McConnell never really loses so I doubt he'd do something stupid.
McConnell wants to force health care vote by July 4th
https://www.axios.com/mcconnell-schedule-health-care-vote-2444017826.html
The real question is who does McConnell let vote against this thing? Flake and Heller are both up for reelection in 2018. But I can't imagine some of the 2020 Rs like Collins and Gardner want to run with the AHCA attached to their hips. But is Murkowski going to vote for this just because she isn't up for reelection until 2022?
The real question is who does McConnell let vote against this thing? Flake and Heller are both up for reelection in 2018. But I can't imagine some of the 2020 Rs like Collins and Gardner want to run with the AHCA attached to their hips. But is Murkowski going to vote for this just because she isn't up for reelection until 2022?
That Chris Wallace interview with Trump's lawyer was something else.
:lol It's amazing when even Fox News is calling out the lawyer for Trump who can't keep his lies straight on whether or not he's being investigated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxAIaFyxzig
So apparently the FBI director has attorney client privilege with the president... Hmmm
On Fox News Sunday, however, Sekulow appeared to be less clear on his talking points.
So hes being investigated for taking the action that the attorney general and deputy attorney general recommended him to take, by the agency who recommended the termination, Sekulow said.
Youve now said that he is being investigated after saying that you didnt, Chris Wallace noted.
No, hes not being investigated, Sekulow interjected.
You just said, sir, you just said that hes being investigated, Wallace said.
Sekulow then reversed direction.
Let me be crystal clear so you completely understand. We have not received, nor are we aware of, any investigation of the President of the United States. Period, Sekulow said, using similar phrasing for emphasis as he did on Meet the Press.
You just said two times that hes being investigated, Wallace said.
Yeah, this was my favorite part:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-lawyer-mixed-messages-russia-mueller-tweets
Only people as stupid as Trump is will work for Trump, outside of the military at least. This much is clear.
I don't think he can pull it off unless he forces a vote on the unmodified House bill (which is parliamentarian-approved, barring certain provisions like the Hyde Amendment parts and some parts relating to Native Americans). The CBO delay alone should be enough to sink his hopes at this point. He's got 10 business days if they submit a bill tomorrow.
Edit: Rand Paul seems to be a hard no, so there's only one person they can afford to let flip on this voluntarily.
Yeah, I mean never trust a Republican but I don't think they can count on Murkowski. Repealing the Medicaid expansion would destroy Alaska, and Murkowski unlike the shitheads in her caucus from Medicaid states actually seems concerned by that.Murkowski seems like a pretty likely no to me. She's still talking shit about it up to today. Rand Paul almost certainly is as well. So they can't really afford to lose anybody else.
I liked it when dude started holding up a piece of paper. Bro, some prop isn't going to make your arguments valid. No one sitting at home thinking this guy waving a piece of paper must be credible. The paper sure looks legal.Yeah, this was my favorite part:
He probably just wants a vote so the base can't accuse the GOP of not trying. I don't think it'll work, they'll just accuse them of not trying hard enough and want to primary Susan Collins or some shit.I don't think McConnell cares if the ACA is repealed ¯_(ツ_/¯
I don't think McConnell cares if the ACA is repealed ¯_(ツ_/¯
I don't think McConnell cares if the ACA is repealed ¯_(ツ_/¯
Prodecdural rules don't matter anymore. Expect them to be dismantled if they are an impediment to the republican agenda. There is no calendar based window for complacency as long as they hold majorities and the White House.What's the deadline for reconciliation now?
Prodecdural rules don't matter anymore. Expect them to be dismantled if they are an impediment to the republican agenda. There is no calendar based window for complacency as long as they hold majorities and the White House.
Yeah, it sounds like Turtle Power wants this out of his hands...one way or another.
He probably just wants a vote so the base can't accuse the GOP of not trying. I don't think it'll work, they'll just accuse them of not trying hard enough and want to primary Susan Collins or some shit.
Yeah but I don't think Collins really wants ACA repealed.Collins is probably better off than you guys are saying here because no Medicaid expansion in Maine.
If you're letting No votes through it should be Flake and Heller.
Collins is probably better off than you guys are saying here because no Medicaid expansion in Maine.
If you're letting No votes through it should be Flake and Heller.
Yeah but I don't think Collins really wants ACA repealed.
I think she and Snowe would have voted for it in 2010 if the party strategy wasn't so explicitly "obstruct everything."
IIRC Obama or Biden said once they had 7 sitting Republican senators tell them in private they supported ACA, but leadership told them not to. I'd have to imagine the Maine Senators were at the top of that list.
God Collins is so fucking useless, but I still hope she does the right thing here.
I know they're more immediately vulnerable, but I'd expect them to vote for it sooner than the other two.May not need her as badly. With Paul sticking to the libertarian shtick, the GOP may need either Flake or Heller to vote Yes. This is all after keeping Collins and Murkowski on board.
Collins is probably better off than you guys are saying here because no Medicaid expansion in Maine.
If you're letting No votes through it should be Flake and Heller.
I know they're more immediately vulnerable, but I'd expect them to vote for it sooner than the other two.
Typically yeah, but I'm optimistic given their own states.
Thing is, if the GOP is expecting them to lose ANYWAY, they might go ham on trying to get them on board because why not?
The GOP isn't expecting to lose any Senate seats in 2018 and the Senators themselves especially aren't thinking that way.
Thing is, if the GOP is expecting them to lose ANYWAY, they might go ham on trying to get them on board because why not?
The GOP isn't expecting to lose any Senate seats in 2018 and the Senators themselves especially aren't thinking that way.
Boy are they in for a surprise
Are they? Even with a wave election the GOP isn't especially vulnerable with the 2018 Senate map.
Ted Cruz isn't really as safe as he'd like to believe. He's vulnerable during a wave.Even the fantasy scenarios people here come up with require things like Texas electing a Democrat to the Senate as the only way for the Democrats to retake the Senate.
We need Sprinkle to run for governor, he wrote the Medicaid bill. There's your platform.I don't think Heller's inclined to vote no. Despite being target #1 in 2018, he's fairly conservative himself.
But the electorate in Nevada's gonna be in a fighting mood since they're trying to pass Medicaid for All at the state level and Sandoval (who's up in 2018) vetoed it.
Are they? Even with a wave election the GOP isn't especially vulnerable with the 2018 Senate map. Even the fantasy scenarios people here come up with require things like Texas electing a Democrat to the Senate as the only way for the Democrats to retake the Senate.
Posted a link above but there is no state where ACA polls well. The closest is Oklahoma where it still has a 38/45 spread.If they repeal the ACA, the senate is absolutely on the table.
Are they? Even with a wave election the GOP isn't especially vulnerable with the 2018 Senate map.
If they repeal the ACA, the senate is absolutely on the table.
Ted Cruz isn't really as safe as he'd like to believe.
If they repeal the ACA, the senate is absolutely on the table.
Ted Cruz isn't really as safe as he'd like to believe. He's vulnerable during a wave.
I know the trends in Indiana wouldn't necessarily correlate with those in the Sun Belt, but any environment that lets us swing Texas would probably be enough for Donnelly to hang on.It's a longshot. And Donnelly may very well lose anyway requiring the Dems to pick up 4 seats for control which is probably impossible.
(CNN)An outside group that supports President Donald Trump is running a radio ad in Atlanta ahead of Georgia's special election Tuesday that takes the voice of former President Barack Obama out of context to make the argument that Democrats take black voters for granted.
Great America Alliance, a pro-Trump non-profit group that previously ran ads attacking former FBI director James Comey during his testimony, is running an ad that quotes Obama narrating his autobiographical book "Dreams From My Father." The ad, however, does not mention that in the selected passage, Obama is actually quoting someone else who is speaking about the black community and Chicago politics before the early 1980s.
The ad begins with narration from conservative activist Autry Pruitt.
"Hi, my name is Autry Pruitt, a fellow black American working hard every day, just like you. It may seem out of season, but all of a sudden, Democratic politicians have started coming around again. We normally only see them every other November, swarming around and making promises to get our vote. But nothing ever changes for us, does it? Here's what President Barack Obama had to say about it."
Then Obama can be heard saying, "Plantation politics. Black people in the worst jobs. The worst housing. Police brutality rampant. But when the so-called black committeemen came around election time, we'd all line up and vote the straight Democratic ticket. Sell our souls for a Christmas turkey."
It's a longshot. And Donnelly may very well lose anyway requiring the Dems to pick up 4 seats for control which is probably impossible.
Who'd be the next most vulnerable after the Heller/Flake/Cruz trifecta? Who's the least long shot of all the long long shots, basically?
Poor phrasing but you get my drift.
Perhaps, but it's no guarantee.I know the trends in Indiana wouldn't necessarily correlate with those in the Sun Belt, but any environment that lets us swing Texas would probably be enough for Donnelly to hang on.
The 2018 map is already the result of 2 Democratic wave elections. Losing a seat in Indiana is hardly out of the question.If we're taking Ted Cruz's seat, there's no way we'd lose any seats. It would be an historically obscene wave
Next would probably be Nebraska's Deb Fischer, Tennessee's Bob Corker, and Mississippi's Roger Wicker. The first we won in 2006, Tennessee we lost 51-48 thanks to a horribly racist ad the Republicans ran, Mississippi went 55-45 in the special election that elected Wicker in 2008. Then there's Utah and Wyoming which not even in my wildest dreams. Maybe if you got Jim Matheson to run, and if Hatch retired, and even then he'd have like a 5% chance at best. Only good candidate I can think of for Wyoming is Dave Freudenthal, and even he wouldn't have much of a shot.Who'd be the next most vulnerable after the Heller/Flake/Cruz trifecta? Who's the least long shot of all the long long shots, basically?
I know the trends in Indiana wouldn't necessarily correlate with those in the Sun Belt, but any environment that lets us swing Texas would probably be enough for Donnelly to hang on.
Brad Ashford just announced for NE-2. He needs to get his ass in gear on fundraising though.I'm from Nebraska guys and we have zero democratic candidates for anything right now. There's no way someone half decent is even up for running.