The right was going to contest EVERYTHING that is even marginally close in 2010 regardless of what happened tonight, but an early wake up call like this might give the left a much needed warning shot. A serious reckoning might be coming this fall.JoeBoy101 said:It also might cause a bunch of weak incumbents to consider retirement. Also, winning in MA could cause the RNC to get bold and start contesting seats and races which they were ready to ignore/let go/write off.
Dax01 said:Do you people enjoy overreacting by a huge, embarrassing margin?
ivysaur12 said:I could not be more upset right now.
The dems wasted a perfectly good supermajority. They fucked up so badly. They need to put health care behind them as soon as possible. What a stupid policy decision to go after first.
Aaron Strife said:Let me start off by reiterating that Coakley deserved to lose. Alright. Now presenting Aaron Strife's patented plan on how the Democrats can still win. And by win I mean "come out of this only missing one or two limbs" which is kind of sad but here goes:
- Pass healthcare reform by having the House vote on the senate bill verbatim. The truth is there's really not much progressives can gain by reconciling the two bills. Actually this leads to...
- Public option through reconciliation. But that might be better to do financial regulations through reconciliation. Actually, do that, because PEOPLE LIKE THAT.
- Focus 2010 message on deficit reduction. 2008 was carried by Obama's agenda, which I think people are sick of after the health care debacle.
- Try to keep house/senate losses to a minimum. By this I mean, retain a majority in the House, at least 55 seats in the senate. Suggested states for Democratic gains: MO, OH, NH
- Put out Reid as a sacrificial lamb, bring in Russ Feingold as majority leader.
thefit said:Super what? They never had any super majority lets get that straight or else the bill would have been passed a long time ago.
If I give you the definition of a turd, would you still vote for it simply because you didn't know the definition of platitudinous?cartoon_soldier said:You had a candidate that never defined herself vs a candidate who defined himself from his first campaign Ad.
eznark said:And you jerks laughed at me. I'm telling you, hard nosed and politically savvy Clinton would have done serious damage this year (and by damage, I mean you guys would have been thrilled).
Anyway, in a two party system neither party will be dead long...and I'd worry about losing a majority in the senate too at this point. In 2000 and 2002 the left was dead for good, that barely lasted 4 years.
Averon said:What was all that BS about the northeast Republican being dead?
Kolgar said:Fucking epic!
LovingSteam said:I don't even know what to think. It's always the status quo with this country.
Reflecting Wall Street's expectations for healthcare reform, investors drove health insurance and drug company shares higher, betting a Brown victory would at least slow Obama's healthcare plans.
Hospital companies, which may gain more insured customers under health reform, saw their shares slump.
"If Brown wins, it is our view that Obamacare will not pass Congress," Avik Roy, a healthcare analyst with Monnes Crespi Hardt, said in a research note.
You mean the same Hillary Clinton that was put in charge of healthcare reform fifteen years ago and couldn't manage to get it out of a single committee?PhoenixDark said:Agreed. I just don't see Hillary sitting on her ass while Baucus, Grassley, and Snowe ran the clock out. Or going on a limp wrist campaign tour in support of the bill.
Might as well chalk this up as the beginning of the end. Can't wait to hear what Obama has to say during his SOTU.
Lieberman?GhaleonEB said:Both Lieberman and Bayh have now said they are rethinking voting for heatlhcare reform in light of this vote.
Welcome to 2010: absolutely nothing will pass the Senate.
reilo said:You mean the same Hillary Clinton that was put in charge of healthcare reform fifteen years ago and couldn't manage to get it out of a single committee?
GhaleonEB said:Both Lieberman and Bayh have now said they are rethinking voting for heatlhcare reform in light of this vote.
Welcome to 2010: absolutely nothing will pass the Senate.
eznark said:I'm going to believe the folks voting with their dollar. Wall St. is never wrong....right?
275 point jump tomorrow, lets get back to 11,000!
Dax01 said:Do you people enjoy overreacting by a huge, embarrassing margin?
Hari Seldon said:hat is all I want right now, a return to surplus and a strong economy.
gkrykewy said:Posted from your Fox News bar party for totally cool people? :lol
But the sitting president at the time felt confident enough in her abilities to get it done. Worked wonders, didn't it?WickedAngel said:She wasn't a President and the country wasn't ready for it. We were ready this time and they've still managed to blow it by bending over the table at every fucking turn.
ToxicAdam said:I wouldn't read too much into this. This is 6 consecutive years of anti-incumbent elections. For whatever reason, Scott Brown was able to capture the "outsider" label and ran with it. That and his distinguished career were probably enough to destroy Coakley among white males.
The current congress has not done much to raise their HORRIBLE approval ratings, something has to give. So even if the Republicans win back the house in 2010, they could give it right back in 2012 if things still remain stagnant. I think it is too soon to label this an 'anti-democrat' movement, more like blind, seething voter rage.
gcubed said:if healthcare goes down in flames now i think i'm off politics for a while. life was so much better when i was ill informed
x Power Pad Death Stomp x said:The best part of all of this.....
the only reason this election even happened is because the Dems in MA changed the law ot have it. They wanted it, they got it.
As a conservative living in MA, I feel like when Ralphie beat up Scott Farcas in A Christmas Story.
Kolgar said:I'm in a VERY liberal town.![]()
No?Sirpopopop said:Didn't you say people were overreacting when they said Brown was going to win?
Equities LOVE gridlock.gcubed said:they attributed teh health care bump today to the MA elections, but i dont understand how the potential killing fo the biggest hand out to the insurance industry improved their stocks
reilo said:You mean the same Hillary Clinton that was put in charge of healthcare reform fifteen years ago and couldn't manage to get it out of a single committee?
Anticitizen One said:This is like joining the blue team in a Halo territories match and quickly realize your team isn't going to win the game because of too many idiots on your side.
x Power Pad Death Stomp x said:The best part of all of this.....
the only reason this election even happened is because the Dems in MA changed the law to have it. They wanted it, they got it.
As a conservative living in MA, I feel like when Ralphie beat up Scott Farcas in A Christmas Story.
This is what I mean when I say conservatives are fucking idiots.Hari Seldon said:Well hopefully he is actually a conservative... cut spending, balance the budget. That is all I want right now, a return to surplus and a strong economy. The dems pushing a costly healthcare plan when the economy is in shambles is their downfall. They should have led with extreme finance reforms, and they would still be rolling strong. There is not a political party anymore that is worth a damn, but at least this is good news in the short term. I want health care reform, but not when the country is massively in debt.
This just means Dems will have to bend over harder and give Insurance companies a bigger handout.gcubed said:they attributed teh health care bump today to the MA elections, but i dont understand how the potential killing fo the biggest hand out to the insurance industry improved their stocks
There was never one to begin with. Having 58 seats, one reliable independent and one unreliable independent is not a supermajority.RiskyChris said:Thank god there's no supermajority about which to feel hopeful anymore.