IggyChooChoo
Member
Why would anyone think Rand Paul is a hard no?
I expected this to happen given Comey's testimonyI don't use the word hate often and always try to see the good in people.
I'm starting to hate these people.
Why would anyone think Rand Paul is a hard no?
Why would anyone think Rand Paul is a hard no?
Is there a chart or break down/calculator that you can do to find out how the bill will effect you?
I have mine through employer, but was wondering how it would effect me...
Well, I hope he sticks by it, I just don't have any faith in Rand Paul abiding by his principles in the final analysis.Paul has said that he'll vote no unless the bill repeals tax credits for premium insurance plans. Something no other Republican is even talking about. Given that Kentucky may be the state hit hardest by the Medicare cuts some have speculated that he's setting a standard that can't be met to prevent the bill from passing.
Really need Collins, Heller and Paul to stay Nos.
What kills me is the Collins-Cassidy bill wouldn't be nearly as terrible (even if it's worse than ACA), but no, we have to pass the bill that kills everyone.
"It is the hardest thing about my entire time in government to defend, the Post quoted one Obama administration official as saying. I feel like we sort of choked.
http://thehill.com/policy/technolog...ggled-with-how-to-respond-to-russian-election
I'm surprised more hasn't been said blasting the Obama administration from Trump, Congress, etc.
http://thehill.com/policy/technolog...ggled-with-how-to-respond-to-russian-election
I'm surprised more hasn't been said blasting the Obama administration from Trump, Congress, etc.
I am smokeymicpot.
I just remember it at least giving states the option to keep ACA.Doesn't that bill also propose to change Medicaid to a block grant rather than need-based system or something like that?
wtf is Johnson doing as a "no"? And he sounds oddly serious about it, too. Is happy to defend the Medicaid cuts but still won't commit and says a vote next week is too soon.
............Huh.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) slammed Senate Republicans' healthcare overhaul bill on Friday, saying that it's grounded in "propping up" insurance companies.
He also called for the creation of a healthcare law that would reduce insurance costs to as little as $1 a day for at least some consumers.
"What I'd like to do is legalize inexpensive Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) slammed Senate Republicans' healthcare overhaul bill on Friday, saying that it's grounded in "propping up" insurance companies.
He also called for the creation of a healthcare law that would reduce insurance costs to as little as $1 a day for at least some consumers.
"What I'd like to do is legalize inexpensive insurance, and you should be able to get insurance for $1 a day. I mean, you really should," Paul said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." "The insurance companies make all the money; all of this is predicated upon still propping up the insurance companies."insurance, and you should be able to get insurance for $1 a day. I mean, you really should," Paul said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." "The insurance companies make all the money; all of this is predicated upon still propping up the insurance companies."
alright. Time for me to stop posting. LOL.
I'm losing train of thought and losing track who I am responding too. My bad.
He wants SafeAuto, only for humans.How did I miss this? Insurance for $1 a day. 😂😂😂
Maybe we can do a Humble Healthcare Bundle! $1 for a whole month of care, $20 for added generic prescription coverage!
Why is Rand Paul pushing single payer?How did I miss this? Insurance for $1 a day. ������
Maybe we can do a Humble Healthcare Bundle! $1 for a whole month of care, $20 for added generic prescription coverage!
It's a Libertarian thing lately to want to offer health insurance to all in order to stabilize that part of the economy and take a lot of the uncertainty away from their desires of being able to do whatever the hell they want to every other aspect of people's lives. I mean, they're not wrong (about the health care part).Why is Rand Paul pushing single payer?
Also UBI would allow them to get rid of every other part of the welfare state. As long as UBI is enough to cover all basics like food, housing, medical, transport, etc, I'm okay with that in principle.A lot of (non-ideologue) libertarians are for UBI, UHC, etc. - because they do see increased labor mobility and freedom to leave jobs as a good thing. This just isn't the methodology I'd expect for a UHC delivery system coming from that angle.
You shouldn't feel that that bad for CNN (and everyone else). They're volunteering to turn off the cameras. There's no known enforcement of the policy other than "maybe they'll kick us out of the briefings so we won't be able to cover the news they're already refusing to share with us." The entire press corp are being cowards about this.#breaking #CNN to use a courtroom sketch artist to cover today's #whbriefing #seriously @PressSec @WhiteHouse
https://twitter.com/kevincorke/status/878306849736597507
That is amazing.
Is there a chart or break down/calculator that you can do to find out how the bill will effect you?
I have mine through employer, but was wondering how it would effect me...
I wonder if we could convince some Republicans to call in and complain that this isn't "Repeal and Replace" this is just Obamacare-lite and they will primary them because they're breaking their promise.
alright. Time for me to stop posting. LOL.
I'm losing train of thought and losing track who I am responding too. My bad.
color me skepticalMJ Lee @mj_lee
Freedom Caucus Chair Mark Meadows says Senate health care bill in current form "does not have enough conservative support to pass in House
2:06 PM · Jun 23, 2017
color me skeptical
Whatever his motives it sounds like he's a pretty hard No.How did I miss this? Insurance for $1 a day. 😂😂😂
Maybe we can do a Humble Healthcare Bundle! $1 for a whole month of care, $20 for added generic prescription coverage!
A lot of (non-ideologue) libertarians are for UBI, UHC, etc. - because they do see increased labor mobility and freedom to leave jobs as a good thing. This just isn't the methodology I'd expect for a UHC delivery system coming from that angle.
Whatever his motives it sounds like he's a pretty hard No.
And I think Sandoval might be able to talk some sense into Heller. He's the only truly vulnerable GOP Senator right now (Flake and Cruz going down would require a lot of things to go right) and supporting this trash, even if it ends up not passing would nuke his political career from orbit.
So does moderate savior Collins really go through with blowing up the economy over repealing a law she probably supports anyway? Does Murkowski, survivor of a primary loss vote to practically kill her state?
Moreover I don't think there will be just three No votes. There will either be the token two, or like with the first House bill a bunch to rats scurrying once they know the bill will fail and they have adequate cover to vote no.
Perhaps it's foolish, and perhaps there's more to be gained electorally by letting this pass, but I really don't want this bill to pass.
From what I have seen, it really is just the ACA, but worse. Is there anything objectively better to it, other than tax cuts?
So does moderate savior Collins really go through with blowing up the economy over repealing a law she probably supports anyway? Does Murkowski, survivor of a primary loss vote to practically kill her state?
Yeah that's the thing, we can still craft a solid message around AHCA failing.The electoral gains work either way:
AHCA Doesn't Pass
"The Republicans complain about the state of healthcare in this country, but they have no answers and refuse to do anything to fix it."
AHCA passes
"The Republicans let your dad die of prostate cancer."
I mean fuck man, Collins could join the Green Party tomorrow and she'd still win her next election with 60% of the vote. They could catch her in bed with a live girl, and a dead boy, and a dead girl and that still would only drag her down to Likely R.I mock these two women because I just can't understand them. They have incredible clout in their respective states. Murkowski ran a successful write-in campaign, and Collins could probably pull it off if she had to. They enjoy reputations as the reasonable moderates in the party. Sure, the party in general might be angry if they killed the bill, but their states would probably reward them for it. Why do they go along with this shit? What do they have to gain in their states, the only places that really matter? Do they really fear McConnell's turtle face or an angry Trump tweet that much?
Perhaps it's foolish, and perhaps there's more to be gained electorally by letting this pass, but I really don't want this bill to pass.
Yeah that's the thing, we can still craft a solid message around AHCA failing.
Wonder if a public option act can be a part of Nancy's 100 hour agenda.
I mock these two women because I just can't understand them. They have incredible clout in their respective states. Murkowski ran a successful write-in campaign, and Collins could probably pull it off if she had to. They enjoy reputations as the reasonable moderates in the party. Sure, the party in general might be angry if they killed the bill, but their states would probably reward them for it. Why do they go along with this shit? What do they have to gain in their states, the only places that really matter? Do they really fear McConnell's turtle face or an angry Trump tweet that much?
You're right how silly of meDon't you mean super liberal fresh face with a penis progressive Tim Ryan's 100-hour agenda?
How did I miss this? Insurance for $1 a day. 😂😂😂
Maybe we can do a Humble Healthcare Bundle! $1 for a whole month of care, $20 for added generic prescription coverage!