of intellectual curiosity he has probably isn't someone too bothered by the details of actual policy discussion.

That's what has me worried - I actually think Trump will be more amenable to policy concessions than the people that will make up his administration and many/most of the Republicans in Congress (not because he's a "good guy", but rather because he's not a fanatic about abortion or gay rights or whatever).

Someone give him a secret cellphone that directly connects to Obama please.
 

thcsquad

Member
I think her being a woman was a large part of what started the Repub. hate machine in the first place. Remember, their vendetta against her began with "I could have stayed home and baked cookies", that's telling.

She was ahead of her time. She had to live through gender battles that younger women just didn't have to do. Because of the crap Hillary went through in the 90s, nobody bats an eye when Heidi Cruz makes more than her husband. But because of the crap Hillary went through in the 90s, lots of people just had an ingrained dislike of her.

It's the same reason Jesse Jackson didn't get to be the first black president. If there was any justice in the world, Obama would have been the second black president. But somebody earlier had to fight the hard battles and take the tarnished reputation for doing so. We'll get there, with hopefully way less lag time than between Jackson and Obama.
 

kirblar

Member
like who here grew up paying attention to the bush administration

you know how they are, this is going to suck
18-25s were too young to remember them.

This has been a serious problem, and it's going to keep happening every 8 years as the base that grows up in their youth with a Dem leader gets super comfortable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom