Tyrone Slothrop
Banned
almost out of the woods. almost.
Bishman said:Gallup Poll
O: 50
M: 42
Obama +8 in today's Gallup.Stoney Mason said:Can someone post the full text. It doesn't display on my phone.
These results, from Sept. 25-27, span the time period since John McCain made the announcement that he was temporarily suspending his campaign and returning to Washington to work for a bipartisan solution to the financial crisis, and since Congressional leaders first announced progress towards the resolution of a financial bailout bill. The results also include one complete day (Saturday) after the first presidential debate on Friday night. McCain had reached a point where he was tied with Obama earlier in the week, but Obama has gained steadily in each of the last three days' reports. Overall, Obama has gained four percentage points over the last three days, while McCain has lost four points, for an eight-point swing in the "gap" or margin.
The full impact of the debate and its aftermath will not be reflected in the tracking data until Tuesday's report, which will be based on interviewing conducted Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. Still, Gallup's one-day read on the standing of the two candidates on Saturday suggests that Obama held the lead over McCain among registered voters that night, just as he had for the two previous nights.
Obama reached an eight-point lead or higher twice before, once after his highly publicized foreign tour to Afghanistan, Iraq, and Europe in July, and once after the Democratic National Convention. In both of these instances, Obama's relatively large lead was short-lived; McCain came charging back to tie the race in both cases. Thus history would suggest the potential for future shifts in voter preferences and for McCain to bounce back once again.
Additionally, major news events relating to the campaign will be forthcoming over the next several weeks -- including the final resolution of Congress' efforts to pass a financial bailout bill and three more debates (two presidential, and one vice presidential), all of which could have the potential for future shifts in voter preferences. Obama has held at least a moderate edge over McCain for the vast majority of the days of Gallup Poll Daily tracking since June, and overall has led by an average of about three points in the over 100,000 interviews conducted by Gallup during this time period. (To view the complete trend since March 7, 2008, click here.) -- Frank Newport
Rur0ni said:And Kerry closed the GAP in one debate. :O McCain must not do the same!
PRINCETON, NJ -- Barack Obama leads John McCain, 50% to 42% among registered voters in the latest Gallup Poll Daily tracking update for Thursday, Friday, and Saturday -- just one point shy of his strongest showing of the year.
These results, from Sept. 25-27, span the time period since John McCain made the announcement that he was temporarily suspending his campaign and returning to Washington to work for a bipartisan solution to the financial crisis, and since Congressional leaders first announced progress towards the resolution of a financial bailout bill. The results also include one complete day (Saturday) after the first presidential debate on Friday night. McCain had reached a point where he was tied with Obama earlier in the week, but Obama has gained steadily in each of the last three days' reports. Overall, Obama has gained four percentage points over the last three days, while McCain has lost four points, for an eight-point swing in the "gap" or margin.
The full impact of the debate and its aftermath will not be reflected in the tracking data until Tuesday's report, which will be based on interviewing conducted Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. Still, Gallup's one-day read on the standing of the two candidates on Saturday suggests that Obama held the lead over McCain among registered voters that night, just as he had for the two previous nights.
Obama reached an eight-point lead or higher twice before, once after his highly publicized foreign tour to Afghanistan, Iraq, and Europe in July, and once after the Democratic National Convention. In both of these instances, Obama's relatively large lead was short-lived; McCain came charging back to tie the race in both cases. Thus history would suggest the potential for future shifts in voter preferences and for McCain to bounce back once again.
Additionally, major news events relating to the campaign will be forthcoming over the next several weeks -- including the final resolution of Congress' efforts to pass a financial bailout bill and three more debates (two presidential, and one vice presidential), all of which could have the potential for future shifts in voter preferences. Obama has held at least a moderate edge over McCain for the vast majority of the days of Gallup Poll Daily tracking since June, and overall has led by an average of about three points in the over 100,000 interviews conducted by Gallup during this time period. (To view the complete trend since March 7, 2008, click here.) -- Frank Newport
Survey Methods
For the Gallup Poll Daily tracking survey, Gallup is interviewing no fewer than 1,000 U.S. adults nationwide each day during 2008.
The general-election results are based on combined data from Sept. 25-27, 2008. For results based on this sample of 2,719 registered voters, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±2 percentage points.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on land-line telephones (for respondents with a landline telephone) and cellular phones (for respondents who are cell phone only).
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
Well, it was affected by the debate. This large a lead is probably temporary.StoOgE said:I think he had a plus 9 during the convention bump, but yes, this is his largest "real" lead that wasnt affected by an event like that.
Amir0x said:
artredis1980 said:But I thought McCain was going to get a bump for suspending his campaign because he cared SO much for the economy
StoOgE said:yeah, but those two +8s were the results of Obama dominating media coverage..
this is after two weeks of pretty even coverage.
Depending on the kind of ads that air, and any gaffes.Dark FaZe said:A lot can change, but hasn't the worst threat to Obama already come and went?
Wasn't this to be his hardest debate? And he actually went +8 after that. Assuming that Obama cleans up in the next debates and Palin gets struck down by Biden in the VP debates, the polls should favor Obama...
Sharp said:Well, it was affected by the debate. This large a lead is probably temporary.
After a certain point, the tipping point just becomes too large to overcome.Amir0x said:I don't think the coverage was 'even'. Sure, they both got equal play... but McCain's was largely negative. And Palin too. and the economy loomed large.
This was just good shit for Obama.
Amir0x said:I don't think the coverage was 'even'. Sure, they both got equal play... but McCain's was largely negative. And Palin too. and the economy loomed large.
This was just good shit for Obama.
artredis1980 said:but McCain got 2 days of FULL coverage when he suspended his campaign and he got more during the hill meeting where obama also went. when Obama was in his foreign trip, McCain got 0 coverage
The Palin choice is going to haunt McCain for the rest of the campaign, and I think it may dampen some of the gains he makes within the next few weeks at least. No matter how she does in the debates, the media coverage of her is going to be predominantly negative from here on out. The economy issue will in the long term hurt both candidates, I think, since last Friday's debate didn't really clarify a lot to most American voters about why the bailout is necessary. However, people seem to be predisposed towards believing that Obama has the edge on economic issues, so that too may end up being a long-term negative for McCain. Those are the only two things that I think will last much beyond this week, though. The debate is ultimately not going to affect very much.Amir0x said:I don't think the coverage was 'even'. Sure, they both got equal play... but McCain's was largely negative. And Palin too. and the economy loomed large.
This was just good shit for Obama.
BenjaminBirdie said:This is the important thing. Regardless of the debates, it shows McCain's stunt gained him absolutely nothing.
Take your pick:StoOgE said:Can someone make me an avatar of Obama with the Heisman (preferably with the longhorns still in the background)
Sharp said:The Palin choice is going to haunt McCain for the rest of the campaign, and I think it may dampen some of the gains he makes within the next few weeks at least. No matter how she does in the debates, the media coverage of her is going to be predominantly negative from here on out. The economy issue will in the long term hurt both candidates, I think, since last Friday's debate didn't really clarify a lot to most American voters about why the bailout is necessary. However, people seem to be predisposed towards believing that Obama has the edge on economic issues, so that too may end up being a long-term negative for McCain. Those are the only two things that I think will last much beyond this week, though. The debate is ultimately not going to affect very much.
I think the crucial part here is that Obama is rising on what is becoming a likely theme of the final sprint - McCain, the erratic hot head. (The Newsweek cover is gold.) His favorability took a sizable hit, in front of nearly 60 million people, as opposed to a one-time event like Obama's overseas adventure or the conventions.Amir0x said:I don't think the coverage was 'even'. Sure, they both got equal play... but McCain's was largely negative. And Palin too. and the economy loomed large.
This was just good shit for Obama.
Tobor said:McCain should jumped over Snake River Canyon in a jet car.
Killthee said:Take your pick:
Woah. They did a Palin skit and a debate skit? Last night I thought it was only the Palin/Couric skit!EMBee99 said:Did everyone see this from SNL? The ending is particularly sweet as they really sum up McCain quite well:
http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/presidential-debate/704121/
The Lamonster said:Woah. They did a Palin skit and a debate skit? Last night I thought it was only the Palin/Couric skit!
BenjaminBirdie said::lol
"Steve Schmidt has just announced that John McCain will not only suspend his campaign, but suspend HIMSELF in mid air for SEVENTY HOURS, starting Monday."
(Sometimes I really amaze myself.)
EMBee99 said:"To show the people and his friends in this great country that it is he who is Mr. Cool, not Senator Obama, JOHN MCCAIN will FREEZE HIMSELF IN A BLOCK OF ICE on the STEPS OF THE CAPITOL BUILDING for ONE WEEK!"
(Really, it should be Sarah Palin, so she could miss the debate)
It won't be. McCain is an excellent debater, and I honestly thought he did better during the economic part of the debate than Obama did. Of course, I thought McCain won the debate overall, so I may just be talking out of my ass here, but McCain's rhetoric about cutting government spending fits better with the image that the government has to do something to deal with this bailout, while Obama's in general does not. The actual impact of the policies or the truth of the rhetoric aside, it sounds better in a debate. Plus, if the reason people think Obama won was because he proved that he could stand toe-to-toe with McCain on foreign policy, that makes the next debate all the tougher--Obama is now the expected winner, not McCain, and McCain will benefit from the underdog status just as Obama did unless he can pull off a very decisive victory.MoxManiac said:If Obama can perform so well during his arguably weakest area (foreign policy) then i'm confident the next debates will be a slam dunk for him.
They parodied Friday night's debate in 2000!?!?Ether_Snake said:That's in 2000
Sharp said:It won't be. McCain is an excellent debater, and I honestly thought he did better during the economic part of the debate than Obama did. Of course, I thought McCain won the debate overall, so I may just be talking out of my ass here, but McCain's rhetoric about cutting government spending fits better with the image that the government has to do something to deal with this bailout, while Obama's in general does not. The actual impact of the policies or the truth of the rhetoric aside, it sounds better in a debate. Plus, if the reason people think Obama won was because he proved that he could stand toe-to-toe with McCain on foreign policy, that makes the next debate all the tougher--Obama is now the expected winner, not McCain, and McCain will benefit from the underdog status just as Obama did unless he can pull off a very decisive victory.
No. But it sounds better in conjunction with a bailout bill, because it seems like the government is at least trying to do something about what is perceived by many as a huge amount of excess bloat. How many people do you know who don't complain about how their tax dollars are used? The bailout thing is just the latest, most egregious example, and people want to hear that things are being cut even if the actual cuts are dwarfed by the size of the bill and the tax breaks that they get. At least, I think they want to hear that. I was totally wrong about the debate so I may be totally wrong about this too.Door2Dawn said:Cutting spending alone isn't going to get this economy back on track. That argument is weak as hell,and everyone knows it.
I know the polling data from the first debate, I know what the American people in general thought about it. I just don't really know why. Like I said, I thought McCain won the debate overall.Tobor said:I think you need to go back and look at the polling data from the first debate.
Rur0ni said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neiYzaiXHpY
New (finalized) Thank John McCain ad going on air in Colorado. Guy wants to put it in another state if possible. MO, VA, and NC would be nice.
Rur0ni said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neiYzaiXHpY
New (finalized) Thank John McCain ad going on air in Colorado. Guy wants to put it in another state if possible. MO, VA, and NC would be nice.
Sharp said:It won't be. McCain is an excellent debater, and I honestly thought he did better during the economic part of the debate than Obama did. Of course, I thought McCain won the debate overall, so I may just be talking out of my ass here, but McCain's rhetoric about cutting government spending fits better with the image that the government has to do something to deal with this bailout, while Obama's in general does not. The actual impact of the policies or the truth of the rhetoric aside, it sounds better in a debate. Plus, if the reason people think Obama won was because he proved that he could stand toe-to-toe with McCain on foreign policy, that makes the next debate all the tougher--Obama is now the expected winner, not McCain, and McCain will benefit from the underdog status just as Obama did unless he can pull off a very decisive victory.
BenjaminBirdie said:Damn, why does the Live Obama feed keep cutting out after every speaker?
Rur0ni said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neiYzaiXHpY
New (finalized) Thank John McCain ad going on air in Colorado. Guy wants to put it in another state if possible. MO, VA, and NC would be nice.
And who was he talking to? Where is this big contingent of voters who think government pork spending is the big problem right now? People want the government to get off their ass on healthcare, housing and energy and do something. So railing on and on about earmarks is speaking to an audience that doesn't exist. It's McCain's big signature stand, but he doesn't seem to realize people don't give a shit.Door2Dawn said:Cutting spending alone isn't going to get this economy back on track. That argument is weak as hell,and everyone knows it.
McCain defending lobbyists and being so passionate about how hard he worked to elect and re-elect Bush are just damning. I hope they get it funded for a few good runs.Rur0ni said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neiYzaiXHpY
New (finalized) Thank John McCain ad going on air in Colorado. Guy wants to put it in another state if possible. MO, VA, and NC would be nice.
Now THAT is an ad. I mean holy crap.Rur0ni said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neiYzaiXHpY
New (finalized) Thank John McCain ad going on air in Colorado. Guy wants to put it in another state if possible. MO, VA, and NC would be nice.