Yo this thread is 143 pages! What if they don't even show it?
Yo this thread is 143 pages! What if they don't even show it?
They're not going to, the insider info points to release in 2017. Why would MS tank their sales for the rest of this year?
Yep. LOL
Can't wait to hear them mad about UWPs. I would bet most PC gamers have a console too for relaxed gaming. I look at XBOX games releasing on PC as a boon because it will make first party more profitable and maybe it will keep more IP alive.
They're not going to, the insider info points to release in 2017. Why would MS tank their sales for the rest of this year?
No it did not. I was games like Oblivion, Bioshock, Mass effect being exclusive for a year plus and the system being cheaper and having a year on the market to itself.
360 didn't take off until Gears of War and after PS3 launched and was more expensive.
World Wide it is even less of a factor, Sony can just stay close in the US and dominate the world wide market, that is the difference between the 2 console manufacturers.
Uncharted 4 is not the first to dip its toes, Games have been using GPU for some of the CPU task since the start of this gen. Even Some EA and UBI games are using it.I think that's where Sony is kinda surprising folks. Uncharted 4 is the first game that really dips it's toes into Gpgpu to offset the jaguar cores. Does a pretty dang good job, there even running some of there A.I. code on the GPU (I didn't know that was possible). In other words I wouldn't underestimate them.
Need to check the margin breakdown. I'd imagine HPC and professional could be the lion's share.I wouldn't go that far, it's big enough to keep companies like Nvidia raking in profits
exclusives aren't as important as you think they are. people will just play the games they like on the platform most convenient to them. they don't care if a game is exclusive or not
liking a game less because its no longer exclusive is absurd
NONSENSE...It's not necessarily about liking a game less it's about seeing less value in the console if there are other places to get the same identical content.
Game exclusivity will ALWAYS be critically important. Even after the rumors of the PS4 NEO the same month Uncharted 4 released PS4 sales spiked. The only month XBone beat PS4 in console sales was the month Halo 5 was released. (millions of dollars exchanged for access to exclusive content)
Uncharted 4 is not the first to dip its toes, Games have been using GPU for some of the CPU task since the start of this gen. Even Some EA and UBI games are using it.
If you have time, search for SIGGRAPH papers.
They're not going to, the insider info points to release in 2017. Why would MS tank their sales for the rest of this year?
But Phil Spencer acknowledged it! Creative chatter!
Seriously though: what you're saying makes logical sense. I will still set myself up for disappointment regardless, heh. I want to get excited.
Actually that's not a myth, it's business 101.
Wow lmao
I assume you're Mexican jorge xD
No it did not. I was games like Oblivion, Bioshock, Mass effect being exclusive for a year plus and the system being cheaper and having a year on the market to itself. Not to mention MS getting huge marketing deals as COD was taking off, GTA DLC exclusives.. Being 599 and a year late really hurt sony in the US and early game support, not the power difference which as the gen went on did not exist except a few exceptions. 360 didn't take off until Gears of War and after PS3 launched and was more expensive. World Wide it is even less of a factor, Sony can just stay close in the US and dominate the world wide market, that is the difference between the 2 console manufacturers.
Liking the game less does come into play though when you realize the shift in platform strategy is basically a back door method of implementing all the foolish and greedy strategies a company planned that turned millions away from the platform 3 years ago.
Game exclusivity will ALWAYS be critically important. Even after the rumors of the PS4 NEO the same month Uncharted 4 released PS4 sales spiked. The only month XBone beat PS4 in console sales was the month Halo 5 was released. (millions of dollars exchanged for access to exclusive content)
That's what people told me about 3d televisions. it doesn't matter if it's cheap if there isn't much content running 4k it doesn't matter, which there won't be since people are streaming now more than ever, and cable networks run mainly 1080i, not even 1080p on most HD channels.
They're not going to, the insider info points to release in 2017. Why would MS tank their sales for the rest of this year?
Okay putting on my tin foil hat:
Major Nelson was discussing the Halo 5 Turbo Warzone mode on "This Week on Xbox" which came out today. Turbo Warzone means you get the REQ levels much faster, and as he was explaining it how fast you get the REQ levels he said "time to Scorpion is very fast", drawing a parallel to "time to kill". But why did he say Scorpion? He could have used any other vehicle or weapon that can be unlocked with REQ levels.
I'll leave my hat on for now.
Netflix, Amazon and Vudu all stream 4K already.
Yeah, no. Xbox/PS2/Gamecube sales didn't halt when the 360/PS3/Wii were announced, and the 360/PS3/Wii didn't die when the XB1/PS4/Wii U were announced. Consoles don't stop selling just because a new one has been announced. Different groups of consumers buy consoles at completely different times, and a machine releasing next year won't deter a consumer from buying a $300 machine now, especially when that $300 console can get even cheaper before the next one releases.
It's a cycle and always has been.
They're not going to, the insider info points to release in 2017. Why would MS tank their sales for the rest of this year?
I expect little to no details about a specific future console (other than the XB1 Slim), but rather a higher-level description of their plan to support multiple Xbox devices of varying capability, as well as PC.
hahaha\
10/10
What Microsoft should do:
1.) have E3 with no mention of the word "Scorpio", but squeeze the word "forward-compatibility" into the presentation
2.) hear Sony talking about the NEO at their conference (to get a hold of more specs)
3.) wait one day, maybe talk to AMD
4.) unleash Scorpio on the last day of E3 - coming at the beginning of 2017, folks!
5.) watch as "PS4 to Scorpio" becomes the new "360 to PS4"
agreed but cue the people going completely ape shit when they don't show an actual prototype.
What Microsoft should do:
1.) have E3 with no mention of the word "Scorpio", but squeeze the word "forward-compatibility" into the presentation
2.) hear Sony talking about the NEO at their conference (to get a hold of more specs)
3.) wait one day, maybe talk to AMD
4.) unleash Scorpio on the last day of E3 - coming at the beginning of 2017, folks!
5.) watch as "PS4 to Scorpio" becomes the new "360 to PS4"
How expensive would Scorpio be at the rumored specs if it came out late this year/early next.
I'm thinking that pricing means DOA.
What Microsoft should do:
1.) have E3 with no mention of the word "Scorpio", but squeeze the word "forward-compatibility" into the presentation
2.) hear Sony talking about the NEO at their conference (to get a hold of more specs)
3.) wait one day, maybe talk to AMD
4.) unleash Scorpio on the last day of E3 - coming at the beginning of 2017, folks!
5.) watch as "PS4 to Scorpio" becomes the new "360 to PS4"
I'm thinking price shouldn't be discussed until we have a better idea what specs we're dealing with.How expensive would Scorpio be at the rumored specs if it came out late this year/early next.
I'm thinking that pricing means DOA.
Game exclusivity will ALWAYS be critically important. Even after the rumors of the PS4 NEO the same month Uncharted 4 released PS4 sales spiked. The only month XBone beat PS4 in console sales was the month Halo 5 was released. (millions of dollars exchanged for access to exclusive content)
I don't think announcing later would do any benefit, there is a lot of preparation involved with the presentation and release dates/specs aren't something they can readily change after seeing Sony's show. Only thing I can think of is adjusting prices.
Scorpio talk now will murder the X1 at Xmas.They're not going to, the insider info points to release in 2017. Why would MS tank their sales for the rest of this year?
Well Sony changed PS4's specs from 4 to 8 GB RAM, after seeing Microsoft's show.
Maybe they don't have to change anything, if their system is really 6TF in opposite to 4,14TF
Yeah, critically important for console war partisans and forum checklist-makers. In the real world, where some of us actually live, the "critically important" thing is for your platform to be perceived as the best place to play the biggest 3rd party multiplat games. Sony built up a huge first party infrastructure in the PS3 era and still ended up losing to the 360. This generation Sony went the other direction and immediately positioned itself as the best place to play COD, Destiny, etc. and in many cases securing the exclusive marketing rights to those games. Lo and behold, they're dominating right now.
1st party is a nice-to-have. They tend to be great showpieces for the platform. But outside of the <100k people on Gaf, having timed exclusives for Call of Duty has a way bigger financial impact than any first party game. Just ask Nintendo.
What Microsoft should do:
1.) have E3 with no mention of the word "Scorpio", but squeeze the word "forward-compatibility" into the presentation
2.) hear Sony talking about the NEO at their conference (to get a hold of more specs)
3.) wait one day, maybe talk to AMD
4.) unleash Scorpio on the last day of E3 - coming at the beginning of 2017, folks!
5.) watch as "PS4 to Scorpio" becomes the new "360 to PS4"