Dubbedinenglish
Banned
Where is Tiffany.
She getting ready to be rightfully there, the fresh princess of New York
Where is Tiffany.
I dont understand why Jr is getting singled out as the guy thats in big trouble when Kushner and Manafort were there too. Can someone explain?
They also have no future, dying jobs market, massive student debt, can't get married, have children, afford a home or have a decent healthcare plan.Of course we should appeal to them with better messaging/policy/etc., but at the end of the day, voters have agency.
The unspoken truth is that young voters simply have the poorest understanding of the electoral process, because they have the least exposure of participating in the process, using gov. programs, etc.
Actual footage from the WH Press Office right now;
They also have no future, dying jobs market, massive student debt, can't get married, have children, afford a home or have a decent healthcare plan.
Why the fuck should they care about whether or not social security is getting cut or not. Most young people aren't even thinking past next month.
It's actually really easy to appeal to young people if you do anything to make any of those prospects about the bleak future of young Americans better. It has nothing to do with them not understanding. It's that politicians barely try to address their concerns and mostly stick with problems boomers care about
I think you're right
Oh my god.
Stupid Watergate
old people are terrible at facebook
would be crazy if the damning evidence is somewhere in a social media account
Older people if they were ever going to have kids already had them. Benefitted from far cheaper college tuition. Got experience in a much better jobs market. Bought a home likely long before the housing market crash. Really young people now are worse off and have far worse prospects in regards to upward mobility than their parents. So it isn't just "fixing the economy". It's directly addressing that now young people are seriously feeling the hurt of trickle down economics.yes, only young people care about fixing the economy and fixing healthcare. easy fixes! why didn't anyone else think of that before?
People are still arguing if Bernie would have won? Of course he would have.
People are still arguing if Bernie would have won? Of course he would have.
I want to believe the only reason Trump's Twitter account hasn't been closed, is that he keeps providing more evidence for the Prosecution though it. There is also the possibility Trump has sent out DMs that have damning info in them.
Jr received the email from Goldstone for a meeting, and presumably it was Jr who brought in KushKush and Manafort to the meeting (because the other two were not in communication with Goldstone).I dont understand why Jr is getting singled out as the guy thats in big trouble when Kushner and Manafort were there too. Can someone explain?
Older people if they were ever going to have kids already had them. Benefitted from far cheaper college tuition. Got experience in a much better jobs market. Bought a home likely long before the housing market crash. Really young people now are worse off and have far worse prospects in regards to upward mobility than their parents. So it isn't just "fixing the economy". It's directly addressing that now young people are seriously feeling the hurt of trickle down economics.
The overall "economy" getting better would be great. But it's not enough for a lot of young people who are at a disadvantage. The next candidate should be able to comminicate to young people that they understand that.
People also like to talk about what direction they want to go from here or what they want the party to be about and focus on. But that somehow turns into "salty burnout so relitigating again", anytime anyone wants to do that.People are still arguing if Bernie would have won? Of course he would have.
Potentially the only objectively intelligent person in the family at this point. Or at least smart enough to never be caught anywhere near politics.Where is Tiffany.
This is proof that DJT Jr. didn't give a fuck about colluding but isn't technically proof that the campaign, as an organization (i.e. on the level of Trump, Flynn, Kushner, etc.), actually did such. I have a feeling the case is going to be highly circumstantial in this way.
This is proof that DJT Jr. didn't give a fuck about colluding but isn't technically proof that the campaign, as an organization (i.e. on the level of Trump, Flynn, Kushner, etc.), actually did such. I have a feeling the case is going to be highly circumstantial in this way.
This is proof that DJT Jr. didn't give a fuck about colluding but isn't technically proof that the campaign, as an organization (i.e. on the level of Trump, Flynn, Kushner, etc.), actually did such. I have a feeling the case is going to be highly circumstantial in this way.
I'm thinking pigeons are more likely to fly overhead and crap on crab shellsI'm curious who would win if a crab and a pigeon did have a fight in real life. I'm thinking a crab's claws would make short work of pigeon's tiny legs.
That's more imagination than knowledge, isn't it?At least you'll always know that. No matter what HillaryGaf says.
Jason Kander @JasonKander
·
6h
With just one phone call, the world's most powerful man could order a surrender on #Trumpcare, yet he sits in the Kremlin and does nothing.
So the fact that the Campaign Manager sat in on this meeting doesn't connect it to the campaign...
I see some fundamental problems with your take.
Wasn't Manafort in the meeting also?
It certainly establishes intent to collude, publicly, for the first time.
Yes, but even though DJT Jr.'s "I didn't know what the guy was offering" alibi is kaput, it still works for Manafort and Kush Kush, technically, if they just say they didn't know what DJTJ had been told, just that he wanted to meet with someone.
Unless oldest Fredo accidentally sent an email to Manafort about this, too. It's so stupid we can't rule that out yet.
My chimp-level understanding of treason is that it has to involve a nation we're at war with or enemies with, and Russia is obviously not the former, and technically not the latter.I heard something on NPR that bummed me out, that there is legally no statute on "collusion" or "coordination" in federal election laws. The person from lawfareblog was a total debbie downer and made it seem like there is no big prosecution coming, other than violation of cybersecurity acts, may be conspiracy.
However I wanted to hear if they can be tried for treason but the host never asked it.
There's no proof the campaign manager knew what the guy was slinging, only supposition. Perfectly LOGICAL supposition, but supposition, nevertheless, unless this leads to damning evidence (say, emails or texts obtained by subpoena). In which case, well, lol, should've used Kik, boys.
Yes, but even though DJT Jr.'s "I didn't know what the guy was offering" alibi is kaput, it still works for Manafort and Kush Kush, technically, if they just say they didn't know what DJTJ had been told, just that he wanted to meet with someone.
Absolutely, but only on the part of this one guy, not necessarily the whole campaign organization. That'll take more, damning though this be.