Tarkus
Member
Try $499-$800 for a new Glock in various models.shinra can confirm that in Australia's black market, a glock costs about 30k USD. Compare that to the US' 1.2k for a glock.
gun bans work :/
I agree though, something must be done.
Try $499-$800 for a new Glock in various models.shinra can confirm that in Australia's black market, a glock costs about 30k USD. Compare that to the US' 1.2k for a glock.
gun bans work :/
Try $499-$800 for a new Glock in various models.
I agree though, something must be done.
More than that, its the mass murderers weapon of choice, presumably because its the best firearm for killing a whole bunch of people all at once. I mean, it is what it was designed for. Lets not pretend otherwise or that its coincidence that such a weapon has been used in five prominent mass shootings since 2012 began.
In some ways, I feel bad for John McCain, he was insulted by Trump and then the guy has the balls to claim we should bring back torture when he dodged the draft while McCain was actually being tortured. Then you have to imagine that he agrees way more with Clinton on foreign policy than Trump but he needs his voters to win. He could pull an Arlen Specter but then the left would lose their minds.
I imagine this would be the kind of dilemma Dems would have been in had LaRouche won the nomination one of those years.
I don't. If he had any integrity at all he should have refused to back Trump. If he loses he loses. Not like he's not old enough and rich enough to retire anyway. After Hillary winning nothing would make me happier than to see McCain lose.
There was like a week of hype about that election due to Pressler splitting the GOP vote.
Na, this is why AR15s are popular. They look like actual military hardware and are very customizable (you can add a ton of frivolous attachments) so civilians can pretend like they are soldiers. As a civilian weapon ARs are gimped, they can't do 3 round burst or automatic fire like actual M4/M16s. They can only do semi-automatic fire like any hunting rifle.
I think of em like some teenager's Toyota Camry with racing stickers, a loud spoiler and tacked on wings.. people who don't know cars might think they're impressive but they're really not.
AR-15s were designed for the military.
Na, this is why AR15s are popular. They look like actual military hardware and are very customizable (you can add a ton of frivolous attachments) so civilians can pretend like they are soldiers. As a civilian weapon ARs are gimped, they can't do 3 round burst or automatic fire like actual M4/M16s. They can only do semi-automatic fire like any hunting rifle.
I think of em like some teenager's Toyota Camry with racing stickers, a loud spoiler and tacked on wings.. people who don't know cars might think they're impressive but they're really not.
I couldn't agree more.Was working all day, so couldn't really post, talk, or read about this, but...
FUCK not politicizing this. Fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it. I get respect for the dead, respect for the wounded, but FUCK not using every goddamn tool in the goddamn toolchest to stop this shit from happening! Emotional manipulation, fear, all of it should be fair game. People are fucking dying! I say we tie national defense to gun control, run around screaming about TERRORISM and paint every single goddamn NRA Republican as weak on defense, anti-American cowards.
God, I'm just PISSED!
Was working all day, so couldn't really post, talk, or read about this, but...
FUCK not politicizing this. Fuck it fuck it fuck it fuck it. I get respect for the dead, respect for the wounded, but FUCK not using every goddamn tool in the goddamn toolchest to stop this shit from happening! Emotional manipulation, fear, all of it should be fair game. People are fucking dying! I say we tie national defense to gun control, run around screaming about TERRORISM and paint every single goddamn NRA Republican as weak on defense, anti-American cowards.
God, I'm just PISSED!
Paul Ryan's statement is actually pretty notable in that he isn't really politicizing the issue at all. He doesn't mention Trump, the election, or even any specific policies. The farthest he gets is saying that radical Islam is bad and we should oppose it.
If anything, Ryan's efforts to distance himself from Trump are forcing him to be more moderate in general.
Na, this is why AR15s are popular. They look like actual military hardware and are very customizable (you can add a ton of frivolous attachments) so civilians can pretend like they are soldiers. As a civilian weapon ARs are gimped, they can't do 3 round burst or automatic fire like actual M4/M16s. They can only do semi-automatic fire like any hunting rifle.
I think of em like some teenager's Toyota Camry with racing stickers, a loud spoiler and tacked on wings.. people who don't know cars might think they're impressive but they're really not.
Kind of irrelevant suggesting where an AR-15 sits in the pecking order or what it is "supposed" to be used for when it has just been proven effective at being able to kill or injure 100 people within a matter of minutes. Being "gimped" in relation to other military hardware doesn't seem to be hurting it much in this instance.
Is there actually any other consumer product available on the market, with as little regulation, that could actually be leveraged to the same effect as this shooting? I can't think of one offhand. Even driving a big truck through a crowd of people wouldn't cause as much damage (and you'd need a commercial license to drive one in the first place and a truck is exponentially more expensive).
the moment a Democratic House ever came to be again and passed gun control say goodbye to holding it. At that point the might as well ram everything from Immigration to minimum wage to SC picks to voting Right Act 6.0 etc.
Like the ACA.the moment a Democratic House ever came to be again and passed gun control say goodbye to holding it.
the moment a Democratic House ever came to be again and passed gun control say goodbye to holding it. At that point the might as well ram everything from Immigration to minimum wage to SC picks to voting Right Act 6.0 etc.
Well, if you filled the truck up with fertilizer first you could have a significant impact.
But in terms of utility to death-dealing effectiveness, guns are certainly at the top of the chart.
The thing is a large majority of the country at the very least wanted more background checks. We can't even get things through that the American people want. Another huge problem is that the gun problem is so bad it would be a decade before meaningful gun legislation had a signifcant impact because of the proliferation of guns currently. By the time things started getting better the republican congress would just repeal it
Aren't toxic fertilizers regulated in the US? Not to mention you still have the cost and portability issues.
In terms of the package of cost, portability, access, and killing effectiveness nothing comes close that I can think of.
Yep there is a reason our soldiers are equipped with guns and not fertilizer trucks, pipe bombs, pilot licenses and cars as weapons.
Lacking burst mode and/or full auto doesn't make it gimped. In fact those firing mods are barely useful in combat situations.
Na, this is why AR15s are popular. They look like actual military hardware and are very customizable (you can add a ton of frivolous attachments) so civilians can pretend like they are soldiers. As a civilian weapon ARs are gimped, they can't do 3 round burst or automatic fire like actual M4/M16s. They can only do semi-automatic fire like any hunting rifle.
I think of em like some teenager's Toyota Camry with racing stickers, a loud spoiler and tacked on wings.. people who don't know cars might think they're impressive but they're really not.
He was a Republican turned Independent (in 2013) who endorsed Obama both in 08 and 12.
Sahil KapurVerified account
‏@sahilkapur
In 12/2015, Senate Dems pushed an amendment to block people on terror watch list from buying guns. It was shot down.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkzURIZUUAAe7yE.jpg:large[IMG][/QUOTE]
I remember the ACLU being against this because the list didn't have due process, but honestly I think gun buying is a dangerous enough thing to err on the side of caution. The 2nd amendment has convinced people gun ownership is this inalienable right, when it really should be a special privilege when certain criteria are met.
Either that or disqualify someone after a domestic abuse incident, or something similar.
[quote="Kristoffer, post: 206681855"]The establishment never changed the title.[/QUOTE]
Still 186 pages left for them to do it
Still have 18k+ posts to change it.The establishment never changed the title.
“We are going to take our campaign to the convention with the full understanding that we are very good at arithmetic and that we know, you know, who has the received the most votes up to now,” Mr. Sanders said after the meeting, standing on his front lawn with his wife, Jane. Among the dozen or so people who attended the gathering were Benjamin T. Jealous, a former president of the N.A.A.C.P.; Congressman Raúl M. Grijalva of Arizona; Nina Turner, a former Ohio state senator; and Bill McKibben, the environmentalist and author.
Notably, Mr. Sanders also said he would continue his efforts aimed at “transforming the Democratic Party,” a sign that his main goal may no longer be to become the nominee.
Besides defeating Mr. Trump, advisers say his focus is to get his ideas, like universal health care and free public college, reflected in the party platform. Refusing to concede and release his delegates to vote for Mrs. Clinton could be a negotiating tactic for winning concessions on the platform. If his delegates tried to nominate Mr. Sanders from the floor of the convention next month, the scene could damage Mrs. Clinton at a time she is trying to project strength and party unity.
...
According to a person who attended the meeting at Mr. Sanders’s home Sunday, and who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe a private gathering, there was no talk from Mr. Sanders about trying to win the nomination. The group was keenly interested in how the senator’s meeting with Mrs. Clinton on Tuesday will turn out, and whether he would get assurances that she would fight for his ideas, this person said.
It took every fiber of my being to resist going with |OT7| Hillary is lame, and if that title would have lasted more than 5 minutes it would have been worth itI dare these suckas not to.
There is no improving perfectionNot sardonic enough. We should have gone with a Radiohead throwback: "Hail to the Thief"
Are you fucking kidding me right now?Based on the title, I was having deja vu, thinking this article was from last week. But nope, this is news from Bernie's Sunday gathering with his staff and major supporters:
New York Times: Bernie Sanders Refuses to Concede Nomination to Hillary Clinton
Based on the title, I was having deja vu, thinking this article was from last week. But nope, this is news from Bernie's Sunday gathering with his staff and major supporters:
New York Times: Bernie Sanders Refuses to Concede Nomination to Hillary Clinton
Not sardonic enough. We should have gone with a Radiohead throwback: "Hail to the Thief"It took every fiber of my being to resist going with |OT7| Hillary is lame, and if that title would have lasted more than 5 minutes it would have been worth it
Well he's not talking about trying to win the nomination much it seems, but he is so goddamn stubborn, it's like he wants to be stuck in that place between campaigning and conceding indefinitely.What happened to landing the plane?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-campaign_us_575d638be4b0e39a28add33cI simply want to get a sense of what kind of platform she will be supporting, whether she will be vigorous in standing up for working families and the middle class, moving aggressively on climate change, healthcare for all, making public colleges and universities tuition-free, he said of Tuesdays planned meeting. And after we have that kind of discussion and after we can determine whether or not we are going to have a strong and progressive platform, I will be able to make other decisions.
That's a fucking disaster. She can't do that. He's too far left.I've been saying this for weeks. Bernie wants to win even though he lost.
He'll land the plane, alright. But only if Hillary concedes her own platform in favor of his.