JayDubya said:To be fair, a cursory glance shows that they're referring to the drivel about "you have a little baby at home, how can you possibly be running for anything" that was mentioned even here.
OK mods, make this Deus Ex's avatar nao:Deus Ex Machina said:
WickedAngel said:Which is correctly labeled as sexism. They're not wrong on that one...that question crossed the line.
JayDubya said:To be fair, a cursory glance shows that they're referring to the drivel about "you have a little baby at home, how can you possibly be running for anything" that was mentioned even here.
JayDubya said:To be fair, a cursory glance shows that they're referring to the drivel about "you have a little baby at home, how can you possibly be running for anything" that was mentioned even here.
Just a word from the bleachers. In all likelihood, Sarah Palin will deliver a speech that will tear the roof off the Xcel Center tonight. Every single commentator on the cable and the networks will declare it a triumph. The base will exult at their Joan of Arc triumphing over the evil, despicable vile press, who have had the effrontery to ask a potential future vice-president of the United States basic questions about her life story and record. Such effrontery has now been greeted by a presidential campaign refusing to answer simple questions that anyone with access to Google can figure out. McCain's relationship with the press corps has hit the ocean bed - which is ironic, since McCain has given the press the wackiest and most copy-ready nominee in recent history.
Nonetheless, the GOP machine will ensure that her speech is great.
She just has to read it from a TelePrompter. It's not that hard. And the crowd will be lifting her up to the rafters. There will be almost nothing about foreign policy because she has demonstrated a total lack of even interest in it her entire life, and has no knowledge of it whatsoever. There will be plenty about drilling and oil and "reform" and an attempt to dress up what is unavoidably a very short career in a very distant and sparsely populated place into a template for the future of Republicanism.
And there will be a swing, as there often is, in the polls, maginified by a huge, temporary sigh of relief that the nightmare of the last five days have at least been lanced by an actual public appearance that is more than a quick intro. The GOP is an operation these days that creates its own reality. There were WMDs in Iraq. We do not torture. We are fiscal conservatives. We have won the Iraq war. You know the drill by now: just keep saying it again and again and refuse to asnwer questions and as long as you have God on your side, everything is okay.
And then it will start all over again. It feels like a decade since Obama accepted the Democratic nomination in Denver. It will feel like a century between now and November. But no one will be able to complain that it has been boring.
avaya said:Is it still sexism when it seems to be women that are making that comment more often?
Zeliard said:If she directs her sexism comments at the likes of James Carville, I'd understand, since he's been rather... well, he's been pretty stupid with his comments. But to try and paint the entire media as sexist simply for questioning where the fuck she came from? That's simply desperate, I'm sorry.
Dax01 said:It wasn't a joke post. It was just a post in which I wasn't being serious in any way what-so-ever and doing it in the form of an ironical taunt.
...
EviLore said:How many minority women are they going to bring out on stage to speak in front of the 99% elderly white audience? This is pretty amusing.
Seriously, they're trying to hit 2 birds with one stone, "The Latino Vote" and "The Hillary Vote"...EviLore said:How many minority women are they going to bring out on stage to speak in front of the 99% elderly white audience? This is pretty amusing.
WickedAngel said:Does it matter what gender a person is? You can be a sexist woman with an antiquated/outdated view of the role of women in the world.
FoneBone said:They have to go to the Texas Railroad Commission for a black republican :lol
MThanded said:Puerto Rican now. Look at all the minorities they are coming out of the woodwork.
Killthee said:Did they raise the huge screen?
Agent Icebeezy said:Good, now I don't feel half as bad about the media burying her.
OuterWorldVoice said:The media is not burying her, it is pouncing on a story, any story, as it does with every candidate. Saying the media is burying her is playing along with the Republican defense strategy on this one.
They wont be and there is.FightyF said:If the Democrats aren't far ahead in polls taken a week from now...there is something seriously wrong with the United States.
FightyF said:If the Democrats aren't far ahead in polls taken a week from now...there is something seriously wrong with the United States.
They are clearly taking the high road here by attacking the issues and the opponent's platform rather than baselessly questioning the opponent's character.
The Republicans are assuming that Americans are idiots and would fall for their baseless attacks.
I have a bad feeling about all of this. I have a feeling that the US is most likely full of people who are easily duped. I mean, I look at the Invasion of Iraq for one, and this is nearly the same situations. The Republican machine has no need for things like "facts" to get what they want.
The fact that the race is as close as it is in this point is very telling...but we've got a lot of lemmings here (I'll include Canada too because the Conservative Party here, who are very much like the Bush Administration, may win a majority this next election).
Hell, I wouldn't be surprised to see McCain take the lead in a few polls.ronito said:They wont be and there is.
ronito said:They wont be and there is.
Tamanon said:Which is weird, because the media didn't even really talk about that at all. It's manufactured outrage, obfuscation.
FightyF said:If the Democrats aren't far ahead in polls taken a week from now...there is something seriously wrong with the United States.
They are clearly taking the high road here by attacking the issues and the opponent's platform rather than baselessly questioning the opponent's character.
The Republicans are assuming that Americans are idiots and would fall for their baseless attacks.
I have a bad feeling about all of this. I have a feeling that the US is most likely full of people who are easily duped. I mean, I look at the Invasion of Iraq for one, and this is nearly the same situations. The Republican machine has no need for things like "facts" to get what they want.
The fact that the race is as close as it is in this point is very telling...but we've got a lot of lemmings here (I'll include Canada too because the Conservative Party here, who are very much like the Bush Administration, may win a majority this next election).
FightyF said:If the Democrats aren't far ahead in polls taken a week from now...there is something seriously wrong with the United States.
JayDubya said:Well, there are some examples if you look.
Nick Gillespie over at reason caught one: http://www.reason.com/convention2008/show/128485.html
Nooo you idiot it's the Democratic Congress's fault!MThanded said:Hai guyz country first. Just keep saying it. Wait shes saying that the economy is jacked. Whos fault is that. The republicans.
Agent Icebeezy said:What I mean is, there is like a huge rat race to dig up everything (presumably negative) about her. A metric fuckton has come out about her in the past few days. I think that with her lashing out at the media, it gives them motive.
Soon to be three times.SteveMeister said:Never forget: George W Bush was elected President. Twice.
Everyone that has gone up there so far today has come off as a robot. The only person who has performed an engaging speech so far is a fucking ACTOR. Where's the RNC's Kucinich? Oh yeah, he's got a convention of his own going on.FitzOfRage said:Is there really talk about that Ebay robot becoming governor of California after Schwarzenegger?
ViperVisor said:
WTF is a 'fundamental leftist'? Is 'leftist' the new 'liberal'? . . . a word that people are supposed to hate even if they don't know what it means?I will still vote for Senator McCain, because I am very concerned about having a fundamental leftist, especially one who is a marvelous orator, as President.
FightyF said:The Republicans are assuming that Americans are idiots and would fall for their baseless attacks.
SteveMeister said:It's understandable, very few people outside of Alaska had ever even heard about Palin, let alone knew anything about her, before last week.
ronito said:They wont be and there is.