Mifune said:I was gonna go with "The Average Russkie Don't Take a Dump Without a Plan" but well done.
syllogism said:This will probably be a common theme
The bulk of Thompson's speech will be a testimonial on behalf of John McCain, his character and his leadership. John McCain has "the kind of character that civilizations from the beginning of history have sought in their leaders."
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/anotherthing/351330Here's the reality: Palin is a rightwing-Christian anti-choice extremist who opposes abortion for any reason wha[t]soever, except to save the life of the girl or woman. No exception even for rape, incest, or the health of the woman. No exception for a ten-year-old, a woman carrying a fetus with no chance of life, a woman on the edge of suicide -- let alone the woman who is not ready to be a parent, who is escaping domestic violence, who is already stretched to the limit as a single mother. She wants to force over one million women and girls a year to give birth against their will and judgment. She wants to use the magnificent freedom the women's movement has won for her at tremendous cost and struggle - -the movement that won her the right to run those marathons and run Alaska -- to take away the freedom of every other woman in the country.
lopaz said:I don't get this. People always say it was out of context, but it was pretty unequivocal.
Mifune said:I was gonna go with "The Average Russkie Don't Take a Dump Without a Plan" but well done.
syllogism said:This will probably be a common theme
Um. Wasn't he referring to God in that response?Obamas responded: "Well, I think that whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade."
syllogism said:This will probably be a common theme
In other words he was being extremely impetuous.GhaleonEB said:That's my theory. His dem convention strategy was to play off the wedge between Obama and Clinton supporters. When it was clear the party was unifying, he doubled down on trying to snag the women's vote.
Gaborn said:Sure, but we're talking about GAF's reaction to stories on Michelle Obama compared to Todd Palin
Dax01 said:If she has small town values, why did she almost get forced out of her position as mayor?
In other words he was being extremely impetuous.
harSon said:Editing 'Really' out of "For the First Time in My Adult Lifetime, I Am Really Proud of My Country" happens to change the meaning of the statement quite a bit.
harSon said:Editing 'Really' out of "For the First Time in My Adult Lifetime, I Am Really Proud of My Country" happens to change the meaning of the statement quite a bit.
ronito said:So it's come to it.
Republicans seeing they can't hide behind terrorism now are hiding behind abortion. Sad thing is it might just work.
That too.:lolTobor said:In other words, he was being John McCain.
It just needs a sign over it saying *soon to become a starbucks*Deus Ex Machina said:
ronito said:So it's come to it.
Republicans seeing they can't hide behind terrorism now are hiding behind abortion. Sad thing is it might just work.
who opposes abortion for any reason wha[t]soever, except to save the life of the girl or woman. No exception even for rape, incest, or the health of the woman.
Amir0x said:so what's new here
GOP speakers today: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/09/a_look_at_speakers_for_tuesday.phpAmir0x said:so what's new here
Gaborn said:ummmm... no it doesn't.
totally agree. It's not like he said he was proud of his country for the first time in a long time or anything like that.Gaborn said:apparently Todd Palin was a member of AIP, not Sarah, and so now attacking spouses is fair game.
Gary Whitta said:What does Wasilla City Hall look like it has a drive-up window?
Amir0x said:so what's new here
Gary Whitta said:What does Wasilla City Hall look like it has a drive-up window?
Really? We have confirmation Sarah Palin was never a member? And we can't express any reservations with a nominee that attended and even delivered a speech at the conventions of a party advocating secession of her state?Gaborn said:apparently Todd Palin was a member of AIP, not Sarah, and so now attacking spouses is fair game.
Nah.MassiveAttack said:Condoms?
Dave Barry said:And now the eyeballs of the nation turn to this quintessentially Middle American or possibly southern Canadian city, where in the next few days, weather permitting, the Republicans will answer the Democratic Party's call for change by sounding, loud and clear, their own bold campaign theme for 2008: 'What, YOU Never Made a Mistake?
Gaborn said:apparently Todd Palin was a member of AIP, not Sarah, and so now attacking spouses is fair game.
lawblob said:ummmm, it obviously does. It changes Michelle's statement from a distinction in kind to a distinction of degree. It obviously has a large qualitative difference.
For example: "I am really hungry for the first time in my life" is clearly different from "I am hungry for the first time in my life."
JayDubya said:I'm not sure why that pic is of any interest, yet it keeps getting brought up.
That is the town she grew up in. She lived there. She decided to get involved in local politics and did the whole city council to mayor thing. If this is inherently a bad thing because the town is small, and this is what Democrats choose to harp on and lawl at, I don't see that going so hot for them.
Of course, with the other scandal and backlash elements in play, it probably won't matter anyway.
Item: A CBS News / New York Times poll finds that 48% of Republican delegates support either gay marriage or civil unions for gay people.
MassiveAttack said:Condoms?
Gaborn said:Ok, but it would sound better if she hadn't changed it after someone obviously told her that she sounded unpatriotic. I don't think this matters, but I think her statement was wrong the first time and she only changed it because someone MADE her change it.
Gaborn said:Ok, but it would sound better if she hadn't changed it after someone obviously told her that she sounded unpatriotic. I don't think this matters, but I think her statement was wrong the first time and she only changed it because someone MADE her change it.
Worldrunover - Whether you can or you can't, I don't think you SHOULD do it. All I'm saying is opening up on one spouse is legitimizing attacks on the other, and if you really think the election should go down that road it's up to you.
GhaleonEB said:GOP speakers today: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/09/a_look_at_speakers_for_tuesday.php
Obama hits 50% and 51% in the Gallup and Rasmussen trackers.
Pollster updgrades the national average from "lean dem" to "strong dem". IIRC, first time so far.
lopaz said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGjR81pFJI4
Two different speeches. Watch the first one, I can't see any sign of editing, can you?
lawblob said:I agree, from a political standpoint it was clearly a stupid thing for her to say. However, none of this would really be at issue if the Republicans hadn't begun the practice of going after candidate's wives. Before Kitty Dukakis, iirc, this shit never happened. For the last 20 years, Republicans have made wives fair game, and we all have to live with it now.
and yet they went after her. So is it really surprising that when no quarter was given then to expect quarter now is a little silly?Gaborn said:As I said, if that's the way you want it, I'm just surprised (well, ok, not really) that it's happening now after GAF protested when people attacked Michelle Obama.
I've got to hand it to some of the reporters in the interviews . . . in many of these interviews I would be unable to stop from bursting out laughing as they rationalize her 'experience' or her 'foreign relations' (Hey . . . Alaska borders Russia! :lol )CharlieDigital said:I really want to see some behind the scenes discussions between some of the (R) defending Palin on TV. It must be hilarious watching these folks behind closed doors try to defend her and how they react out of the spotlight.
No, the Republicans & MSM made it fair game to attack spouses, when they did it to Michelle Obama (as they did to Hillary Clinton before her). I don't condone it, but that's how they're playing "the game" these days. At least Obama is speaking out against it.Gaborn said:apparently Todd Palin was a member of AIP, not Sarah, and so now attacking spouses is fair game.