ChrisGoldstein said:Racists are republican so it doesnt make much of a difference imo. But yes it's a brilliant pick by those damn schmucks.
gofreak said:Depends where many of their loyalties lie - to Hillary, or to 'women', in general. Palin can create history now for women, even if not to the same degree that Hillary could have.
I dunno.
If Palin puts out a strong show at the convention, I can see her becoming a Hillary surrogate to a lot of women. Any Clinton supporters who had even a slight inkling about not voting for Obama are probably going to be pushed over now because of this, IMO.
riskVSreward said:What a blatant power move by McCain, I hate him even more now. Hopefully the majority of Hillary supporters wont sway to McCain simply because of this random woman.
Branduil said:"Do you know women? All she'll have to do is complain about how men always leave the toilet seat up, follow it up with a complaint about how awful the menstrual cycle is and/or how men will never know the pain of childbirth, and then 'Bam!', all women are putty in her hands."
Zeliard said:The VP debates will definitely be rough for him. There was even talk about the danger of Obama looking like a bully when he attacked Hillary in the primaries, and Biden is just a tad bit more tempermental. I just don't think that outside of the debates, Biden will concentrate that much of his attention on Palin, but rather on McCain. Or maybe that's just what I hope.
"In fact, she said she doesnt know what the vice president does."GhaleonEB said:The more I read about her, the more I think this is going to backfire. Can you imagine the veep debate? How is she going to line up with Biden's foreing policy expertise?
eznark said:i don't even know what you are talking about anymore.
Given how things worked out for Ferraro, wouldn't that be a good thing?DenogginizerOS said:Biden at the debate: "I know Geraldine Ferraro. I worked with Geraldine Ferraro. Mrs. Palin, you aren't even close to being Geraldine Ferraro."
Huzah said:What's the meme on Mccain? Boring? Old? The same? Doesn't palin counteract all of these points?
RiskyChris said:It's not equivalent to say Barack is the nominee because he is black while Palin is here because she is a woman, because the latter is a calculated choice by McCain, whereas the former came after a hard fought campaign.
Not comparable.
Yeah, that's going to be a zinger. :lolDax01 said:"In fact, she said she doesnt know what the vice president does."
:lol
Tyrone Slothrop said:i don't think mccain is trying to attract hillary voters as much as he's trying to make the ticket historical - i.e. create buzz - in his own right. and that's exactly what this'll do. his party has something to rally around.
Zamorro said:Obama-Biden looks like the safe choice now.
DenogginizerOS said:Biden at the debate: "I know Geraldine Ferraro. I worked with Geraldine Ferraro. Mrs. Palin, you aren't even close to being Geraldine Ferraro."
Branduil said:Some interesting sexism in this thread.
But is she ready?APF said:Good pick; she was my first choice for his VP but recently it seemed unlikely.
Imm0rt4l said:oh shut up
Forgotten_Taco said:Screw it, Destory her I say! Leave her weaping and desprate-cold, naked and alone.
ryutaro's mama said:They do when the presidential candidate is 72 years old.
Republicans have kind of been all over the place this election cycle. They'll be solidified and on the attack next week. They know how to give a convention, even if this year's looks kind of sad and pathetic.Agent Icebeezy said:Repubs on Politico seem to be scared shitless of this pick.
Stoney Mason said:Definitely a calculated cynical pick. In this day and age though I'm just not so sure the casual Joe looks that deeply into the issue.
Although like I said this completely baffles me as to how he will continue the "Is he ready" theme.
I guess so. I had seen some comments along similar lines before, so I took it seriously.Amir0x said:I thought it was obvious that was sarcasm? It seemed like a sarcastic jab at the idea that women are some homogeneous voting bloc.
Gaborn said:I think the interesting point is 2012. Let's say that (to GAF's dismay) McCain wins in 08 and does halfway decent. In 2012 I suspect he's NOT going to run for reelection. I also suspect in that scenario Hillary would be the heavy favorite among the Democrats. I think Palin would be the Republican nominee in that scenario.
Wow did she really say that?Dax01 said:"In fact, she said she doesnt know what the vice president does."
:lol
RiskyChris said:It's not equivalent to say Barack is the nominee because he is black while Palin is here because she is a woman, because the latter is a calculated choice by McCain, whereas the former came after a hard fought campaign.
Not comparable.
speculawyer said:Palin?
I guess that is nothing but a transparent attempt to siphon away Hillary voters. What does hillaryis44 say about this?
Gaborn said:I think the interesting point is 2012. Let's say that (to GAF's dismay) McCain wins in 08 and does halfway decent. In 2012 I suspect he's NOT going to run for reelection. I also suspect in that scenario Hillary would be the heavy favorite among the Democrats. I think Palin would be the Republican nominee in that scenario.
Correct. But I removed it anyway.Amir0x said:I thought it was obvious that was sarcasm? It seemed like a sarcastic jab at the idea that women are some homogeneous voting bloc.
Azrael said:People dismissing McCain/Palin are deluding themselves.
I was thinking worse.DancingJesus said:Yea she's better... Geraldine Ferraro is a racist old hag.
Instigator said:Aleady discussed earlier.
They're divided whether it's good or not. But that's just raw reactions from speculations it's going to be Palin. Some clearly wouldprefer another pick.
They could change their tune once it is really official and revert back to their old mantra NOBAMA and claim this is the best thing ever (after Hillary).
GashPrex said:Well its sort of hard to criticize Palin for a lack of experience, but then on the other hand say Obama is qualified and ready...Kind of a catch 22 for democrats. Plus lets be honest, i think people are more comfortable with an experienced president over an inexperienced VP candidate on that issue.
who would have thought a republican ticket would be the first with a woman on it...doesn't matter to me at all, still not sure who i'll vote for. I think VP's are completely inconsequential for voting purposes
GashPrex said:Well its sort of hard to criticize Palin for a lack of experience, but then on the other hand say Obama is qualified and ready...Kind of a catch 22 for democrats. Plus lets be honest, i think people are more comfortable with an experienced president over an inexperienced VP candidate on that issue.
who would have thought a republican ticket would be the first with a woman on it...doesn't matter to me at all, still not sure who i'll vote for. I think VP's are completely inconsequential for voting purposes
Why does Biden change the score for Obama, yet Palin doesn't do the same for McCain?VistraNorrez said:McCain didn't suddenly change as a person because of the pick.
GashPrex said:Well its sort of hard to criticize Palin for a lack of experience, but then on the other hand say Obama is qualified and ready...Kind of a catch 22 for democrats.
RiskyChris said:It's not equivalent to say Barack is the nominee because he is black while Palin is here because she is a woman, because the latter is a calculated choice by McCain, whereas the former came after a hard fought campaign.
Not comparable.
Stoney Mason said:It isn't. 1984.