whyamihere
Banned
*whispers*
If Ossoff is up by 1-3, you'd expect a few polls to show that Handel is up as well.
If Ossoff is up by 1-3, you'd expect a few polls to show that Handel is up as well.
*whispers*
If Ossoff is up by 1-3, you'd expect a few polls to show that Handel is up as well.
What is this now?
Link? I missed this.
Edit Jinx plinko!
The main reason Ossoff losing would be so disappointing is because Handel sucks. You would hope we could beat such a mediocre, if that, candidate.
Manchin up 50/41 over generic R, 57/39 approvals.
https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/polls/2017/06/15/west-virginia-senate-poll-joe-manchin/
Manchin up 50/41 over generic R, 57/39 approvals.
https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/polls/2017/06/15/west-virginia-senate-poll-joe-manchin/
Who the hell is concerned about Kamala Harris? I'm watching montages of her and she kicks ass. Basically already has my vote, damn.
"Kicking ass" isn't the same as appealing to voters nationwide. I like her a lot, but it remains to be seen if she has what it takes to be a quality presidential candidate.
For being the worst Democrat in the Senate I've always counted Manchin among the likeliest to hold his seat next year.Manchin up 50/41 over generic R, 57/39 approvals.
https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/polls/2017/06/15/west-virginia-senate-poll-joe-manchin/
I'd talk about her being a newly elected Senator from California, but the real problem is that being a black woman is a lot to overcome in American politics. We all just saw what happened to Hillary because of her gender, if we're talking about winning election this is unfortunately still a big hurdle. I don't even like typing this shit, but I don't know how you could look at this country and think otherwise.
For being the worst Democrat in the Senate I've always counted Manchin among the likeliest to hold his seat next year.
Of the red state Democrats I'd rank it thus:
Stabenow (MI)
Casey (PA)
Nelson (FL)
Brown (OH)
Manchin (WV)
Baldwin (WI)
Tester (MT)
Heitkamp (ND)
McCaskill (MO)
Donnelly (IN)
With the caveat that several of these are interchangeable and I view them more as clusters (too 3 being the safest, middle 4 being decent bets for re-election, bottom 3 I'm still fairly concerned about).
That's about where i'd draw the line, though i'd put Manchin below Tester and above Heitkamp, who may just luck herself into another Senate term by having a shit challenger).
Donnelly's probably toast because he really lucked into the job the first time and Indiana's just trending further right with time. McCaskill and Heitkamp could well make it with bad opponents in a strong D year (much as they did in 2012). Everyone above them is not much of a cause for worry.
Which surprises me about Manchin. A few months ago i was of the opinion that he was a dead man walking.
Edit: my math right now is we could lose one, flip three (believe in Cruzing for a Bruising, along with Heller and Flake), for a net gain of two, which wouldn't be enough but would mean that anytime Rand Paul wants to be principled, McConnell fails to pass.
Thing about West Virginia is it'll still elect a Democrat who's hard right on coal and other social issues, it's just that's so far removed from the national platform now that it's easier to just write them off as a red state.That's about where i'd draw the line, though i'd put Manchin below Tester and above Heitkamp, who may just luck herself into another Senate term by having a shit challenger).
Donnelly's probably toast because he really lucked into the job the first time and Indiana's just trending further right with time. McCaskill and Heitkamp could well make it with bad opponents in a strong D year (much as they did in 2012). Everyone above them is not much of a cause for worry.
Which surprises me about Manchin. A few months ago i was of the opinion that he was a dead man walking.
Conversely this is the problem Warren would have as a candidate. The GOP has openly bragged about their smear campaign against Warren being a redux of what they did to Hillary. It won't be enough to bring her down in Massachusetts but it's enough to make her a bad bet for the presidency.I'm sure Hillary's gender played somewhat of a factor in why some of her haters hated her so much, but I wouldn't put among the top 5 reasons Hillary lost to Trump.
I think the bigger factor, and something Kamala has an edge over Hillary in, is just how relentlessly the GOP targeted Hillary for years, particularly the last 4 years when everyone knew she was going to be the 2016 nominee.
The GOP simply does not have enough time to brew a "get 60% of voters to hate Kamala" stew like they had with Hillary and by the time they try to get it going it'll fail just like it did when they tried it on Obama.
So we just shouldn't run women or minorities? That's the logical conclusion of what you're arguing. (Which I very much disagree w/)I'd talk about her being a newly elected Senator from California, but the real problem is that being a black woman is a lot to overcome in American politics. We all just saw what happened to Hillary because of her gender, if we're talking about winning election this is unfortunately still a big hurdle. I don't even like typing this shit, but I don't know how you could look at this country and think otherwise.
Seems unlikely because he'd be in the White House10. Kaine
It'd be McAuliffe.Seems unlikely because he'd be in the White House
luckily for him he's poised now to be 2020 frontrunner!It'd be McAuliffe.
I think Scott was meant to be a placeholder for McAuliffe to run, but now that I think about it I remember them saying they wanted Scott to boost black turnout for the special election, so maybe not.luckily for him he's poised now to be 2020 frontrunner!
I think the plan was to appoint Bobby Scott, at least that's what Perriello said
American forces have shot down a Syrian government fighter jet accused of attacking Kurdish-led troops fighting Isis.
US Central Command said the SU-22 dropped bombs near the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), who are being supported by the US-led coalition as they advance on the terrorist stronghold of Raqqa.
”In accordance with rules of engagement and in collective self-defence of Coalition partnered forces, it was immediately shot down by a US F/A-18E Super Hornet," a statement said.
Manchin up 50/41 over generic R, 57/39 approvals.
https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/polls/2017/06/15/west-virginia-senate-poll-joe-manchin/
Noted libertarian with friends
What would be the Dem equivalent of GA-6th?
Are you kidding me? Media ratings are through the roof, this Russia shit sells like hotcakes. Why do you think they aren't talking about healthcare or something actually important?Feel bad for the US that neither Trump nor the media can avoid their worse impulses.
Probably looks like thisThis is a weird source.
I'd like to see generic D vs generic R here.
This is certainly a new era of civic participation, folks.
What an upsetting picture.Noted libertarian with friends
Noted libertarian with friends
Sources close to Mitch McConnell tell me the Majority Leader is dead serious about forcing a Senate vote on the Obamacare repeal-and-replace bill before the July 4 holiday.
Some senators want to delay the vote but McConnell views that as delaying the inevitable. There are no mysteries about what the toughest disagreements are over Medicaid funding and insurance market regulations.
This week is crucial: the Senate won't vote without a CBO score, which means they need to finalize negotiations this week.
Behind-the-scenes: McConnell and Senate leaders have been at this for all of May and now first couple weeks of June, turning their weekly lunches into working sessions on various aspects of the healthcare legislation. They've whittled down the stack of items that people don't agree on. I've spoken to a number of people who know McConnell well who speculate that he'll force a vote regardless of whether he knows he has 50 votes.
They say he's desperate to move on to tax reform and can't have healthcare hanging around like a bad smell through the summer.
On the House side:
Following the White House's "Workforce Development Week," House GOP leadership will vote on two workforce bills. The big one: a bipartisan bill to reauthorize the "Perkins Act" for six years providing more than $1 billion per year in federal support for career and technical education programs.
Wednesday's conference meeting is expected to be more policy-focused than usual. (They had to cancel Friday's meeting due to the fallout from last week's shooting.) A senior House aide tells me the Wednesday conference will focus on the budget caps and appropriations.
Paul Ryan and Kevin McCarthy will both address the National Association of Manufacturers. Ryan pushing tax reform and McCarthy on reg reform and workforce development.
This is certainly a new era of civic participation, folks.
Some bad shit happened in my personal life in 2016 and the election night managed to top all of it.I think I'll just ignore all media on Tuesday and check the results at midnight on Wednesday. Election night in November gave me tremors.
McConnell wants to force health care vote by July 4th
https://www.axios.com/mcconnell-schedule-health-care-vote-2444017826.html
"Camp David is very rustic, it's nice, you'd like it," Trump said in an interview with a European journalist just before taking office. "You know how long you'd like it? For about 30 minutes."
McConnell wants to force health care vote by July 4th
https://www.axios.com/mcconnell-schedule-health-care-vote-2444017826.html
:lol It's amazing when even Fox News is calling out the lawyer for Trump who can't keep his lies straight on whether or not he's being investigated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxAIaFyxzig
So apparently the FBI director has attorney client privilege with the president... Hmmm